Analys
Oil and Dollar – A self-reinforcing feedback loop

There is an intimate relationship between the oil price and the USD. Looking back at the crude oil price and the USD Index since 2013 they are mirror images of each other. We argue that it is not only a one way street from a weaker USD to a nominally higher crude oil price. There is also likely a link from a stronger crude oil price to a weaker USD as well. In addition we also have that OPEC & Co is forcing the oil price higher through their cuts while Donald Trump is promoting a softer USD amid a global economy which is reviving. We are currently in a Merry-go-round circle which is feeding on itself pushing crude prices higher, the USD lower which again is bullish for Emerging Markets which is bullish again for commodity demand,… If the circle is not stopped by verbal intervention from either OPEC & Co on the oil price or ECB on the Eurodollar side then this circle could spiral higher with Brent crude rising another 10% to $77/bl while the USD Index moves back to its 2014 level of 80 points. But both the dollar and crude prices are technically very stretch at the moment and ripe for corrections.
Price action – Higher on a softer USD and bullish WTI on Cushing draw
Yesterday the USD Index fell 1% while the Brent 1mth contract gained 0.8% to $70.53/bl. Brent crude thus actually fell 0.2% in real terms. The dollar was trading lower and lower all through the day. Brent crude also traded in bearish territory most of the day while it normally should have taken a bullish queue from the softer USD. The view that Brent has gone too far already probably weighted on the crude oil price. Brent was trying to move lower while the softening USD Index pulled stronger and stronger in the bullish direction.
Brent crude caved in to bullish push from the weaker dollar when the US inventory data came in at 16:30 CET. It showed that US crude stocks declined 1.1 m bl last week while the market had feared a gain of 4.8 m bl following the indicative numbers from API on Tuesday evening. Great relief. No decline. In addition the crude stocks in Cushing declined a full 3.2 m bl which gave a real boost to WTI crude prices relative to Brent crude. All in all for crude, gasoline and middle distillates there was a rise of 3.6 m bl which is not really all bullish. However, it was clearly bullish for WTI crude prices versus Brent and the whole mood just turned bullish. The Brent bears caved in to the bullish push from WTI and the strong bullish push from the weaker USD and up it went. This morning we have some follow-through as the USD Index declines another 0.2% while Brent trades 0.5% higher at $70.9/bl.
A higher crude oil price is dollar bearish – The feedback loop
A pure 50% devaluation of the USD would obviously lead to a doubling of the nominal crude oil price. The dollar is just a unit of measure. If the yardstick shrinks by 50% then the amount measured will have to double.
There is also another effect in reverse. If the crude oil price increases strongly then it is also dollar bearish and if it falls strongly it is dollar bullish. This is probably why we have such an incredible mirror image of the USD Index and the Brent crude oil price since 2013. The huge drop in the Brent crude oil price from mid-2014 was not driven by a weaker USD but by surplus crude and OPEC moving from a price game to a market share game.
In 2014 the US had a net petroleum import of 5 m bl/d and China imported of 6 m bl/d. Every dollar increase in the crude oil price results in a $4bn increase in the yearly expenditure of USD for China and US crude imports.
From mid-2014 the crude oil price moved from $110/bl to a low of $27/bl in early 2016. That is a decline of 83 dollar per barrel. If this difference sustained for a full year it would have and impact of $333bn. In comparison the US trade deficit is roughly $500bn per year. So the oil price drop equaled a 70% drop in the US trade deficit in terms of magnitude.
When the US spends USD on oil imports it receives crude oil and sends USD into the global market place. First into the pockets of global oil producers like Russia and OPEC. Then these dollars are spent in the global market place by them. A high crude oil price results in a larger flow of dollar from the US into the global market place and is thus dollar bearish. Russia for example will have a good dollar situation when the oil price is high as it receives a lot of USDs. A sharp decline in the oil price leads to less dollar being sent out of the US to global oil producers and into the global market place and is thus dollar bullish.
Most other countries than the US do not have this impact on the dollar cycle because they do not have dollar as their currency. When Europe for example purchases and imports crude oil it has to first buy the dollars in the global market place in exchange for euros. Then it spends the dollar for oil sending them to Russia and OPEC which then sends them back into the global market place when they spend it. Thus Europe’s oil imports are dollar neutral in terms of varying crude oil prices.
China is however a different case than most other countries. It has a dollar surplus to start with due to its trade surplus with the US. Normally this surplus of dollars are recirculated back into the US as China buys US treasuries, different bonds, equities or other US assets. A part of China’s dollar surplus is however spent on its crude oil imports and is thus fed to Russia or OPEC and then into the global market. China does not need to go into the market in the first place to purchase the dollar which it spends on crude oil imports. When the price of crude oil falls sharply then China will spend less of its surplus of dollar on crude oil and instead recirculate it back into the US by purchasing US assets. So a sharply lower oil price means China will feed a significantly lower amount of dollar into the global market place. Due to its dollar surplus and dollar recycling China is not dollar neutral in its crude oil import as Europe is.
The crude oil price has moved higher since early 2016 and sharply higher since June 2017. It has probably had an impact on the USD as it means a larger flow of dollar from the US and from China being fed into the global offshore dollar market via global oil producers like OPEC and Russia. It has relieved a dollar shortage among the world’s oil producers
At the moment there is thus likely a self-reinforcing cycle feeding a higher crude oil price and a softer USD. The USD is of course primed for weakness due to other reasons as well. That is also the case for Brent crude for which OPEC & Co has set the market up for tightness. So crude oil moves higher, the dollar moves lower which again implies a higher nominal crude price. The softer dollar is also EM bullish as it reduces their dollar payment burden of debt. So softer dollar leads to more bullish EM which again means stronger commodity demand and again a higher oil price. That’s a great Merry go round circle!
In the shorter term we are likely set for a correction in the dollar weakening. Verbal intervention from the ECB is probable. That would also likely be a trigger for a correction in Brent crude as it now has the most technically stretched level since 2011.
However, if there really is significant relationship going from the crude oil price to to dollar it means that the current crude oil price revival is now pointing us in the direction of a dollar Index level which we last saw back in 2014 which is another 10% lower at an index level of 80. A 10% softer USD also means a 10% nominally higher crude oil price. The current [oil to dollar] feeding cycle can thus go upwards/downwards to $77/bl for Brent crude oil and to 80 for the dollar index unless OPEC & Co stops the oil rally or the ECB stops the euro appreciation and the dollar weakening.
Chart 1: US dollar and oil – The mirror image
Chart 2: The market is tight as in 2013/14 shown by Brent spot versus Brent 1mth contract
Chart 3: Deliberate OPEC & Co production cuts of 2.1 m bl/d
Sum of cuts not including gains by Libya, Nigeria etc
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).
Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.
The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.
Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.


Analys
Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.
As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.
Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.
However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.
That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.
The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.
Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.
In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.
Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.
Analys
A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.
It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.
No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.
What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend.
The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Stor uppsida i Lappland Guldprospekterings aktie enligt analys
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Brookfield ska bygga ett AI-datacenter på hela 750 MW i Strängnäs
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Sommaren inleds med sol och varierande elpriser
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
OPEC+ ökar oljeproduktionen trots fallande priser
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Silverpriset släpar efter guldets utveckling, har mer uppsida
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent needs to fall to USD 58/b to make cheating unprofitable for Kazakhstan
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tradingfirman XTX Markets bygger datacenter i finska Kajana för 1 miljard euro
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Uppgången i oljepriset planade ut under helgen