Analys
The cutters should utilize seasonal strong demand in H2-18 to wind down cuts
Headlines this morning gives the impression that all are now on-board for extending the cuts to the end of 2018. Reading in more detail however shows that it is not at all yet a done deal. And in addition it does not say whether the cuts will be maintained at current level all to the end of 2018. Specifically it seems like there is going to be an option to review and revise strategy at the next meeting in June. I.e. “maintain cuts if needed, but only if needed”. Russian producers are deeply concerned about the end-game. How to wind down the cuts without risking to crash the oil price. As such a sensible outcome in our eyes would be to wind down the cuts gradually through seasonal demand strength in H2-18. The cutters probably do not want to surprise the market positively risking firing up the oil price yet more at the same time as Rystad Energy is calling US crude oil production to hit 9.9 mb/d end of 2017 while also the US oil rig count has started to rise.
We have seen great reluctance from the Russian side in the run-up to this meeting and decision. Key has been the ”independent” oil companies in Russia who are getting ready dispatch new green field projects in 2018 in addition to what they have been holding back this year. These companies are getting very eager to get these new projects into production as well as the side lined once.
These companies fear that unconditional promises of cuts to the end of 2018 will fire up the oil market yet more with yet more stimulus of US shale oil production thus making it difficult for them to get back into the market at the start of 2019 without risking crashing the oil price then.
Thus exit of cuts has come into focus and has been a key point for Russian oil companies and thus the Russian delegation in Vienna.
I do not expect to see an unconditional extension of cuts to end of 2018 coming out of today’s meeting. A sensible outcome would be to keep current production cap through H1-18 and then ramp down the cuts through H2-18 during seasonally high demand in H2-18. And finally to have a touchdown in November 2018 assessing whether there is a need to trim production during seasonal weakness in H1-19.
This kind of outcome is probably less than what the market is hoping for and pricing in. Such an outcome would thus likely lead to some sell-off in the crude oil market.
Nonetheless in terms of appearance of price action ahead of the meeting the market seems extremely relaxed in terms of interpreting oil price action in the run-up to the meeting. I think the market is correctly assessing that OPEC/Non-OPEC is highly unlikely to throw away all what they have achieved over the past year (inventory draw down and a major shift from contango to backwardation, from spot price discount to spot price premium versus longer dated prices). However, it is probably wrong in assuming a full Christmas present with unconditional cuts to end of 2018.
Speculative net long crude oil positions in the market are currently at the second highest level in history. The fairly muted price action ahead of this meeting may thus be completely misguided in terms of possible price reaction to the outcome of this meeting in case the market is significantly disappointed by the outcome.
My expectation in terms of outcome of the meeting is thus that cuts are maintained during H1-18 and then gradually ramped down in H2-18 with a possible trimming during seasonal weakness in H1-19 if needed.
The message will be clear that they are NOT shifting from current strategy of “Price over volume” and back again to “Volume over price”. However, they are neither willing to drive the Brent crude oil price to the sky risking further strong acceleration of US shale oil production at the same time as OPEC/Non-OPEC cutters are holding back production. Yesterday’s news that US crude oil production is likely going to reach 9.9 mb/d by end of 2017 according to Rystad Energy’s estimates is a very clear message that OPEC/Non-OPEC cutters needs to tread carefully both when it comes to actual further cut extensions as well as how it communicates its plans and ambitions in terms of prices and goals.
As such the group should not really want to surprise the market positively today.
Rather it should want to give reassurance and confidence.
The perfect outcome for the group today would be if the oil price does not move at all.
Ch1: “I want $69.63/b!”
Brent crude oil 1mth contract in USD/bl
But the market has gone in a one way street upwards since June.
Will we get there this time around or will we need a round of speculative re-set before heading for the $69.63/bl at a later stage?
Ch3: And speculators have positioned themselves accordingly. A sell-off ahead in the making?
Riding the upwards trend since June has been a good thing adding more and more length on the way upwards
Ch4: Record high net long spec position (Brent + WTI) when counting contracts and barrels
Almost doubling since June!
There will be a reset at one point. Maybe today or maybe later
Ch5: Brent Dated crude oil price has started to weaken versus the Brent 1mth price signalling weakness in the physical Brent crude oil market
Should be trading on par if market is tight
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Brent prices slip on USD surge despite tight inventory conditions
Brent crude prices dropped by USD 1.4 per barrel yesterday evening, sliding from USD 74.2 to USD 72.8 per barrel overnight. However, prices have ticked slightly higher in early trading this morning and are currently hovering around USD 73.3 per barrel.
Yesterday’s decline was primarily driven by a significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar, fueled by expectations of fewer interest rate cuts by the Fed in the coming year. While the Fed lowered borrowing costs as anticipated, it signaled a more cautious approach to rate reductions in 2025. This pushed the U.S. dollar to its strongest level in over two years, raising the cost of commodities priced in dollars.
Earlier in the day (yesterday), crude prices briefly rose following reports of continued declines in U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR), which fell by 0.9 million barrels last week to 421.0 million barrels. This level is approximately 6% below the five-year average for this time of year, highlighting persistently tight market conditions.
In contrast, total motor gasoline inventories saw a significant build of 2.3 million barrels but remain 3% below the five-year average. A closer look reveals that finished gasoline inventories declined, while blending components inventories increased.
Distillate (diesel) fuel inventories experienced a substantial draw of 3.2 million barrels and are now approximately 7% below the five-year average. Overall, total commercial petroleum inventories recorded a net decline of 3.2 million barrels last week, underscoring tightening market conditions across key product categories.
Despite the ongoing drawdowns in U.S. crude and product inventories, global oil prices have remained range-bound since mid-October. Market participants are balancing a muted outlook for Chinese demand and rising production from non-OPEC+ sources against elevated geopolitical risks. The potential for stricter sanctions on Iranian oil supply, particularly as Donald Trump prepares to re-enter the White House, has introduced an additional layer of uncertainty.
We remain cautiously optimistic about the oil market balance in 2025 and are maintaining our Brent price forecast of an average USD 75 per barrel for the year. We believe the market has both fundamental and technical support at these levels.
Analys
Oil falling only marginally on weak China data as Iran oil exports starts to struggle
Up 4.7% last week on US Iran hawkishness and China stimulus optimism. Brent crude gained 4.7% last week and closed on a high note at USD 74.49/b. Through the week it traded in a USD 70.92 – 74.59/b range. Increased optimism over China stimulus together with Iran hawkishness from the incoming Donald Trump administration were the main drivers. Technically Brent crude broke above the 50dma on Friday. On the upside it has the USD 75/b 100dma and on the downside it now has the 50dma at USD 73.84. It is likely to test both of these in the near term. With respect to the Relative Strength Index (RSI) it is neither cold nor warm.
Lower this morning as China November statistics still disappointing (stimulus isn’t here in size yet). This morning it is trading down 0.4% to USD 74.2/b following bearish statistics from China. Retail sales only rose 3% y/y and well short of Industrial production which rose 5.4% y/y, painting a lackluster picture of the demand side of the Chinese economy. This morning the Chinese 30-year bond rate fell below the 2% mark for the first time ever. Very weak demand for credit and investments is essentially what it is saying. Implied demand for oil down 2.1% in November and ytd y/y it was down 3.3%. Oil refining slipped to 5-month low (Bloomberg). This sets a bearish tone for oil at the start of the week. But it isn’t really killing off the oil price either except pushing it down a little this morning.
China will likely choose the US over Iranian oil as long as the oil market is plentiful. It is becoming increasingly apparent that exports of crude oil from Iran is being disrupted by broadening US sanctions on tankers according to Vortexa (Bloomberg). Some Iranian November oil cargoes still remain undelivered. Chinese buyers are increasingly saying no to sanctioned vessels. China import around 90% of Iranian crude oil. Looking forward to the Trump administration the choice for China will likely be easy when it comes to Iranian oil. China needs the US much more than it needs Iranian oil. At leas as long as there is plenty of oil in the market. OPEC+ is currently holds plenty of oil on the side-line waiting for room to re-enter. So if Iran goes out, then other oil from OPEC+ will come back in. So there won’t be any squeeze in the oil market and price shouldn’t move all that much up.
Analys
Brent crude inches higher as ”Maximum pressure on Iran” could remove all talk of surplus in 2025
Brent crude inch higher despite bearish Chinese equity backdrop. Brent crude traded between 72.42 and 74.0 USD/b yesterday before closing down 0.15% on the day at USD 73.41/b. Since last Friday Brent crude has gained 3.2%. This morning it is trading in marginal positive territory (+0.3%) at USD 73.65/b. Chinese equities are down 2% following disappointing signals from the Central Economic Work Conference. The dollar is also 0.2% stronger. None of this has been able to pull oil lower this morning.
”Maximum pressure on Iran” are the signals from the incoming US administration. Last time Donald Trump was president he drove down Iranian oil exports to close to zero as he exited the JCPOA Iranian nuclear deal and implemented maximum sanctions. A repeat of that would remove all talk about a surplus oil market next year leaving room for the rest of OPEC+ as well as the US to lift production a little. It would however probably require some kind of cooperation with China in some kind of overall US – China trade deal. Because it is hard to prevent oil flowing from Iran to China as long as China wants to buy large amounts.
Mildly bullish adjustment from the IEA but still with an overall bearish message for 2025. The IEA came out with a mildly bullish adjustment in its monthly Oil Market Report yesterday. For 2025 it adjusted global demand up by 0.1 mb/d to 103.9 mb/d (+1.1 mb/d y/y growth) while it also adjusted non-OPEC production down by 0.1 mb/d to 71.9 mb/d (+1.7 mb/d y/y). As a result its calculated call-on-OPEC rose by 0.2 mb/d y/y to 26.3 mb/d.
Overall the IEA still sees a market in 2025 where non-OPEC production grows considerably faster (+1.7 mb/d y/y) than demand (+1.1 mb/d y/y) which requires OPEC to cut its production by close to 700 kb/d in 2025 to keep the market balanced.
The IEA treats OPEC+ as it if doesn’t exist even if it is 8 years since it was established. The weird thing is that the IEA after 8 full years with the constellation of OPEC+ still calculates and argues as if the wider organisation which was established in December 2016 doesn’t exist. In its oil market balance it projects an increase from FSU of +0.3 mb/d in 2025. But FSU is predominantly part of OPEC+ and thus bound by production targets. Thus call on OPEC+ is only falling by 0.4 mb/d in 2025. In IEA’s calculations the OPEC+ group thus needs to cut production by 0.4 mb/d in 2024 or 0.4% of global demand. That is still a bearish outlook. But error of margin on such calculations are quite large so this prediction needs to be treated with a pinch of salt.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
De tre bästa olje- och naturgasaktierna i Kanada
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: OPEC+ meeting postponement adds new uncertainties
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: US inventories remain well below averages despite yesterday’s build
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Oklart om drill baby drill-politik ökar USAs oljeproduktion
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Vad den stora uppgången i guldpriset säger om Kina
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Meta vill vara med och bygga 1-4 GW kärnkraft, begär in förslag från kärnkraftsutvecklare
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Kina gör stor satsning på billig kol i Xinjiang
-
Analys1 vecka sedan
Brent crude rises 0.8% on Syria but with no immediate risk to supply