Analys
Bulls recover their confidence as US crude stocks draws lower

Over the past week we have seen some sharp moves to the downside with Brent trading down to below $47/b before recovering. The sell-off was partly in a joint sell-off together with industrial metals. Possibly on the back of general commodity profit taking as some indications pointed to a peak in growth momentum.
There is clearly a widespread consensus that OPEC will roll cuts over into H2-17. The decision is however still ahead of us and as such is an uncertain element which creates some hesitation in the market. Better safe than sorry and as such we are likely to head into the meeting most likely at the low side of the prise spectre with a bounce up after the meeting with what now seems likely a positive decision by OPEC to roll cuts over into H2-17. Trading Brent crude at around $51-52/b ahead of the meeting with a jump up to $56/b post the meeting seems sensible.
We have seen some aired concerns that oil demand growth is coming in much weaker than expected with a growth rate as low as 0.8 mb/d y/y in H1-17. We find it hard to believe at the moment that there should be reason to be concerned for such a soft global oil demand growth in 2017. Overall oil demand growth is quite steady and fairly well related to overall global economic growth. In 2014 we had the exact same kind of concern where oil demand at times was estimated as low as 0.7 mb/d y/y. In hindsight though it has been adjusted up to 1.4% y/y for that year or +1.3 mb/d oil demand growth in 2014.
The US EIA on Tuesday released its monthly Short Term Energy Outlook (STEO) for May. It adjusted global supply up by 0.2% for both 2017 and 2018 while demand was lifted by 0.1% for each year. Net it saw a global surplus of 0.17 mb/d and 0.47 mb/d respectively for the two years. With a slightly higher projected surplus it adjusted its Brent and WTI price forecast down by 3% each for 2017 to $52.6/b and $50.7/b respectively for the two grades. The price forecast for 2018 was kept unchanged at $57.1/b and $55.1/b respectively for Brent and WTI. With a projected surplus for both 2017 and 2018 it naturally saw no draw down in OECD inventories neither in 2017 nor in 2018. It projected OECD ending stocks to end 2018 at 3109 mb which was 2.2% higher than in its April report and above the 2016 ending stock level of 2967 mb. Such an outlook should mean that the contango in the crude oil curves should be just as deep in 2017 as in 2018. It is a bit difficult to understand why they have a higher price forecast for 2018 than for 2017 when inventories are rising in 2018. The forecast for 2018 is actually 8.5% higher in 2018 than for 2017. The only explanation for such a view is that cost inflation will push prices higher.
US crude oil inventories yesterday showed a decline of 5.8 mb last week with gasoline declining 0.2 mb and distillates declining 1.6 mb. That gave the market back a lot of confidence. Total crude and product stocks in the US has actually been falling since mid-February but very high inventories for crude specifically has created lots of discomfort for the oil bulls this spring. Yesterday however some of those concerns were eased. The US EIA also estimated US crude production to be 9.3 mb/d last week (+21 kb/d w/w). In its STEO report on the EIA projected that US crude production would rise to 9.7 mb/d in November 2017 and thus pas its prior peak of 9.6 mb/d.
In perspective it is good to take a look at the current global rig count. It stood at 3656 rigs in 2014 while it stood at 2065 rigs in March according to OPEC. Also, it actually fell 42 rigs mth/mth from February. From 2014 to the latest count there is a drop of 43%. If we adjust for US shale oil volume productivity where today’s 600 shale oil rigs are as effective as 1200 rigs in 2014 we still get that the effective real decline in oil rigs is about 30% since 2014. Our ball-park figure is that only 20% of global upstream oil investments are needed to cover the global oil demand growth of some 1.3 mb/d y/y. The other 80% of upstream investments are basically used to produce oil that will counter declining production in existing production. The same goes for oil rigs. Only 20% of the rigs are needed to cover oil demand growth. The other 80% are needed to cover declines. Thus a 20% decline in real, global rig count will lead to no growth in global oil production. The above rig count does however not dissect between rigs used for prospecting versus rigs used to create production rigs. And as such the decline gives a misleading picture since prospecting for oil was the first to be cut in the downturn.
In the shorter term price picture we believe that Brent crude front month will head towards $51-52/b ahead of the OPEC meeting. Technically it then first out needs to break above $51.1/b and then more importantly above $51.67/b. Breaking above the later would technically be a goodbye to the downside technical correction we have had lately.
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).
Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.
The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.
Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.


Analys
Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.
As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.
Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.
However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.
That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.
The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.
Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.
In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.
Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.
Analys
A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.
It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.
No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.
What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend.
The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Stor uppsida i Lappland Guldprospekterings aktie enligt analys
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Brookfield ska bygga ett AI-datacenter på hela 750 MW i Strängnäs
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Sommaren inleds med sol och varierande elpriser
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Silverpriset släpar efter guldets utveckling, har mer uppsida
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent needs to fall to USD 58/b to make cheating unprofitable for Kazakhstan
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tradingfirman XTX Markets bygger datacenter i finska Kajana för 1 miljard euro
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Uppgången i oljepriset planade ut under helgen
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Låga elpriser i sommar – men mellersta Sverige får en ökning