Analys
Brent near USD 100 again(!)… SPR headlines cannot replace Hormuz flows
Brent crude is trading higher overnight, up roughly USD 4.5/bl from yesterday’s close. That said, prices were at one point up nearly USD 8/bl during the night before easing back this morning. Brent is currently hovering around USD 98/bl.

Analyst Commodities, SEB
This week has been extraordinarily volatile. We have seen intraday highs at USD 119.5/bl and intraday lows at USD 81.16/bl: all within roughly 38 hours. Every headline is being parsed for signs of escalation or de-escalation, and price action reflects exactly that.
The latest political headlines do little to calm the market. President Trump told Axios on Wednesday that the war with Iran will end “soon” because there is “practically nothing left to target.” On the surface, that sounds like an attempt to signal that the campaign is nearing its end.
Yet, the rest of the reporting points in the opposite direction. According to the same article, neither US nor Israeli officials have received any internal guidance on when military operations are expected to stop. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said the war will continue “without any time limit” for as long as necessary to achieve its objectives. In parallel, both US and Israeli officials are reportedly preparing for at least two more weeks of strikes inside Iran.
That is a major mismatch. Trump is talking as if the campaign is close to completion, while those involved operationally appear to be preparing for something much more prolonged. For the oil market, that alone is enough to keep prices elevated. Even if the White House wants to calm expectations, the underlying signal is still that this may not be over anytime soon.
The “at least two more weeks of strikes” headline matters when you put the numbers into context. We have already had roughly 11-12 days of conflict. Add another 14 days, and we are suddenly looking at around 25 days in total. Apply that to roughly 20 million bl/d of flows through the Strait of Hormuz, and you are talking about something close to 500 million barrels of disrupted supply to global markets.
That is where the 400-million-barrel SPR release headline needs to be understood properly. Yes, 400 million barrels sounds huge. But the key issue is not the total volume (it is the daily release rate). The maximum sustainable release rate is roughly 2 million barrels per day, meaning a 400-million-barrel release would take around 200 days to fully hit the market.
So even though the headline number looks impressive, the short-term offset is limited. If a major disruption removes 15-18 million bl/d from the market, roughly the scale tied to Hormuz flows, then a 2 million bl/d emergency release barely scratches the surface.
i.e., SPR releases are likely more to signal and calm market psychology than replacing lost supply.
There has also been some confusion around the US reserve-release headlines. The 172 million barrels referenced in some reports are not additional barrels on top of the 400 million already announced, they are part of the same broader release package.
Our base view remains that Trump will want this war to end. Oil prices and the approaching midterm elections will push him in that direction. But the much harder question is what it would take for Iran to “reopen” Hormuz fully and safely afterwards. Compensation for rebuilding damaged infrastructure? Guarantees against renewed attacks? Some broader political or security arrangement? That remains completely unclear.
Another important point is that two more weeks of strikes also mean two more weeks of risk for lasting damage to oil infrastructure. Even if the conflict eventually de-escalates, the market may still have to deal with damaged loading facilities, terminals, pipelines or shipping routes. That is part of what makes this more serious than a simple headline-driven spike.
At the same time, some of the “lost” supply may in practice be delayed rather than permanently destroyed. Oil has been built up inside the Gulf during the disruption, and some of those barrels would start flowing back to global markets once the Gulf reopens. So, part of the current shock could later reverse as trapped supply is released.
Overnight headlines underline just how nervous the market remains. Trump said he wants to refill the SPR quickly, Oman reportedly began evacuating ships from Mina al Fahal, and Brent briefly moved back above USD 100/bl as disruption hit a key Omani port. In addition, China has reportedly told refiners to suspend all refined fuel export cargoes: another sign that governments are shifting into supply-security mode.
Another thing often overlooked in these situations is hoarding behavior. If governments or market participants start stockpiling aggressively, the effect can make the situation worse. That is exactly what happened during the 1970s oil crisis, when precautionary buying added roughly 2-3 million bl/d of extra demand on top of the underlying supply shock. That kind of behavior can amplify price spikes very quickly. China has already been building inventories over the past year, and there are signs that other large importers such as Japan and South Korea are also securing as many barrels as they can.
Finally, on naval escorts: we have highlighted before that even if they are introduced, flows would still likely remain well below normal. Lloyd’s estimates that naval escorts could in theory protect enough ships to keep some traffic moving, but that this would require more naval assets than are currently available. Even in that best-case scenario, less than 10% of normal traffic may get through, and realistically, even that may prove optimistic.
In short, inventory releases may help at the margin, but they are nowhere near large enough to offset a major physical disruption. The real issue is not the headline volume of reserves; it is whether physical flows through Hormuz can resume in a credible and sustained way.
_______________
Yesterday’s US DOE report was somewhat mixed, but with the key point being that commercial crude inventories rose by 3.8 m bl on the week to 443.1 m bl. Even after the build, crude inventories still sit around 2% below the five-year average for this time of year.
On the products side, the picture was more constructive. Gasoline inventories fell 3.7 m bl, while distillates declined 1.3 m bl. Gasoline stocks remain about 5% above the five-year average, but distillates are now roughly 2% below. Total commercial petroleum inventories fell by 2.0 m bl on the week, which softens the bearish read from the crude build alone.
Refinery activity picked up further, with crude runs increasing by 328 k bl/d to 16.2 m bl/d, while utilisation rose to 90.8%. Product output also moved higher, with gasoline production at 9.9 m bl/d and distillate production at 4.9 m bl/d.
On the demand side, the four-week averages remain reasonably supportive. Total products supplied are running 1.9% above the same period last year, with gasoline up 0.8%, distillates up 0.4%, and jet fuel showing the strongest growth at +7.3% YoY.
i.e., the crude build is the headline, but the broader inventory picture is less bearish than that suggests. Product draws continue, total commercial inventories fell, and crude stocks remain slightly below normal for the time of year.


Analys
Brent falling like a rock with oil likely to flow from SoH until at least 3 November
Brent M1 moving below the 200 dma of $78.7/b. Brent crude continued its move lower yesterday with a decline of 3.3% to $77.9/b. This morning it is adding another drop of 1.4% to $76.8/b. Israel bombing Lebanon during the weekend was a violence of the MoU and Iran was quick to declare the SoH closed again. But the willingness to move forward by both the US and Iran obviously trumped the bombing in Lebanon making the event more of a hiccup on the road of further negotiations.

The US has now waived sanctions against Iranian oil exports for two months allowing Iran to sell its oil all over the world, though sanctions instated in Europe will take more time to unwind. Oil from Iran, Russia as well as Venezuela can for the time being be sold across the world without any sharp discount due to sanctions. Chinese Tea-pot refineries will suffer as they previously could buy rebated crude while selling products at market prices.
Crude oil is no flowing out of the SoH with latest number close to 7 mb/d on a three day moving average. That is still well below the 14 mb/d of crude and 6 mb/d of products normally flowing out of the SoH. Latest estimate is that there is around 80 mb of crude on water inside the Persian Gulf and maybe another 80 mb of oil products on water as well. If crude is exiting the SoH at a rate of around 7 mb/d, then the 80 mb of crude would be depleted within 10-15 days and there after the flow would rely on new crude tankers entering, loading and then exiting the SoH to continue further flows. Given the uncertainties surrounding the status of the SoH with Iran stating that it was closed again as recent as this weekend, there is likely an asymmetry here where ships and oil stranded in the SoH for months are much more eager to exit than new ships are eager to enter.
For now Brent crude keeps falling like a rock with the front-end Brent contract now only trading at a premium of $7.6/b above the five year contract. Quickly heading towards parity. The Brent M1 contract has now broken below its 200 dma of $78.7/b and is closing in on the Fibo-level at $74.7/b. Below that there is not much more supporting levels to be found before $73/b which would close the gap from February 3.
Brent crude M1 technical levels

Net long speculative positions are also falling like a rock and as of Tuesday last week the net long positioning in Brent and WTI together summed to 314 million barrels and falling fast.

Will there be a rebound? A possible combination could be an exhaustion of the oil blob caught within the SoH within 1-2 weeks if exits continue at current rate while new ships entering are much more cautious, more Israeli bombardments in Lebanon as Netanyahu fights for re-election, a temporary closure of the SoH again while speculative short positions take cover buying back and covering their positions.
US and Israeli stands versus Iran could harden beyond elections so 2027 surplus is far from given. But Iran and the US are all in all moving towards a set of solutions with both clearly eager to reopen the SoH and keep it open. And that is what the market is pricing along with sharply falling prices. The ongoing discussions will likely take months and last beyond both the upcoming Israeli election (before 27 oct) and the US midterm elections on 3 Nov. Beyond those dates the stance by both Israel and the US may harden again versus Iran. But Iran knows that and is most likely preparing for such a hardening turn. Thus a surplus of oil and global oil stock rebuilding in 2027 (as now is mostly projected) is far from given.
Analys
Selling down on a ”deal”
Selling down on a ”deal”. Brent crude fell 6.2% last week with accelerated weakness towards the end of the week. Close of the week at $87.33/b and low of the week (and on Friday) of $85.8/b. Brent is falling another 4% this morning to $83.7/b on confirmation by Iran that a MoU text has been reached and that it will be signed on Friday this week.

So what is this ”deal” worth? Talk on the desk here this morning is that it is much like ”putting lipstick on a pig” where Trump has to sell this at home as a victory where ”the SoH has reopened”, the nuclear issue will be ironed out over the coming 60 days (or maybe 600 days?) and US consumers are getting a lower gasoline price and maybe US republicans survives the midterm elections.
The importance for Iran is that it emerges as the defacto winner of this war in the eyes of the non-US public world. That Iran now onwards is the ”ruler of the SoH” (combo of geography and new weapons systems like drones) or more softer: ”the guarantor of safe passage through the SoH”.
Iran doesn’t need nuclear weapons any more. Nuclear deterrence doesn’t work any more. Ukraine has made many attacks deep into Russia without being nuked in return. Plenty of Iranian ballistic rockets blasts over Israel but Iran wasn’t nuked in return.
There is no trust between the US and Iran. We don’t know all the details yet of the MoU. But what we do know is that there is no trust between the US and Iran what so ever. This is probably more like a descriptive text on how they can cooperate in a way where both sides keeps tactical leverage. Neither side makes irreversible concessions. Violations can be punished quickly. Cooperation produces immediate benefits.
This is a fragile structure. It can easily break down. There may be details which cannot be overcome. To be seen on Friday. The US has to show that it is willing put enough force behind managing and restraining Israel versus Hezbollah in Lebanon. We have seen that Netanyahu hasn’t listened all that much to Trump’s directives and wishes. This could be a major obstacle.
A gradual reopening is tactically preferable for Iran. A tactical leverage for Iran right now is that global oil stocks have been drawn down towards painful and increasingly dangerous levels with increasing risks for oil price spikes in mid-July to August. This together with US midterm elections on 3 November gives tactical leverage to Iran. Iran probably doesn’t want to fully give up on that leverage. A rapid, full reopening where global stocks are able to refill over the coming 60 days will significantly erode that leverage. If Iran reinstates a closure of the SoH after 60 days (if talks break down again), then the effect won’t be that impactful in terms of prices and the US midterm elections.
So a gradual and partial reopening where global markets gets the oil they need while they are unable to rebuild stocks could be a practical middle way for both parties. Trump can sell it as ”the SoH has reopened” and get affordable gasoline for US consumers. Iran can sell it as ”the SoH has fully reopened, but there is some friction” so flow is only 60-80% of normal.
Not much real demand destruction below $100/b. What we do know is that there is not much real price pain demand destruction for oil globally at an oil price below $100/b. A lot of demand-shock destruction. Fear. But demand should now come roaring back towards normal with fear for exceptionally high prices now is rapidly receding.
Sudden China demand destruction due to EVs? Bullocks. EV share of total Chinese carpool now around 13%. Share of new sales of EVs has reached 50%. This is a very gradual process. It doesn’t make oil demand fall like a rock over night. When EV new sales share reaches 100%, then the gasoline car pool will contract by some 5-10% per year. But that is only gasoline. Sudden reduction in Chinese oil demand is more about shock and risk.
Chinese crude oil imports will come roaring back. At what price? Today’s ”neutral” oil price is $70/b. That is the five year price which has steadily traded around the $70/b mark over the past 3-4 years. With still a risky picture one would think that China and the rest of the world will be big buyers of oil in the range of $70-85/b.
Global demand will likely snap back towards normal, forecasted demand and growth at such prices.
Physical reopening is a gradual process. The physical and practical reopening of the SoH will likely be gradual rather than sudden. And that probably suites Iran tactically as well.
Brent M1 price versus the Brent 5-yr (today’s ”normal” price)

Analys
Oil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer
Market is starting to take US/Iran headlines with a pinch of salt. Brent crude rose $2.8/b yesterday to an official close of $112.1/b. But after that it traded as low as $108.05/b before ending late night at around $109.7/b. Through the day it traded in a range of $106.87 – 112.72/b amid a flurry of news or rumors from Iran and the US. ”US temporary sanctions during negotiations” (falls alarm). ”We will bomb Iran” (not anyhow),… etc. While the market is still fluctuating to this kind of news flow, it is starting to take such headlines with a pinch of salt.

We’ll see. Maybe, maybe not. The Brent M1 contract is trading at $110.2/b this morning which very close to the average ticks through yesterday of $110.4/b.
Trump with bearish, verbal intervention whenever Brent trades above $110/b it seems. What seems to be a pattern is that Trump states something like ”very good negotiations going on with Iran”, ”New leaders in Iran are great,..”, ”Great progress in negotiations,…”, ”Deal in sight,..” etc whenever the Brent M1 contract trades above $110/b. An effort to cool the market. These hot air verbal interventions from Trump used to have a heavy bearish impact on prices, but they now seems to have less and less effect unless they are backed by reality.
As far as we can see there has been no real progress in the negotiations between the US and Iran with both sides still standing by their previous demands.
Iran is getting stronger while the cease fire lasts making a return to war for Trump yet harder. Iran is naturally in constant preparation for a return to war given Trump’s steady threats of bombing Iran again. Iran is naturally doing what ever is possible to prepare for a return to war. And every day the cease fire lasts it is better prepared. This naturally makes it more and more difficult and dangerous for the US to return to warring activity versus Iran as the consequences for energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf will be more and more severe the longer the cease fire lasts. Israel seems to see it this way as well. That the war is not won and that current frozen state of a cease fire gives Iran opportunity to rebuild military and politically.
Global inventories are drawing down day by day. How much? In the meantime the Strait of Hormuz stays closed. There is varying measures and estimates of how much global inventories are drawing down. Our rough estimate, back of the envelope, is that global inventories are drawing down by at least some 10 mb/d or about 300 mb/d in a balance between loss of supply versus demand destruction. Other estimates we see are a monthly draw of 250-270 mb/d. The IEA only ’measured’ a draw in global observable stocks of 117 mb in April with oil on water rising 53 mb while on shore stocks fell 170 mb. But global stocks are hard to measure with large invisible, unmeasured stocks. As such a back of the envelope approach may be better.
Oil products is what the world is consuming. Oil product prices likely to rise while product stocks fall. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are predominantly crude oil. Discharging oil from OECD SPR stocks, a sharp reduction in Chinese crude imports and a reduction in global refinery throughput of 6-7 mb/d has helped to keep crude oil markets satisfactorily supplied. But global inventories are drawing down none the less. And oil products is really what the world is consuming. So if global refinery throughput stays subdued, then demand will eventually have to match the supply of oil products. The likely path forward this summer is a steady draw down in jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. Higher prices for these. Then, if possible, higher refinery throughput and higher usage of crude in response to very profitable refinery margins. And lastly sharper draw in crude stocks and higher prices for these. But some 6 mb/d of oil products used to be exported through the Strait of Hormuz. And it may not be so easy to ramp up refinery activity across the world to compensate. Especially as Ukraine continues to damage Russian refineries as well as Russian crude production and export facilities.
Watch oil product stocks and prices as well as Brent calendar 2027. What to watch for this summer is thus oil product inventories falling and oil product premiums to crude rising. Another measure to watch is the Brent crude 2027 contract as it rises steadily day by day as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed and global oil inventories decline. The latter is close to the highest level since the start of the war and keeps rising.
The Brent M1 contract and the Brent 2027 prices and current price of jet fuel in Europe (ARA). All in USD/b

Our back of the envelope calculation of the global shortage created by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Note that 3.5 mb/d of discharge from SPR is also a draw. Note also that ’Forced demand loss’ of 2.5 mb/d is probably temporary and will fall back towards zero as logistics are sorted out leaving ’Price demand loss’ to do the job of balancing the market. Thus a shortfall of at least 9 mb/d created by the closure. More if SPR discharge is included and more if Forced demand loss recedes.

-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanVattenfalls och Industrikrafts kärnkraftsbolag Videberg Kraft har valt Rolls-Royce SMR
-
Analys4 veckor sedanSelling down on a ”deal”
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanDen fysiska oljemarknaden, från extremt stark till svag
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanLeading Edge Materials får bearbetningskoncession för Norra Kärr av regeringen
-
Analys3 veckor sedanBrent falling like a rock with oil likely to flow from SoH until at least 3 November
-
Nyheter22 timmar sedanIrak, Syrien och USA ska bygga oljeledning från norra Irak till medelhavet

