Analys
Increased OPEC power in 2021 requires demand revival
Brent crude rebounded almost 1% yesterday to $64.62/bl and continues to tick a little higher this morning but still below the $65/bl mark. The signing of the US – China trade deal has given optimism for a revival in global manufacturing and thus stronger oil demand growth and this is what gives the oil price some vigour. It is very hard for OPEC to fight a war on two fronts with both rising non-OPEC supply and weakening global oil demand growth at the same time. A potential revival in global manufacturing (and oil demand growth) would thus be a great relief for OPEC and remove a lot of downside price risk for the oil price. The oil price is at its current level at the mercy of OPEC and OPEC’s current strategy of “price over volume”. If global oil demand continues at last year’s weaker than normal 1% growth rate also in 2020 and 2021 then OPEC and its allies might be forced to switch strategy to “volume over price” once again.
The monthly oil market report from EIA on Tuesday projected a lukewarm but stable outlook for the global oil market in 2020 and 2021 with Brent crude oil prices projected to average $64.8/bl in 2020 rising to $67.5/bl in 2021. It lifted its US shale oil production projection a tad for 2020 (+0.15 m bl/d) and extended the projection to 2021 with an average YoY growth of 0.4 m bl/d in 2021. That is a far cry from latest years booming US shale oil production growth. A shale oil production growth of +0.4 m bl/d per year is still a lot of new oil though.
Key assumptions in the US EIA forecast is that global demand will grow by 1.3% p.a. for the coming two years and that OPEC will stick to its current “price over volume” strategy and continue to hold back supply. EIA’s supply/demand balance “allows” OPEC to produce 29.2 m bl/d on average through the forecast horizon. The sharp decline in the need for OPEC oil over the latest couple of years is projected to halt and stabilize at around that level and then rise marginally in 2021. I.e. it projects that OPEC will be handed back a little bit of volume and market power and thus room to manoeuvre towards the end of 2021. But not a lot.
If EIA’s forecast materializes with no major disruptions in middle east supply, then we are looking at a very stable oil market with low oil price volatility for the coming two years: US shale oil production growth is slowing down and OPEC’s challenged position over the latest years is stabilizing while global oil inventories are projected to stay elevated and plentiful.
The oil price is now getting some vigour on the back of the US – China trade deal with hopes for global manufacturing revival and stronger oil demand growth. If this materializes it will put OPEC on a more stable footing and thus increase the probability that they will be able to stick with “price over volume” throughout the forecast horizon to end of 2021.
But even with a historically normal oil demand growth of 1.3% per year the oil price will still be at the mercy of OPEC’s choice of market strategy even in 2021. The US EIA is projecting non-OPEC production to grow by 0.9 m bl/d in 2021. If global oil demand grows at 1.3% that year it will hand some volume back to OPEC. Global inventories will still be high at that point, but it could be the gradual start of some lost volume starting to return back to OPEC.
True oil market strength won’t come before non-OPEC production starts to grow more slowly than global oil demand growth. This would mean increased call-on-OPEC crude oil and would hand some of the lost volume over the past years back to OPEC again. It would place OPEC in proper control of the market again with significantly reduced risk for a switch to back to “volume over price” (which would lead to a collapse in the oil price).
The US EIA projects that non-OPEC production will grow at +0.9 m bl/d YoY in 2021. This is below the historical oil demand growth rate of about 1.3% YoY (about 1.3 m bl/d) and thus projects a possible return of volume back to OPEC. That’s the turning point OPEC is looking for. However, the increase in call-on-OPEC in 2021 cannot all that easily be realized as increased production because inventories will still be high. If OPEC wants to draw down inventories at that time, they will still need to hold back production at unchanged level. EIA’s outlook is positive for OPEC, but it is at the very end of the two-year forecast period and highly vulnerable if global oil demand growth is weak. Global manufacturing revival will thus be key.
Ch1: US EIA Supply/demand balance. Fairly stable with plenty of oil in the market. Could imply low price volatility if OPEC sticks to its “price over volume” strategy all through the period. Some deficit in 2021 hands some volume back to OPEC as non-OPEC production is projected to grow at only 0.9 m bl/d YoY that year versus normal oil demand growth of 1.3 m bl/d.
Ch2: EIA projects OECD inventories to rise in 2020 and then a marginal decline in 2021. Plenty of oil in the market next two years unless we get a considerable supply outage in the middle east.
Ch3: EIA’s historical and projected OPEC production. Stabilizing next two years after a steep decline past two years. I.e. OPEC’s position looks set to stabilize at around 29.2 m bl/d versus a production of 29.6 m bl/d in December. What the outlook shows is that oil prices forecasted by the US EIA are totally reliant on OPEC sticking with “price over volume” for the coming two years and only produce about 29.2 m bl/d. No more
Ch4: The US EIA lifted its projection for US shale oil production by 150 k bl/d in 2020 and extended its forecast to 2021. Steady growth rate of 0.4 m bl/d in 2021. No flat-lining from 2020 to 2021
Analys
Crude oil comment: Mixed U.S. data skews bearish – prices respond accordingly
Since market opening yesterday, Brent crude prices have returned close to the same level as 24 hours ago. However, before the release of the weekly U.S. petroleum status report at 17:00 CEST yesterday, we observed a brief spike, with prices reaching USD 73.2 per barrel. This morning, Brent is trading at USD 71.4 per barrel as the market searches for any bullish fundamentals amid ongoing concerns about demand growth and the potential for increased OPEC+ production in 2025, for which there currently appears to be limited capacity – a fact that OPEC+ is fully aware of, raising doubts about any such action.
It is also notable that the USD strengthened yesterday but retreated slightly this morning.
U.S. commercial crude oil inventories increased by 2.1 million barrels to 429.7 million barrels. Although this build brings inventories to about 4% below the five-year seasonal average, it contrasts with the earlier U.S. API data, which had indicated a decline of 0.8 million barrels. This discrepancy has added some downward pressure on prices.
On the other hand, gasoline inventories fell sharply by 4.4 million barrels, and distillate (diesel) inventories dropped by 1.4 million barrels, both now sitting around 4-5% below the five-year average. Total commercial petroleum inventories also saw a significant decline of 6.5 million barrels, helping to maintain some balance in the market.
Refinery inputs averaged 16.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 175,000 barrels per day from the previous week, with refineries operating at 91.4% capacity. Crude imports rose to 6.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 269,000 barrels per day.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied averaged 20.8 million barrels per day, up 1.8% from the same period last year. Gasoline demand increased by 0.6%, while distillate (diesel) and jet fuel demand declined significantly by 4.0% and 4.6%, respectively, compared to the same period a year ago.
Overall, the report presents mixed signals but leans slightly bearish due to the increase in crude inventories and notably weaker demand for diesel and jet fuel. These factors somewhat overshadow the bullish aspects, such as the decline in gasoline inventories and higher refinery utilization.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Fundamentals back in focus, with OPEC+ strategy crucial for price direction
Since the market close on Monday, November 11, Brent crude prices have stabilized around USD 72 per barrel, after briefly dipping to a monthly low of USD 70.7 per barrel yesterday afternoon. The momentum has been mixed, oscillating between bearish and cautious optimism. This morning, Brent is trading at USD 71.9 per barrel as the market adopts a “wait and see” stance. The continued strength of the US dollar is exerting downward pressure on commodities overall, while ongoing concerns about demand growth are weighing on the outlook for crude.
As we noted in Tuesday’s crude oil comment, there has been an unusual silence from Iran, leading to a significant reduction in the geopolitical risk premium. According to the Washington Post, Israel has initiated cease-fire negotiations with Lebanon, influenced by the shifting political landscape following Trump’s potential return to the White House. As a result, the market is currently pricing in a reduced risk of further major escalations in the Middle East. However, while the geopolitical risk premium of around USD 4-5 per barrel remains in the background, it has been temporarily sidelined but could quickly resurface if tensions escalate.
The EIA reports that India has now become the primary source of oil demand growth in Asia, as China’s consumption weakens due to its economic slowdown and rising electric vehicle sales. This highlights growing concerns over China’s diminishing role in the global oil market.
From a fundamental perspective, we expect Brent crude to remain well above USD 70 per barrel in the near term, but the outlook hinges largely on the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early December. So far, the cartel, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, has twice postponed its plans to increase production this year. This decision was made in response to weakening demand from China and increasing US oil supplies, which have dampened market sentiment. The cartel now plans to implement the first in a series of monthly hikes starting in January 2025, after originally planning them for October. Given the current supply dynamics, there appears to be limited room for additional OPEC volumes at this time, and the situation will likely be reassessed at their December 1st meeting.
The latest report from the US API showed a decline in US crude inventories of 0.8 million barrels last week, with stockpiles at the Cushing, Oklahoma hub falling by a substantial 1.9 million barrels. The “official” figures from the US DOE are expected to be released today at 16:30 CEST.
In conclusion, over the past month, global crude oil prices have fluctuated between gains and losses as market participants weigh US monetary policy (particularly in light of the election), concerns over Chinese demand, and the evolving supply strategy of OPEC+. The coming weeks will be critical in shaping the near-term outlook for the oil market.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Iran’s silence hints at a new geopolitical reality
Since the market opened on Monday, November 11, Brent crude prices have declined sharply, dropping nearly USD 2.2 per barrel in just over a day. The positive momentum seen in late October and early November has largely dissipated, with Brent now trading at USD 71.9 per barrel.
Several factors have contributed to the recent price decline. Most notably, the continued strengthening of the U.S. dollar remains a key driver, as it gained further overnight. Meanwhile, U.S. government bond yields showed mixed movements: the 2-year yield rose, while the 10-year yield edged slightly lower, indicating larger uncertainty.
Adding to the downward pressure is ongoing concern over weak Chinese crude demand. The market reacted negatively to the absence of a consumer-focused stimulus package, which has led to persistent pricing in of subdued demand from China – the world’s largest crude importer and second-largest crude consumer. However, we anticipate that China recognizes the significance of the situation, and a substantial stimulus package is imminent once the country emerges from its current balance sheet recession: where businesses and households are currently prioritizing debt reduction over spending and investment, limiting immediate economic recovery.
Lastly, the geopolitical risk premium appears to be fading due to the current silence from Iran. As we have highlighted previously, when a “scheduled” retaliatory strike does not materialize quickly, it reduces any built-in price premium. With no visible retaliation from Iran yesterday, and likely none today or tomorrow, the market is pricing in diminished geopolitical risk. Furthermore, the outcome of the U.S. with a Trump victory may have altered the dynamics of the conflict entirely. It is plausible that Iran will proceed cautiously, anticipating a harsh response (read sanctions) from the U.S. should tensions escalate further.
Looking ahead, the market will be closely monitoring key reports this week: the EIA’s Weekly Petroleum Status Report on Wednesday and the IEA’s Oil Market Report on Thursday.
In summary, we believe that while the demand outlook will eventually stabilize, the strong oil supply continues to act as a suppressing force on prices. Given the current supply environment, there appears to be little room for additional OPEC volumes at this time, a situation the cartel will likely assess continuously on a monthly basis going forward.
With this context, we maintain moderately bullish for next year and continue to see an average Brent price of USD 75 per barrel.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Market battling between spike-risk versus 2025 surplus
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Uniper har säkrat 175 MW elektricitet i Östersund för e-metanol
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guldpriset passerar 2700 USD till sin högsta nivå någonsin
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
District Metals prospekterar uran i Sverige, nu noteras även aktierna här
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: It takes guts to hold short positions
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Guldpriset stiger hela tiden till nya rekord
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: A price rise driven by fundamentals
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Recent ’geopolitical relief’ seems premature