Analys
SEB – Jordbruksprodukter, vecka 50
I detta det sista veckobrevet för 2011 om marknaderna för jordbruksprodukter kan vi summera året. Det senaste året har priset på kvarnvete sjunkit med 23%, rapsfrö med 12%. Mjölkpriset har stigit med 35% och urea med 52%. Tack vare gynnsamt väder har priset på potatis fallit med 71% på Eurexbörsen i Frankfurt. Dollarn är upp med 3% mot svenska kronor och euron är oförändrad, faktiskt.
Konjunkturoron och med den oron för svagare efterfrågan på mat tynger marknaderna just nu. Precis som väntat åstadkom EU-ledarna ingenting, vilket gick upp för marknaden på måndagen när stora kursfall noterades på råvaru-, kapital- och kreditmarknader i hela världen. Det hela sjönk in ordentligt på onsdagen, när panikförsäljning startade i guldmarknaden och sedan spred sig till oljemarknaden och slutligen till hela råvarumarknaden. OPEC kom under onsdagens möte i Wien fram till att öka produktionen av olja (höja produktionstaket). Det hjälpte inte upp situationen på marknaden.
Den ledande kinesiska websidan för fastighetsbranschen sade i måndags att antalet fastighetsaffärer har fallit mer än 50% i 13 av de 35 största städerna och sjunkit i 27 av dem. Kinas ekonomi bromsar in och Shanghaibörsens aktieindex noterade ett kursfall i onsdags till den lägsta nivån på mer än 2 år.
Nedan ser vi vetepriset på Matif de senaste tio åren. Priset är faktiskt ganska högt ännu i ett historiskt perspektiv och det är fortfarande attraktiva priser att säkra framtida försäljning till genom att sälja terminskontrakt.
Vete
Terminspriset på Matif-vete (mars) ligger i en stadig trend nedåt.
När handeln öppnade på CBOT i onsdags eftermiddag satta kursfallet fart. Priset för mars-leverans föll från 600 cent / bushel ner till 580 cent, som vi ser i diagrammet nedan.
Fredagens WASDE rapport bjöd inte på några större överraskningar då marknaden förväntade sig en höjning av estimaten för produktion samt utgående lager. Några dagar innan hade dessutom FAO kommit med sin decemberrapport där man justerade upp den globala vete produktionen till rekordhöga 694.8 mt, vilket är en ökning med 6.5% jämfört med 2010 och 10 mt mer än den tidigare högsta nivån från 2009.
Den globala vete produktionen justerades upp 5.7 mt till en all-time-high på 688.97 mt, där USDA höjer sina estimat för Argentina, Australien, Kanada och Kina medan estimaten för Nordafrika sänks något.
Produktionen för EU-27 noterades oförändrad (137.49 mt) från föregående rapport. Även produktionen i Ryssland och Kazakhstan var oförändrad (56 mt resp 21 mt) medan FAO tidigare i veckan estimerade produktionen till 58 mt resp 24 mt för dessa länder.
Utgående lager (world wheat ending stocks) för 2011/12 justeras upp till 208.52 mt jämfört med 202.60 mt för en månad sedan. Detta gör att vi nu börjar närma oss historiska rekordnivåer. Intressant var också utgående lager för USA. Innan rapporten förväntade sig marknaden en snittsiffra på ca 830 miljoner bushels, en liten förändring från novembers 828 miljoner bushels, men när rapporten kom hade USDA justerat upp siffran med 50 miljoner och landade på 878 miljoner till följd av en nedjustering på 50 miljoner bushels för estimerad export.
Terminspriserna sjönk som en första reaktion på WASDE-rapporten för att sedan återhämtade sig trots att rapporten var starkt ”bearish” för vetet med rekordskördar, höga lagernivåer och minskad export. Vi ser i grafen nedan (procentuell förändring) att detta är femte månaden i följd som USDA har reviderat upp produktionen och utgående lager för vete!
PRODUCTION AND INVENTORY ESTIMATE
REVISIONS
(WASDE, MONTHLY DATA, %, JUNE CORN INV. EST. CUT FOR
Men redan nu börjar marknaden att blicka fram emot januaris WASDE-rapport. Det är den rapportsom brukar ge de största prisrörelserna när den kommer ut:
Genomsnittlig prisrörelse på WASDE-rapporteringsdagar sedan 2002 (10 år):
I fredags publicerade också FranceAgriMer sina arealprognoser för nästa säsong där man räknar med följande ökningar av arealen; vete (+1,61%), durumvete (2,79%), korn (0,91%) och raps (+1,75%). Frankrike är EU:s största producent och exportör av vete.
Enligt Coceral kommer den europeiska (EU-27) vete produktionen att uppgå till 129.64 mt i år, vilket är en justering från 128.39 mt från förra månaden.
Egyptens GASC köpte 180,000 ton vete i tisdags med jämn fördelning mellan Ryssland, Argentina och… Frankrike! Priset på det franska vetet som vann budgivningen kom in på 240.50 usd / ton, vilket var ca 3.50 usd / ton billigare än det ryska vetet på 243.98 usd / ton (FOB). Ryssland har dock ett övertag mot Frankrike vad gäller frakt (kostnad) till Egypten. Argentina erbjuder fortfarande det billigaste vetet (226.19 usd / ton) men har dyrare fraktkostnad emot sig.
Nämnvärt är också att US White Wheat fanns med i denna budgivning, men exkluderades då leveransen inte avsåg 60,000 ton. Vi ser dock att gapet i prisskillnaderna nu minskar och att både det franska och amerikanska vetet börjar bli konkurrenskraftigt mot FSU länderna.
Även det kraftiga fallet i euron ger stöd åt jordbruksprodukterna på Matif och gör att Europa åter kan konkurrera på den internationella marknaden.
Nedan ser vi terminskurvan för Chicagovete och Matif nu och för en vecka sedan. De ”feta” kurvorna är de aktuella. De ”smala” är förra veckans. Matif är nästan inte förändrat alls, medan priserna liksom förra veckan gått upp i Chicago – för längre löptider. Bakom ligger oro för kommande skörd pga La Niña kanske och förmodligen också för att räntorna (som man kan låna till) är högre.
Allt talar för att Matif-vete faller ner i första hand till 150 – 160 – euro-nivån.
Maltkorn
Maltkornsmarknaden har behållit sin styrka relativt andra spannmål med marsleverans på Matif på 262 euro per ton.
I Ryssland försöker regeringen att stödja produktionen av maltkorn genom subventioner av inköp av utsäde och bekämpningsmedel. Även om Ryssland producerar 17 MMT foderkorn så importeras det 400 000 ton maltkorn varje år sedan 2007 för att möta de behov som finns.
Potatis
Priset på potatis av årets skörd fortsatte stiga i veckan, ännu en vecka. Rapporten kom från Jordbruksverket tidigare i veckan om en betydligt högre skörd av matpotatis i Sverige, men informationen nådde alltså marknaden redan på försommaren, när priserna började falla. Nedan ser vi kursdiagrammet på europeisk potatis, som handlas på Eurex; terminen avser leverans april 2012.
Priset för leverans i april 2013 ligger betydligt högre på 13.37 euro per deciton och har också stigit ännu mer den senaste tiden.
Majs
Majspriset föll liksom det mesta andra kraftigt när börserna öppnade på onsdagseftermiddagen. Den 12 december rapporterade Martell Crop Projections att tork-stressen ökat i Argentina och södra Brasiliens majsfält. De skriver
”Growing conditions have become increasingly stressful in southern South America the past 2-3 weeks with intense drying. The crop area affected by emerging drought includes Argentina’s eastern grain belt in Buenos Aires, Entre Rios and Santa Fe. La Nina is the suspected culprit. Uruguay and Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil also are very dry.”
Kopplingen till etanol och oron kring Irans kärnvapenprogram och dess potentiellt explosiva effekt på oljepriset gör majshandlare oroliga att sälja, fast mycket annat tyder på att priset borde vara lägre.
Nedan ser vi marskontraktet på CBOT, där priset just fallit ner från 600-cent-nivån.
Tekniskt ser det ut som om priset skulle kunna falla ner mot 500 cent.
Sojabönor
Priset på sojabönor befinner sig i en sjunkande trend. Vi sade i förra veckan att den lilla rekylen uppåt var ett säljtillfälle och det visade sig rätt. Priset ligger just nu på 1100 cent, som har utgjort ett stöd. Troligtvis bryter trenden nedåt igenom nivån och då blir nästa nivå som kan utgöra ett stöd, den jämna siffran 1000 cent.
Vi är negativa ur tekniskt perspektiv de närmaste tre månaderna.
Raps
Priset på raps har gått upp och håller sig starkt med stöd från den svaga euron.
Uppgifter om att Hormuz-sundet skulle stängas på grund av militärövning (vilket förnekades av Irans utrikesdepartement) och nyheten om en attack mot en oljeledning i Irak fick råoljepriset att stiga under tisdagen och drog med sig priset på raps. Priset har också påverkats av oro över de extremt torra väderförhållanden som kan komma att påverka ny skörd.
Oljepriset föll under onsdagskvällen mycket kraftigt, med mer än 4% för Brent och mer än 5% för West Texas Intermediate. Detta bör påverka rapsfröet på Matif under torsdag och fredag. Nedan ser vi priset på februariterminen på Matif.
Matifraps var förra veckan 13% dyrare än kanadensisk canola och ligger kvar på samma nivå den är veckan. Raps är ovanligt dyrt.
Vi har en negativ vy på Matif raps.
Mjölk
Nedan ser vi priset på marskontraktet på flytande mjölk (kontakt avräknat mot USDA:s prisindex). Priset har varit väldigt rörligt den senaste tiden. Trenden är uppåtriktad, men är vid den nivå som priset toppade vid under sensommaren. Det kan utgöra ett motstånd för ytterligare prisuppgång.
Gris
Priset på lean hogs har fallit stadigt den senaste veckan, men priset ligger ännu inom det breda prisintervall som etablerades under senvåren. 85 cent torde utgöra ett stöd, såsom botten på prisintervallet.
Valutor
EURSEK har märkligt nog stigit upp från 9 kr. Kanske tycker marknaden att det finns anledning att tveka även om den svenska kronans värde.
EURUSD är i en tydlig negativ trend.
USDSEK har en stigande trend och har nått upp till heltalet 7 kr per dollar. Växelkursen har vänt ner därifrån två gånger tidigare och frågan är nu om kursen ska orka ta sig igenom den här gången.
Gödsel
Kväve
Nedan ser vi 1 månads terminspris på Urea fob Uyzhnyy. Priset har fallit kraftigt under hösten.
[box]SEB Veckobrev Jordbruksprodukter är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]
Disclaimer
The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).
Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.
About SEB
SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.
Analys
[If demand] ”comes around as forecast, Hallelujah, we can produce more”

Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, last week stated at a conference in Calgary: ”I believe it when I see it. When reality comes around as it’s been forecast, Hallelujah, we can produce more” (Reuters, John Kemp). So Saudi Arabia wants to and will produce more once it is confident that there really is demand for additional crude. Saudi Arabia has good reason to be concerned for global oil demand. It is not the only one struggling to predict global demand amid the haze and turmoil in the global oil market following the Russian invasion of Ukraine and sanctions towards Russian crude and product stocks. Add a shaky Chinese housing market and the highest US rates since 2001. Estimates for global oil demand in Q4-23 are ranging from 100.6 m b/d to 104.7 m b/d with many estimates in between. Current crude and mid-dist inventories are low. Supply/demand is balanced to tight and clearly very tight for mid-dists (diesel, jet fuel, gasoil). But amid current speculative bullishness it is important to note that Saudi Arabia can undo the current upwards price journey just as quickly as it created the current bull-market as it drop in production from 10.5 m b/d in April to only 9.0 m b/d since July. Quickly resolving the current mid-dist crisis is beyond the powers of Saudi Arabia. But China could come to the rescue if increased oil product export quotas as it holds spare refining capacity.

The oil market is well aware that the main reasons for why oil has rallied 25% over the past months is reduced production by Saudi Arabia and Russia, global oil demand holding up better than feared together with still declining US shale oil activity. US oil drilling rig count fell by 8 rigs last week to 507 rigs which is the lowest since Feb 2022.
The big question is how strong is global oil demand and how will it hold up or even maybe increase in the coming quarters? And here the spread of estimates are still all over the place. For Q4-23 we have the following range of estimates for global oil demand in m b/d: 100.6; 101.8; 103.1; 103.2 and 104.7 from main oil market research providers. This wide spread of estimates is mindbogglingly and head-scratching both for analysts and for oil producers. It leads to a wide spread in estimates for Call-on-OPEC. Some say the current market is in a 2-3 m b/d deficit while others calculate that the global oil market today is nicely balanced.
The sanctions towards Russian crude and oil product exports with a ban on imports to the EU and UK has led to a large reshuffling of the global oil market flows which again has created a haze through which it is hard to gauge the correct state of the global oil market.
We have previously argued that there may be a significant amount of ”pent-up-demand” following the Covid-years with potential for global oil demand to surprise on the upside versus most demand forecasts. But there are also good reasons to be cautious to demand given Chinese property market woes and the highest US interest rates since 2001!
The uncertainty in global oil demand is clearly at the heart of Saudi Arabia’s production cuts since April this year. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister, Prince Abulaziz bin Salman, last week stated at a conference in Calgary: ”I believe it when I see it. When reality comes around as it’s been forecast, Hallelujah, we can produce more” (Reuters, John Kemp).
So if it turns out that demand is indeed stronger than Saudi Arabia fears, then we should see increased production from Saudi Arabia. Saudi could of course then argue that yes, it is stronger than expected right now, but tomorrow may be worse. Also, the continued decline in US oil drilling rig count is a home-free card for continued low production from Saudi Arabia.
Both crude stocks and mid-dist stocks (diesel, jet fuel, gasoil) are still significantly below normal and the global oil market is somewhere between balanced, mild deficit or large deficit (-2-3 m b/d). The global oil market is as such stressed due to low inventories and potentially in either mild or large deficit on top. The latter though can be undone by higher production from Saudi Arabia whenever it chooses to do so.
What is again getting center stage are the low mid-dist stocks ahead of winter. The war in Ukraine and the sanctions towards Russian crude and product stocks created chaos in the global oil product market. Refining margins went crazy last year. But they are still crazy. The global refining system got reduced maintenance in 2020 and 2021 due to Covid-19 and low staffing. Following decades of mediocre margins and losses, a lot of older refineries finally decided to close down for good during Covid as refining margins collapsed as the world stopped driving and flying. The global refining capacity contracted in 2021 for the first time in 30 years as a result. Then in 2022 refining margins exploded along with reviving global oil demand and the invasion of Ukraine. Refineries globally then ran as hard as they could, eager to make money, and reduced maintenance to a minimum for a third year in a row. Many refineries are now prone for technical failures following three years of low maintenance. This is part of the reason why mid-dist stocks struggle to rebuild. The refineries which can run however are running as hard as they can. With current refining margins they are pure money machines.
Amid all of this, Russia last week imposed an export ban for gasoline and diesel products to support domestic consumers with lower oil product prices. Russia normally exports 1.1 m b/d of diesel products and 0.2 m b/d of gasoline. The message is that it is temporary and this is also what the market expects. Russia has little oil product export storage capacity. The export ban will likely fill these up within a couple of weeks. Russia will then either have to close down refineries or restart its oil product exports.
The oil market continues in a very bullish state with stress both in crude and mid-dists. Speculators continues to roll into the market with net long positions in Brent crude and WTI increasing by 29 m b over the week to last Tuesday. Since the end of June it has increased from 330 m b to now 637 m b. Net-long speculative positions are now at the highest level in 52 weeks.
The market didn’t believe Saudi Arabia this spring when it warned speculators about being too bearish on oil and that they would burn their fingers. And so they did. After having held production at 9 m b/d since July, the market finally believes in Saudi Arabia. But the market still doesn’t quite listen when Saudi says that its current production is not about driving the oil price to the sky (and beyond). It’s about concerns for global oil demand amid many macro economic challenges. It’s about being preemptive versus weakening demand. The current oil rally can thus be undone by Saudi Arabia just as it was created by Saudi Arabia. The current refinery stress is however beyond the powers of Saudi Arabia. But China could come to the rescue as it holds spare refining capacity. It could increase export quotas for oil products and thus alleviate global mid-dist shortages. The first round effect of this would however be yet stronger Chinese crude oil imports.
Brent crude and ARA diesel refining premiums/margins. It is easy to see when Russia invaded Ukraine. Diesel margins then exploded. The market is not taking the latest Russian export ban on diesel and gasoline too seriously. Not very big moves last week.

ARA mid-dist margins still exceptionally high at USD 35-40/b versus a more normal USD 12-15/b. We are now heading into the heating season, but the summer driving season is fading and so are gasoline margins.

ARA mid-dist margins still exceptionally high at USD 35-40/b versus a more normal USD 12-15/b. Here same graph as above but with longer perspective to show how extreme the situation is.

US crude and product stocks vs. the 2015-19 average. Very low mid-dist stocks.

Speculators are rolling into long positions. Now highest net long spec in 52 weeks.

Analys
The ”normal” oil price is USD 97/b

The Dated Brent crude oil price ydy closed at USD 96/b. Wow, that’s a high price! This sensation however depends on what you think is ”normal”. And normal in the eyes of most market participants today is USD 60/b. But this perception is probably largely based on the recent experience of the market. The average Brent crude oil price from 2015-2019 was USD 58.5/b. But that was a period of booming non-OPEC supply, mostly shale oil. But booming shale oil supply is now increasingly coming towards an end. Looking more broadly at the last 20 years the nominal average price was USD 75/b. But in inflation adjusted terms it was actually USD 97/b.

Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, Abdulaziz bin Salman, yesterday stated that its production cuts was not about driving the price up but instead it was preemptive versus the highly uncertain global economic development. In that respect it has a very good point. The US 2yr government bond rate has rallied to 5.06% which is the highest since 2006 and just a fraction away of being the highest since December 2000. The Chinese property market is struggling and global PMIs have been downhill since mid-2021 with many countries now at contractive, sub-50 level. Thus a deep concern for the health of the global economy and thus oil demand going forward is absolutely warranted. And thus the preemptive production cuts by Saudi Arabia. But killing the global economy off while it is wobbling with an oil price of USD 110-120/b or higher is of course not a smart thing to do either.
At the same conference in Canada yesterday the CEO of Aramco, Amin H. Nasser, said that he expected global oil demand to reach 110 m b/d in 2030 and that talk about a near term peak in global oil demand was ”driven by policies, rather than the proven combination of markets, competitive economics and technology” (Reuters).
With a demand outlook of 110 m b/d in 2030 the responsible thing to do is of course to make sure that the oil price stays at a level where investments are sufficient to cover both decline in existing production as well as future demand growth.
In terms of oil prices we tend to think about recent history and also in nominal terms. Most market participants are still mentally thinking of the oil prices we have experienced during the shale oil boom years from 2015-2019. The average nominal Brent crude price during that period was USD 58.5/b. This is today often perceived as ”the normal price”. But it was a very special period with booming non-OPEC supply whenever the WTI price moved above USD 45/b. But that period is increasingly behind us. While we could enjoy fairly low oil prices during this period it also left the world with a legacy: Subdued capex spending in upstream oil and gas all through these years. Then came the Covid-years which led to yet another trough in capex spending. We are soon talking close to 9 years of subdued capex spending.
If Amin H. Nasser is ballpark correct in his prediction that global oil demand will reach 110 m b/d in 2030 then the world should better get capex spending rolling. There is only one way to make that happen: a higher oil price. If the global economy now runs into an economic setback or recession and OPEC allows the oil price to drop to say USD 50/b, then we’d get yet another couple of years with subdued capex spending on top of the close to 9 years with subdued spending we already have behind us. So in the eyes of Saudi Arabia, Amin H. Nasser and Abdulaziz bin Salman, the responsible thing to do is to make sure that the oil price stays up at a sufficient level to ensure that capex spending stays up even during an economic downturn.
This brings us back to the question of what is a high oil price. We remember the shale oil boom years with an average nominal price of USD 58.5/b. We tend to think of it as the per definition ”normal” price. But we should instead think of it as the price depression period. A low-price period during which non-OPEC production boomed. Also, adjusting it for inflation, the real average price during this period was actually USD 72.2/b and not USD 58.5/b. If we however zoom out a little and look at the last 20 years then we get a nominal average of USD 75/b. The real, average inflation adjusted price over the past 20 years is however USD 97/b. The Dated Brent crude oil price yesterday closed at USD 96/b.
Worth noting however is that for such inflation adjustment to make sense then the assumed cost of production should actually rise along with inflation and as such create a ”rising floor price” to oil based on rising real costs. If costs in real terms instead are falling due to productivity improvements, then such inflation adjusted prices will have limited bearing for future prices. What matters more specifically is the development of real production costs for non-OPEC producers and the possibility to ramp up such production. Environmental politics in OECD countries is of course a clear limiting factor for non-OPEC oil production growth and possibly a much more important factor than the production cost it self.
But one last note on the fact that Saudi Arabia’s energy minister, Abdulaziz bin Salman, is emphasizing that the cuts are preemptive rather then an effort to drive the oil price to the sky while Amin H. Nasser is emphasizing that we need to be responsible. It means that if it turns out that the current cuts have indeed made the global oil market too tight with an oil price spiraling towards USD 110-120/b then we’ll highly likely see added supply from Saudi Arabia in November and December rather than Saudi sticking to 9.0 m b/d. This limits the risk for a continued unchecked price rally to such levels.
Oil price perspectives. We tend to think that the nominal average Brent crude oil price of USD 58.5/b during the shale oil boom years from 2015-19 is per definition the ”normal” price. But that period is now increasingly behind us. Zoom out a little to the real, average, inflation adjusted price of the past 20 years and we get USD 97/b. In mathematical terms it is much more ”normal” than the nominal price during the shale oil boom years

Is global oil demand about to peak 1: OECD and non-OECD share of global population

Is global oil demand about to peak 2: Oil demand per capita per year

Analys
USD 100/b in sight but oil product demand may start to hurt

Some crude oil grades have already traded above USD 100/b. Tapis last week at USD 101.3/b. Dated Brent is trading at USD 95.1/b. No more than some market noise is needed to drive it above USD 100/b. But a perceived and implied oil market deficit of 1.5 to 2.5 m b/d may be closer to balance than a deficit. And if so the reason is probably that oil product demand is hurting. Refineries are running hard. They are craving for crude and converting it to oil products. Crude stocks in US, EU16 and Japan fell 23 m b in August as a result of this and amid continued restraint production by Saudi/Russia. But oil product stocks rose 20.3 m b with net draws in crude and products of only 2.7 m b for these regions. Thus indicating more of a balanced market than a deficit. Naturally there has been strong support for crude prices while oil product refinery margins have started to come off. Saudi/Russia is in solid control of the market. Both crude and product stocks are low while the market is either in deficit or at best in balance. So there should be limited down side price risk. But oil product demand is likely to hurt more if Brent crude rises to USD 110-120/b and such a price level looks excessive.

Crude oil prices have been on a relentless rise since late June when it became clear that Saudi Arabia would keep its production at 9 m b/d not just in July but also in August. Then later extended to September and then lately to the end of the year. On paper this has placed the market into a solid deficit. Total OPEC production was 27.8 m b/d in August and likely more or less the same in September. OPEC estimates that the need for oil from OPEC in Q3-23 is 29.2 m b/d which places the global market in a 1.4 m b/d deficit when OPEC produces 27.8 m b/d.
The proof of the pudding is of course that inventories actually draws down when there is a deficit. A 1.4 m b/d of deficit for 31 days in August implies a global inventory draw of 43.4 m b/d. If we assume that OECD countries accounts for 46% of global oil demand then OECD could/should have had a fair share of inventory rise of say 20 m b in August. Actual inventory data are however usually a lagging set of data so we have to work with sub sets of data being released on a higher frequency. And non-OECD demand and inventory data are hard to come by.
If we look at oil inventory data for US, EU16 and Japan we see that crude stocks fell 23 m b in August while product stocks rose 20.3 m b with a total crude and product draw of only 2.7 m b. I.e. indicating close to a balanced market in August rather than a big deficit. But it matters that crude stocks fell 23 m b. That is a tight crude market where refineries are craving and bidding for crude oil together with speculators who are buying paper-oil. So refineries worked hard to buy crude oil and converting it to oil products in August. But these additional oil products weren’t gobbled up by consumers but instead went into inventories.
Rising oil product inventories is of course a good thing since these inventories in general are low. And also oil product stocks are low. The point is more that the world did maybe not run a large supply/demand deficit of 1.5 to 2.5 m b/d in August but rather had a more balanced market. A weaker oil product demand than anticipated would then likely be the natural explanation for this. Strong refinery demand for crude oil, crude oil inventory draws amid a situation where crude inventories already are low is of course creating an added sense of bullishness for crude oil.
On the one hand strong refinery demand for crude oil has helped to drive crude oil prices higher amid continued production cuts by Saudi Arabia. Rising oil product stocks have on the other hand eased the pressure on oil products and thus softened the oil product refinery margins.
The overall situation is that Saudi Arabia together with Russia are in solid control of the oil market. Further that the global market is either balanced or in deficit and that both crude and product stocks are still low. Thus we have a tight market both in terms of supplies and inventories. So there should be limited downside in oil prices. We are highly likely to see Dated Brent moving above USD 100/b. It is now less than USD 5/b away from that level and only noise is needed to bring it above. Tupis crude oil in Asia traded at USD 101.3/b last week. So some crude benchmarks are already above the USD 100/b mark.
While Dated Brent looks set to hit USD 100/b in not too long we are skeptical with respect to further price rises to USD 110-120/b as oil product demand likely increasingly would start to hurt. Unless of course if we get some serious supply disruptions. But Saudi Arabia now has several million barrels per day of reserve capacity as it today only produces 9.0 m b/d. Thus disruptions can be countered. Oil product demand, oil product cracks and oil product inventories is a good thing to watch going forward. An oil price of USD 85-95/b is probably much better than USD 110-120/b for a world where economic activity is likely set to slow rather than accelerate following large interest rate hikes over the past 12-18 months.
OPEC’s implied call-on-OPEC crude oil. If OPEC’s production stays at 27.8 m b/d throughout Q3-23 and Q4-23 then OPECs numbers further strong inventory draws to the end of the year.

Net long speculative positions in Brent crude and WTI. Speculators have joined the price rally since end of June.

End of month crude and product stocks in m b in EU16, US and Japan. Solid draw in crude stocks but also solid rise in product stocks. In total very limited inventory draw. Refineries ran hard to convert crude to oil products but these then went straight into inventories alleviating low oil product inventories there.

ARA oil product refinery margins have come off their highs for all products as the oil product situation has eased a bit. Especially so for gasoline with now fading summer driving. But also HFO 3.5% cracks have eased back a little bit. But to be clear, diesel cracks and mid-dist cracks are still exceptionally high. And even gasoline crack down to USD 17.6/b is still very high this time of year.

ARA diesel cracks in USD/b. Very, very high in 2022. Almost normal in Apr and May. Now very high vs. normal though a little softer than last year.

US crude and product stocks vs. 2015-2019 average. Still very low mid-dist inventories (diesel) and also low crude stocks but not all that low gasoline inventories.

US crude and product stocks vs. 2015-2019 averages. Mid-dist stocks have stayed persistently low while gasoline stocks suddenly have jumped as gasoline demand seems to have started to hurt due to higher prices.

Total commercial US crude and product stocks in million barrels. Rising lately. If large, global deficit they should have been falling sharply. Might be a blip?

Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data feed, EIA data
-
Nyheter1 vecka sedan
Africa Oil har fokus på offshore-tillgångar i Nigeria
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Fireweed Metals – bolaget som nästan ingår i Lundin-sfären
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
EnQuest ska avnotera sina aktier från Nasdaq Stockholm
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Kyawthuite – världens mest sällsynta mineral
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Det svenska fusionsföretaget Novatron Fusion Group får ytterligare kraft med ny investering
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Sveriges största elektrolysanläggning invigs idag
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Kraftigt prisfall på el i höst
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Det finns tillräckligt med koppar