Följ oss

Analys

SEB – Råvarukommentarer vecka 19 2012

Publicerat

den

Sammanfattning: Föregående vecka

  • Analyser - Prognos på priser för råvarorBrett råvaruindex: -2,79 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI TR Index
  • Energi: -4,31 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI Energy TR Index
  • Ädelmetaller: -1,59%
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI Precious Metals TR Index
  • Industrimetaller: -2,42 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI Industrial Metals TR Index
  • Jordbruk: -2,01 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI Agriculture TR Index

Kortsiktig marknadsvy:

  • Guld: Neutral/köp
  • Olja: Sälj
  • Koppar: Sälj
  • Majs: Sälj
  • Vete: Sälj

Guld

Guldkursen (Comex) och spekulativa positioner

  • Guldet föll 1,14 procent förra veckan och vi såg att guldtillgångar i börshandlade ETP: er sjönk till 2 381 ton, den lägsta nivån sedan 1 februari i år. Guldet handlade i ett intervall och lyckas inte bryta på uppsidan. Bristen på av politiker bekräftade penningpolitiska lättnader och en starkare dollar höll tillbaka guldet.
  • Den amerikanska jobbrapporten NFP som publiceras i fredags kom ut sämre än förväntat, 115 000 nya jobb mot förväntade 160 000 nya jobb skapades. NFP siffran ökade marknadens förhoppningar om nya kvantitativa lättnader vilket gav stöd åt guldet som steg en halv procent samtidigt dollarn försvagades marginellt.
  • Råvaror faller brett idag på morgonen efter valseger för Hollande i Frankrike. Segern skapar politisk oro eftersom överenskommelser med Tyskland nu kan komma att rivas upp. Helgens val i Grekland gav en klar seger för små partier som visat missnöje med de överenskommelser landets största partier gjort med EU och IMF. Osäkerheten i Europa ökar och euron tappade kraftigt mot dollarn efter valresultaten.
  • I Europa är osäkerheten kring Spanien stor där ekonomin åter är i recession, dvs. ekonomin krymper för andra kvartalet i rad. En fråga som oroar marknaden är om Spanien kommet att behöva resurser från EU:s nödlånefaciliteter. Negativa nyheter kan snabbt skapa turbulens i marknaden. Den oro man ser i Europa har emellertid inte ökat intresset för guld som säker hamn. Guldet har snarare korrelerat positivt med övriga risktillgångar.
  • Teknisk Analys: Fortsatt endast marginella rörelser noterade inom ett redan ganska väl utstakat intervall där under $1620 verkar ”för lågt” och over $1690 ”för högt”. Priset håller sig under ett rullande 55-dagars genomsinittsband. Bandet är svagt i fallande och är på marginalen ett uttryck för visst nedåttryck, men marknaden svarar samtidigt bra på nedställ och i en större positiv bild ser eventuell svaghet ut at vara temporär. Över $1670 & $1695 skulle påvisa efterfrågan och ses som positivt.

Prognos på guldkursen är neutral till köp

Olja

Oljeprisets utveckling 4 januari 2011 till 4 maj 2012

  • Oljepriset föll 5,3 procent förra veckan. Statistik från USA:s energidepartement, DOE, visade att de amerikanska lagren av råolja steg med 2,8 miljoner fat under förra veckan till den högsta nivån på 21 år.
  • Den viktiga amerikanska jobbrapporten NFP som publiceras på fredagen kom ut sämre än förväntat, 115 000 nya jobb mot förväntade 160 000 nya jobb skapades.
  • Arbetslösheten minskade med 0,1 % och föll till 8,1 procent (samtidigt bör noteras att antalet registrerade arbetslösa minskade, de försvinner alltså ur systemet vilket i sig förbättrar siffran).
  • Den inofficiell amerikanska jobbstatistiken, ADP-rapporten, som mäter utvecklingen i den privata sysselsättningen, visade på en ökning om 119 000 personer vilket också var långt under väntade 170 000.)
  • Opec:s generalsekreterare är “inte nöjd” över nuvarande oljepris och kartellen arbetar för att få ned priserna. Enligt Opec som idag producerar 3,2 miljoner fat per dag över de uppsatta kvoterna, är ett oljepris kring 100 dollar att föredra. Enligt Opec finns det gott om olja och utbudssituationen är inte ett problem trots Irankrisen. Exporten från Iran har minskat mindre än förväntat. Detta, tillsammans med Europas kris, gör att vi kortsiktigt inte tror på en uppgång i oljepriset.
  • Teknisk Analys: Undersidan av 55-dagars bandet (som efter kraftigt nedställ denna vecka är satt i fallande) agerar som dynamisk motstånd (borde inte återtestas under de kommande veckorna). Rörelsen ner är som sagt hård och ska väntas fortsätta för att testa 233-dagars bandet som just nu börjar vid $113.

Prognos på oljepriset - Certifikat Short Olja A S

Koppar

Kopparprisets utveckling 4 januari 2011 - 4 maj 2012

  • Kopparlagren på LME (London Metal Exchange) föll förra veckan till den lägsta nivån sedan november 2008.
  • HSBC inköpschefsindex för tillverkningsindustrin kom in under 50-nivån vilket är den nivå som indikerar att ekonomin är i kontraktion. Fastighetspriser i Kina faller och föll i april till 14-månaders lägsta. Husbyggande står för ungefär 40 procent av inhemsk efterfrågan på koppar enligt Copper Development Association.
  • ECB lämnade som förväntat räntan oförändrad på en procent. Störst fokus var emellertid på ECB chefen Draghis efterföljande presskonferens i samband med räntebeskedet där Draghi uttryckte kritik mot euro-ländernas politiker vilka inte har förbättrat tillväxtpotentialen med förbättrade strukturreformer. Framtiden ser osäker ut enligt Draghi som inte heller utlovade ytterligare stimulanser vilket marknaden reagerade negativt på och råvaror fortsatte att falla brett på fredagen i samklang med aktiemarknaden.
  • Stämningsläget hos europeiska inköpschefer bekräftade det kärva läge som europeisk tillväxt befinner sig i. Arbetsmarknadsstatistiken är dyster och den europeiska arbetslösheten har stigit till 15-årshögsta. Obligationsräntorna har rört sig nedåt eller ligger kvar på mycket låga nivåer t.o.m. i ekonomier som bedöms som säkra att låna ut till.
  • Teknisk Analys: Rörelsen högre gick något längre än vad som tidigare var trott, men uppsidan av 55-, & 233-dagars ”banden” höll köpare över $8500 nivån borta. Den nuvarande överlappningen under 20 april toppen vid $8218 har ökat sannolikheten att apr/maj rörelsen verkligen är den korrektion vi antagit att den är. Under $$7977 skulle helt bekräfta detta och starkt argumentera för fortsatt rörelse under apr botten vid 7885.

Prognos på kopparpriset - Använd certifikat Short KOPPA A S

Majs

Majsprisets utveckling 4 januari - 2011 4 maj 2012

  • Denna vecka byter vi referenskontrakt för majs. Från att den senaste tiden ha använt majkontraktet byter vi nu istället till julikontraktet.
  • Förra veckan kunde vi se en nedgång med knappt en procent, detta till följd av framförallt den fortsatt goda utvecklingen för den amerikanska majsskörden, där mer än 50 procent av planteringen nu är avslutad.
  • Prognoserna för den sydamerikanska majsskörden ser fortsatt blandade ut, där Brasilien som kontinentens största producent justerat upp sin prognos samtidigt som Argentina fått dra ned sina estimat något.
  • Den senaste tiden har det spekulerats mycket kring Kinas ökade import av majs och huruvida denna kommer att fortlöpa under 2012. Enligt en mängd analytiker verkar det i nuläget som att importen kommer att öka något, vilket borde utgöra ett starkt fundamentalt motstånd för majspriset.
  • Fundamentalt förhåller vi oss fortsatt negativa till majspriset, där fredagens amerikanska arbetsmarknadsdata, tillsammans med den generella riskaversionen i kapitalmarknaden, bör agera sänke även på spannmålspriserna denna vecka.
  • Teknisk Analys: Rörelsen upp från apr botten har kommit av sig och börjat se ut som en korrektiv ”3-vågs” rörelse där A-, & C-vågorna nu är symmetriska i storlek och hastighet. Tillbaka under 599 skulle till fullo bekräfta detta och den lätt negativa lutningen på 55-dagars bandet och då argumentera för rörelse under 592, möjligtvis ner mot 580-området.

Prognos på majspriset - Köp certifikat Short MAJS A S

Vete

Veteprisets utveckling 15 mars 2011 - 4 maj 2012

  • Efter att den senaste månaden ha använt majkontraktet som referenskontrakt för europeiskt vete byter vi nu över till novemberkontraktet.
  • Förra veckan föll priset på vete med nästan 3,5 procent, vilket till stor del kan förklaras av den amerikanska skördeutvecklingen, där 64 procent av vintervetet är av hög eller mycket hög kvalitet. Den gängse normen på marknaden är att en siffra över 60 procent i regel leder till hög avkastning på skörden.
  • I Europa är det fortsatt blandat, där exempelvis skörden i Ukraina och Spanien i år ser ut att bli väsentligen sämre jämfört med föregående skördeår. I länder som Ryssland och Frankrike ser det däremot förhållandevis ljust ut, där det blöta vädret under april och maj skapat förutsättningar för en god avkastning.
  • Som en konsekvens av rådande riskaversion samt de goda utsikterna för den amerikanska skörden är vi denna vecka säljare av vete. Det krävs en svag WASDE-rapport på torsdag för att vi ska revidera denna kortsiktiga vy.
  • Teknisk Analys: Fallande toppar indikerar ett något höjt säljtryck. Skulle stödet just under €200-nivån (& nedsidan på 55-dagars bandet) sluta att attrahera köpare så väntas snabb rörelse tillbaka ner mot stödet vid 233-dagars bandet (som är i fallande) och som börjar vid €193. Över €206 skulle åter minska risken för brott lägre och i stället tas som efterfrågan vid nivåer som tidigare.

Prognos på vetepriset - Köp certifikat Short VETE A S

[box]SEB Veckobrev Veckans råvarukommentar är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]

Disclaimer

The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).

Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.

About SEB

SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

Fundamentals trump geopolitical tensions

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Throughout this week, the Brent Crude price has experienced a decline of USD 3 per barrel, despite ongoing turmoil in the Middle East. Price fluctuations have ranged from highs of USD 91 per barrel at the beginning of the week to lows of USD 87 per barrel as of yesterday evening.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Following the release of yesterday’s US inventory report, Brent Crude once again demonstrated resilience against broader macroeconomic concerns, instead focusing on underlying market fundamentals.

Nevertheless, the recent drop in prices may come as somewhat surprising given the array of conflicting signals observed. Despite an increase in US inventories—a typically bearish indicator—we’ve also witnessed escalating tensions in the Middle East, coupled with the reinstatement of US sanctions on Venezuela. Furthermore, there are indications of impending sanctions on Iran in response to the recent attack on Israel.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has indicated that new sanctions targeting Iran, particularly aimed at restricting its oil exports, could be announced as early as this week. As previously highlighted, we maintain the view that Iran’s oil exports remain vulnerable even without further escalation of the conflict. It appears that Israel is exerting pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran, an action that is unfolding before our eyes.

Iran’s current oil production stands at close to 3.2 million barrels per day. Considering additional condensate production of about 0.8 million barrels per day and subtracting domestic demand of roughly 1.8 million barrels per day, the net export of Iranian crude and condensate is approximately 2.2 million barrels per day.

However, the uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of such sanctions casts doubt on the likelihood of a complete ending of Iranian exports. Approximately 80% of Iran’s exports are directed to independent refineries in China, suggesting that US sanctions may have limited efficacy unless China complies. The prospect of China resisting US pressure on its oil imports from Iran poses a significant challenge to US sanctions enforcement efforts.

Furthermore, any shortfall resulting from sanctions could potentially be offset by other OPEC nations with spare capacity. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for instance, can collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day, although this remains a contingency measure.

In addition to developments related to Iran, the Biden administration has re-imposed restrictions on Venezuelan oil, marking the end of a six-month reprieve. This move is expected to impact flows from the South American nation.

Meanwhile, US crude inventories (excluding SPR holdings) surged by 2.7 million barrels last week (page 11 attached), reaching their highest level since June of last year. This increase coincided with a decline in measures of fuel demand (page 14 attached), underscoring a slightly weaker US market.

In summary, while geopolitical tensions persist and new rounds of sanctions are imposed, our market outlook remains intact. We maintain our forecast of an average Brent Crude price of USD 85 per barrel for the year 2024. In the short term, however, prices are expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark as they navigate through geopolitical uncertainties and fundamental factors.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brace for Covert Conflict

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

In the past two trading days, Brent Crude prices have fluctuated between highs of USD 92.2 per barrel and lows of USD 88.7 per barrel. Despite escalation tensions in the Middle East, oil prices have remained relatively stable over the past 24 hours. The recent barrage of rockets and drones in the region hasn’t significantly affected market sentiment regarding potential disruptions to oil supply. The key concern now is how Israel will respond: will it choose a strong retaliation to assert deterrence, risking wider regional instability, or will it revert to targeted strikes on Iran’s proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq? While it’s too early to predict, one thing is clear: brace for increased volatility, uncertainty, and speculation.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Amidst these developments, the market continues to focus on current fundamentals rather than unfolding geopolitical risks. Despite Iran’s recent attack on Israel, oil prices have slid, reflecting a sideways or slightly bearish sentiment. This morning, oil prices stand at USD 90 per barrel, down 2.5% from Friday’s highs.

The attack

Iran’s launch of over 300 rockets and drones toward Israel marks the first direct assault from Iranian territory since 1991. However, the attack, announced well in advance, resulted in minimal damage as Israeli and allied forces intercepted nearly all projectiles. Hence, the damage inflicted was limited. The incident has prompted US President Joe Biden to urge Israel to exercise restraint, as part of broader efforts to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East.

Israel’s response remains uncertain as its war cabinet deliberates on potential courses of action. While the necessity of a response is acknowledged, the timing and magnitude remain undecided.

The attack was allegedly in retaliation for an Israeli airstrike on Iran’s consulate in Damascus, resulting in significant casualties, including a senior leader in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force. It’s notable that this marks the first direct targeting of Israel from Iranian territory, setting the stage for heightened tensions between the two nations.

Despite the scale of the attack, the vast majority of Iranian projectiles were intercepted before reaching Israeli territory. However, a small number did land, causing minor damage to a military base in the southern region.

President Biden swiftly condemned Iran’s actions and pledged to coordinate a diplomatic response with leaders from the G7 nations. The US military’s rapid repositioning of assets in the region underscores the seriousness of the situation.

Iran’s willingness to escalate tensions further depends on Israel’s response, as indicated by General Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces. Meanwhile, speculation about a retaliatory attack from Israel persists.

Looking ahead, key questions remain unanswered. Will Iran launch additional attacks? How will Israel respond, and what implications will it have for the region? Moreover, how will Iran’s allies react to the escalating tensions?

Given the potential for a full-scale war between Iran and Israel, concerns about its impact on global energy markets are growing. Both the United States and China have strong incentives to reduce tensions in the region, given the destabilizing effects of a regional conflict.

Our view in conclusion

The recent escalation between Iran and Israel underscores the delicate balance of power in the volatile Middle East. With tensions reaching unprecedented levels and the specter of further escalation looming, the potential for a full-blown conflict cannot be understated. The ramifications of such a scenario would be far-reaching and could have significant implications for regional stability and global security.

Turning to the oil market, there has been much speculation about the possibility of a full-scale blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the event of further escalation. However, at present, such a scenario remains highly speculative. Nonetheless, it is crucial to note that Iran’s oil production and exports remain at risk even without further escalation. Currently producing close to 3.2 million barrels per day, Iran has significantly increased its production from mid-2020 levels of 1.9 million barrels per day.

In response to the recent attack, Israel may exert pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran. The enforcement of such sanctions, particularly on Iranian oil exports, could result in a loss of anywhere between 0.5 million to 1 million barrels per day of oil supply. This would likely keep the oil market in deficit for the remainder of the year, contradicting the Biden administration’s wish to maintain oil and gasoline prices at sustainable levels ahead of the election. While other OPEC nations have spare capacity, utilizing it would tighten the global oil market even further. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for example, could collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day if necessary.

Furthermore, both Iran and the US have expressed a desire to prevent further escalation. However, much depends on Israel’s response to the recent barrage of rockets. While Israel has historically refrained from responding violently to attacks (1991), the situation remains fluid. If Israel chooses not to respond forcefully, the US may be compelled to promise stronger enforcement of sanctions on Iranian oil exports. Consequently, Iranian oil exports are at risk, regardless of whether a wider confrontation ensues in the Middle East.

Analyzing the potential impact, approximately 2.2 million barrels per day of net Iranian crude and condensate exports could be at risk, factoring in Iranian domestic demand and condensate production. The effectiveness of US sanctions enforcement, however, remains uncertain, especially considering China’s stance on Iranian oil imports.

Despite these uncertainties, the market outlook remains cautiously optimistic for now, with Brent Crude expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark in the near term. Navigating through geopolitical tensions and fundamental factors, the oil market continues to adapt to evolving conflicts in the Middle East and beyond.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Lots of talk about an increasingly tight oil market. And yes, the oil price will move higher as a result of this and most likely move towards USD 100/b. Tensions and flareups in the Middle East is little threat to oil supply and will be more like catalysts driving the oil price higher on the back of a fundamentally bullish market. I.e. flareups will be more like releasing factors. But OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed as it has no interest in killing the goose (global economy) that lays the golden egg (oil demand growth). We’ll probably get verbal intervention by OPEC+ with ”.. more supply in H2” quite quickly when oil price moves closer to USD 100/b and that will likely subdue the bullishness. OPEC+ in full control of the oil market probably means an oil price ranging from USD 70/b to USD 100/b with an average of around USD 85/b. Just like last year.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent crude continues to trade around USD 90/b awaiting catalysts like further inventory declines or Mid East flareups. Brent crude ydy traded in a range of USD 88.78 – 91.1/b before settling at USD 90.38/b. Trading activity ydy seems like it was much about getting comfortable with 90-level. Is it too high? Is there still more upside etc. But in the end it settled above the 90-line. This morning it has traded consistently above the line without making any kind of great leap higher.

Netanyahu made it clear that Rafah will be attacked. Israel ydy pulled some troops out of Khan Younis in Gaza and that calmed nerves in the region a tiny bit. But it seems to be all about tactical preparations rather than an indication of a defuse of the situation. Ydy evening Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel made it clear that a date for an assault on Rafah indeed has been set despite Biden’s efforts to prevent him doing so. Article in FT on this today. So tension in Israel/Gaza looks set to rise in not too long. The market is also still awaiting Iran’s response to the bombing of its consulate in Damascus one week ago. There is of course no oil production in Israel/Gaza and not much in Syria, Lebanon or Yemen either. The effects on the oil market from tensions and flareups in these countries are first and foremost that they work as catalysts for the oil price to move higher in an oil market which is fundamentally bullish. Deficit and falling oil inventories is the fundamental reason for why the oil price is moving higher and for why it is at USD 90/b today. There is also the long connecting string of:

[Iran-Iraq-Syria/Yemen/Lebanon/Gaza – Israel – US]

which creates a remote risk that oil supply in the Middle East potentially could be at risk in the end when turmoil is flaring in the middle of this connecting string. This always creates discomfort in the oil market. But we see little risk premium for a scenario where oil supply is really hurt in the end as neither Iran nor the US wants to end up in such a situation.

Tight market but OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed to prevent global economy getting hurt. There  is increasing talk about the oil market getting very tight in H2-24 and that the oil price could shoot higher unless OPEC+ is producing more. But of course OPEC+ will indeed produce more. The health of the global economy is essential for OPEC+. Healthy oil demand growth is like the goose that lays the golden egg for them. In no way do they want to kill it with too high oil prices. Brent crude averaged USD 82.2/b last year with a high of USD 98/b. So far this year it has averaged USD 82.6/b. SEB’s forecast is USD 85/b for the average year with a high of USD 100/b. We think that a repetition of last year with respect to oil prices is great for OPEC+ and fully acceptable for the global economy and thus will not hinder a solid oil demand growth which OPEC+ needs. Nothing would make OPEC+ more happy than to produce at a normal level and still being able to get USD 85/b. Brent crude will head yet higher because OPEC+ continues to hold back supply Q2-24 resulting in declining inventories and thus higher prices. But when the oil price is nearing USD 100/b we expect verbal intervention from the group with statements like ”… more supply in H2-24” and that will probably dampen bullish prices.

Not only does OPEC+ want to produce at a normal level. It also needs to produce at a normal level. Because at some point in time in the future there will be a situation sooner or later where they will have to cut again. And unless they are back to normal production at that time they won’t be in a position to cut again.

So OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg. They won’t allow the oil price to stay too high for too long. I.e. USD 100/b or higher. They will produce more in H2-24 if needed to prevent too high oil prices and they have the reserve capacity to do it.

Data today: US monthly oil market report (STEO) with forecast for US crude and liquids production at 18:00 CET

Fortsätt läsa

Populära