Analys
It’s artificial, but is still real and prices will tick higher

Donald’s tweet on Friday that the OPEC cartel is keeping oil prices artificially high sent Brent crude down to an intraday low of $72.88/bl. The market later in the day totally disregarded the tweet sending Brent to its highest close of the week at $74.06/bl, up $0.4/bl on the day, +2% w/w and the highest close since November 2014. Of course Donald is totally right. The market is artificially tight because the OPEC+ cartel has deliberately cut production. In total its production is down 1.7 m bl/d versus Oct 2016. In our view there were deliberate cuts of 2,052 k bl/d in February if we cut out involuntary cuts of 810 k bl/d and production gains of 1,146 k bl/d. Of course Donald is right that it is the OPEC+ cartel which is driving the market. Tell us something new! That has been the case since their decision in October 2016. Of course the cartel has been lucky since their strategy has been supported by synchronised global growth and very strong oil demand growth as well as production in Venezuela falling like a rock. If it had not been for the very strong global oil demand growth their strategy would probably have been very close to failure since US crude oil production is reviving so strongly. In our estimate they will not be able to exit their cuts in 2019 without driving global inventories back up again. That is why an extension of their agreement to 2019 is on the agenda for the meeting in Vienna on June 20/21/22. So the market is artificially tight but it is the oil market reality of today. They are cutting, oil demand is strong, inventories are going down and prices are moving higher. The OPEC+ cartel will in our view be in control of the market in 2019 unless we have a global recession. They can put some of their cuts back into the market, but not all. Any involuntary production cuts by Venezuela, Libya, Mexico or possibly Iran will of course be welcomed by the deliberate cutters in the group.
If it had not been for cuts by the OPEC+ cartel since January 2017 we would probably have had an oil price still somewhere around $50-55/b
Since a 2017 high of 3059.7 in May 2017 the commercial OECD oil inventories have declined 218 million barrels which equals a 0.8 m bl/d daily draw down on average through the period. On average through that period the production of OPEC+ has been 1.4 m bl/d below its October 2016 production level in a mix of deliberate cuts, gains and involuntary cuts. Since the world is bigger than the OECD inventories there has probably been some inventory draws in non-OECD stocks as well. So while the OECD drawdown implied global deficit since May 2017 is 0.8 m bl/d the actual deficit may have been higher, but probably not higher than the net effective cuts of OPEC+ of 1.4 m bl/d over the same period. So yes, our view sides with Donald Trump that if it had not been for cuts by the OPEC+ cartel since January 2017 we would probably have had an oil price still somewhere around $50-55/b or even maybe sub-$50/bl.
There have however hardly been any negative responses to the OPEC+ cartel’s actions up until now on Friday with the tweet by Donald Trump. Not even Donald has acted before now even though production cuts have been going on since the start of 2017. Mostly the action by the cartel has been viewed positively across the board. I cannot remember to have seen any negative takes on it before now. Mostly the take has been that OPEC+ has been doing the world a favour.
OPEC+ has driven the global oil sector out of its investment hysteresis and out of its deep, dark abyss of despair and back into action
Through its cuts, inventory draws and higher prices OPEC+ has driven the global oil sector out of its investment hysteresis and out of its deep, dark abyss of despair and back into action. That is probably a good thing since it will help to reduce the risk for a significant undershoot in supply down the road due to the deep investment cuts in new conventional supply since 2014. And the jury is still out whether we will be able to dodge that bullet when the pipeline of legacy green field conventional oil investments from before 2014 starts to run dry in 2020. Our view is that there is clearly upside price risk due to this on this time horizon.
For the time being we remain bullish for Brent crude oil prices as OPEC+ cuts are intact, their agreement will and must be extended to 2019 at their June 20/21/22 in order to avoid raising inventories in 2019. For the rest of 2018 we expect inventories do draw lower with added supply risk due to Venezuela, Libya and possibly Iran.
If Donald wants to do something he can sign the sanction waivers on May 12 in order to safeguard Iranian crude oil supply. Else his dear voters and consumers are likely to face higher gasoline prices this summer.
Ch1: OPEC+ deliberate cuts, involuntary cuts and gains
Ch2: OPEC+showing who are doing what versus October 2018
C3: Crude and product weekly inventory data versus start of year. Heading lower. Down 23 m bl last week
Analys
Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).
Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.
The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.
Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.


Analys
Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.
As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.
Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.
However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.
That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.
The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.
Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.
In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.
Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.
Analys
A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.
It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.
No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.
What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend.
The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
USA slår nytt produktionsrekord av naturgas
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
All eyes on OPEC V8 and their July quota decision on Saturday
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Stor uppsida i Lappland Guldprospekterings aktie enligt analys
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Brookfield ska bygga ett AI-datacenter på hela 750 MW i Strängnäs
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Sommaren inleds med sol och varierande elpriser
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
OPEC+ ökar oljeproduktionen trots fallande priser
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Silverpriset släpar efter guldets utveckling, har mer uppsida
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent needs to fall to USD 58/b to make cheating unprofitable for Kazakhstan