Analys
Another geopolitical jolt for oil markets?
Oil prices surged in the first week of the new year following a US airstrike which killed Qassem Soleimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ overseas forces. Tensions are rife in the region as the Iraqi parliament has since voted to expel US military from their soil prompting US President Trump to threaten sanctions against the country. Brent, which was trading at around $59/barrel at the end of Q3 last year, was hovering around $69/barrel on 8 Jan 2020.
In our annual outlook for 2020 published last month, we stressed that oil markets have not been pricing at a reasonable level of geopolitical risk premium given the fragility in the Middle East. In this blog, we will review why we believe that to be the case, analyse what is being priced in by oil futures curves and discuss where oil markets may head from here.
The missing geopolitical risk premium
Brent prices were trading around $85/barrel in October 2018 when the US announced sanctions against Iran. Since then, prices have fallen considerably as markets have been fixated on demand growth destruction on account of lukewarm global economic growth. But the period in between has not been devoid of volatility. What has been most curious is how quickly oil prices have reset after spiking sharply every time a ‘geopolitical’ event has taken place. The most vivid example of this came in September 2019 when Saudi oil facilities were hit by a drone attack raising major oil supply concerns among global markets. Prices fell back quickly when Saudi authorities assured markets that the damage was well within their control (See Figure 1). We believe a reasonable level of geopolitical risk premium has been missing from oil prices given the tensions in the region in recent months. Recent price action may be an early sign that markets are beginning to price in this premium to take us closer to a fairer price range for Brent around $70-$75/barrel.
Figure 1: Geopolitical risk premium has vanished from oil prices
What the backwardated futures curves tell us
A backwardated futures curve typically indicates that people are willing to pay more for prompt delivery than wait, suggesting near-term tightness for the commodity. Brent and WTI curves have become considerably more backwardated in the last three months (See Figure 2). Front-end prices started rising in October last year when markets started to price in further supply cuts by the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). OPEC and its allies, known as OPEC+ delivered by cutting supplies by 0.5mn barrels per day to bring total cuts to 1.7mn barrels per day compared to October 2018 levels. The steep backwardation in the curves, however, tells us that oil futures are pricing in the following:
- Supply will be plentiful over longer maturities as any tightness from a near-term shock may be offset by more sources of oil opening up (e.g. OPEC could loosen supply)
- Geopolitical risks are gradually getting priced in making the curve steeper at the front end.
If geopolitical tensions persist, or indeed escalate, oil prices are likely to experience upward pressure. Front end prices for oil can be volatile and, in recent months, oil curves have become more backwardated following geopolitical events before flattening out again. To infer that a geopolitical risk premium has been reasonably priced in, the backwardation would need to persist while the risks remain alive.
Figure 2: Brent and WTI curves have become more backwardated
The events from last week have had a slightly bigger impact on Brent, which is a more international oil benchmark, compared to WTI, which tends to be impacted more by US supply and demand dynamics.
Where do we go from here?
Oil markets are likely to remain reactive to developments between US and Iran. An outright conflict between the two could result in a major supply shock and the Strait of Hormuz could become inaccessible to a third of global oil volume which currently flows through it. Equally, a de-escalation in the most recent tensions may calm market nerves and lower oil prices yet again as they have following other geopolitical incidents in the region over the last year.
Given the uncertainty and the stakes, rationality would dictate that markets bake a geopolitical risk premium into oil prices until we see a meaningful resolution of major issues between the US and Iran. As tensions persist, markets will likely become more cognizant of this and oil prices will be supported. If however markets become complacent yet again and the premium erodes before all issues are resolved, oil could serve as a very good hedge for geopolitical risks as prices theoretically would rise whenever a geopolitical ‘event’ takes place.
A futures curve is said to be backwardated when its spot or cash price is higher than the forward price. The opposite situation is called contango in which the forward price is higher than the spot or cash price.
This material is prepared by WisdomTree and its affiliates and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of production and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by WisdomTree, nor any affiliate, nor any of their officers, employees or agents. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Analys
Brent prices slip on USD surge despite tight inventory conditions
Brent crude prices dropped by USD 1.4 per barrel yesterday evening, sliding from USD 74.2 to USD 72.8 per barrel overnight. However, prices have ticked slightly higher in early trading this morning and are currently hovering around USD 73.3 per barrel.
Yesterday’s decline was primarily driven by a significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar, fueled by expectations of fewer interest rate cuts by the Fed in the coming year. While the Fed lowered borrowing costs as anticipated, it signaled a more cautious approach to rate reductions in 2025. This pushed the U.S. dollar to its strongest level in over two years, raising the cost of commodities priced in dollars.
Earlier in the day (yesterday), crude prices briefly rose following reports of continued declines in U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR), which fell by 0.9 million barrels last week to 421.0 million barrels. This level is approximately 6% below the five-year average for this time of year, highlighting persistently tight market conditions.
In contrast, total motor gasoline inventories saw a significant build of 2.3 million barrels but remain 3% below the five-year average. A closer look reveals that finished gasoline inventories declined, while blending components inventories increased.
Distillate (diesel) fuel inventories experienced a substantial draw of 3.2 million barrels and are now approximately 7% below the five-year average. Overall, total commercial petroleum inventories recorded a net decline of 3.2 million barrels last week, underscoring tightening market conditions across key product categories.
Despite the ongoing drawdowns in U.S. crude and product inventories, global oil prices have remained range-bound since mid-October. Market participants are balancing a muted outlook for Chinese demand and rising production from non-OPEC+ sources against elevated geopolitical risks. The potential for stricter sanctions on Iranian oil supply, particularly as Donald Trump prepares to re-enter the White House, has introduced an additional layer of uncertainty.
We remain cautiously optimistic about the oil market balance in 2025 and are maintaining our Brent price forecast of an average USD 75 per barrel for the year. We believe the market has both fundamental and technical support at these levels.
Analys
Oil falling only marginally on weak China data as Iran oil exports starts to struggle
Up 4.7% last week on US Iran hawkishness and China stimulus optimism. Brent crude gained 4.7% last week and closed on a high note at USD 74.49/b. Through the week it traded in a USD 70.92 – 74.59/b range. Increased optimism over China stimulus together with Iran hawkishness from the incoming Donald Trump administration were the main drivers. Technically Brent crude broke above the 50dma on Friday. On the upside it has the USD 75/b 100dma and on the downside it now has the 50dma at USD 73.84. It is likely to test both of these in the near term. With respect to the Relative Strength Index (RSI) it is neither cold nor warm.
Lower this morning as China November statistics still disappointing (stimulus isn’t here in size yet). This morning it is trading down 0.4% to USD 74.2/b following bearish statistics from China. Retail sales only rose 3% y/y and well short of Industrial production which rose 5.4% y/y, painting a lackluster picture of the demand side of the Chinese economy. This morning the Chinese 30-year bond rate fell below the 2% mark for the first time ever. Very weak demand for credit and investments is essentially what it is saying. Implied demand for oil down 2.1% in November and ytd y/y it was down 3.3%. Oil refining slipped to 5-month low (Bloomberg). This sets a bearish tone for oil at the start of the week. But it isn’t really killing off the oil price either except pushing it down a little this morning.
China will likely choose the US over Iranian oil as long as the oil market is plentiful. It is becoming increasingly apparent that exports of crude oil from Iran is being disrupted by broadening US sanctions on tankers according to Vortexa (Bloomberg). Some Iranian November oil cargoes still remain undelivered. Chinese buyers are increasingly saying no to sanctioned vessels. China import around 90% of Iranian crude oil. Looking forward to the Trump administration the choice for China will likely be easy when it comes to Iranian oil. China needs the US much more than it needs Iranian oil. At leas as long as there is plenty of oil in the market. OPEC+ is currently holds plenty of oil on the side-line waiting for room to re-enter. So if Iran goes out, then other oil from OPEC+ will come back in. So there won’t be any squeeze in the oil market and price shouldn’t move all that much up.
Analys
Brent crude inches higher as ”Maximum pressure on Iran” could remove all talk of surplus in 2025
Brent crude inch higher despite bearish Chinese equity backdrop. Brent crude traded between 72.42 and 74.0 USD/b yesterday before closing down 0.15% on the day at USD 73.41/b. Since last Friday Brent crude has gained 3.2%. This morning it is trading in marginal positive territory (+0.3%) at USD 73.65/b. Chinese equities are down 2% following disappointing signals from the Central Economic Work Conference. The dollar is also 0.2% stronger. None of this has been able to pull oil lower this morning.
”Maximum pressure on Iran” are the signals from the incoming US administration. Last time Donald Trump was president he drove down Iranian oil exports to close to zero as he exited the JCPOA Iranian nuclear deal and implemented maximum sanctions. A repeat of that would remove all talk about a surplus oil market next year leaving room for the rest of OPEC+ as well as the US to lift production a little. It would however probably require some kind of cooperation with China in some kind of overall US – China trade deal. Because it is hard to prevent oil flowing from Iran to China as long as China wants to buy large amounts.
Mildly bullish adjustment from the IEA but still with an overall bearish message for 2025. The IEA came out with a mildly bullish adjustment in its monthly Oil Market Report yesterday. For 2025 it adjusted global demand up by 0.1 mb/d to 103.9 mb/d (+1.1 mb/d y/y growth) while it also adjusted non-OPEC production down by 0.1 mb/d to 71.9 mb/d (+1.7 mb/d y/y). As a result its calculated call-on-OPEC rose by 0.2 mb/d y/y to 26.3 mb/d.
Overall the IEA still sees a market in 2025 where non-OPEC production grows considerably faster (+1.7 mb/d y/y) than demand (+1.1 mb/d y/y) which requires OPEC to cut its production by close to 700 kb/d in 2025 to keep the market balanced.
The IEA treats OPEC+ as it if doesn’t exist even if it is 8 years since it was established. The weird thing is that the IEA after 8 full years with the constellation of OPEC+ still calculates and argues as if the wider organisation which was established in December 2016 doesn’t exist. In its oil market balance it projects an increase from FSU of +0.3 mb/d in 2025. But FSU is predominantly part of OPEC+ and thus bound by production targets. Thus call on OPEC+ is only falling by 0.4 mb/d in 2025. In IEA’s calculations the OPEC+ group thus needs to cut production by 0.4 mb/d in 2024 or 0.4% of global demand. That is still a bearish outlook. But error of margin on such calculations are quite large so this prediction needs to be treated with a pinch of salt.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: OPEC+ meeting postponement adds new uncertainties
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Vad den stora uppgången i guldpriset säger om Kina
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Meta vill vara med och bygga 1-4 GW kärnkraft, begär in förslag från kärnkraftsutvecklare
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Kina gör stor satsning på billig kol i Xinjiang
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
OPEC takes center stage, but China’s recovery remains key
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Brent crude rises 0.8% on Syria but with no immediate risk to supply
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
De tre bästa aktierna inom olja, gas och råvaror enligt Rick Rule
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Christian Kopfer ger sin syn på den stora affären mellan Boliden och Lundin Mining