Analys
OPEC+ in comfortable position as U.S. shale oil slows down


This week is the week of monthly oil market reports from the three main energy organisations IEA, EIA and OPEC. The US EIA is first out with its monthly update today at 18:00 CET. Then OPEC on Wednesday and the IEA on Thursday at 10:00 CET.
We expect to see a further downward revision today of U.S. shale oil production growth for 2020 today by the U.S. EIA. In its data tables it does not specify shale oil production specifically but its projection for “Lower 48 States (excl. GOM)” is pretty much shale oil production. In its December report it projected U.S. shale oil production to grow by only 0.3 m bl/d from Dec-19 to Dec-20. That’s a far cry from the booming production growth of 1.74 m bl/d from Dec-17 to Dec-18. It also projected basically flat U.S. shale oil production in H2-20 with a contraction at the very end of the year. We expect these projections to be reduced further in its report today.

Schlumberger yesterday commented that most U.S. production projections are probably too high with peak production now reached in both Bakken and Eagle Ford. Further that at a WTI price of $55/bl there would be no production growth in the years to come and that at a WTI price of $70/bl U.S. production will probably grow at a yearly rate of 0.5 m bl/d per year. The WTI forward 5-year price strip is currently trading at $53/bl ($50.5/bl real-term).
We fully agree with Schlumberger’s comment yesterday. We have frequently seen statements from Rystad Energy about the waste reserves of U.S. shale oil deposits. We agree with that too and that U.S. shale oil production can grow robustly and even at a stunning pace also in the years to come. The big question is at what price will/can this happen while at the same time keeping investors satisfied with their returns on investments. Schlumberger’s comment yesterday is basically that there will be no further growth at the current forward WTI price level and that the forward WTI price needs to be lifted to $70/bl in order to get a 0.5 m bl/d US shale oil production growth in the years to come.
Add to this that non-OPEC, non-US crude oil production is increasingly projected to be in contraction from 2021 onwards as a result of the deep slump in off-shore investments since the oil price took a dive in 2014. Investments were booming in the five years running up to 2014. That led to a stream of new supply coming online during the following five years of 2015/16/17/18/19. Over the past five years the world has been feeding off legacy off-shore investments from 2014 and before as well as a hugely debt-driven U.S. shale oil production growth.
The year 2020 is probably going to be the last year of new non-OPEC, non-US production coming online in a magnitude that offsets production declines. I.e. non-OPEC, non-US production is likely to be in sideways to lower from 2021 onwards due to the slump in investments in this sector since 2014.
This should leave OPEC(+) in a very good position already by the middle of this year and for quite a few years after that. Why on earth should OPEC(+) throw in the towel on its “price over volume” strategy when the forward horizon looks like this? We don’t think they will. And that is of course hugely important for the oil price outlook for 2020. By and large the more significant oil price moves since mid-2014 (when Saudi Arabia stopped defending the oil price) has plain and simply been decided by shifts in OPEC(+)’s strategy between “price over volume” and “volume over price”. So if OPEC(+) sticks to “price over volume” as we think they will (we see increasing compliance to pledges) then Brent is unlikely to average sub-$60/bl in 2020.
Our Brent crude oil 2020 price forecast of $70/bl was largely viewed as close to outrageously high just a few months ago. Now we see that forecasts are gradually lifted higher and calls for $65-75/bl Brent crude oil price range in 2020 are starting to emerge as US shale oil production growth continues to slow and OPEC(+) sticks to its “price over volume” strategy. Add some improvements in global manufacturing and this will likely be the view of many.
Ch1: Strategy by OPEC(+). “Price over volume” or “Volume over price”.
Saudi Arabia did not increase production from mid-2014 but it started to lower its official selling prices and stopped defending the oil price. It could have lowered its production and defended the price, but it didn’t. So basically, it shifted to “volume over price” already in mid-2014 even if it did not become official before the OPEC meeting at the end of 2014.
The strategy shifted to “price over volume” at the OPEC meeting on November 30 in 2016 with additional help from 10 non-OPEC countries. The strategy then shifted back to “volume over price” for a brief period from June 2018 to Dec 2018 before cuts were implemented again. The strategy is currently “price over volume” and we think OPEC(+) will stick comfortably with this strategy in 2020.

Analys
A deliberate measure to push oil price lower but it is not the opening of the floodgates

Hurt by US tariffs and more oil from OPEC+. Brent crude fell 2.1% yesterday to USD 71.62/b and is down an additional 0.9% this morning to USD 71/b. New tariff-announcements by Donald Trump and a decision by OPEC+ to lift production by 138 kb/d in April is driving the oil price lower.

The decision by OPEC+ to lift production is a deliberate decision to get a lower oil price. All the members in OPEC+ wants to produce more as a general rule. Their plan and hope for a long time has been that they could gradually revive production back to a more normal level without pushing the oil price lower. As such they have postponed the planned production increases time and time again. Opting for price over volume. Waiting for the opportunity to lift production without pushing the price lower. And now it has suddenly changed. They start to lift production by 138 kb/d in April even if they know that the oil market this year then will run a surplus. Donald Trump is the reason.
Putin, Muhammed bin Salman (MBS) and Trump all met in Riyadh recently to discuss the war in Ukraine. They naturally discussed politics and energy and what is most important for each and one of them. Putin wants a favorable deal in Ukraine, MBS may want harsher measures towards Iran while Trump amongst other things want a lower oil price. The latter is to appease US consumers to which he has promised a lower oil price. A lower oil price over the coming two years could be good for Trump and the Republicans in the mid-term elections if a lower oil price makes US consumers happy. And a powerful Trump for a full four years is also good for Putin and MBS.
This is not the opening of the floodgates. It is not the start of blindly lifting production each month. It is still highly measured and controlled. It is about lowering the oil price to a level that is acceptable for Putin, MBS, Trump, US oil companies and the US consumers. Such an imagined ”target price” or common denominator is clearly not USD 50-55/b. US production would in that case fall markedly and the finances of Saudi Arabia and Russia would hurt too badly. The price is probably somewhere in the USD 60ies/b.
Brent crude averaged USD 99.5/b, USD 82/b and USD 80/b in 2022, 2023 and 2024 respectively. An oil price of USD 65/b is markedly lower in the sense that it probably would be positively felt by US consumers. The five-year Brent crude oil contract is USD 67/b. In a laxed oil market with little strain and a gradual rise in oil inventories we would see a lowering of the front-end of the Brent crude curve so that the front-end comes down to the level of the longer dated prices. The longer-dated prices usually soften a little bit as well when this happens. The five-year Brent contract could easily slide a couple of dollars down to USD 65/b versus USD 67/b.
Brent crude 1 month contract in USD/b. USD 68.68/b is the level to watch out for. It was the lowpoint in September last year. Breaking below that will bring us to lowest level since December 2021.

Analys
Brent whacked down yet again by negative Trump-fallout

Sharply lower yesterday with negative US consumer confidence. Brent crude fell like a rock to USD 73.02/b (-2.4%) yesterday following the publishing of US consumer confidence which fell to 98.3 in February from 105.3 in January (100 is neutral). Intraday Brent fell as low as USD 72.7/b. The closing yesterday was the lowest since late December and at a level where Brent frequently crossed over from September to the end of last year. Brent has now lost both the late December, early January Trump-optimism gains as well as the Biden-spike in mid-Jan and is back in the range from this Autumn. This morning it is staging a small rebound to USD 73.2/b but with little conviction it seems. The US sentiment readings since Friday last week is damaging evidence of the negative fallout Trump is creating.

Evidence growing that Trump-turmoil are having negative effects on the US economy. The US consumer confidence index has been in a seesaw pattern since mid-2022 and the reading yesterday was reached twice in 2024 and close to it also in 2023. But the reading yesterday needs to be seen in the context of Donald Trump being inaugurated as president again on 20 January. The reading must thus be interpreted as direct response by US consumers to what Trump has been doing since he became president and all the uncertainty it has created. The negative reading yesterday also falls into line with the negative readings on Friday, amplifying the message that Trump action will indeed have a negative fallout. At least the first-round effects of it. The market is staging a small rebound this morning to USD 73.3/b. But the genie is out of the bottle: Trump actions is having a negative effect on US consumers and businesses and thus the US economy. Likely effects will be reduced spending by consumers and reduced capex spending by businesses.
Brent crude falling lowest since late December and a level it frequently crossed during autumn.

White: US Conference Board Consumer Confidence (published yesterday). Blue: US Services PMI Business activity (published last Friday). Red: US University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment (published last Friday). All three falling sharply in February. Indexed 100 on Feb-2022.

Analys
Crude oil comment: Price reaction driven by intensified sanctions on Iran

Brent crude prices bottomed out at USD 74.20 per barrel at the close of trading on Friday, following a steep decline from USD 77.15 per barrel on Thursday evening (February 20th). During yesterday’s trading session, prices steadily climbed by roughly USD 1 per barrel (1.20%), reaching the current level of USD 75 per barrel.

Yesterday’s price rebound, which has continued into today, is primarily driven by recent U.S. actions aimed at intensifying pressure on Iran. These moves were formalized in the second round of sanctions since the presidential shift, specifically targeting Iranian oil exports. Notably, the U.S. Treasury Department has sanctioned several Iran-related oil companies, added 13 new tankers to the OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) sanctions list, and sanctioned individuals, oil brokers, and terminals connected to Iran’s oil trade.
The National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 now calls for the U.S. to ”drive Iran’s oil exports to zero,” further asserting that Iran ”can never be allowed to acquire or develop nuclear weapons.” This intensified focus on Iran’s oil exports is naturally fueling market expectations of tighter supply. Yet, OPEC+ spare capacity remains robust, standing at 5.3 million barrels per day, with Saudi Arabia holding 3.1 million, the UAE 1.1 million, Iraq 600k, and Kuwait 400k. As such, any significant price spirals are not expected, given the current OPEC+ supply buffer.
Further contributing to recent price movements, OPEC has yet to decide on its stance regarding production cuts for Q2 2025. The group remains in control of the market, evaluating global supply and demand dynamics on a monthly basis. Given the current state of the market, we believe there is limited capacity for additional OPEC production without risking further price declines.
On a more bullish note, Iraq reaffirmed its commitment to the OPEC+ agreement yesterday, signaling that it would present an updated plan to compensate for any overproduction, which supports ongoing market stability.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Belgien gör en u-sväng, går från att lägga ner kärnkraft till att bygga ny
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Priset på arabica-kaffebönor är nu över 4 USD per pund för första gången någonsin
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Glansen är tillbaka på guldet
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
The Damocles Sword of OPEC+ hanging over US shale oil producers
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Balancing act
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oill comment: Caught between trade war fears and Iranian supply disruption risk
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guldpriset stiger till över 1 miljon kronor per kilo
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Christian Kopfer om guld, olja och stål