Analys
The EUA price could drop to EUR 40/ton and then be picked up by Airliners, Shipping and Utilities
The EUA price is dropping hard along with a sharp decline in the front-year TTF nat gas contract. The typical last-round sell-off in EUA prices have typically been a final sell-off of 10-20-30%. From EUR 60/ton level it implies a price decline down to EUR 54; 48; 42/ton. The front-year nat gas price and the front-year Coal-to-Gas (C-t-G) differential is what has held the EUA price above EUR 60/ton. But if the TTF 2025 price falls down to EUR 27/ton the front-year C-t-G differential will fall all the way towards EUR 40/ton. That TTF 2025 falls to EUR 27/ton or lower seems likely to happen and the risk is high that the EUA price will be sucked down along with it. But nat gas demand is starting to come back with a lag in nat gas price declines in the EU but probably also in Asia. Thus first an over-sell in nat gas prices, then demand revival and then a rebound in both nat gas prices and EUA prices. Airliners, shipping companies and Utilities will probably buy as much EUAs they can get if the EUA price fall down towards EUR 40/ton.
Front-year 2025 TTF nat gas price falls hard and so does the EUA price. The front-month EUA price dropped 2.7% yesterday to EUR 58.97/ton and thus broke out of the sideways trend around EUR 61/ton since 18 January. Today it has sold off another 3.2% to EUR 57.1/ton.
Again it is the nat gas price which is leading the way and more specifically it is about the front-year nat gas which lost 1.9% on Wednesday and another 2.5% again ydy to a close of EUR 30.65/MWh and today it has solf off 2.8% to EUR 29.8/ton.
The EUA price has very clearly been balancing on the front-year Coal-to-Gas (C-t-G) differentials. The C-t-G differentials have been significantly lower than EUR 60/ton both at the front-end of the curve (1-2-3 month) and for calendars 2026 and 2027. But the front-year nat gas price has held up at around EUR 31/MWh quite well since around mid January.
How far down will the EUA price go? The final sell-off could be down towards EUR 40/ton. With these dynamics the big question then becomes: How far down will the front-year nat gas contract sell? It will of course sell off too far as commodities always do. The reason commodities do this is the natural reactive chain of events which normally comes with a lag: First the price goes down before dropping hard in the final round of the sell-off. Then demand comes back with a lag to the price action. This again drives the price back up and off from the lows to a level consistent with the revival in demand. If demand instead had reacted immediately to lower prices then the hard drop at the end of the sell-off might not have happened.
Looking at previous hard, final sell-off-drops in the EUA price we can see that final drops typically have been 10-20-30% as the last final drop. If we take the EUR 60/ton as the starting point of this final drop, then we are talking an EUA price bottom of somewhere in the range of EUR 54; 48; 42/ton.
Global nat gas demand destruction in the face of very high nat gas prices solved the energy crisis. Let’s link this back to price action in nat gas. The reason why Europe has managed the recent energy crisis (Russia/Ukraine, nat gas,…) so surprisingly well is 1) Large reduction in nat gas demand in EU due to exceptionally high prices and 2) Significant demand destruction in Asia freeing up nat gas to flow to the EU. I.e. it was global demand destruction of nat gas in response to extremely high prices globally which solved the energy crisis. It was solved by the global market.
Demand for nat gas is starting to come back as the price falls. The nominal historical average nat gas TTF price was EUR 20/MWh from 2010 to 2019. But the real average was EUR 26/MWh. So seen from the eyes of consumers in both Europe and Asia, a price of EUR 26/MWh is an historically absolutely normal price. Demand for nat gas should thus naturally accelerate back towards normal levels at current nat gas prices. Not just in Europe, but also globally in all regions exposed to nat gas prices set by global LNG prices. This is already happening in the EU. Temp. adj. demand destruction vs. normal has typically been running at around 16% from mid-2022 to December 2023. Average ytd is 14% while the last 15 days is 9%. Demand destruction is fading as the price of nat gas is falling. But do remember that this is also happening in Asia but it is harder to track.
Normal nat gas demand AND normal gas prices is not consistent as Russian nat gas exports still down 1100 TWh/yr. There is however an inconsistency here in expecting normal prices and normal demand for natural gas now onward. The inconsistency is that the EU and thus the world is still robbed of the normal flow of nat gas on pipelines to Europe. This amounts to a loss of 3 TWh/day and thus close to 1100 TWh/year. When this gas is no longer flowing to the EU it isn’t flowing anywhere. It is lost to both the EU and the world. Until that is, Russia has built loads of new pipes to Asia and new LNG terminals. And that takes years.
A return to normal prices and normal demand while the world still is missing 1100 TWh/year of Russian nat gas isn’t really a consistent outcome in our view.
Demand for nat gas will continue to revive as the price of nat gas keeps falling. But both the EU and the world still need of a nat gas price at above normal levels to induce a certain amount of demand destruction until the point in time when new LNG export facilities globally has managed to replace the 1100 TWh/year we have lost from Russia.
Front-end TTF nat gas down to EUR 27/MWh could drive the EUA price to EUR 40/ton. The dynamic sell-off nat gas, prices will likely move lower than to the level which over time is consistent with continued need for some demand destruction globally. This because demand revival will come with a lag to the decline in prices. It is thus fully plausible that the TTF 2025 contract moves all the way down to EUR 27/MWh (or maybe even lower). If so it would imply a 2025 C-t-G differential of only EUR 40/ton for the EUA price to balance on and reference to. That could be the final hard drop in the EUA price. That’s a 30% drop from EUR 60/ton. But it won’t last because that nat gas price is likely too low vs. what is needed globally to maintain some level of demand destruction for a while longer.
An EUA price of EUR 40/ton would also be too cheap to resist for a range of market participants and they’d likely jump in and purchase with both hands. Airliners and shipping companies which will have difficulties of shifting away from fossil fuels and will need EUAs for years to come. Also utilities could step in and purchase large amounts of EUAs even if forward margins are negative. Some EU based utilities with large fossil-based assets bought truckloads of EUAs from 2011 to 2017 when the EUA price ranged from EUR 3/ton to EUR 9/ton. For them the EUA certificate is not only a marginal cost. It is also a licence to operate. The EUA price will of course not return to that level again. But if we move to EUR 40-50/ton, then it will probably trigger strategic buying by shipping companies, airliners as well as utilities.
Front-year TTF nat gas TTF price is dropping and leading the EUA price lower after a period of sideways action since mid-Jan
But the EU and the world is still missing some 3 TWh/d or 1100 TWh/yr of piped nat gas from Russia. When Russian nat gas is no longer flowing on pipes to Europe, it is flowing nowhere.
Nat gas demand destruction in the EU has been running at 15% to 17% since mid-2022 in the face of high nat gas prices. But demand destruction is now fading down to 8%. Demand has started to come back as nat gas prices fall. Demand is probably also coming back in Asia, but not so easily to see.
EU nat gas demand destruction has started to fade.
Forward Coal to Gas (C-t-G) differentials vs EUA market prices. The EUA price has balanced on the front-year differential. But that has now fallen like a rock along with the fall in front-year TTF nat gas price. Lead the EUA into a free-fall
The front-year Coal-to-Gas differential is a distribution of crosses between many different levels of efficiencies for coal and nat gas power plants. Averages of these are EUR 52.4/ton with Coal at USD 94.3/ton and Nat gas at EUR 29.8/MWh (both front-year 2025 prices). So EUA price is still hanging high.
Higher last week and today as sanctions bite harder than recession fears. Brent crude gained 2% last week with a close on Friday of USD 73.63/b. It traded in a range of USD 71.8-74.17/b. It traded mostly higher through the week despite sharp, new selloffs in equities along with US consumer expectations falling to lowest level since 2013 (Consumer Conf. Board Expectations.) together with signals of new tariffs from the White House. Ahead this week looms the ”US Liberation Day” on April 2 when the White House will announce major changes in the country’s trade policy. Equity markets are down across the board this morning while Brent crude has traded higher and lower and is currently up 0.5% at USD 74.0/b at the moment.
New US sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela and threats of new sanctions towards Russia. New sanctions on Venezuela and Iran are helping to keep the market tight. Oil production in Venezuela reached 980 kb/d in February following a steady rise from 310 kb/d in mid-2020 while it used to produce 2.3 mb/d up to 2016. Trump last week allowed Chevron to import oil from Venezuela until 27 May. But he also said that any country taking oil or gas from Venezuela after 2 April will face 25% tariffs on any goods exported into the US. Trump is also threatening to sanction Russian oil further if Putin doesn’t move towards a peace solution with Ukraine.
The OPEC+ to meet on Saturday 5 April to decide whether to lift production in May or not. The OPEC+ Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee will meet on Saturday 5 April to review market conditions, compliance by the members versus their production targets and most importantly decide whether they shall increase production further in May following first production hike in April. We find it highly likely that they will continue to lift production also in May.
OPEC(+) crashed the oil price twice to curb US shale, but it kicked back quickly. OPEC(+) has twice crashed the oil price in an effort to hurt and disable booming US shale oil production. First in 2014/15/16 and then in the spring of 2020. The first later led to the creation of OPEC+ through the Declaration of Cooperation (DoC) in the autumn of 2016. The second was in part driven by Covid-19 as well as a quarrel between Russia and Saudi Arabia over market strategy. But the fundamental reason for that quarrel and the crash in the oil price was US shale oil producers taking more and more market share.
The experience by OPEC+ through both of these two events was that US shale oil quickly kicked back even bigger and better yielding very little for OPEC+ to cheer about.
OPEC+ has harvested an elevated oil price but is left with a large spare capacity. The group has held back large production volumes since Spring 2020. It yielded the group USD 100/b in 2022 (with some help from the war in Ukraine), USD 81/b on average in 2023/24 and USD 75/b so far this year. The group is however left with a large spare capacity with little room to place it back into the market without crashing the price. It needs non-OPEC+ in general and US shale oil especially to yield room for it to re-enter.
A quick crash and painful blow to US shale oil is no longer the strategy. The strategy this time is clearly very different from the previous two times. It is no longer about trying to give US shale oil producers a quick, painful blow in the hope that the sector will stay down for an extended period. It is instead a lengthier process of finding the pain-point of US shale oil players (and other non-OPEC+ producers) through a gradual increase in production by OPEC+ and a gradual decline in the oil price down to the point where non-OPEC+ in general and US liquids production especially will gradually tick lower and yield room to the reentry of OPEC+ spare capacity. It does not look like a plan for a crash and a rush, but instead a tedious process where OPEC+ will gradually force its volumes back into the market.
Where is the price pain-point for US shale oil players? The Brent crude oil price dropped from USD 84/b over the year to September last year to USD 74/b on average since 1 September. The values for US WTI were USD 79/b and USD 71/b respectively. A drop of USD 9/b for both crudes. There has however been no visible reaction in the US drilling rig count following the USD 9/b fall. The US drilling rig count has stayed unchanged at around 480 rigs since mid-2024 with the latest count at 484 operating rigs. While US liquids production growth is slowing, it is still set to grow by 580 kb/d in 2025 and 445 kb/d in 2026 (US EIA).
US shale oil average cost-break-even at sub USD 50/b (BNEF). Industry says it is USD 65/b. BNEF last autumn estimated that all US shale oil production fields had a cost-break-even below USD 60/b with a volume weighted average just below USD 50/b while conventional US onshore oil had a break-even of USD 65/b. A recent US Dallas Fed report which surveyed US oil producers did however yield a response that the US oil industry on average needed USD 65/b to break even. That is more than USD 15/b higher than the volume weighted average of the BNEF estimates.
The WTI 13-to-24-month strip is at USD 64/b. Probably the part of the curve controlling activity. As such it needs to move lower to curb US shale oil activity. The WTI price is currently at USD 69.7/b. But the US shale oil industry today works on a ”12-month drilling first, then fracking after” production cycle. When it considers whether to drill more or less or not, it is typically on a deferred 12-month forward price basis. The average WTI price for months 13 to 24 is today USD 64/b. The price signal from this part of the curve is thus already down at the pain-point highlighted by the US shale oil industry. In order to yield zero growth and possibly contraction in US shale oil production, this part of the curve needs to move below that point.
The real pain-point is where we’ll see US drilling rig count starting to decline. We still don’t know whether the actual average pain-point is around USD 50/b as BNEF estimate it is or whether it is closer to USD 65/b which the US shale oil bosses say it is. The actual pain-point is where we’ll see further decline in US drilling rig count. And there has been no visible change in the rig count since mid-2024. The WTI 13-to-24-month prices need to fall further to reveal where the US shale oil industry’ actual pain-point is. And then a little bit more in order to slow production growth further and likely into some decline to make room for reactivation of OPEC+ spare capacity.
The WTI forward price curve. The average of 13 to 24 month is now USD 64.3/b.
The average 13-to-24-month prices on the WTI price curve going back to primo January 2022. Recently dropping below USD 65/b for some extended period.
Brent has defied bearish equities for three days but is losing its stamina today. Brent gained 0.3% yesterday with a close of USD 74.03/b, the highest close since 27 February and almost at the high of the day. It traded as low as USD 73.23/b. Brent has now defied the equity selloff three days in a row by instead ticking steadily higher. A sign of current spot tightness. This morning however it is losing some of its stamina and is down 0.5% at USD 73.7/b along with negative equities and yet higher gold prices.
The new US Iran sanctions is creating frictions in getting its oil to market and helps keeping oil market tight. Part of the current tightness is due to the new US sanctions on Iran which. Ships containing 17 mb of its oil now sits idle east of Malaysia waiting (Bloomberg) for ship-to-ship transfers with China teapot refineries the normal final destination. But the latest US sanctions has probably made these refineries much more cautious. More friction before Iranian oil is reaching its final destination if at all. Tighter market.
Lower Saudi OSPs for May is expected. A signal of a softer market ahead as OPEC+ lifts production. Saudi Aramco is expected to reduce it official selling price (OSPs) for Arab Light to Asia for May deliveries by USD 2/b. A measure to make its oil more competitive in relative to other crudes suppliers. It is also a sign of a softer market ahead. Naturally so since OPEC+ is set to lift production in April and also most likely in May. If Saudi Aramco reduces its OSPs to Asia for May across its segments of crudes, then it is a signal it is expecting softer oil market conditions. But news today is only discussing Arab Light while the main tightness int the market today is centered around medium sour crude segment. A lowering of the OSPs for the heavier and more sour grades will thus be a more forceful bearish signal.
Front-end backwardation may ease as the Brent May contract rolls off early next week. The Brent May future will roll off early next week. It will be interesting to see how that affects the front-end 1-3mth backwardation as it is shifted out into summer where a softer market is expected.
Brent is boring like crazy with 30dma annualized volatility of just 21%. Waiting for something to happen.
Brent crude has defied three days of bearish equity markets and ticked higher instead. Caving in a bit this morning with yet another day of bearish equities and bullish gold.
Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.8 million barrels per day, an increase of 87k bl/day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 87% of their total operable capacity during the period. Gasoline production declined, averaging 9.2 million barrels per day (m bl/d), while distillate (diesel) production also edged lower to 4.5 m bl/d.
U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.2 m bl/d, up 810k barrels from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports have averaged 5.7 m bl/d, representing an 11% YoY decline compared to the same period last year.
Where we place most of our attention – and what continues to influence short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude – remains U.S. crude and product inventories. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 3.2 m bl, a relatively modest build that is unlikely to trigger major price reactions. Brent crude traded at around USD 73.9 per barrel when the data was released yesterday afternoon (16:30 CEST) and has since slid by USD 0.4/bl to USD 73.5/bl this morning, still among the highest price levels seen in March 2025.
Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 3.3 m bl, contrasting with last week’s build and offering some price support, though the draw was less severe than the API’s reported -4.6 m bl. Crude inventories now stand at 433.6 m bl, about 5% below the five-year average for this time of year. Gasoline inventories declined by 1.4 m bl (API: -3.3 m bl), though they remain 2% above the five-year average. Diesel inventories fell by 0.4 m bl (API: -1.3 m bl), leaving them 7% below seasonal norms.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied – a proxy for U.S. demand – averaged 20.2 m bl/d, up 0.5% compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.9 m bl/d, down 0.2%, while diesel supplied came in at 3.9 m bl/d, up 1.8%. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 3.9% over the same four-week period.
Guld kostar över 3100 USD per uns och 1 miljoner kronor per kilo
Oil gains as sanctions bite harder than recession fears
Danska Seaborg Technologies siktar på serieproduktion av smältsaltsreaktorer till mitten av 2030-talet
Ett samtal om läget på uranmarknaden
Brent Edges Lower After Resisting Equity Slump – Sanctions, Saudi Pricing in Focus
USA är världens största importör av aluminium
OPEC+ börjar öka oljeutbudet från april
Crude oil comment: Unable to rebound as the US SPX is signaling dark clouds on the horizon
Oversold. Rising 1-3mth time-spreads. Possibly rebounding to USD 73.5/b before downside ensues
Arctic Minerals är ett nordiskt mineralprospekterings- och gruvutvecklingsbolag
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanUSA är världens största importör av aluminium
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanOPEC+ börjar öka oljeutbudet från april
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Unable to rebound as the US SPX is signaling dark clouds on the horizon
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Oversold. Rising 1-3mth time-spreads. Possibly rebounding to USD 73.5/b before downside ensues
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanArctic Minerals är ett nordiskt mineralprospekterings- och gruvutvecklingsbolag
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Not so fragile yet. If it was it would have sold off more yesterday
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
A deliberate measure to push oil price lower but it is not the opening of the floodgates
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanPriset på koppar skiljer sig åt efter tariffer