Analys
A neat OPEC+ deal: Carrot and Stick


OPEC+ struck a neat deal in our view at the end of last week. The carrot was that if all participants to the deal comply with their individual caps then Saudi Arabia will cut an additional 400 k bl/d versus its obligation. The stick is that the latest deal only stretches to March 2020 and then needs to be reviewed and renewed: “Get in line or you’ll be suffering already in March. Free-riding will be short-lived from now onwards.”

I.e. they will all receive the benefit of Saudi Arabia’s additional self-imposed restricted cap. However, if they do not comply with their own individual caps they will quickly get caught and brought to justice already in March. I.e. there is significant leveraged upside to comply (windfall from Saudi Arabia’s additional 400 k bl/d cut) and significant downside risk of not complying.
An ultimatum is of course always problematic in the sense that you might have to execute an action you don’t really want to. The main three offenders so far have been Russia, Iraq and Nigeria. Together the offenders produced 0.5 m bl/d above their caps in October 2019 so bringing them into line will help a lot versus overall production.
The new deal means that the risk for a strong stock-build in H1-2020 is significantly reduced and so is the risk for a sharp price drop towards the lower $50ies/bl for Brent.
If producers do not comply with their new caps in Q1-20 then we might be in for some bumps in March as Saudi Arabia then would retract its additional 400 k bl/d cut. It would however not necessarily imply that the whole deal falls apart other than the retraction of the 400 k bl/d additional Saudi cuts.
The sum of reductions in the deal from December 2018 equalled a 1,2 m bl/d reduction from individual 2018 October production levels. The additional cuts agreed last week in sum added 0.5 m bl/d to these cuts and then Saudi Arabia added the carrot of an additional self-imposed cut of 0.4 m bl/d. Thus, in total a reduction of 2,1 m bl/d from 2018 October prod. levels.
What skews the picture is of course the fact they all boosted production in the run-up to the OPEC+ meeting in December 2018. As a result, all these production cuts are coming from close to record high monthly values.
The media is constantly bashing OPEC and OPEC+ plus for cutting and cutting but getting nowhere. Fact is that there has not been a lot of cuts except for the misfortunes of Libya, Iran, Venezuela and Mexico.
If all OPEC 10 members comply with their new production caps then they will produce only 0.7 m bl/d (-2.7%) below their 5 year average. The 10 non-OPEC cooperating countries would produce 0.5% above their 5-year average while the total OPEC+ (19) would produce only 1.4% below their 5-year average production.
Libya, Iran, Venezuela and Mexico are suffering but the others aren’t really suffering very much. They are only cutting their production at the margin. Even Saudi Arabia which is cutting the most on the face of it will produce just 4% below its 5-year average under the new cap. Its 5-year average production is 10.14 m bl/d while its new self-imposed cap is 9.75 m bl/d.
First and foremost, the deal from last week means that OPEC+ is not dropping the ball. It is not letting oil flow freely. It will work actively to prevent an above normal stock-building in H1-2020. High and above normal inventory levels mean a spot price discount versus longer dated prices. Normal to low inventories means a spot price premium of $5-10/bl. That is why OPEC+ so strongly wants to avoid a solid stock building in H1-2020. The longer dated price anchor is $60/bl. So a “premium” situation will hand oil producers a price of $65-70/bl while a surplus inventory situation would give them a $50-55/bl price level.
Adding some confusion to the OPEC mathematics: Ecuador is leaving OPEC in January. The 10 non-OPEC cooperating countries will subtract natural gas liquids from production before applying the new quotas => some problems with historical data.
Table one: Old and new quotas. We have not yet seen the new individual quotas for the non-OPEC countries. These will be adjusted versus new production levels excluding natural gas liquids. The reduction decided in December 2018 was 1.2 m bl/d from Oct-2018 levels. The new cuts are added to these with first 500 k bl/d divided amongst all members and then Saudi Arabia takes on an additional 400 k bl/d cut on top of that. Do note that Saudi Arabia’s average production from Jan-2019 to Oct-2019 was 9.78 m bl/d versus its new cap of 9.74 m bl/d.
Ch1: OPEC 10 production versus old and new cap in m bl/d
Analys
A deliberate measure to push oil price lower but it is not the opening of the floodgates

Hurt by US tariffs and more oil from OPEC+. Brent crude fell 2.1% yesterday to USD 71.62/b and is down an additional 0.9% this morning to USD 71/b. New tariff-announcements by Donald Trump and a decision by OPEC+ to lift production by 138 kb/d in April is driving the oil price lower.

The decision by OPEC+ to lift production is a deliberate decision to get a lower oil price. All the members in OPEC+ wants to produce more as a general rule. Their plan and hope for a long time has been that they could gradually revive production back to a more normal level without pushing the oil price lower. As such they have postponed the planned production increases time and time again. Opting for price over volume. Waiting for the opportunity to lift production without pushing the price lower. And now it has suddenly changed. They start to lift production by 138 kb/d in April even if they know that the oil market this year then will run a surplus. Donald Trump is the reason.
Putin, Muhammed bin Salman (MBS) and Trump all met in Riyadh recently to discuss the war in Ukraine. They naturally discussed politics and energy and what is most important for each and one of them. Putin wants a favorable deal in Ukraine, MBS may want harsher measures towards Iran while Trump amongst other things want a lower oil price. The latter is to appease US consumers to which he has promised a lower oil price. A lower oil price over the coming two years could be good for Trump and the Republicans in the mid-term elections if a lower oil price makes US consumers happy. And a powerful Trump for a full four years is also good for Putin and MBS.
This is not the opening of the floodgates. It is not the start of blindly lifting production each month. It is still highly measured and controlled. It is about lowering the oil price to a level that is acceptable for Putin, MBS, Trump, US oil companies and the US consumers. Such an imagined ”target price” or common denominator is clearly not USD 50-55/b. US production would in that case fall markedly and the finances of Saudi Arabia and Russia would hurt too badly. The price is probably somewhere in the USD 60ies/b.
Brent crude averaged USD 99.5/b, USD 82/b and USD 80/b in 2022, 2023 and 2024 respectively. An oil price of USD 65/b is markedly lower in the sense that it probably would be positively felt by US consumers. The five-year Brent crude oil contract is USD 67/b. In a laxed oil market with little strain and a gradual rise in oil inventories we would see a lowering of the front-end of the Brent crude curve so that the front-end comes down to the level of the longer dated prices. The longer-dated prices usually soften a little bit as well when this happens. The five-year Brent contract could easily slide a couple of dollars down to USD 65/b versus USD 67/b.
Brent crude 1 month contract in USD/b. USD 68.68/b is the level to watch out for. It was the lowpoint in September last year. Breaking below that will bring us to lowest level since December 2021.

Analys
Brent whacked down yet again by negative Trump-fallout

Sharply lower yesterday with negative US consumer confidence. Brent crude fell like a rock to USD 73.02/b (-2.4%) yesterday following the publishing of US consumer confidence which fell to 98.3 in February from 105.3 in January (100 is neutral). Intraday Brent fell as low as USD 72.7/b. The closing yesterday was the lowest since late December and at a level where Brent frequently crossed over from September to the end of last year. Brent has now lost both the late December, early January Trump-optimism gains as well as the Biden-spike in mid-Jan and is back in the range from this Autumn. This morning it is staging a small rebound to USD 73.2/b but with little conviction it seems. The US sentiment readings since Friday last week is damaging evidence of the negative fallout Trump is creating.

Evidence growing that Trump-turmoil are having negative effects on the US economy. The US consumer confidence index has been in a seesaw pattern since mid-2022 and the reading yesterday was reached twice in 2024 and close to it also in 2023. But the reading yesterday needs to be seen in the context of Donald Trump being inaugurated as president again on 20 January. The reading must thus be interpreted as direct response by US consumers to what Trump has been doing since he became president and all the uncertainty it has created. The negative reading yesterday also falls into line with the negative readings on Friday, amplifying the message that Trump action will indeed have a negative fallout. At least the first-round effects of it. The market is staging a small rebound this morning to USD 73.3/b. But the genie is out of the bottle: Trump actions is having a negative effect on US consumers and businesses and thus the US economy. Likely effects will be reduced spending by consumers and reduced capex spending by businesses.
Brent crude falling lowest since late December and a level it frequently crossed during autumn.

White: US Conference Board Consumer Confidence (published yesterday). Blue: US Services PMI Business activity (published last Friday). Red: US University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment (published last Friday). All three falling sharply in February. Indexed 100 on Feb-2022.

Analys
Crude oil comment: Price reaction driven by intensified sanctions on Iran

Brent crude prices bottomed out at USD 74.20 per barrel at the close of trading on Friday, following a steep decline from USD 77.15 per barrel on Thursday evening (February 20th). During yesterday’s trading session, prices steadily climbed by roughly USD 1 per barrel (1.20%), reaching the current level of USD 75 per barrel.

Yesterday’s price rebound, which has continued into today, is primarily driven by recent U.S. actions aimed at intensifying pressure on Iran. These moves were formalized in the second round of sanctions since the presidential shift, specifically targeting Iranian oil exports. Notably, the U.S. Treasury Department has sanctioned several Iran-related oil companies, added 13 new tankers to the OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) sanctions list, and sanctioned individuals, oil brokers, and terminals connected to Iran’s oil trade.
The National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 now calls for the U.S. to ”drive Iran’s oil exports to zero,” further asserting that Iran ”can never be allowed to acquire or develop nuclear weapons.” This intensified focus on Iran’s oil exports is naturally fueling market expectations of tighter supply. Yet, OPEC+ spare capacity remains robust, standing at 5.3 million barrels per day, with Saudi Arabia holding 3.1 million, the UAE 1.1 million, Iraq 600k, and Kuwait 400k. As such, any significant price spirals are not expected, given the current OPEC+ supply buffer.
Further contributing to recent price movements, OPEC has yet to decide on its stance regarding production cuts for Q2 2025. The group remains in control of the market, evaluating global supply and demand dynamics on a monthly basis. Given the current state of the market, we believe there is limited capacity for additional OPEC production without risking further price declines.
On a more bullish note, Iraq reaffirmed its commitment to the OPEC+ agreement yesterday, signaling that it would present an updated plan to compensate for any overproduction, which supports ongoing market stability.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Belgien gör en u-sväng, går från att lägga ner kärnkraft till att bygga ny
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Priset på arabica-kaffebönor är nu över 4 USD per pund för första gången någonsin
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Glansen är tillbaka på guldet
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
The Damocles Sword of OPEC+ hanging over US shale oil producers
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Balancing act
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oill comment: Caught between trade war fears and Iranian supply disruption risk
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guldpriset stiger till över 1 miljon kronor per kilo
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Christian Kopfer om guld, olja och stål