Analys
Crude oil – It’s a (hybrid) market share war

Rebound after a very bearish day as US inventories declines further. Last week Brent crude broke down below USD 75/b. And it didn’t take long before the heralded production increase was shifted out two months to instead start in December. This however, was far from enough to halt the oil price sell-off where Brent crude traded down to USD 68.68/b (-4.4%) before closing the day at USD 69.19/b (-3.7%). The market was gripped with bearish demand fears and there were hardly any bullish voices to be heard. This morning Brent is rebounding 1.5% to USD 70.25/b. US inventories likely continued to decline last week by around 3 mb according to indics by API in an extension of steady declines since mid-June. Russia and other OPEC+ members complied better to quota targets in August.

A (hybrid) market share war. A fight over market share between OPEC+ and non-OPEC+ is indeed a key element of the latest turmoil in the oil market. And not the least unclarity over how exactly the group is going to execute its long heralded production increase. But the group partially showed its cards last week when it modified its plan to hike production almost immediately after Brent crude fell below USD 75/b last week.
This is very different from 2014/15. OPEC+ is clearly set to return volumes to the market. But this looks very different from 2014/15 when OPEC simply flooded the market with oil and crashed the price. This time around the group is behaving more like a central bank. In June they laid out and communicated to the market their plan to return 2.2 m b/d of voluntary cuts to the market. Gradually lifting production from Q4-2024 to Q3-2025. They communicated this long time in advance of when the actual production increase is supposed to take place. At first it shocked the market and Saudi Arabia was forced to soften the message with ifs and buts. Saying that the plan will be adaptable to market circumstances once we actually get to Q4-2024. Though without being too specific about it. And now we are very, very close to Q4. The market is hit by China weakness as well as a bit of unclarity over the ”new” strategy of OPEC+. The oil price tanks.
They will lift production by 2.2 mb/d but it will take longer time. We do believe that OPEC+ will indeed lift production by 2.2 m b/d as stated but that they will spend more time doing it and also that they will have to accept a somewhat lower price to get it done. If nothing else they need to lift production back towards more normal levels in order to be in a position to cut again when the next crisis occur. Just like central banks needs to lift interest rates in order to be positioned to cut the yet again.
Not all bearish. Here are some bullish elements. Amid all the bearish concerns which is gripping the market currently here is a list of supportive elements.
1) OPEC+ modified its production increase plan the moment Brent fell below USD 75/b. More modifications to come if needed in our view.
2) Better compliance by OPEC+ members in August with Russia now very close to production quota-target.
3) US oil inventories have fallen steadily and counter seasonally since mid-June and likely fell another 3 mb last week (crude and products) according to indic. by API. Global floating crude oil stocks have declined by close to 50 mb since a peak in mid-June.
4) VLCC freight rates from the Middle East to China are ticking higher. Probably a sign of increased appetite for oil imports.
5) US EIA yesterday reduced its US crude oil production forecast marginally lower along with a slightly lower price forecast.
Deep rooted market concerns at the moment are about fear for coming surplus with predictions that the market will flip to surplus some time in November and December. Thus no surplus as of yet. Though Chinese weakness is apparent to be seen.
An oil price of USD 75/b in 2025 will likely give OPEC+ what it wants. A somewhat lower oil price (SEB 2024 Brent average forecast is USD 75/b) will be very positive for the global economy, lower inflation, lower interest rates, higher oil demand growth down the road and also further dampening of US shale oil production growth. A WTI crude oil price of around USD 70/b will likely also stimulated the US government to buy more oil to refill its Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) which were heavily depleted in 2022/23. All good things for OPEC+ and its ability to place 2.2 mb/d of oil back into the market.
Analys
Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).
Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.
The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.
Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.


Analys
Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.
As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.
Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.
However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.
That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.
The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.
Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.
In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.
Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.
Analys
A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.
It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.
No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.
What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend.
The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Stor uppsida i Lappland Guldprospekterings aktie enligt analys
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Silverpriset släpar efter guldets utveckling, har mer uppsida
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Uppgången i oljepriset planade ut under helgen
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Låga elpriser i sommar – men mellersta Sverige får en ökning
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Mahvie Minerals växlar spår – satsar fullt ut på guld
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Very relaxed at USD 75/b. Risk barometer will likely fluctuate to higher levels with Brent into the 80ies or higher coming 2-3 weeks
-
Nyheter1 vecka sedan
Oljan, guldet och marknadens oroande tystnad
-
Nyheter1 vecka sedan
Jonas Lindvall är tillbaka med ett nytt oljebolag, Perthro, som ska börsnoteras