Följ oss

Analys

Crude oil comment – The risk is to the downside: $35/b before $45/b

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror
  • SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - CommodityCrude oil comment – The risk is to the downside: $35/b before $45/b
  • Graph 1: Contango likely to deepen again
  • Graph 2: As the market is still running a solid surplus
  • Graph 3: Temporary Dated Brent tightness is softening again
  • Graph 4: Price gains have managed to extend somewhat to the longer dated contracts
  • Graph 5: US oil rig count still lower despite now 8 weeks since price headed higher

Crude oil comment – The risk is to the downside
Two key drivers which have been important for the price rally to $40/b are fading. The 600 kbpd oil pipeline from northern Iraq to Ceyhan on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey is now repaired and only awaits a go signal from Baghdad. Together with the outage of Forcados in Nigeria it helped to tighten up the Brent spot market and thus assist the financial Brent crude oil rally with net long speculative positions now at record high. While still awaiting a go from Baghdad, the pipeline is likely to come back any day. The “production freeze discussion” between OPEC/Russia now holds no hope of creating any changes on the supply side. We never had any hopes for these discussions. Nonetheless, the fact that Saudi Arabia joined in on the discussions created some hope in the market that something might materialize from this in terms of restrained supply. It is however becoming more and more evident for everyone that this will come to nothing with latest statement from Iran: “Leave us alone. We’ll talk when we are back at 4 mbpd (now 3 mbpd)”.

The market is running a solid surplus. Looking at the weekly data so far this year it basically looks like a 2 mbpd surplus and just as big as last year. Yes, the market is now rebalancing. US production is declining and non-OPEC is declining, but as of yet it is not enough. Over time it is a contradiction to have increasing inventories and a flattening oil curves. Speculative positioning can shift it substantially out of shape for periods, but it will have to move back to reflect fundamentals again. If the flatter curve persists, then physical oil will have to leave inventories as economics can no longer support holding theme there. As the surplus persists we think that the contango will have to deepen again with front contracts coming lower again versus longer dated contracts in order to maintain oil inventory economics.

Since the end of December last year the net long speculative positioning in Brent and WTI has increased by 250,000 contracts equalling 250 million barrels. On the other side of this speculative equation are the physical producers. If the oil price now falls back $10/b down to $30/b again then the financial community will have handed the physical producers some $2.5bn in much needed funding.

In terms of the possibility for further oil price gains we think that it will be increasingly difficult for the oil price to move from $40/b to $50/b as there as far as we can see is an accelerating number of shale oil activities which becomes profitable as the oil price moves through this price span up to $50/b. Note also that if the Brent 1mth contract moves to $50/b then due to the contango in the oil price curve this will typically place the WTI Cal-2017 at $55/b. This should be perceived as a very nice price for many US shale oil producers to hedge at.

All told. There is increasing headwind for the oil price to move to the upside from $40/b. In addition the oil price is losing two key supportive elements which helped it move higher. The Ceyhan pipeline will come back any day and the “production freeze” discussion will just go away. Add solid, running surplus and rising oil inventories, too much flattening of the oil price curves and record high net long speculative positioning and voila, we are set to move to the downside. We are likely to see $35/b before we see $45/b.

Contango likely to deepen again

Brent and WTI prices

As the market is still running a solid surplus with stocks in weekly data growing some 2 mbpd year to date
However, crude and product stocks in weekly data declined last week:

Numbers

Crude and product stocks

Temporary Dated Brent tightness is softening again

Brent

Price gains have managed to extend somewhat to the longer dated contracts

Brent

US oil rig count still lower despite now 8 weeks since price headed higher

US oil rig

Oil

Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking

Analys

Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).

Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.

Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.

The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.

Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.

US DOE, inventories, change in million barrels per week
US crude inventories excl. SPR in million barrels
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.

As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.

Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.

However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.

That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.

The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.

Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.

In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.

Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.

It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.

No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.

What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend. 

The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.

Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära