Analys
Searching for the US shale oil price floor
In hindsight the market was obviously not satisfied with OPEC just rolling their cuts over for another 9 months. The market’ judgement was clearly that that was far from enough. So if OPEC & Co’s production cuts were judged to be insufficient to balance the market then the price itself will have to do the job or a part of the job as well. If so, then the question is at what level do the oil price need to move to in order to shift US shale oil rig count from expansion to neutral or contraction.
The US shale oil space has now been in one loooong expansion phase continuously for one year. First in terms of rig additions). So our current empirical knowledge is actually one year old from when we experienced that US shale oil rig count started to expand when the US WTI 18 mth contract crossed above $46-47/b however with a 6 weeks lag. Has this inflection point shifted higher or lower over the last year? The market doesn’t really know and now it needs to know. Shale oil productivity and technology improvements and further spreading of “best practice” from the leading companies to the less advanced has probably shifted it lower. Cost inflation is however clearly evident and is working in the other direction. Fracking and completion of wells seems to be a bottleneck at the moment. This should make companies more caution in terms of adding more drilling rigs. No point in more rigs and more wells if you cannot complete them and move them into production.
The one and a half year forward WTI crude oil price (18thm contract) yesterday briefly traded down to $47.2/b before closing the day at $47.89/b. Thus right down to the empirical “shale oil floor” before bouncing up again. The 30 day average (6 weeks) for this contract is today $49.5/b. Thus we are at least starting to get close to the empirical inflection point from last year. We should thus soon see much softer growth in the US shale oil rig count and then it eventually should crawl to a halt if the WTI 18 mth contract continues to trade at current level of $47.5/b. Unless of course the inflection point has shifted yet lower today than where it was last year. This is clearly possible and it is also clearly what the market needs to know.
The US EIA this week released its monthly energy report. Its prognosis was that there was no deficit on the horizon for the global oil market within their outlook to 2018. Actually they project that the OECD stocks inches slightly higher y/y to end 2017 and then again a little higher y/y to end 2018. That was depressing for the bulls and it again strengthened the post OPEC view that what OPEC has decided to do is not going to be enough. The EIA actually agrees with this view.
Then on Wednesday, just one day after the EIA’s monthly report, data was released showing a big jump in oil inventories with crude stocks up 3.3 mb, gasoline up 3.3 mb and distillates up 4.4 mb with total for the three up 11 mb. That was kind of a nail in the coffin for the oil bulls and the oil price sold off sharply.
The whole debacle around Qatar has not been good for the oil price either with concerns that increasing disagreement between the OPEC countries could possibly undermine the current agreement for production cuts. Historically however OPEC has managed to sail through major political differences while still maintaining production cuts or strategies.
The price declines over the last week has primarily taken place at the front end of the forward curve where the front end has dipped 5.5% while the longer dated Brent December 2020 contract has only declined 0.5%. So no major sell-off along the curve. The sell-off in the front end of the curve is a signal of concerns for high inventories which won’t go away.
We do agree that it would be a good thing to get a refresh of where the current US shale oil rig inflection point is today as it is a full year since last time. However, we do disagree with the current view that OPEC & Co’s cuts won’t do the trick in 2017. We still strongly believe (baring Nigeria and Libya revival) that OECD’s commercial inventories will draw down strongly through H2-17 and stand close to normal by the end of the year in strong contrast to the latest monthly report from the US EIA. The inventories in weekly data have drawn down strongly since mid-March. Yes, this week they went up by some 10 mb for US, EU, Sing and floating combined, but last week it went down by 20 mb. In total they have drawn down 70 mb since mid-March and more is to come as we head into H2-17 with strong revival in global refining activity. We thus expect that the current view that there will be no draws in OECD stocks in 2017 displayed by the EIA this week will evaporate in not too long. We also think that OPEC’s production cuts will not fall apart due to the current debacle surrounding Qatar.
As such we don’t expect the current depression in oil prices to last through to the end of the year. We may have to hold out for a little while in order to figure out where the current US shale oil rig count inflection point is – where “the US shale oil price floor” currently is, but continued solid inventory draws should soon convince the market again that the market is surly running a deficit.
Today at 19.00 CET we have the Baker Hughes US rig count. Highly interesting to see whether the last six weeks with an average WTI 18 mth price of $49.5/b has started to slow down the US shale oil rig count growth.
Ch1 – Where is the “US shale oil price floor”? Still at $46-47/b (WTI 18 mth reference)?
Ch2: US inventories did counter the downward trend this week. But that should be noise
We still expect inventories to draw down across the board the coming half year
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Oil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer
Market is starting to take US/Iran headlines with a pinch of salt. Brent crude rose $2.8/b yesterday to an official close of $112.1/b. But after that it traded as low as $108.05/b before ending late night at around $109.7/b. Through the day it traded in a range of $106.87 – 112.72/b amid a flurry of news or rumors from Iran and the US. ”US temporary sanctions during negotiations” (falls alarm). ”We will bomb Iran” (not anyhow),… etc. While the market is still fluctuating to this kind of news flow, it is starting to take such headlines with a pinch of salt.

We’ll see. Maybe, maybe not. The Brent M1 contract is trading at $110.2/b this morning which very close to the average ticks through yesterday of $110.4/b.
Trump with bearish, verbal intervention whenever Brent trades above $110/b it seems. What seems to be a pattern is that Trump states something like ”very good negotiations going on with Iran”, ”New leaders in Iran are great,..”, ”Great progress in negotiations,…”, ”Deal in sight,..” etc whenever the Brent M1 contract trades above $110/b. An effort to cool the market. These hot air verbal interventions from Trump used to have a heavy bearish impact on prices, but they now seems to have less and less effect unless they are backed by reality.
As far as we can see there has been no real progress in the negotiations between the US and Iran with both sides still standing by their previous demands.
Iran is getting stronger while the cease fire lasts making a return to war for Trump yet harder. Iran is naturally in constant preparation for a return to war given Trump’s steady threats of bombing Iran again. Iran is naturally doing what ever is possible to prepare for a return to war. And every day the cease fire lasts it is better prepared. This naturally makes it more and more difficult and dangerous for the US to return to warring activity versus Iran as the consequences for energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf will be more and more severe the longer the cease fire lasts. Israel seems to see it this way as well. That the war is not won and that current frozen state of a cease fire gives Iran opportunity to rebuild military and politically.
Global inventories are drawing down day by day. How much? In the meantime the Strait of Hormuz stays closed. There is varying measures and estimates of how much global inventories are drawing down. Our rough estimate, back of the envelope, is that global inventories are drawing down by at least some 10 mb/d or about 300 mb/d in a balance between loss of supply versus demand destruction. Other estimates we see are a monthly draw of 250-270 mb/d. The IEA only ’measured’ a draw in global observable stocks of 117 mb in April with oil on water rising 53 mb while on shore stocks fell 170 mb. But global stocks are hard to measure with large invisible, unmeasured stocks. As such a back of the envelope approach may be better.
Oil products is what the world is consuming. Oil product prices likely to rise while product stocks fall. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are predominantly crude oil. Discharging oil from OECD SPR stocks, a sharp reduction in Chinese crude imports and a reduction in global refinery throughput of 6-7 mb/d has helped to keep crude oil markets satisfactorily supplied. But global inventories are drawing down none the less. And oil products is really what the world is consuming. So if global refinery throughput stays subdued, then demand will eventually have to match the supply of oil products. The likely path forward this summer is a steady draw down in jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. Higher prices for these. Then, if possible, higher refinery throughput and higher usage of crude in response to very profitable refinery margins. And lastly sharper draw in crude stocks and higher prices for these. But some 6 mb/d of oil products used to be exported through the Strait of Hormuz. And it may not be so easy to ramp up refinery activity across the world to compensate. Especially as Ukraine continues to damage Russian refineries as well as Russian crude production and export facilities.
Watch oil product stocks and prices as well as Brent calendar 2027. What to watch for this summer is thus oil product inventories falling and oil product premiums to crude rising. Another measure to watch is the Brent crude 2027 contract as it rises steadily day by day as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed and global oil inventories decline. The latter is close to the highest level since the start of the war and keeps rising.
The Brent M1 contract and the Brent 2027 prices and current price of jet fuel in Europe (ARA). All in USD/b

Our back of the envelope calculation of the global shortage created by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Note that 3.5 mb/d of discharge from SPR is also a draw. Note also that ’Forced demand loss’ of 2.5 mb/d is probably temporary and will fall back towards zero as logistics are sorted out leaving ’Price demand loss’ to do the job of balancing the market. Thus a shortfall of at least 9 mb/d created by the closure. More if SPR discharge is included and more if Forced demand loss recedes.

Analys
Brent crude up USD 9/bl on the week… ”deal around the corner” narrative fades
Brent is climbing higher. Front-month is at USD 106.3/bl this morning, close to a weekly high and a USD 9/bl jump from Mondays open. This is the move we flagged as a risk earlier in the week: the market shifting from ”a deal is around the corner” to ”this is going to take longer than we thought”.

Analyst Commodities, SEB
During April, rest-of-year Brent remained remarkably stable around USD 90/bl. A stability which rested on one single assumption: the SoH reopens around 1 May. That assumption is now slowly falling apart.
As we highlighted yesterday: every week of delay beyond 1 May adds (theoretically) ish USD 5/bl to the rest-of-year average, as global inventories draw 100 million barrels per week. i.e., a mid-May reopening implies rest-of-year Brent closer to USD 100/bl, and anything pushing into June or July takes us meaningfully higher.
What’s changed in the last 48 hours:
#1: The US military has formally warned that clearing suspected sea mines from SoH could take up to six months. That is a completely different timescale from what the financial market is pricing. Even a political deal tomorrow does not immediately reopen the strait.
#2: Trump has shifted his tone from urgency to ”strategic patience”. In yesterday’s press conference: ”Don’t rush me… I want a great deal.” The market is reading this as a president no longer feeling pressured by timelines, with the naval blockade running in the background.
#3: So far, the military activity is escalating, not de-escalating. Axios reports Iran is laying more mines in SoH. The US 3rd carrier strike group (USS George H.W. Bush) is arriving with two countermine vessels. Trump yesterday ordered the US Navy to destroy any Iranian boats caught laying mines. While CNN reports that the Pentagon is actively drawing up plans to strike Iranian SoH capabilities and individual Iranian military leaders if the ceasefire collapses. i.e., NOT a attitude consistent with an imminent deal!
Spot crude and product prices eased off the early-April highs on a combination of system rerouting and deal optimism. Both now weakening. Goldman estimates April Gulf output is reduced by 14.5 mbl/d, or 57% of pre-war supply, a number that keeps getting worse the longer this drags on.
Demand-side adaptation is ongoing: S. Korea has cut its Middle East crude dependence from 69% to 56% by pulling more from the Americas and Africa, and Japan is kicking off a second round of SPR releases from 1 May. But SPRs are finite.
Ref. to the negotiations, we should not bet on speed. The current Iranian leadership is dominated by genuine hardliners willing to absorb economic pain and run the clock to extract concessions. That is not a setup for a rapid resolution. US/Israeli media briefings keep framing the delay as ”internal Iranian divisions”, the reality is more complicated and points toward weeks and months, not days.
Our point is that the complexity is large, and higher prices have only just started (given a scenario where the negotiations drag out in time). The market spent April leaning on the USD 90/bl rest-of-year assumption; that case is diminishing by the hour. If ”early May reopening” is replaced by ”June, July or later” over the next week or two, both crude and products have meaningful room to reprice higher from here. There is a high risk being short energy and betting on any immediate political resolution(!).
Analys
Market Still Betting on Timely Resolution, But Each Day Raises Shortage Risk
Down on Friday. Up on Monday. The Brent June crude oil contract traded down 5.1% last week to a close of $90.38/b. It reached a high of $103.87/b last Monday and a low of $86.09/b on Friday as Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz was fully open for transit. That quickly changed over the weekend as the US upheld its blockade of Iranian oil exports while Iran naturally responded by closing the SoH again. The US blew a hole in the engine room of the Iranian ship TOUSKA and took custody of the ship on Sunday. Brent crude is up 5.6% this morning to $95.4/b.

The cease-fire is expiring tomorrow. The US has said it will send a delegation for a second round of negotiations in Islamabad in Pakistan. But Iran has for now rejected a second round of talks as it views US demands as unrealistic and excessive while the US is also blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
While Brent is up 5% this morning, the financial market is still very optimistic that progress will be made. That talks will continue and that the SoH will fully open by the start of May which is consistent with a rest-of-year average Brent crude oil price of around $90/b with the market now trading that balance at around $88/b.
Financial optimism vs. physical deterioration. We have a divergence where the financial market is trading negotiations, improvements and resolution while at the same time the physical market is deteriorating day by day. Physical oil flows remain constrained by disrupted flows, longer voyage times and elevated freight and insurance costs.
Financial markets are betting that a US/Iranian resolution will save us in time from violent shortages down the road. But every day that the SoH remains closed is bringing us closer to a potentially very painful point of shortages and much higher prices.
The US blockade is also a weapon of leverage against its European and Asian allies. When Iran closed the SoH it held the world economy as a hostage against the US. The US blockade of the SoH is of course blocking Iranian oil exports. But it is also an action of disruption directed towards Europe and Asia. The US has called for the rest of the world to engaged in the war with Iran: ”If you want oil from the Persian Gulf, then go and get it”. A risk is that the US plays brinkmanship with the global oil market directed towards its European and Asian allies and maybe even towards China to force them to engage and take part. Maybe unthinkable. But unthinkable has become the norm with Trump in the White House.
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanSolkraften pressar elpriserna dagtid
-
Analys4 veckor sedanBrent crude up USD 9/bl on the week… ”deal around the corner” narrative fades
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanMichel Gubel ger sin syn på oljemarknaden
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanSvag vårflod dubblar elpriserna
-
Analys2 dagar sedanOil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer



