Följ oss

Analys

Iran – Reactive Saudi means price will tick higher

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror
SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - Commodity

Saudi Arabia pre-emptively and proactively lifted oil production last year in anticipation of US sanctions towards Iran. Sanctions were supposed to be more or less “cold turkey” starting November last year but Donald caved in and handed out a large portion of waivers. The result was that the pre-emptive production increase by OPEC+ last year instead managed to crash the oil price down to below $50/bl. Saudi Arabia is unlikely to make the same mistake again and is in our view likely to be reactive this time. First see how much oil supply is really lost and then increase production according to needs.

That means that the oil price is likely going to continue on its current bull-ride for a while before Saudi Arabia (++) decides to pitch in with substantially more production.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Iran probably exported about 2 m bl/d in March according to tanker tracker news. That is down 1 m bl/d from one year ago when they exported about 3.0 m bl/d liquids.

South Korea, India, Japan imported 0.75 m bl/d in March. They are likely going to comply fully so that their imports will likely fall to close to zero in May/June.

China imported 0.61 m bl/d in March versus waivers allowed by the US of 0.36 m bl/d. China has strongly opposed the US sanctions towards Iran: “The US is reaching beyond its jurisdiction” and “Our cooperation with Iran is open, transparent, lawful and legitimate”. We think that China can’t and won’t back down this time and that we could easily see an increase of Chinese oil imports from Iran up towards maybe 1.0 m bl/d

China Iran oil imports to increase and more Iran oil under the radar. There will also be an increasing amount of oil exports out of Iran which will go “under the sanctions radar”. This could probably amount to some 0.5 m bl/d and were probably already standing at around 0.3 m bl/d in March. So if China lifts imports from 0.6 m bl/d in March to instead 1.0 m bl/d and “under the radar” exports increase from 0.3 m bl/d in March to instead 0.5 m bl/d then Iran oil exports will continue at around 1.5 m bl/d versus around 2.0 m bl/d in March

Increasing collision course between the US and China. The “cold turkey” Iran sanctions from the US will force China to decide what to do, to hold its turf and claim its right to import oil from Iran. It will drive Iran closer to China and enable China to settle yet more oil in renminbi.

Russia is unlikely to hold back production in 2H-19. It reduced its production by some 0.2 m bl/d to 11.3 m bl/d in March in order to comply with the OPEC+ agreement from early December. It’ll probably lift production back up to 11.5 m bl/d in 2H-19 and then tick higher. It has been sensibly reluctant to pre-emptively promise to hold back production in 2H-19 and stated very clearly that it’ll manage production according to circumstances and that these circumstances will be evaluated when they meet with OPEC+ in Vienna in June 25/26.

Russian willingness to cut probably vanishes around $65/bl. Saudi Arabia would happily see the oil price back up at $85/bl. Russia’s willingness to cut in order to support the oil price probably vanishes around $65/bl. Russia is all-in joining Saudi Arabia on production cuts in times of surplus, rising stocks and Brent below $50/bl. It has however communicated very clearly that it is not all too eager to hold the oil price much above $65/bl as it will boost shale oil investments and production. That is alright as long as we are losing more and more supply from Iran and Venezuela. But what if those supplies come back into the market while US shale production growth is booming at the same time? Thus better to be safe than sorry and keep the oil price at around $65/bl and US shale oil activity at medium temperature.  

The market will lose some 0.5 – 1.0 m bl/d. We cannot really know how much supply will now be lost from Iran. We don’t think it will go to zero but rather that exports will decline from 2.0 m bl/d in March to instead some 1.0 – 1.5 m bl/d along with increasing imports by China and “unknowns”. I.e. the market will lose some 0.5 – 1.0 m bl/d. OPEC+ can easily adjust for this. Saudi Arabia could actually do it alone.

Saudi Arabia (OPEC+) in very good control of the market. OPEC+ in general and Saudi Arabia specifically will have a very good handle of the supply situation of the oil market. I.e. Saudi will put current cuts partially back into the market and can then cut again at a later time instead.

John Bolton aiming for Iran regime shift. It has been stated that Donald Trump does not know what he want to achieve in the Middle East but that John Bolton does: a regime shift. The zero waivers is a victory for John Bolton’s politics. It increases the risk for turmoil in the Middle East.

A higher oil price is good for the US. Donald Trump has for a long time tried to aim for a low oil price in support of the US consumer and his core voters. His economic advisors have however this spring argued that a high oil price is now increasingly positive for the US economy as a whole as it is now increasingly becoming a net oil exporter. The negative for the consumers is increasingly outweighed by the positives for the oil producers. Thus Donald going for no waivers means that Donald is now increasingly siding with the producers rather than the consumers.

A more fragile oil market balance and yet more supply from the US. Less oil from Iran and a higher oil price means more US shale oil drilling and more supply growth from the US. But we are also getting a more fragile oil market. Supply from Venezuela continues to decline while supply from Libya and Nigeria is unstable as well.

Crude quality matters – IMO 2020 and diesel. Global oil supply is losing more and more medium to heavy sour crude oil which instead is largely replaced by ultralight US shale oil supply. The former is rich on medium to heavy molecule chains where the heavy chains can be converted to medium. The ultralight is rich on gasoline and light products which cannot be converted to medium elements. Medium elements mean Diesel, Gasoil and Jet fuel. Due to new fuel regulations in global shipping from 1 January 2020 the global shipping fleet will consume a lot more diesel/Gasoil like molecules. So less supply of diesel/Gasoil rich crudes but more demand means yet stronger mid-dist cracks.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Medium sour crude is typically the crude Saudi Arabia and OPEC and Russia. So if the world is craving for more Diesel, Gasoil and Jet fuel it is also craving for more of this crude. It means that Saudi Arabia and Russia (and OPEC) are in very good control of the oil market, even better than headline numbers indicate due to quality issues.

Ch1: Iran consumes some 1.7 m bl/d. In addition to 2.7 m bl/d of crude production in March 2019 it probably also produced some 0.95 m bl/d of condensates with total production of liquids of about 3.65 m bl/d. Exports thus probably stood at around 2.0 m bl/d in March which is also what tanker tracker data indicates. Exports are probably going to decline to about 1.0 to 1.5 m bl/d in May June

Iran consumes oil

Ch2: Implied Iran hydro carbon liquids exports in m bl/d. US IEA data up to Sep 2018. Last data point estimated by SEB

Implied Iran hydro carbon liquids exports in m bl/d

Ch3: Saudi Arabia, UAE and Russia can easily lift production by 1.5 m bl/d

Saudi Arabia, UAE and Russia can easily lift production by 1.5 m bl/d

Analys

Brent prices slip on USD surge despite tight inventory conditions

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude prices dropped by USD 1.4 per barrel yesterday evening, sliding from USD 74.2 to USD 72.8 per barrel overnight. However, prices have ticked slightly higher in early trading this morning and are currently hovering around USD 73.3 per barrel.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Yesterday’s decline was primarily driven by a significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar, fueled by expectations of fewer interest rate cuts by the Fed in the coming year. While the Fed lowered borrowing costs as anticipated, it signaled a more cautious approach to rate reductions in 2025. This pushed the U.S. dollar to its strongest level in over two years, raising the cost of commodities priced in dollars.

Earlier in the day (yesterday), crude prices briefly rose following reports of continued declines in U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR), which fell by 0.9 million barrels last week to 421.0 million barrels. This level is approximately 6% below the five-year average for this time of year, highlighting persistently tight market conditions.

In contrast, total motor gasoline inventories saw a significant build of 2.3 million barrels but remain 3% below the five-year average. A closer look reveals that finished gasoline inventories declined, while blending components inventories increased.

Distillate (diesel) fuel inventories experienced a substantial draw of 3.2 million barrels and are now approximately 7% below the five-year average. Overall, total commercial petroleum inventories recorded a net decline of 3.2 million barrels last week, underscoring tightening market conditions across key product categories.

Despite the ongoing drawdowns in U.S. crude and product inventories, global oil prices have remained range-bound since mid-October. Market participants are balancing a muted outlook for Chinese demand and rising production from non-OPEC+ sources against elevated geopolitical risks. The potential for stricter sanctions on Iranian oil supply, particularly as Donald Trump prepares to re-enter the White House, has introduced an additional layer of uncertainty.

We remain cautiously optimistic about the oil market balance in 2025 and are maintaining our Brent price forecast of an average USD 75 per barrel for the year. We believe the market has both fundamental and technical support at these levels.

Oil inventories
Oil inventories
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Oil falling only marginally on weak China data as Iran oil exports starts to struggle

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Up 4.7% last week on US Iran hawkishness and China stimulus optimism. Brent crude gained 4.7% last week and closed on a high note at USD 74.49/b. Through the week it traded in a USD 70.92 – 74.59/b range. Increased optimism over China stimulus together with Iran hawkishness from the incoming Donald Trump administration were the main drivers. Technically Brent crude broke above the 50dma on Friday. On the upside it has the USD 75/b 100dma and on the downside it now has the 50dma at USD 73.84. It is likely to test both of these in the near term. With respect to the Relative Strength Index (RSI) it is neither cold nor warm.

Lower this morning as China November statistics still disappointing (stimulus isn’t here in size yet). This morning it is trading down 0.4% to USD 74.2/b following bearish statistics from China. Retail sales only rose 3% y/y and well short of Industrial production which rose 5.4% y/y, painting a lackluster picture of the demand side of the Chinese economy. This morning the Chinese 30-year bond rate fell below the 2% mark for the first time ever. Very weak demand for credit and investments is essentially what it is saying. Implied demand for oil down 2.1% in November and ytd y/y it was down 3.3%. Oil refining slipped to 5-month low (Bloomberg). This sets a bearish tone for oil at the start of the week. But it isn’t really killing off the oil price either except pushing it down a little this morning.

China will likely choose the US over Iranian oil as long as the oil market is plentiful. It is becoming increasingly apparent that exports of crude oil from Iran is being disrupted by broadening US sanctions on tankers according to Vortexa (Bloomberg). Some Iranian November oil cargoes still remain undelivered. Chinese buyers are increasingly saying no to sanctioned vessels. China import around 90% of Iranian crude oil. Looking forward to the Trump administration the choice for China will likely be easy when it comes to Iranian oil. China needs the US much more than it needs Iranian oil. At leas as long as there is plenty of oil in the market. OPEC+ is currently holds plenty of oil on the side-line waiting for room to re-enter. So if Iran goes out, then other oil from OPEC+ will come back in. So there won’t be any squeeze in the oil market and price shouldn’t move all that much up.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent crude inches higher as ”Maximum pressure on Iran” could remove all talk of surplus in 2025

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude inch higher despite bearish Chinese equity backdrop. Brent crude traded between 72.42 and 74.0 USD/b yesterday before closing down 0.15% on the day at USD 73.41/b. Since last Friday Brent crude has gained 3.2%. This morning it is trading in marginal positive territory (+0.3%) at USD 73.65/b. Chinese equities are down 2% following disappointing signals from the Central Economic Work Conference. The dollar is also 0.2% stronger. None of this has been able to pull oil lower this morning.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

”Maximum pressure on Iran” are the signals from the incoming US administration. Last time Donald Trump was president he drove down Iranian oil exports to close to zero as he exited the JCPOA Iranian nuclear deal and implemented maximum sanctions. A repeat of that would remove all talk about a surplus oil market next year leaving room for the rest of OPEC+ as well as the US to lift production a little. It would however probably require some kind of cooperation with China in some kind of overall US – China trade deal. Because it is hard to prevent oil flowing from Iran to China as long as China wants to buy large amounts.

Mildly bullish adjustment from the IEA but still with an overall bearish message for 2025. The IEA came out with a mildly bullish adjustment in its monthly Oil Market Report yesterday. For 2025 it adjusted global demand up by 0.1 mb/d to 103.9 mb/d (+1.1 mb/d y/y growth) while it also adjusted non-OPEC production down by 0.1 mb/d to 71.9 mb/d (+1.7 mb/d y/y). As a result its calculated call-on-OPEC rose by 0.2 mb/d y/y to 26.3 mb/d.

Overall the IEA still sees a market in 2025 where non-OPEC production grows considerably faster (+1.7 mb/d y/y) than demand (+1.1 mb/d y/y) which requires OPEC to cut its production by close to 700 kb/d in 2025 to keep the market balanced.

The IEA treats OPEC+ as it if doesn’t exist even if it is 8 years since it was established. The weird thing is that the IEA after 8 full years with the constellation of OPEC+ still calculates and argues as if the wider organisation which was established in December 2016 doesn’t exist. In its oil market balance it projects an increase from FSU of +0.3 mb/d in 2025. But FSU is predominantly part of OPEC+ and thus bound by production targets. Thus call on OPEC+ is only falling by 0.4 mb/d in 2025. In IEA’s calculations the OPEC+ group thus needs to cut production by 0.4 mb/d in 2024 or 0.4% of global demand. That is still a bearish outlook. But error of margin on such calculations are quite large so this prediction needs to be treated with a pinch of salt.

Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära