Analys
Peak oil-teorin har peakat – men har priset gjort det?

International Petroleum Week London
“Peak oil theory has peaked – but has the price peaked too?”
Under veckan besökte vi den årliga internationella petroleum konferensen i London. Vårt första intryck var lika starkt som tydligt; för sex år sedan pratade alla ”peak oil”, i år pratar alla ”shale revolution”. Nedan sammanfattar vi de fundamentala förutsättningarna på oljemarknaden inför konferensen samt de diskussioner som fördes såväl på podiet som i annexen över kaffe, snacks och drinkar.
Oljemarknadens hörnpelare skakar
Vi reste till London med bilden av en oljemarknad som på pappret ser ut att möta svåra prövningar under 2014. Brent, den nya globala standarden, har snittat 110 USD under de tre senaste åren, ett väldigt högt pris med historisk blick. Under 25 år fram till 2011 snittade brent 33 USD. På kort tid har konsensus långsiktiga syn med ett brentpris över 100 USD växt sig så starkt att man kan tro att vi alla föds med den vyn. Bloombergs konsensus-undersökning visar just nu 105 USD för december 14. Goda nyheter för oljeproducenter – mindre goda för oljeimporterande länder, speciellt de lidande i Europa som med en svag euro betalar mer för sin oljenota under eurokrisen än under prisspiken på 147 USD 2008. ”That´s the Europeans´ problem isn´t it?”, som en amerikansk producent kommenterade den saken.
Emerging Markets
Första och största utmaningen för året är Kina och de övriga snabbväxande icke OECDländerna. Detta kluster ska skapa väldens ökade oljekonsumtion under året genom att kompensera för fallande konsumtion i OECD orsakad av energieffektiviseringar. Kina står för 25 % av gruppens oljekonsumtion men landets ekonomi skakar. Sista kvartalet 2013 växte drakens revir med 7,7 %, den lägsta nivån på 14 år och vår prognos är att inbromsningen fortsätter till 7,5 % under 2014. Zoomar vi in på drakens aptit för olja har den mättats oroväckande fort. Under 2013 växte den bara med 1,6 % klart under IEA:s förväntning på 3,8%. Det gjorde faktiskt att USA blev världens snabbast växande oljekonsument i fat räknat 2013. Det gör också att Kina inte längre kan axla rollen som hörnpelaren på efterfrågesidan i ekvationen som ger ett oljepris över 100 USD.
Big Ben
Det slutar inte med Kina, icke OECD blocket har problem även utöver drakens matvanor. Västvärldens maniska stimulanser efter finanskrisen har gett EM ett lyft när investerare sökt bättre avkastning utanför sina hemmamarknader och på så vis gett EM-länderna tillgång till billig finansiering. Denna rörelse har triggat ett starkt behov av råvaror – däribland olja – till EM. När nu västvärldens fanbärare, Fed har vänt på klacken och börjat strypa tillgången på ”hot money” till EM så har det skakat om EM ordentligt, både i år när tapering började och i maj 2013 när tapering påkallades av Ben Bernanke.
Geopolitiken och OPEC
Den tredje skakande hörnpelaren är den geopolitiska oron. Oron kring Iran, oljetjuvar i Nigeria, sönderfallet i Irak och inbördeskriget i Libyen har alla eldat på oljepriset under de tre senaste åren. Omkring 3 millioner fat per dag i export ligger idag nere i dessa länder. Denna förlust kompenseras ganska precist av USA:s stigande produktion vilket skapat ett status quo för oljepriset trots den dramatiska omfördelningen i produktion de senaste åren. Nu börjar emellertid dessa problem att lätta. Irak har redan ökat exporten från de södra delarna med 0,3 Mbpd och landet säger sig kunna addera 1 Mbpd under året totalt.
Förhandlingarna med Iran har däremot klappat ihop och motsvarar inte längre förväntansbilden. Lättnader i sanktionerna innefattar ännu inte olja men om de fortsätter borde oljesanktionerna släppas i mitten av året och Irans oljeexport kan då påbörja en långsam återhämtning. Om det överhuvudtaget händer.
Libyen ser däremot hoppfullt ut. Exporten är uppdämd av strejker och hot från östra delarna av landet om att sälja olja oberoende av Tripoli. Det vore osannolikt att 2014 slutar utan en lösning och möjlighet för Libyen att säkra väl behövda exportinkomster från olja. Av de tre oroshärdarna är Libyen den som snabbast kan åstadkomma en prispåverkande export och därför den främste att hålla ögonen på.
OPEC:s situation kommer därmed försämras radikalt. De icke drabbade medlemmarna i kartellen har kunnat åtnjuta hög produktion till högt pris då tre av medlemmarnas export ofrivilligt legat nere. Återvänder Libyen, Iran och Irak till export återstår det att se hur intresserade Saudi är av att skära ner på produktionen för att lämna över inkomsterna till Irak (som ännu officiellt står utanför OPEC:s gemensamma produktionskvot) och Iran?
Vad tyckte folk på IP Week?
Enklast kan man dela upp diskussionspunkterna i vad som deltagarna generellt tycktes vara
väl överrens om:
- Brent som benchmark fungerar dåligt. Den underliggande produktionen är nu under 1 Mbpd och 60-70 % av den går till Asien. Ska Brent som benchmark överleva när Nordsjöns produktion faller måste kvalitéer från Afrika eller Ryssland inkluderas.
- Energiefterfrågan kommer att öka med icke OECD-ländernas framväxt.
- Elproduktion kommer ta en allt större del av oljekonsumtionen när EM får utökad tillgång till el.
- Energikonsumtionen är mättad i OECD och kommer minska i takt med energieffektiviseringar.
- Kina kommer öka energikonsumtionen fram till 2020 och sedan plana ut.
- Konceptet med ”peak oil” är utdött, var är Aleklett nu?
- Fossila bränslen kommer att dominera under en horisont fram till 2040
- Naturgas har växt fram som den mest prisvärda energiråvaran i kontexten av ett pris på CO2 utsläpp.
…och de områden där åsikterna starkt gick isär:
- Kommer kolanvändningen öka eller minska (beror på Kinas vägval för att lösa luftproblemen)
- Hur kommer efterfrågan på energi att påverkas av OECD:s allt effektivare energianvändande? (potentialen är enorm, energiförlusten innan den slutar som användbar värme eller kyla, ljus eller rörelse är förvånansvärt stor) .
- Kommer gas ersätta oljan i transportsektorn?
- Kommer el och/eller vätgasbilar ta betydelsefulla marknadsandelar från olja i transportsektorn?
Man kan konstatera att transportsektorns ökade andel av oljekonsumtionen förde sektorn högt på agendan. Utvecklingspotentialen i sektorn skapade diskussioner. Så gjorde även de nu inte lika aktuella klimatmålen. Osäkerheten kring hur mycket koldioxid som krävs för en grad uppvärmning divergerar mer än någonsin och gör diskussionerna hypotetiska. 2 gradsmålet verkar energiindustrin inte längre ta på allvar.
Analys
Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days

Brent Crude prices continued their decline heading into the weekend. On Friday, the price fell another USD 4 per barrel, followed by a further USD 3 per barrel drop this morning. This means Brent crude oil prices have crashed by a whopping USD 13 per barrel (-21%) since last Wednesday high, marking a significant decline in just four trading days. As of now, Brent crude is trading at USD 62.8 per barrel, its lowest point since February 2021.

The market has faced a ”quadruple whammy”:
#1: U.S. Tariffs: On Wednesday, the U.S. unveiled its new package of individual tariffs. The market reacted swiftly, as Trump followed through on his promise to rebalance the U.S. trade position with the world. His primary objective is a more balanced trade environment, which, naturally, weakened Brent crude prices. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is likely to fuel concerns about an economic slowdown, which would weaken global oil demand. This macroeconomic uncertainty, especially regarding tariffs, calls for caution about the pace of demand growth.
#2: OPEC+ hike: Shortly after, OPEC+ announced plans to raise production in May by 41,000 bpd, exceeding earlier expectations with a three-monthly increment. OPEC emphasized that strong market fundamentals and a positive outlook were behind the decision. However, the decision likely stemmed from frustration within the cartel, particularly after months of excess production from Kazakhstan and Iraq. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister seemed to have reached his limit, emphasizing that the larger-than-expected May output hike would only be a “prelude” if those countries didn’t improve their performance. From Saudi Arabia’s perspective, this signals: ”All comply, or we will drag down the price.”
#3: China’s retaliation: Last Friday, even though the Chinese market was closed, firm indications came from China on how it plans to handle the U.S. tariffs. China is clearly meeting force with force, imposing 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods. This move raises fears of an economic slowdown due to reduced global trade, which would consequently weaken global oil demand going forward.
#4: Saudi price cuts: At the start of this week, oil prices continued to drop after Saudi Arabia slashed its flagship crude price by the most in over two years. Saudi Arabia reduced the Arab Light OSP by USD 2.3 per barrel for Asia in May, while prices to Europe and the U.S. were also cut.
These four key factors have driven the massive price drop over the last four trading days. The overarching theme is the fear of weaker demand and stronger supply. The escalating trade war has raised concerns about a potential global recession, leading to weaker demand, compounded by the surprisingly large output hike from OPEC+.
That said, it’s worth questioning whether the market is underestimating the risk of a U.S.-Iran conflict this year.
U.S. military mobilization and Iran’s resistance to diplomacy have raised the risk of conflict. Efforts to neutralize the Houthis suggest a buildup toward potential strikes on Iran. The recent Liberation Day episode further underscores that economic fallout is not a constraint for Trump, and markets may be underestimating the threat of war in the Middle East.
With this backdrop, we continue to forecast USD 70 per barrel for this year (2025). For reference, Brent crude averaged USD 75 per barrel in Q1-2025.
Analys
Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May

Collapsing after Trump tariffs and large surprise production hike by OPEC+ in May. Brent crude collapsed yesterday following the shock of the Trump tariffs on April 2 and even more so due to the unexpected announcement from OPEC+ that they will lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is three times as much as expected. Brent fell 6.4% yesterday with a close of USD 70.14/b and traded to a low of USD 69.48/b within the day. This morning it is down another 2.7% to USD 68.2/b. That is below the recent low point in early March of USD 68.33/b. Thus, a new ”lowest since December 2021” today.

Kazakhstan seems to be the problem and the reason for the unexpected large hike by OPEC+ in May. Kazakhstan has consistently breached its production cap. In February it produced 1.83 mb/d crude and 2.12 mb/d including condensates. In March its production reached a new record of 2.17 mb/d. Its crude production cap however is 1.468 mb/d. In February it thus exceeded its production cap by 362 kb/d.
Those who comply are getting frustrated with those who don’t. Internal compliance is an important and difficult issue when OPEC+ is holding back production. The problem naturally grows the bigger the cuts are and the longer they last as impatience grows over time. The cuts have been large, and they have lasted for a long time. And now some cracks are appearing. But that does not mean they cannot be mended. And it does not imply either that the group is totally shifting strategy from Price to Volume. It is still a measured approach. Also, by lifting all caps across the voluntary cutters, Kazakhstan becomes less out of compliance. Thus, less cuts by Kazakhstan are needed in order to become compliant.
While not a shift from Price to Volume, the surprise hike in May is clearly a sign of weakness. The struggle over internal compliance has now led to a rupture in strategy and more production in May than what was previously planned and signaled to the market. It is thus natural to assign a higher production path from the group for 2025 than previously assumed. Do however remember how quickly the price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia ended in the spring of 2020.
Higher production by OPEC+ will be partially countered by lower production from Venezuela and Iran. The new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela can to a large degree counter the production increase from OPEC+. But to what extent is still unclear.
Buy some oil calls. Bullish risks are never far away. Rising risks for US/Israeli attack on Iran? The US has increased its indirect attacks on Iran by fresh attacks on Syria and Yemen lately. The US has also escalated sanctions towards the country in an effort to force Iran into a new nuclear deal. The UK newspaper TheSun yesterday ran the following story: ”ON THE BRINK US & Iran war is ‘INEVITABLE’, France warns as Trump masses huge strike force with THIRD of America’s stealth bombers”. This is indeed a clear risk which would lead to significant losses of supply of oil in the Middle East and probably not just from Iran. So, buying some oil calls amid the current selloff is probably a prudent thing to do for oil consumers.
Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons. New painful tariffs from Trump in combination with more oil from OPEC+ is not a great combination.

Analys
Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.
However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.
Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.
Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.
Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.
Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.
Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.
___
US DOE data:
Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.
U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.
The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.
Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Ticking higher as tariff-panic eases. Demand growth and OPEC+ will be key
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude prices hold gains amid fresh tariff threats
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Ett samtal om råvarorna som behövs för batterier
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Tysklands SEFE skriver avtal om att köpa 1,5 miljarder ton LNG per år från Delfin i USA
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
700 timmar med negativa elpriser och dyrare biobränsle gav lägre resultat för Jämtkraft
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Danska Seaborg Technologies siktar på serieproduktion av smältsaltsreaktorer till mitten av 2030-talet
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Brent Edges Lower After Resisting Equity Slump – Sanctions, Saudi Pricing in Focus
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Oljepriserna slaktas på samtidiga negativa faktorer