Analys
OPEC must talk bearish on the curve
It was nothing wrong with OPEC’s decision on November 30th to cut production in H1-17 by 1.16 mb/d versus October levels. What they did wrong and why their decision ended up being close to a shot in their own foot rather than a solution was their communication. When they decided to cut they gave a shine that they actually were back as a price setting organisation. Not just for the short term but also for the medium to longer term. The feel from the organisation at the end of November last year was the communication, stated or not, that OPEC don’t want an oil price below $50/b and that OPEC is aiming for an oil price of $60/b and lastly that OPEC was ready to use its size and muscles to support and achieve that. OPEC gave the shine that it was not just about a short term operation of draining the inventories. OPEC was actually there to support the level of $50/b and aim for $60/b. They probably had some remote hope and dream as well that they could actually deliver on this over the medium to longer term. I.e. that OPEC would again become the factor in the market setting the oil price within reasonable ranges. Deep down however they know that this is not in their power. In the longer term they have no control over prices. If the oil price heads to $30/b or $70/b (+/- $20/b versus today’s spot price) over the longer term it will have nothing to do with OPEC’s decisions but instead have all to do with technology, economic growth, investment cycles, resource availability etc. OPEC’s primary goal is to draw down current elevated inventories in order to remove the spot price discount versus longer dated contracts (whatever they might be). Last year that discount was $12/b and that cost OPEC a lost income of $150-200 bn as the organisation is mostly selling crude oil at spot prices.
It is in OPEC’s power to cut production and draw down inventories in the short term and thus remove the discount in crude oil spot prices. That is what they want. When the job is done the plan is to move back into full production again. That is however difficult if non-OPEC production has risen since when OPEC started to cut. That is the problem with the rising US crude oil production. It might be problematic for OPEC to move back into full production again once inventories have drawn down. So OPEC can cut as long as non-OPEC doesn’t revive when they do it. And that is where OPEC failed when they gave the shine that they were there also for the medium to longer term to support and set prices. “OPEC is back” was the perception. The result of OPEC’s actions, production cut decision and communication was that the medium term WTI forward crude oil prices rose from $52/b to $55-56/b and thus accelerated US shale oil recovery even more. And now we are here with US crude oil production at 9.1 mb/d and possibly reaching 9.5 mb/d in the end of May (if we extrapolate US production trend since the start of the year) when OPEC meets in Vienna on the 25th of that month.
OPEC can extend and cut production successfully in H2-17 but only if they get the communication right. They need to make it entirely clear that they have no plan to support or steer oil prices in any direction or to support the oil price at any specific level in the medium to longer term other than what the market actually stets it at. Everybody knows this anyhow it is just that markets so easily mislead themselves and gets side-lined from reality for periods. If OPEC wants to cut and draw down inventories they need to talk bearish on the curve in order to prevent it from rising while they cut since a rise in the curve would lead to an acceleration in US shale oil production and thus make it difficult for OPEC to move back into full operation again following the cuts. OPEC should make it clear that they plan to increase production according to their current market share along with global oil demand growth. OPEC has an overall market share of about 40%. If global demand grows with 1.3 mb/d then OPEC should make it clear that they plan to increase their production by 0.5 mb/d every year going forward. OPEC’s market dream is a tight spot oil market with high spot prices holding a substantial premium to longer dated prices. That would hand them a nice cash flow from spot crude oil sales while the much lower medium to longer dated oil prices constantly works to temper non-OPEC investments. A medium term forward WTI curve at $45/b would do the trick. So OPEC needs to talk bearish on the curve if they want to be successful with the cuts. If OPEC follows this strattegy it does of course mean downside risk for the medium to longer dated contracts. That will of course be no prediciton of where spot crude oil prices will deliver in the end. The forward curve is a tool in order to control investments in new oil production. More so than ever before with agile shale invenstments reacting directly on where the level of the forward prices are.
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Crude oil comment: US inventories remain well below averages despite yesterday’s build
Brent crude prices have remained stable since the sharp price surge on Monday afternoon, when the price jumped from USD 71.5 per barrel to USD 73.5 per barrel – close to current levels (now trading at USD 73.45 per barrel). The initial price spike was triggered by short-term supply disruptions at Norway’s Johan Sverdrup field and Kazakhstan’s Tengiz field.
While the disruptions in Norway have been resolved and production at Tengiz is expected to return to full capacity by the weekend, elevated prices have persisted. The market’s focus has now shifted to heightened concerns about an escalation in the war in Ukraine. This geopolitical uncertainty continues to support safe-haven assets, including gold and government bonds. Consequently, safe-haven currencies such as the U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, and Swiss franc have also strengthened.
U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 0.5 million barrels last week, according to U.S DOE. This build contrasts with expectations, as consensus had predicted no change (0.0 million barrels), and the API forecast projected a much larger increase of 4.8 million barrels. With last week’s build, crude oil inventories now stand at 430.3 million barrels, yet down 18 million barrels(!) compared to the same week last year and ish 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Gasoline inventories rose by 2.1 million barrels (still 4% below their five-year average), defying consensus expectations of a slight draw of 0.1 million barrels. Distillate (diesel) inventories, on the other hand, fell by 0.1 million barrels, aligning closely with expectations of no change (0.0 million barrels) but also remain 4% below their five-year average. In total, combined stocks of crude, gasoline, and distillates increased by 2.5 million barrels last week.
U.S. demand data showed mixed trends. Over the past four weeks, total petroleum products supplied averaged 20.7 million barrels per day, representing a 1.2% increase compared to the same period last year. Motor gasoline demand remained relatively stable at 8.9 million barrels per day, a 0.5% rise year-over-year. In contrast, distillate fuel demand continued to weaken, averaging 3.8 million barrels per day, down 6.4% from a year ago. Jet fuel demand also softened, falling 1.3% compared to the same four-week period in 2023.
Analys
China is turning the corner and oil sentiment will likely turn with it
Brent crude is maintaining its gains from Monday and ticking yet higher. Brent crude made a jump of 3.2% on Monday to USD 73.5/b and has managed to maintain the gain since then. Virtually no price change yesterday and opening this morning at USD 73.3/b.
Emerging positive signs from the Chinese economy may lift oil market sentiment. Chinese economic weakness in general and shockingly weak oil demand there has been pestering the oil price since its peak of USD 92.2/b in mid-April. Net Chinese crude and product imports has been negative since May as measured by 3mth y/y changes. This measure reached minus 10% in July and was still minus 3% in September. And on a year to Sep, y/y it is down 2%. Chinese oil demand growth has been a cornerstone of global oil demand over the past decades accounting for a growth of around half a million barrels per day per year or around 40% of yearly global oil demand growth. Electrification and gassification (LNG HDTrucking) of transportation is part of the reason, but that should only have weakened China’s oil demand growth and not turned it abruptly negative. Historically it has been running at around +3-4% pa.
With a sense of ’no end in sight’ for China’ ills and with a trade war rapidly approaching with Trump in charge next year, the oil bears have been in charge of the oil market. Oil prices have moved lower and lower since April. Refinery margins have also fallen sharply along with weaker oil products demand. The front-month gasoil crack to Brent peaked this year at USD 34.4/b (premium to Brent) in February and fell all the way to USD 14.4/b in mid October. Several dollar below its normal seasonal level. Now however it has recovered to a more normal, healthy seasonal level of USD 18.2/b.
But Chinese stimulus measures are already working. The best immediate measure of that is the China surprise index which has rallied from -40 at the end of September to now +20. This is probably starting to filter in to the oil market sentiment.
The market has for quite some time now been staring down towards the USD 60/b. But this may now start to change with a bit more optimistic tones emerging from the Chinese economy.
China economic surprise index (white). Front-month ARA Gasoil crack to Brent in USD/b (blue)
The IEA could be too bearish by up to 0.8 mb/d. IEA’s calculations for Q3-24 are off by 0.8 mb/d. OECD inventories fell by 1.16 mb/d in Q3 according to the IEA’s latest OMR. But according to the IEA’s supply/demand balance the decline should only have been 0.38 mb/d. I.e. the supply/demand balance of IEA for Q3-24 was much less bullish than how the inventories actually developed by a full 0.8 mb/d. If we assume that the OECD inventory changes in Q3-24 is the ”proof of the pudding”, then IEA’s estimated supply/demand balance was off by a full 0.8 mb/d. That is a lot. It could have a significant consequence for 2025 where the IEA is estimating that call-on-OPEC will decline by 0.9 mb/d y/y according to its estimated supply/demand balance. But if the IEA is off by 0.8 mb/d in Q3-24, it could be equally off by 0.8 mb/d for 2025 as a whole as well. Leading to a change in the call-on-OPEC of only 0.1 mb/d y/y instead. Story by Bloomberg: {NSN SMXSUYT1UM0W <GO>}. And looking at US oil inventories they have consistently fallen significantly more than normal since June this year. See below.
Later today at 16:30 CET we’ll have the US oil inventory data. Bearish indic by API, but could be a bullish surprise yet again. Last night the US API indicated that US crude stocks rose by 4.8 mb, gasoline stocks fell by 2.5 mb and distillates fell by 0.7 mb. In total a gain of 1.6 mb. Total US crude and product stocks normally decline by 3.7 mb for week 46.
The trend since June has been that US oil inventories have been falling significantly versus normal seasonal trends. US oil inventories stood 16 mb above the seasonal 2015-19 average on 21 June. In week 45 they ended 34 mb below their 2015-19 seasonal average. Recent news is that US Gulf refineries are running close to max in order to satisfy Lat Am demand for oil products.
US oil inventories versus the 2015-19 seasonal averages.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Europe’s largest oil field halted – driving prices higher
Since market opening on Monday, November 18, Brent crude prices have climbed steadily. Starting the week at approximately USD 70.7 per barrel, prices rose to USD 71.5 per barrel by noon yesterday. However, in the afternoon, Brent crude surged by nearly USD 2 per barrel, reaching USD 73.5 per barrel, which is close to where we are currently trading.
This sharp price increase has been driven by supply disruptions at two major oil fields: Norway’s Johan Sverdrup and Kazakhstan’s Tengiz. The Brent benchmark is now continuing to trade above USD 73 per barrel as the market reacts to heightened concerns about short-term supply tightness.
Norway’s Johan Sverdrup field, Europe’s largest and one of the top 10 globally in terms of estimated recoverable reserves, temporarily halted production on Monday afternoon due to an onshore power outage. According to Equinor, the issue was quickly identified but resulted in a complete shutdown of the field. Restoration efforts are underway. With a production capacity of 755,000 barrels per day, Sverdrup accounts for approximately 36% of Norway’s total oil output, making it a critical player in the country’s production. The unexpected outage has significantly supported Brent prices as the market evaluates its impact on overall supply.
Adding to the bullish momentum, supply constraints at Kazakhstan’s Tengiz field have further intensified concerns. Tengiz, with a production capacity of around 700,000 barrels per day, has seen output cut by approximately 30% this month due to ongoing repairs, exceeding earlier estimates of a 20% reduction. Repairs are expected to conclude by November 23, but in the meantime, supply tightness persists, amplifying market vol.
On a broader scale, a pullback in the U.S. dollar yesterday (down 0.15%) provided additional tailwinds for crude prices, making oil more attractive to international buyers. However, over the past few weeks, Brent crude has alternated between gains and losses as market participants juggle multiple factors, including U.S. monetary policy, concerns over Chinese demand, and the evolving supply strategy of OPEC+.
The latter remains a critical factor, as unused production capacity within OPEC continues to exert downward pressure on prices. An acceleration in the global economy will be crucial to improving demand fundamentals.
Despite these short-term fluctuations, we see encouraging signs of a recovering global economy and remain moderately bullish. We are holding to our price forecast of USD 75 per barrel in 2025, followed by USD 87.5 in 2026.
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: A price rise driven by fundamentals
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Recent ’geopolitical relief’ seems premature
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guldpriset stiger hela tiden till nya rekord
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
ABB och Blykalla samarbetar om teknikutveckling för små modulära reaktorer
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Oljepriset kommer gå upp till 500 USD per fat år 2030
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Brent resumes after yesterday’s price tumble
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Iran’s silence hints at a new geopolitical reality
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Michel Rufli förklarar vad som händer på guldmarknaden