Analys
Iran – Hard to swallow a double insult
Brent crude fell back 0.3% to $75.08/bl ydy after a strong rebound on Mon but is again up 0.8% this morning to $75.7/bl. It is taking little notice of the escalating trade war between the US and China which is threatening global growth and oil demand growth down the road. It is not even daunted by the repeated proposition by Russia to lift the production cap by 1.5 m bl/d.
Iran is naturally offended and disgusted by first having US sanctions reactivated forcing down its production and exports and then at the same time seeing Donald calling for more oil from from OPEC+ in order to push oil prices lower and appease US consumers so the Republicans can make a good mid-term election in Nov. Iran is thus naturally opposing any suggestion of an increase in production. Iran argues that if the oil price now goes high and the US consumers suffers at the pump then Donald is directly to be blamed for this due to the Iran sanctions.
Apparently it looks like Saudi Arabia wants more oil from OPEC+ because Donald Trump is asking for it as a return favour for reviving sanctions towards Iran and standing by Saudi Arabia as a long term ally. Thus even if the most sensible and responsible thing to do is to increase production in the face of collapsing production in Venezuela and now also Libya it will be extremely difficult for Iran to swallow a decision to increase production. It would be a double insult to see the “US bully” first having its way with Iran and then having its way with OPEC+.
It is important to remember that OPEC+ has been extremely lucky with its production cuts. Yes, they have been good and delivered on their cuts but they have also definitely been lucky. If it had not been for a continuous improvement in the global economy since late 2016 and thus strong oil demand growth and a collapsing production in Venezuela then things might have looked quite differently today. Then the group might have had to cut deeper and then yet deeper again in 2019. Now instead the five active cutters (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Iraq and Russia), can and should responsibly exit their cuts in order to avoid a further rallying in the oil price towards $100/bl in 2H18. An oil price of $75/bl is already taxing global consumers (ex-US) as when the oil price was $110/bl back in 2011 to 2014 due to the today much stronger USD. Thus having the oil price rallying to $100/bl in 2H18 at today’s dollar strength would not be good for the global economy at all.
By exiting cuts and reviving production the group is achieving two things. Firs it avoids creating unnecessary risk of hurting global growth and thus oil demand growth. Worst case if OPEC+ does not revive production would be a real spike in the oil price tipping the global economy into recession. In that case there would be no exit from current cuts as an option and instead the cutters would potentially have to cut yet deeper in the face of booming US shale oil production and a tanking global economy. Secondly, by exiting cuts now that it is possible and necessary to do so it will strengthen the position of the group to cut the next time it is a need for cuts by the group.
Thus the only sensible thing to do seems to be to revive production and exit cuts. However, as long as it seems like OPEC+ is abiding by Donald Trump’s call for more oil from OPEC+ it must be very difficult for Iran to swallow such a double insult. To us however it seem more like the real call for more oil and exit of cuts is coming from Russia. Its private oil companies are clearly eager to get back in business and away from their “voluntary” caps directed by Putin/Novak in cooperation with OPEC+. After all the goal of the cuts of getting OECD inventories back down to the rolling five year average has been reached.
It would be great if OPEC+ could unite behind exit of cuts and revival of production. The challenge would be to formulate a statement that removes any suggestion that the increase in production comes as a response to Donald’s call for more oil from OPEC+. It would however be difficult to avoid that Donald would take it as a victory to see a revival of production by the cutters in the group following he’s recent tweets on the subject. Iran’s oil minister Zanganeh has said that he’ll leave Vienna on Friday following the normal OPEC meeting and not attending the Saturday meeting including the ten cooperating countries.
We think that OPEC+ will either unanimously decide to lift production or the cutters will increase production anyhow. Cutters lifting production by 1 m bl/d in 2H18 and another 0.5 m bl/d in 2019 will however not lift total production by OPEC+ in our estimates due to declines within the group. It would probably look more like Iran is in control of the situation if it unites together with OPEC+ on lifting production.
Ch1: Weekly crude and product inventories US, EU, Sing, Floating given as change vs. start of year in million barrels.
Iran has a point that it does not seem like there is a need for more oil in the market as inventories are actually up ytd by 25 m bl. This does however not take into account likely further rapid decline in Venezuela’s production in 2H18 together with seasonally higher demand in the second half of the year. Latest disruption in Libya’s production adds to the tightening outlook for 2H18. The jump in weekly stocks does however look a little random and may just be a temporary issue due to refinery maintenance.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Mixed U.S. data skews bearish – prices respond accordingly
Since market opening yesterday, Brent crude prices have returned close to the same level as 24 hours ago. However, before the release of the weekly U.S. petroleum status report at 17:00 CEST yesterday, we observed a brief spike, with prices reaching USD 73.2 per barrel. This morning, Brent is trading at USD 71.4 per barrel as the market searches for any bullish fundamentals amid ongoing concerns about demand growth and the potential for increased OPEC+ production in 2025, for which there currently appears to be limited capacity – a fact that OPEC+ is fully aware of, raising doubts about any such action.
It is also notable that the USD strengthened yesterday but retreated slightly this morning.
U.S. commercial crude oil inventories increased by 2.1 million barrels to 429.7 million barrels. Although this build brings inventories to about 4% below the five-year seasonal average, it contrasts with the earlier U.S. API data, which had indicated a decline of 0.8 million barrels. This discrepancy has added some downward pressure on prices.
On the other hand, gasoline inventories fell sharply by 4.4 million barrels, and distillate (diesel) inventories dropped by 1.4 million barrels, both now sitting around 4-5% below the five-year average. Total commercial petroleum inventories also saw a significant decline of 6.5 million barrels, helping to maintain some balance in the market.
Refinery inputs averaged 16.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 175,000 barrels per day from the previous week, with refineries operating at 91.4% capacity. Crude imports rose to 6.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 269,000 barrels per day.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied averaged 20.8 million barrels per day, up 1.8% from the same period last year. Gasoline demand increased by 0.6%, while distillate (diesel) and jet fuel demand declined significantly by 4.0% and 4.6%, respectively, compared to the same period a year ago.
Overall, the report presents mixed signals but leans slightly bearish due to the increase in crude inventories and notably weaker demand for diesel and jet fuel. These factors somewhat overshadow the bullish aspects, such as the decline in gasoline inventories and higher refinery utilization.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Fundamentals back in focus, with OPEC+ strategy crucial for price direction
Since the market close on Monday, November 11, Brent crude prices have stabilized around USD 72 per barrel, after briefly dipping to a monthly low of USD 70.7 per barrel yesterday afternoon. The momentum has been mixed, oscillating between bearish and cautious optimism. This morning, Brent is trading at USD 71.9 per barrel as the market adopts a “wait and see” stance. The continued strength of the US dollar is exerting downward pressure on commodities overall, while ongoing concerns about demand growth are weighing on the outlook for crude.
As we noted in Tuesday’s crude oil comment, there has been an unusual silence from Iran, leading to a significant reduction in the geopolitical risk premium. According to the Washington Post, Israel has initiated cease-fire negotiations with Lebanon, influenced by the shifting political landscape following Trump’s potential return to the White House. As a result, the market is currently pricing in a reduced risk of further major escalations in the Middle East. However, while the geopolitical risk premium of around USD 4-5 per barrel remains in the background, it has been temporarily sidelined but could quickly resurface if tensions escalate.
The EIA reports that India has now become the primary source of oil demand growth in Asia, as China’s consumption weakens due to its economic slowdown and rising electric vehicle sales. This highlights growing concerns over China’s diminishing role in the global oil market.
From a fundamental perspective, we expect Brent crude to remain well above USD 70 per barrel in the near term, but the outlook hinges largely on the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early December. So far, the cartel, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, has twice postponed its plans to increase production this year. This decision was made in response to weakening demand from China and increasing US oil supplies, which have dampened market sentiment. The cartel now plans to implement the first in a series of monthly hikes starting in January 2025, after originally planning them for October. Given the current supply dynamics, there appears to be limited room for additional OPEC volumes at this time, and the situation will likely be reassessed at their December 1st meeting.
The latest report from the US API showed a decline in US crude inventories of 0.8 million barrels last week, with stockpiles at the Cushing, Oklahoma hub falling by a substantial 1.9 million barrels. The “official” figures from the US DOE are expected to be released today at 16:30 CEST.
In conclusion, over the past month, global crude oil prices have fluctuated between gains and losses as market participants weigh US monetary policy (particularly in light of the election), concerns over Chinese demand, and the evolving supply strategy of OPEC+. The coming weeks will be critical in shaping the near-term outlook for the oil market.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Iran’s silence hints at a new geopolitical reality
Since the market opened on Monday, November 11, Brent crude prices have declined sharply, dropping nearly USD 2.2 per barrel in just over a day. The positive momentum seen in late October and early November has largely dissipated, with Brent now trading at USD 71.9 per barrel.
Several factors have contributed to the recent price decline. Most notably, the continued strengthening of the U.S. dollar remains a key driver, as it gained further overnight. Meanwhile, U.S. government bond yields showed mixed movements: the 2-year yield rose, while the 10-year yield edged slightly lower, indicating larger uncertainty.
Adding to the downward pressure is ongoing concern over weak Chinese crude demand. The market reacted negatively to the absence of a consumer-focused stimulus package, which has led to persistent pricing in of subdued demand from China – the world’s largest crude importer and second-largest crude consumer. However, we anticipate that China recognizes the significance of the situation, and a substantial stimulus package is imminent once the country emerges from its current balance sheet recession: where businesses and households are currently prioritizing debt reduction over spending and investment, limiting immediate economic recovery.
Lastly, the geopolitical risk premium appears to be fading due to the current silence from Iran. As we have highlighted previously, when a “scheduled” retaliatory strike does not materialize quickly, it reduces any built-in price premium. With no visible retaliation from Iran yesterday, and likely none today or tomorrow, the market is pricing in diminished geopolitical risk. Furthermore, the outcome of the U.S. with a Trump victory may have altered the dynamics of the conflict entirely. It is plausible that Iran will proceed cautiously, anticipating a harsh response (read sanctions) from the U.S. should tensions escalate further.
Looking ahead, the market will be closely monitoring key reports this week: the EIA’s Weekly Petroleum Status Report on Wednesday and the IEA’s Oil Market Report on Thursday.
In summary, we believe that while the demand outlook will eventually stabilize, the strong oil supply continues to act as a suppressing force on prices. Given the current supply environment, there appears to be little room for additional OPEC volumes at this time, a situation the cartel will likely assess continuously on a monthly basis going forward.
With this context, we maintain moderately bullish for next year and continue to see an average Brent price of USD 75 per barrel.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Market battling between spike-risk versus 2025 surplus
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Uniper har säkrat 175 MW elektricitet i Östersund för e-metanol
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guldpriset passerar 2700 USD till sin högsta nivå någonsin
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
District Metals prospekterar uran i Sverige, nu noteras även aktierna här
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: It takes guts to hold short positions
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Guldpriset stiger hela tiden till nya rekord
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: A price rise driven by fundamentals
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Recent ’geopolitical relief’ seems premature