Analys
Bearish momentum may return but strategic buying is starting to kick in
EUA price action: The seeds of the rally may have come from Red Sea troubles, higher freight rates and higher ARA coal prices. Add in record short positioning in EUAs, nat gas being cheap relative to oil in Asia, participants in the EU ETS purchasing EUAs strategically, rising temperature adj. nat gas demand in Europe (though absolute demand still very, very weak due to warm weather) and lastly a weather forecast pointing to more normal temperatures in North West Europe. And ”Bob’s your uncle”, the EUA Dec-24 price rallied 10.8% from EUR 52.2/ton on Feb 26 to EUR 57.84/ton ydy.

It is normal with short-covering rallies in bear markets. What puzzled us a little was the involvement of coal prices in the rally together with nat gas and EUAs. Did the upturn in coal prices come from the Chinese market with participants there maybe sniffing out some kind of imminent, large government stimulus package and front-running the market? No. There has been no rally in iron ore and the upturn in coal prices in Asia have been lagging the upturn in ARA coal prices.
Did the rally come from the Utility side in Europe where Utilities jumped in and bought Coal, Gas and EUAs and selling power against it? Probably not because forward fossil power margins are still very negative.
The most plausible explanation for the upturn in coal prices is thus Red Sea troubles, higher dry freight rates and higher ARA coal prices as a result. ARA coal prices bottomed out on 14 Feb and then started to move higher. The Baltic dry index started to rally already in mid-January. This may have been the seeds which a little later helped to ignite the short-covering rally in nat gas and EUAs. Add in a) Record short positioning in EUA contracts by investment funds with need for short-covering as EUA prices headed higher, b) Japanese LNG trading at only 58% versus Brent crude vs. a 2015-19 average of 73% thus nat gas was cheap vs. oil, c) Participants in the EU ETS starting to buy EUAs strategically because the price was close to EUR 50/ton, d) Gradually improving nat gas demand in Europe in temperature adjusted terms though actual.
Mixed price action this morning. Bearish momentum may return but strategic buying is kicking in. Today the EUA price is falling back a little (-0.3%) along with mixed direction in nat gas prices. The coal-to-gas differential (C-t-G diff) for the front-year 2025 still looks like it is residing at around EUR 47/ton and lower for 2026 and 2027. We expect C-t-G diffs to work as attractors to the EUA price from the power market dynamics side of the equation. Thus if nat gas prices now stabilizes at current levels we should still see bearish pressure on EUAs return towards these C-t-G diff levels. The forward hedging incentive index for power utilities in Germany is still deeply negative with no incentive to lock in forward margins as these largely are negative. Thus no normal purchasing of EUAs for hedging of power margin purposes.
That said however. We do see increasing interest from corporate clients to pick up EUAs for longer-term use and strategic positioning and that will likely be a counter to current bearish power market drivers. Even utilities will likely step in a make strategic purchases of EUAs. Especially those with coal assets. Irrespective of current forward power margins. An EUA price below EUR 60/ton is cheap in our view versus a medium-term outlook 2026/27 north of EUR 100/ton and we are not alone holding the view.
The Baltic dry index (blue) bottomed in mid-Jan and rallied on Red Sea issues. European coal, ARA 1mth coal price (white) bottomed on 14 Feb and then rallied.

ARA 1mth coal price in orange starting to move higher from 14 Feb. EUA Dec-24 price bottomed for now on 26 Feb

Net speculative positioning in EUAs by financial players. Record short

Price of Japanese LNG vs price of TTF nat gas as a spread in EUR/MWh. Rising price of Japanese LNG vs. TTF. But this could be coming from changes in LNG freight rates

Price of Japanese LNG vs. Brent crude traded all the way down to 58% making it cheap in relative terms to oil.

The German forward hedging incentive index just getting more and more negative

Forward EUA prices in green (today’s prices) and the EUA balancing price for Coal power vs Gas power in lilac. The latter is calculated with today’s nat gas prices and closing prices for ARA coal from ydy. In a medium-tight EUA market the Coal-to-Gas differential in lilac will typically be an ”attractor” for the EUA price in terms of power market dynamics.

Analys
Soon into the $50ies/b unless OPEC+ flips to production cuts
Brent crude fell 3.8% yesterday to $62.71/b. With that Brent has eradicated most of the gains it got when the US announced sanctions related to oil sales by Rosneft and Lukeoil on 22 October. Just before that it traded around $61/b and briefly touched $60.07/b. The US sanctions then distorted the reality of a global market in surplus. But reality has now reemerged. We never held much belief that 1) The sanctions would prevent Russian oil from flowing to the market via the dark fleet and diverse ship to ship transferee. Russia and the world has after all perfected this art since 2022. Extra friction in oil to market, yes, but no real hinderance. And 2) That Trump/US would really enforce these sanctions which won’t really kick in before 21 November. And post that date they will likely be rolled forward or discarded. So now we are almost back to where we were pre the US sanctions announcement.

OPEC revising (and admitting) that the global oil market was running a surplus of 0.5 mb/d in Q3-25 probably helped to drive Brent crude lower yesterday. The group has steadfastly promoted a view of very strong demand while IEA and EIA have estimated supply/demand surpluses. Given OPEC’s heavy role in the physical global oil market the group has gotten the benefit of the doubt of the market. I.e. the group probably knows what it is talking about given its massive physical presence in the global oil market. The global oil market has also gotten increasingly less transparent over the past years as non-OECD increasingly holds the dominant share of global consumption. And visibility there is low.
US EIA report: US liquids production keeps growing by 243 kb/d YoY in 2026. Brent = $55/b in 2026. The monthly energy report from the US energy department was neither a joy for oil prices yesterday. It estimated that total US hydrocarbon liquids production would grow by 243 kb/d YoY to 2026 to a total of 23.8 mb/d. It has upped its 2026 forecast from 23.4 mb/d in September to 23.6 mb/d in October and now 23.8 mb/d. For now prices are ticking lower while US EIA liquids production estimates keeps ticking higher. EIA expects Brent to average $55/b in 2026.
IEA OMR today. Call-on-OPEC 2026 at only 25.4 mb/d. I.e. OPEC needs to cut production by 3.7 mb/d if it wants to balance the market. The IEA estimated in its Monthly Oil Market Report that a balanced oil market in 2026 would require OPEC to produce only 25.4 mb/d. That is 3.7 mb/d less than the group’s production of 29.1 mb/d in October.
OPEC+ now has to make some hard choices. Will it choose market share or will it choose price? Since August there has been no further decline in US shale oil drilling rig count. It has instead ticked up 4 to now 414 rigs. A lower oil price is thus needed to drive US production lower and make room for OPEC+. Down in the 50ies we need to go for that to happen. We think that first into the 50ies. Then lower US oil rig count. Then lastly OPEC+ action to stabilize the market.
Analys
Trump’s China sanctions stance outweighs OPEC+ quota halt for Q1-26
Easing last week and lower this morning as Trump ”non-enforcement of sanctions towards China” carries more weight than halt in OPEC+ quotas in Q1-26. Brent crude calmed and fell back 1.3% to $65.07/b last week following the rally the week before when it touched down to $60.07/b before rising to a high of $66.78/b on the back of new US sanctions on Rosneft and Lukeoil. These new sanctions naturally affect the biggest buyers of Russian crude oil which are India and China. Trump said after his meeting last week with Xi Jinping that: ”we didn’t really discuss the oil”. China has stated explicitly that it opposes the new unilateral US sanctions with no basis in international law. There is thus no point for Trump to try to enforce the new sanctions versus China. The meeting last week showed that he didn’t even want to talk to Xi Jinping about it. Keeping these sanctions operational on 21 November onwards when they kick into force will be an embarrassment for Donald Trump. Come that date, China will likely explicitly defy the new US sanctions in yet another show of force versus the US.

Halt in OPEC+ quotas shows that 2026 won’t be a bloodbath for oil. Though still surplus in the cards. Brent crude started up 0.4% this morning on the news that OPEC+ will keep quotas unchanged in Q1-26 following another increase of 137k b/d in December. But following a brief jump it has fallen back and is now down slightly at $64.7/b. The halt in quotas for Q1-26 doesn’t do anything to projected surplus in Q1-26. So rising stocks and a pressure towards the downside for oil is still the main picture ahead. But it shows that OPEC+ hasn’t forgotten about the price. It still cares about price. It tells us that 2026 won’t be a bloodbath or graveyard for oil with an average Brent crude oil price of say $45/b. The year will be controlled by OPEC+ according to how it wants to play it in a balance between price and volume where the group is in a process of taking back market share.
Better beyond the 2026 weakness. Increasing comments in the market that the oil market it will be better later. After some slight pain and surplus in 2026. This is definitely what it looks like. The production forecast for non-OPEC+ production by the US EIA is basically sideways with no growth from September 2025. Thus beyond surplus 2026, this places OPEC+ in a very comfortable situation and with good market control.
US IEA October forecast for US liquids and non-OPEC+, non-US production. No net production growth outside of OPEC+ from September 2025 to end of 2026. OPEC+ is already in good position to control the market. It still want’s to take back some more market share. Thus still 2026 weakness.

Analys
OPEC+ quotas looks set to rise and US oil sanctions looks set to be toothless
Down this morning with concerns that US won’t enforce Russian oil sanctions towards China. Brent crude closed up 0.7% yesterday to a close of $65.0/b after having traded in a fairly narrow range of $64.06 – 65.15/b. This morning it is down 0.1% at $64.7/b while the ICE Gasoil crack is down 1% as reports from Trump’s high level talks with Xi Jinping sows doubts about the enforcement of the new US sanctions towards Russia’s Lukoil and Rosneft.

Concerns that US sanctions will create significant friction in crude and product markets. Much focus in the oil market yesterday was on whether the recent new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukeoil would have a material impact on the supply/demand balance in the global oil market. Total CEO, Patrick Pouyanne, said that the market was underestimating the sanctions with three Indian refineries accounting for half of India’s Russian crude oil imports now placing crude oil orders elsewhere. FGE added that there would be massive trade friction over the coming 6-8 weeks with 800k b/d of products and 1m b/d of crude at risk of being stranded at sea in November and December. While Brent crude traded to an intraday low of $60.07/b on 20 October, it is currently only up $3.4/b since its lowest recent close of $61.3/b on 17 October. That is not much in the scale of things. Maybe the market is underestimating the problem as argued by Total and FGE. But Russia and its shadow fleet companions have been hard at work avoiding western sanctions since 2022. Today they are experts at this. Ship to ship transfers of crude to hide that the oil is coming from Russia. Blending Russian crude into other streams. And if Russian crude oil is cheap then there is a lot of profits on the table for willing hands.
But it is highly unlikely that the US will enforce Russian oil sanctions when it comes to China. Both crude oil and gasoil are down this morning in part because Trump said about his meeting with Xi Jinping that ”we really didn’t discuss the (Russian) oil”. China is one of the biggest buyers of Russian crude oil. Not discussing the new US sanctions with China is a clear signal that these sanctions won’t be enforced. China has been standing up against the US this year on any issue of importance. China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated right after the new sanctions were announced that China “oppose unilateral sanctions which lack a basis in international law and authorization of the UN Security Council”. China won’t be bullied by over something as important as its oil purchases. If Trump tried to push the issue on sanctions on Russian oil versus China he would lose. He would get nowhere. So sensibly enough he didn’t lift the topic at the high level meeting. So China will likely pick up Russian crude cargoes who no one else dare to touch. Naturally at a bargain as well. If at all, the new sanctions are not in effect anyhow before 21 November. And as it said in the sanctions: ”may” and ”run the risk of” be prosecuted. Donald Trump thus stands free to not enforce the new sanctions. And how can he enforce them versus India if he can’t/won’t enforce them versus China. Again, as we said on 24 October: ”Sell the (sanctions) rally..”.
OPEC+ likely to lift its December quotas by 137k b/d on 2 November. OPEC+ will on 2 November discuss what it wants to do with its quotas for December. We expect the group to lift its quotas with an additional 137k b/d as it has done the last couple of meetings.
Crude oil at sea rose 69m b over week to 26 October and is up 253m b since mid-August.

-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanVad guldets uppgång egentligen betyder för världen
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanAustralien och USA investerar 8,5 miljarder USD för försörjningskedja av kritiska mineraler
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanSpotpriset på guld över 4300 USD och silver över 54 USD
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanGruvbolaget Boliden överträffade analytikernas förväntningar
-
Analys4 veckor sedanBrent crude set to dip its feet into the high $50ies/b this week
-
Analys4 veckor sedanCrude oil soon coming to a port near you
-
Analys3 veckor sedanSell the rally. Trump has become predictable in his unpredictability
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanVarför faller guldpriset tillbaka under 4 000 dollar?

