Följ oss

Analys

Brent near USD 100 again(!)… SPR headlines cannot replace Hormuz flows

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude is trading higher overnight, up roughly USD 4.5/bl from yesterday’s close. That said, prices were at one point up nearly USD 8/bl during the night before easing back this morning. Brent is currently hovering around USD 98/bl.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye,
Analyst Commodities, SEB

This week has been extraordinarily volatile. We have seen intraday highs at USD 119.5/bl and intraday lows at USD 81.16/bl: all within roughly 38 hours. Every headline is being parsed for signs of escalation or de-escalation, and price action reflects exactly that.

The latest political headlines do little to calm the market. President Trump told Axios on Wednesday that the war with Iran will end “soon” because there is “practically nothing left to target.” On the surface, that sounds like an attempt to signal that the campaign is nearing its end.

Yet, the rest of the reporting points in the opposite direction. According to the same article, neither US nor Israeli officials have received any internal guidance on when military operations are expected to stop. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said the war will continue “without any time limit” for as long as necessary to achieve its objectives. In parallel, both US and Israeli officials are reportedly preparing for at least two more weeks of strikes inside Iran.

That is a major mismatch. Trump is talking as if the campaign is close to completion, while those involved operationally appear to be preparing for something much more prolonged. For the oil market, that alone is enough to keep prices elevated. Even if the White House wants to calm expectations, the underlying signal is still that this may not be over anytime soon.

The “at least two more weeks of strikes” headline matters when you put the numbers into context. We have already had roughly 11-12 days of conflict. Add another 14 days, and we are suddenly looking at around 25 days in total. Apply that to roughly 20 million bl/d of flows through the Strait of Hormuz, and you are talking about something close to 500 million barrels of disrupted supply to global markets.

That is where the 400-million-barrel SPR release headline needs to be understood properly. Yes, 400 million barrels sounds huge. But the key issue is not the total volume (it is the daily release rate). The maximum sustainable release rate is roughly 2 million barrels per day, meaning a 400-million-barrel release would take around 200 days to fully hit the market.

So even though the headline number looks impressive, the short-term offset is limited. If a major disruption removes 15-18 million bl/d from the market, roughly the scale tied to Hormuz flows, then a 2 million bl/d emergency release barely scratches the surface.

i.e., SPR releases are likely more to signal and calm market psychology than replacing lost supply.

There has also been some confusion around the US reserve-release headlines. The 172 million barrels referenced in some reports are not additional barrels on top of the 400 million already announced, they are part of the same broader release package.

Our base view remains that Trump will want this war to end. Oil prices and the approaching midterm elections will push him in that direction. But the much harder question is what it would take for Iran to “reopen” Hormuz fully and safely afterwards. Compensation for rebuilding damaged infrastructure? Guarantees against renewed attacks? Some broader political or security arrangement? That remains completely unclear.

Another important point is that two more weeks of strikes also mean two more weeks of risk for lasting damage to oil infrastructure. Even if the conflict eventually de-escalates, the market may still have to deal with damaged loading facilities, terminals, pipelines or shipping routes. That is part of what makes this more serious than a simple headline-driven spike.

At the same time, some of the “lost” supply may in practice be delayed rather than permanently destroyed. Oil has been built up inside the Gulf during the disruption, and some of those barrels would start flowing back to global markets once the Gulf reopens. So, part of the current shock could later reverse as trapped supply is released.

Overnight headlines underline just how nervous the market remains. Trump said he wants to refill the SPR quickly, Oman reportedly began evacuating ships from Mina al Fahal, and Brent briefly moved back above USD 100/bl as disruption hit a key Omani port. In addition, China has reportedly told refiners to suspend all refined fuel export cargoes: another sign that governments are shifting into supply-security mode.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Another thing often overlooked in these situations is hoarding behavior. If governments or market participants start stockpiling aggressively, the effect can make the situation worse. That is exactly what happened during the 1970s oil crisis, when precautionary buying added roughly 2-3 million bl/d of extra demand on top of the underlying supply shock. That kind of behavior can amplify price spikes very quickly. China has already been building inventories over the past year, and there are signs that other large importers such as Japan and South Korea are also securing as many barrels as they can.

Finally, on naval escorts: we have highlighted before that even if they are introduced, flows would still likely remain well below normal. Lloyd’s estimates that naval escorts could in theory protect enough ships to keep some traffic moving, but that this would require more naval assets than are currently available. Even in that best-case scenario, less than 10% of normal traffic may get through, and realistically, even that may prove optimistic.

In short, inventory releases may help at the margin, but they are nowhere near large enough to offset a major physical disruption. The real issue is not the headline volume of reserves; it is whether physical flows through Hormuz can resume in a credible and sustained way.

_______________

Yesterday’s US DOE report was somewhat mixed, but with the key point being that commercial crude inventories rose by 3.8 m bl on the week to 443.1 m bl. Even after the build, crude inventories still sit around 2% below the five-year average for this time of year.

On the products side, the picture was more constructive. Gasoline inventories fell 3.7 m bl, while distillates declined 1.3 m bl. Gasoline stocks remain about 5% above the five-year average, but distillates are now roughly 2% below. Total commercial petroleum inventories fell by 2.0 m bl on the week, which softens the bearish read from the crude build alone.

Refinery activity picked up further, with crude runs increasing by 328 k bl/d to 16.2 m bl/d, while utilisation rose to 90.8%. Product output also moved higher, with gasoline production at 9.9 m bl/d and distillate production at 4.9 m bl/d.

On the demand side, the four-week averages remain reasonably supportive. Total products supplied are running 1.9% above the same period last year, with gasoline up 0.8%, distillates up 0.4%, and jet fuel showing the strongest growth at +7.3% YoY.

i.e., the crude build is the headline, but the broader inventory picture is less bearish than that suggests. Product draws continue, total commercial inventories fell, and crude stocks remain slightly below normal for the time of year.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Analys

The price of crude oil in Europe today is $140/b

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Last week’s oil price action distorted by rolling of the November contract last week. The December Brent crude oil contract rose $4.8/b, or 5% last week. Much of that gain was due to the roll-yield as the November contract rolled off as the M1 contract to be replaced by the Dec-26 contract. The backwardation between the Nov and the Dec contract averaged $6.5/b over the last three days before 1 October and the rolling of contract. The ”gain” over the week was thus not much of a gain at all. If we just look at the M1 contract it instead fell 2% Friday to Friday though that disguises the change in the underlying contract over the week. The Brent M1 contract closed the week at $102.25/b. The announcement of 100 mb of oil from G7 SPR helped to ease prices at the end of last week. Though that effect seems to have faded today.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

More barrels from Strategic Petroleum Reserves or really barrels which were supposed to be released previously? Nonetheless, Trump seems to be content and is backing down from diesel export ban. Trump threatened the world, but especially Europe with a US diesel export ban unless Europe agreed to release diesel from strategic reserves. G7 last week decided to release 100 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves. But here the obscurity starts. How much of that will be diesel? ”Substantial release of diesel within 20 days” was the statement. If it happens late in this 20 day period, it would bring us very close to the US midterm elections which of course is what Trump is worried about here. IEA members promised to release 425 mb of oil from strategic reserves of which 125 mb was to be oil products. But a significant portion of that was never really released. The question is thus whether these ”new” 100 mb release will really be new or if the lion’s share of the ”new” 100 mb is really just part of the old 425 not yet fully released. Well, it looks like the promise, irrespectively what it really is, has averted a US diesel export ban for now. And it did also help to ease prices a bit at the end of last week. An effect which looks like it has mostly faded this Monday.

$140/b is the price of crude oil in Europe today. Back to the complete distortion of oil and product prices in time and geography. The Dated Brent ”spot” price averaged $123.3/b last week. But that is really the average Day_10 to Day_20 of the ”daily Dated Brent” forward curve. But since this curve is in very steep backwardation, the real prices for physical oil cargoes at the very front-end of this daily curve sits well above the average of this daily curve. The physical premiums for Oseberg and for Fortis crude takes this steep backwardation into account. The full price average for Oseberg and Fortis last week were thus $142.5/b and $140.2/b. That is way, way higher than both the Dated Brent ”spot” price last week and the average of the Brent futures price, the M1 contract, which averaged $103.2/b last week and is trading at $102.4/b

Extreme prompt tightness may fade or get much worse. The extreme prompt tightness and backwardation we see in the market today is a display of today’s prompt situation and not necessarily a guide for the future. The much more relaxed Brent M1 contract (today December) at $102.4/b is maybe a reflection of an oil market either betting or expecting that today’s problems will be resolved somehow over the coming three months. Or, that the current flow of oil out of the SoH at 17.5 mb/d (close to normal) will be sustained or even increase over time. But we don’t know exactly why the flow of crude, products and LNG out of the SoH has been able to sustain at around 17.5 mb/d since mid-September (it seems). Is it because shippers are better at managing the risk or more willing to take the risk of transiting? Is it because the US military assistance is better? Or is it because Iran is paid by exporters and is allowing exports out through the SoH? It seems plausible that Iran expects the US to attack again after the US midterm elections. If so, then Iran may engage with fresh attacks before that date. Physical crude in Europe today is $140/b, or 2x the ”normal” price of $70/b. But if tightness escalates further, then price of crude in Europe could go to 3x, 4x or even 5x the normal level. Let’s hope that the US is able to keep the SoH ”open” at a rate of 17.5 mb/d and that another 100 mb of oil from G7 helps to shield against that upside risk.

The global oil-stock cushion is getting ”scarily thin”. Looking at the Brent M1 Dec-26 contract, one gets the impression that risks may be fairly contained. Looking at physical spot prices in Europe however of around $140/b, the sense of stress rises substantially. The latter better reflects Amin Nasser, CEO of Saudi Aramco, when he recently said that the cushion capacity of global oil stocks are getting ”scarily thin”.

Some key questions helping to keep the Brent M1 price above $100/b: Will Iran initiate fresh attacks before the US midterm elections? Will the US attack Iran after the elections? Will the US be able to keep the SoH close to open at 17.5 mb/d? Will the Houthis re-attack the Saudi east-west pipeline and ships trying to traverse the Bab-el Mandeb Strait as the Saudi-backed Yemen government tries to retake areas along the Red Sea recently taken by the Houthis? How far will this have to go before China finally decides to step in as a peacemaker in ME negotiations?

ARA Crude oil, diesel and nat gas prices in USD/boe

ARA Crude oil, diesel and nat gas prices in USD/boe
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Bloomberg data

Physical crude oil premiums for Fortis and Oseberg in the NSea in USD/b premium over the Dated Brent index

Physical crude oil premiums for Fortis and Oseberg in the NSea in USD/b premium over the Dated Brent index
Source: SEB graph, Bloomberg data feed, Platts data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Oil prices are rising, but a picture of the future ME order may start to emerge

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Spot crude oil prices at very high levels. The Brent 1M (November) contract yesterday traded between $103.76 – 108.83/b before settling the day at $105.28/b. This morning it is trading up 1.4% to $106.8/b. That is not much of a price given that the ME crisis has been ongoing since 28 February. The Dated Brent spot price however settled yesterday at $123.78/b and averaged $120.6/b last week. Even stronger were the individual North Sea spot crude prices where Johan Sverdrup crude averaged $144/b from 21 to 24 September. And Johan Castberg was said to have traded at a premium of $32/b to the Dated Brent price last week which potentially would have placed it closer to $150/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

A steady trend higher since $70/b in early July. Crude oil prices have been on a steady trend upwards since they bottomed out at around $70/b in early July following the discharge of some 200 million barrels of crude, products and liquids from the Persian Gulf during a two week MoU window. from 20 June to 7 July when hostilities again resumed.

The oil market today is split apart in time, space and molecules. Financial crude oil prices for November delivery are trading at $106/b (Brent) and $93.3/b (US WTI) and $107/b (Oman). But spot crude oil prices are much higher at $120-150/b as described above. But consumers do not consume crude oil, they consume diesel and gasoline and other products. And diesel prices are closer to $200/b in ARA due to destruction of Russian refineries and locked-in refineries in the Persian Gulf. Oil markets are very stressed with respect to products, but not so stressed with respect to crude oil. But refineries are eager to pay up for crude deliveries right here and now so they can convert that crude to products and make a killing profit. They are not willing to pay up for November crude deliveries in the same way as uncertainties on the Middle East situation is so high. Exorbitantly expensive VLCC freight rates is also driving prices apart. VLCC freight rates are today running at 500,000 to 1,000,000 dollar a day rather than the normal 20,000 a day. This typically adds $10-20/b for crude oil between the point of origin and the point of delivery some 30-50 days out in time when the crude is delivered. This creates a lot of confusion of what really is the price of crude oil these days. Prices are very different in time and space.

Bonds and equity markets are starting to feel the heat. The Middle East crisis is starting to feed risk and pain into financial markets where the US 10-year rate is rising along with crude and product prices with equity market indices starting to pull back in response.

The risk is rising that the ”Trump war” in the Middle East may lead to the ”Trump recession”. A legacy Trump would not likely want to have. Feed-through to financial markets, rising risks for US financial and economic recession, rising risk to Trump’s legacy, declining US stocks of Patriot and THAAD rockets could be forcing mechanisms towards a resolution of the Middle East crisis. 

A picture of the future Middle East order is starting to emerge. There seems to be a lot of discussions between different parties going on and a picture of a new Middle East order is starting to emerge. A post Middle East pax Americana order. Where the different countries in the Middle East are taking much more responsibility for the security order in the region. The US provides intelligence and sell weapons to the region but is reducing its military presence. Iran is recognized as a regional power, but not the dominant one and is part of the security order in some ways. Trump can say that he reshaped the Middle East order. Exports of oil restored. The region now paying for its own defense. US soldiers pulled out to a minimum. China part of the diplomatic solution and taking some responsibility for keeping Iran in check.

Time to some kind of ME resolution? Forcing mechanisms: Declining stocks of defensive US rockets + rising crude and product prices + rising economic and financial pain and rising risk to Trump’s legacy. A window of resolution could be November to January maybe. Markets will likely increasingly price in a resolution as the picture of the future security order in the Middle East emerges further.

Crude and diesel prices in USD/b

Crude and diesel prices in USD/b
Source: SEB graph, Bloomberg data

European M1 refinery margins at record high.

European M1 refinery margins at record high.
Source: SEB graph, Bloomberg data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Dated Brent and Oman crude are showing the way higher

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Dated Brent and Oman crude are showing the way higher. The Brent crude M1 contract (October) gained another 0.75% yesterday. It traded in a range of $95.97-95.06/b and closed at $97.0/b. This morning it gains another 1.4% to $98.4/b. The Dubai M1 contract which is settled in November is showing the way at $105/b while Dated Brent settled ydy at $106.8/b. Brent crude M1 is now well above both the 50dma, 100dma and 200dma and is heading towards the 61.8% Fibo level of $100.55/b with $110.44/b next in line technical level thereafter.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Tight oil product markets are helping to drive crude oil prices higher as well. The strong push upwards for the Dated Brent price with ydy price reaching $106.8/b. Behind that drive upwards it very tight oil product markets with balance of month diesel refining margins in ARA now close to $90/b and gasoil cracks have been reported to top $100/b for the first time ever. That means extreme profitability for refineries. In response refineries here, there and everywhere want to get their hands on physical crude as quickly as possible. Convert it to oil products and sell the products into the ultra-tight spot oil product markets. Especially the diesel segment (Jet, diesel, gasoil). The economic incentive is huge for refineries.

This drive by refineries to process more crude in response to high refining margins, usually kicks in at much lower levels. Thereby normally transferring tightness from the oil product market over to the crude oil market. That normal mechanism hasn’t really worked properly in this crisis so far since there hasn’t been all that much spare refining capacity left as Ukraine is constantly damaging Russian refineries while the semi-closure of the SoH has sharply reduced oil product exports.

Stronger Chinese crude oil imports but higher oil product exports as well. Chines crude imports rose 6.2% MoM in August to 9.21 mb/d. That was  still 2.9 mb/d below the 2025 average of 12.1 mb/d. But China’s net oil product exports rose to 0.91 mb/d in August which is the highest level since February 2023. As a result, Chinese imports of crude and oil products was still 3.5 mb/d below the 2025 average versus 3.6 mb/d in July. That is a strengthening of net imports of only 0.1 mb/d. Not much change in total. But it shows that Chinese refineries, probably with the blessing of government, are importing more crude and re-export these as oil products. That helps to transfer oil product tightness to crude oil tightness. India is doing the same. In July it exported about 1.4 mb/d of oil products and the highest since September.

The Iran-Oman deal on the SoH will give China a forceful political option. The Iran-Oman agreement over how to operate the SoH is just days away from finalization says Iran. The IMO and the US is said to have been involved in the process. Once it is agreed and published, China will have the option to sail a Chinese flagged VLCC through the SoH according to the new, official regulation of the SoH, load oil at Kharg Island and take it back to China. That is a very forceful option for China.

Oil and the SoH will for sure be a hot topic when Trump and Xi Jinping meets in the US on 25 September. And China will have some forceful bargaining chips to play versus Donald Trump regarding the SoH and oil.

ARA balance of month refining margins at close to $90/b giving refineries strong incentives to run hard converting crude to products = stronger refinery crude oil demand

ARA balance of month refining margins at close to $90/b giving refineries strong incentives to run hard converting crude to products = stronger refinery crude oil demand
Source: SEB graph, Bloomberg

Dated Brent and Oman crude (settled outside of the Persian Gulf) are showing the way upwards

Dated Brent and Oman crude (settled outside of the Persian Gulf) are showing the way upwards
Source: SEB graph, Bloomberg data

Chinese crude (crude) and net crude and oil product imports (red) versus the 2025 average. Net crude and oil product imports was 3.5 mb/d below the 2025 average in August and 3.6 mb/d below in July. Almost the same. Stronger crude imports but also higher oil product exports

Chinese crude (crude) and net crude and oil product imports (red) versus the 2025 average.
Source: SEB graph, Bloomberg data

Chinese oil product exports rose to 0.91 mb/d in August and highest since Feb 2023. (numbers in reverse)

Chinese oil product exports rose to 0.91 mb/d in August and highest since Feb 2023. (numbers in reverse)
Source: SEB graph, Bloomberg
Fortsätt läsa

Sälja Guld - Guldbrev.se

Guldcentralen

Aktier

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära