Följ oss

Analys

Iran – Reactive Saudi means price will tick higher

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror
SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - Commodity

Saudi Arabia pre-emptively and proactively lifted oil production last year in anticipation of US sanctions towards Iran. Sanctions were supposed to be more or less “cold turkey” starting November last year but Donald caved in and handed out a large portion of waivers. The result was that the pre-emptive production increase by OPEC+ last year instead managed to crash the oil price down to below $50/bl. Saudi Arabia is unlikely to make the same mistake again and is in our view likely to be reactive this time. First see how much oil supply is really lost and then increase production according to needs.

That means that the oil price is likely going to continue on its current bull-ride for a while before Saudi Arabia (++) decides to pitch in with substantially more production.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Iran probably exported about 2 m bl/d in March according to tanker tracker news. That is down 1 m bl/d from one year ago when they exported about 3.0 m bl/d liquids.

South Korea, India, Japan imported 0.75 m bl/d in March. They are likely going to comply fully so that their imports will likely fall to close to zero in May/June.

China imported 0.61 m bl/d in March versus waivers allowed by the US of 0.36 m bl/d. China has strongly opposed the US sanctions towards Iran: “The US is reaching beyond its jurisdiction” and “Our cooperation with Iran is open, transparent, lawful and legitimate”. We think that China can’t and won’t back down this time and that we could easily see an increase of Chinese oil imports from Iran up towards maybe 1.0 m bl/d

China Iran oil imports to increase and more Iran oil under the radar. There will also be an increasing amount of oil exports out of Iran which will go “under the sanctions radar”. This could probably amount to some 0.5 m bl/d and were probably already standing at around 0.3 m bl/d in March. So if China lifts imports from 0.6 m bl/d in March to instead 1.0 m bl/d and “under the radar” exports increase from 0.3 m bl/d in March to instead 0.5 m bl/d then Iran oil exports will continue at around 1.5 m bl/d versus around 2.0 m bl/d in March

Increasing collision course between the US and China. The “cold turkey” Iran sanctions from the US will force China to decide what to do, to hold its turf and claim its right to import oil from Iran. It will drive Iran closer to China and enable China to settle yet more oil in renminbi.

Russia is unlikely to hold back production in 2H-19. It reduced its production by some 0.2 m bl/d to 11.3 m bl/d in March in order to comply with the OPEC+ agreement from early December. It’ll probably lift production back up to 11.5 m bl/d in 2H-19 and then tick higher. It has been sensibly reluctant to pre-emptively promise to hold back production in 2H-19 and stated very clearly that it’ll manage production according to circumstances and that these circumstances will be evaluated when they meet with OPEC+ in Vienna in June 25/26.

Russian willingness to cut probably vanishes around $65/bl. Saudi Arabia would happily see the oil price back up at $85/bl. Russia’s willingness to cut in order to support the oil price probably vanishes around $65/bl. Russia is all-in joining Saudi Arabia on production cuts in times of surplus, rising stocks and Brent below $50/bl. It has however communicated very clearly that it is not all too eager to hold the oil price much above $65/bl as it will boost shale oil investments and production. That is alright as long as we are losing more and more supply from Iran and Venezuela. But what if those supplies come back into the market while US shale production growth is booming at the same time? Thus better to be safe than sorry and keep the oil price at around $65/bl and US shale oil activity at medium temperature.  

The market will lose some 0.5 – 1.0 m bl/d. We cannot really know how much supply will now be lost from Iran. We don’t think it will go to zero but rather that exports will decline from 2.0 m bl/d in March to instead some 1.0 – 1.5 m bl/d along with increasing imports by China and “unknowns”. I.e. the market will lose some 0.5 – 1.0 m bl/d. OPEC+ can easily adjust for this. Saudi Arabia could actually do it alone.

Saudi Arabia (OPEC+) in very good control of the market. OPEC+ in general and Saudi Arabia specifically will have a very good handle of the supply situation of the oil market. I.e. Saudi will put current cuts partially back into the market and can then cut again at a later time instead.

John Bolton aiming for Iran regime shift. It has been stated that Donald Trump does not know what he want to achieve in the Middle East but that John Bolton does: a regime shift. The zero waivers is a victory for John Bolton’s politics. It increases the risk for turmoil in the Middle East.

A higher oil price is good for the US. Donald Trump has for a long time tried to aim for a low oil price in support of the US consumer and his core voters. His economic advisors have however this spring argued that a high oil price is now increasingly positive for the US economy as a whole as it is now increasingly becoming a net oil exporter. The negative for the consumers is increasingly outweighed by the positives for the oil producers. Thus Donald going for no waivers means that Donald is now increasingly siding with the producers rather than the consumers.

A more fragile oil market balance and yet more supply from the US. Less oil from Iran and a higher oil price means more US shale oil drilling and more supply growth from the US. But we are also getting a more fragile oil market. Supply from Venezuela continues to decline while supply from Libya and Nigeria is unstable as well.

Crude quality matters – IMO 2020 and diesel. Global oil supply is losing more and more medium to heavy sour crude oil which instead is largely replaced by ultralight US shale oil supply. The former is rich on medium to heavy molecule chains where the heavy chains can be converted to medium. The ultralight is rich on gasoline and light products which cannot be converted to medium elements. Medium elements mean Diesel, Gasoil and Jet fuel. Due to new fuel regulations in global shipping from 1 January 2020 the global shipping fleet will consume a lot more diesel/Gasoil like molecules. So less supply of diesel/Gasoil rich crudes but more demand means yet stronger mid-dist cracks.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Medium sour crude is typically the crude Saudi Arabia and OPEC and Russia. So if the world is craving for more Diesel, Gasoil and Jet fuel it is also craving for more of this crude. It means that Saudi Arabia and Russia (and OPEC) are in very good control of the oil market, even better than headline numbers indicate due to quality issues.

Ch1: Iran consumes some 1.7 m bl/d. In addition to 2.7 m bl/d of crude production in March 2019 it probably also produced some 0.95 m bl/d of condensates with total production of liquids of about 3.65 m bl/d. Exports thus probably stood at around 2.0 m bl/d in March which is also what tanker tracker data indicates. Exports are probably going to decline to about 1.0 to 1.5 m bl/d in May June

Iran consumes oil

Ch2: Implied Iran hydro carbon liquids exports in m bl/d. US IEA data up to Sep 2018. Last data point estimated by SEB

Implied Iran hydro carbon liquids exports in m bl/d

Ch3: Saudi Arabia, UAE and Russia can easily lift production by 1.5 m bl/d

Saudi Arabia, UAE and Russia can easily lift production by 1.5 m bl/d

Analys

A deliberate measure to push oil price lower but it is not the opening of the floodgates

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Hurt by US tariffs and more oil from OPEC+. Brent crude fell 2.1% yesterday to USD 71.62/b and is down an additional 0.9% this morning to USD 71/b. New tariff-announcements by Donald Trump and a decision by OPEC+ to lift production by 138 kb/d in April is driving the oil price lower.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The decision by OPEC+ to lift production is a deliberate decision to get a lower oil price. All the members in OPEC+ wants to produce more as a general rule. Their plan and hope for a long time has been that they could gradually revive production back to a more normal level without pushing the oil price lower. As such they have postponed the planned production increases time and time again. Opting for price over volume. Waiting for the opportunity to lift production without pushing the price lower. And now it has suddenly changed. They start to lift production by 138 kb/d in April even if they know that the oil market this year then will run a surplus. Donald Trump is the reason.

Putin, Muhammed bin Salman (MBS) and Trump all met in Riyadh recently to discuss the war in Ukraine. They naturally discussed politics and energy and what is most important for each and one of them. Putin wants a favorable deal in Ukraine, MBS may want harsher measures towards Iran while Trump amongst other things want a lower oil price. The latter is to appease US consumers to which he has promised a lower oil price. A lower oil price over the coming two years could be good for Trump and the Republicans in the mid-term elections if a lower oil price makes US consumers happy. And a powerful Trump for a full four years is also good for Putin and MBS.

This is not the opening of the floodgates. It is not the start of blindly lifting production each month. It is still highly measured and controlled. It is about lowering the oil price to a level that is acceptable for Putin, MBS, Trump, US oil companies and the US consumers. Such an imagined ”target price” or common denominator is clearly not USD 50-55/b. US production would in that case fall markedly and the finances of Saudi Arabia and Russia would hurt too badly. The price is probably somewhere in the USD 60ies/b.

Brent crude averaged USD 99.5/b, USD 82/b and USD 80/b in 2022, 2023 and 2024 respectively. An oil price of USD 65/b is markedly lower in the sense that it probably would be positively felt by US consumers. The five-year Brent crude oil contract is USD 67/b. In a laxed oil market with little strain and a gradual rise in oil inventories we would see a lowering of the front-end of the Brent crude curve so that the front-end comes down to the level of the longer dated prices. The longer-dated prices usually soften a little bit as well when this happens. The five-year Brent contract could easily slide a couple of dollars down to USD 65/b versus USD 67/b.

Brent crude 1 month contract in USD/b. USD 68.68/b is the level to watch out for. It was the lowpoint in September last year. Breaking below that will bring us to lowest level since December 2021.

Brent crude 1 month contract in USD/b.
Source: Bloomberg
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent whacked down yet again by negative Trump-fallout

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Sharply lower yesterday with negative US consumer confidence. Brent crude fell like a rock to USD 73.02/b (-2.4%) yesterday following the publishing of US consumer confidence which fell to 98.3 in February from 105.3 in January (100 is neutral). Intraday Brent fell as low as USD 72.7/b. The closing yesterday was the lowest since late December and at a level where Brent frequently crossed over from September to the end of last year. Brent has now lost both the late December, early January Trump-optimism gains as well as the Biden-spike in mid-Jan and is back in the range from this Autumn. This morning it is staging a small rebound to USD 73.2/b but with little conviction it seems. The US sentiment readings since Friday last week is damaging evidence of the negative fallout Trump is creating.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Evidence growing that Trump-turmoil are having negative effects on the US economy. The US consumer confidence index has been in a seesaw pattern since mid-2022 and the reading yesterday was reached twice in 2024 and close to it also in 2023. But the reading yesterday needs to be seen in the context of Donald Trump being inaugurated as president again on 20 January. The reading must thus be interpreted as direct response by US consumers to what Trump has been doing since he became president and all the uncertainty it has created. The negative reading yesterday also falls into line with the negative readings on Friday, amplifying the message that Trump action will indeed have a negative fallout. At least the first-round effects of it. The market is staging a small rebound this morning to USD 73.3/b. But the genie is out of the bottle: Trump actions is having a negative effect on US consumers and businesses and thus the US economy. Likely effects will be reduced spending by consumers and reduced capex spending by businesses.

Brent crude falling lowest since late December and a level it frequently crossed during autumn.

Brent crude falling lowest since late December and a level it frequently crossed during autumn.
Source: Bloomberg

White: US Conference Board Consumer Confidence (published yesterday). Blue: US Services PMI Business activity (published last Friday). Red: US University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment (published last Friday). All three falling sharply in February. Indexed 100 on Feb-2022.

White: US Conference Board Consumer Confidence (published yesterday). Blue: US Services PMI Business activity (published last Friday). Red: US University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment (published last Friday). All three falling sharply in February. Indexed 100 on Feb-2022.
Source: Bloomberg
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Crude oil comment: Price reaction driven by intensified sanctions on Iran

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude prices bottomed out at USD 74.20 per barrel at the close of trading on Friday, following a steep decline from USD 77.15 per barrel on Thursday evening (February 20th). During yesterday’s trading session, prices steadily climbed by roughly USD 1 per barrel (1.20%), reaching the current level of USD 75 per barrel.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Yesterday’s price rebound, which has continued into today, is primarily driven by recent U.S. actions aimed at intensifying pressure on Iran. These moves were formalized in the second round of sanctions since the presidential shift, specifically targeting Iranian oil exports. Notably, the U.S. Treasury Department has sanctioned several Iran-related oil companies, added 13 new tankers to the OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) sanctions list, and sanctioned individuals, oil brokers, and terminals connected to Iran’s oil trade.

The National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 now calls for the U.S. to ”drive Iran’s oil exports to zero,” further asserting that Iran ”can never be allowed to acquire or develop nuclear weapons.” This intensified focus on Iran’s oil exports is naturally fueling market expectations of tighter supply. Yet, OPEC+ spare capacity remains robust, standing at 5.3 million barrels per day, with Saudi Arabia holding 3.1 million, the UAE 1.1 million, Iraq 600k, and Kuwait 400k. As such, any significant price spirals are not expected, given the current OPEC+ supply buffer.

Further contributing to recent price movements, OPEC has yet to decide on its stance regarding production cuts for Q2 2025. The group remains in control of the market, evaluating global supply and demand dynamics on a monthly basis. Given the current state of the market, we believe there is limited capacity for additional OPEC production without risking further price declines.

On a more bullish note, Iraq reaffirmed its commitment to the OPEC+ agreement yesterday, signaling that it would present an updated plan to compensate for any overproduction, which supports ongoing market stability.

Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära