Följ oss

Analys

SEB – Råvarukommentarer vecka 18 2012

Publicerat

den

Sammanfattning: Föregående vecka

  • Analyser - Prognos på priser för råvarorBrett råvaruindex: +1,62 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI TR Index
  • Energi: +1,42 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI Energy TR Index
  • Ädelmetaller: +2,12 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI Precious Metals TR Index
  • Industrimetaller: +3,47 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI Industrial Metals TR Index
  • Jordbruk: +0,59 %
    UBS Bloomberg CMCI Agriculture TR Index

Kortsiktig marknadsvy:

  • Guld: Neutral/köp
  • Olja: Sälj
  • Koppar: Sälj
  • Majs: Sälj
  • Vete: Neutral/sälj

Guld

Guldkursen januari 2011 till april 2012

  • Guldet steg 1,97 procent förra veckan och har för tillfället svårt att bryta ut på uppsidan. Flera länder går till val i Europa vilket försvårar för gemensamma förhandlingar. Tidigare överenskommelser såsom den förhandlade budgetpakten, som drivits fram av Tyskland, kan komma att rivas upp eller omförhandlas vilket försvagar euron och ger styrka till dollarn vilket i sin tur dämpar guldpriset.
  • I USA redovisade U.S Mint guldmyntförsäljningen för april vilken var den lägsta på fem år. Endast 17 000 troy ounce (ett troy ounce är ca 31 gram) har sålts i april jämfört med 70 000 ton under årets tre första månader. Spekulativa positioner på Comex har också minskat.
  • Fed lämnade räntan oförändrad vilket ger stöd åt guldpriset samtidigt som avsaknaden av ytterligare stimulanser verkade dämpande. Guldpriset var oför-ändrat på Feds räntebesked.
  • Centralbanker är fortfarande nettoköpare av guld och den ryska centralbanken ökade sin reserv med 15,5 ton. Guldet kommer troligen från inhemsk produktion. Börsen i Shanghai kommer att införa högre marginalkrav för några råvaror, däribland guld. Höjningen träder i kraft den 27:e april. Detta kan tillfälligt förhindra prisökningar.
  • Teknisk Analys: Dubbelbotten? Bara marginella rörelser noterade sedan förra fredagen. Dock har vi fått ett par spikar på nedsidan vilket visar att köparna har visat intresse under 1640 området något som vi tolkar lätt positivt. Som tidigare krävs dock åtminstone en uppgång över 1680 för att öka på sannolikheten för att en botten äntligen är på plats.

Köp SEB Råvarucertifikat GULD S

Olja

Pris på brentolja 2011-01-04 till 2012-04-27

  • Europa fortsätter att oroa marknaden och statistik från det viktiga dragloket Tyskland har varit sämre än förväntat. Preliminära inköpschefsindexet för den tyska industrin sjönk till 46,3 i april jämfört med 48,4 i mars. Det är den lägsta siffran på 33 månader. Att S & P:s beslutade att sänka Spaniens kreditbetyg två steg med fortsatt negativa utsikter spär på oro och ovisshet.
  • Fed lämnade räntan oförändrad på onsdagen med en förväntad låg ränta t.o.m. slutet av 2014 eftersom de ekonomiska förhållandena enligt Fed kräver en extrem lågräntepolitik. Vad gäller kvantitativa lättnader så är Fed redo att göra mer om förhållanden i marknaden skulle kräva det. Oljepriset steg på beskedet att Fed trots allt reviderade upp sin prognos för amerikansk tillväxt i 2012.
  • Förra veckan gjorde Iran ett utspel där landet meddelade att man kommer att överväga Rysslands förslag om att inte vidareutveckla landets kärnvapenprogram och att tillåta ytterligare inspektioner. Utspelet kan mycket väl vara ett sätt för landet att vinna tid. Oljan sjönk en procent efter uttalandet. Nytt atommöte med Iran kommer att hållas i Bagdad den 23:e maj.
  • Veckostatistik från American Petroleum Institute (API) visade att råoljelager föll med en miljon fat medan onsdagens DOE siffra visade att råoljelager steg med fyra miljoner fat mot förväntade tre miljoner.
  • Teknisk Analys: Återtest av bandet & sedan ned. Vi bör nu vara i slutfasen av återtestet av 55 dagars bandet (vi flaggade för förra veckan). Återtestet har gått långsammare än förväntat vilket å andra sidan visar på lågt deltagande av köpare, något som passar bra in i vår nu något mer negativ vy.

Köp SEB Råvarucertifikat Short OLJA A S

Koppar

Diagram över kopparprisets utveckling, 2011 till april 2012

  • S & P:s beslutade i torsdags att sänka Spaniens kreditbetyg två steg med fort-satt negativa utsikter. Motiveringen är en ökad risk att spanska staten behöver mer kapital för att kunna bistå bankerna samt risk för två år med recession. Hela Eurozonen fick en känga av S & P: ”strategin att hantera Europas stats-skuldkris fortsätter att sakna effektivitet.” Euroländerna måste besluta om man ska hjälpa Spanien.
  • Dollarn stärktes på S & Ps besked och kopparpriset steg t.o.m något trots dollarns förstärkning.
  • Enligt kinesiska myndigheter importerade Kina 345,7 ton koppar i mars vilket är en minskning med 8 procent från februari. Flera rapporter bekräftar att koppar-lagren i Kina är välfyllda till bredden. Inkluderat 600 000 ton i frihamnslager uppges lagren uppgå till 1 miljon ton. Enligt estimat finns ¾ av globala lager i Kina nu. Marknaden i Kina är stängd idag.
  • Terminskurvan i koppar är i backwardation dvs. framtida förväntade priser är billigare än aktuellt pris och denna skillnad blir allt större vilket vi tolkar som att tillgången på koppar utanför Kina är begränsad USA:s BNP ökade med 2,2 procent på årlig basis under det första kvartalet vilket var lägre än vad analytiker hade räknat med enligt Bloomberg. Siffran kan tolkas på så sätt att sannolikheten för kvantitativa lättnader ökar.
  • Teknisk Analys: Färdig korrektion. Studsen upp från trend linjen blev lite starkare än vad vi initialt räknade med (8218) vilket i och för sig inte ändrar nå-got av den större vyn. Vi ser fortfarande marknaden som negativ och kommer att fortsätta göra så länge vi inte återetablerar oss över medelvärdesbanden.

Analys - Köp SEB Certifikat Short KOPPA A S

Majs

Majsets prisutveckling mellan januari 2011 och april 2012

  • Majspriset steg ca en halv procent förra veckan. Vi kan se en fortsatt hög volatilitet i majsmarknaden, där majkontraktet i Chicago handlades upp och ned med några procent varje dag, men utan tydlig riktning.
  • En faktor som hjälpt till att trycka upp priset är den kinesiska efterfrågan, där USDA i början av veckan kom ut med statistik som påvisade en god export av amerikansk majs till okända destinationer. Det kunde senare under veckan bekräftas att en stor del av denna majs gått till Kina.
  • Samtidigt har det spekulerats en hel del kring huruvida den goda starten på den amerikanska majsplanteringen ska kunna fortsätta på samma sätt framöver, där det funnits en viss oro för att det kalla väder som råder norr om flera viktiga majsstater ska leta sig söderut. Då en mängd prognoser visat på att så inte är fallet har oron minskat och med dessa även efterfrågan på majs.
  • Vi anser inte att förra veckans uppgång kan motiveras av stark efterfrågan från Kina och tror med detta att majspriset under den kommande veckan kommer att kunna falla tillbaka något.
  • Teknisk Analys: Lite förvirrat. Efter det falska brottet under botten linjen samt efterföljande test och studs av densamma ser det ut som om marknaden skulle kunna vara på väg att söka sig norrut. Å andra sidan har vi än så länge inte lyckats hålla oss kvar över mitten punkten, 624, av den kraftigt stigande ”candlen” per 30:e mars. För att minska förvirringen måste vi bryta antingen 632 eller 609 ½.

Analys - Köp SEB Certifikat Short MAJS A S

Vete

EU milling wheat (Matif) - Prisutveckling

  • Vetet i Paris föll nära två procent veckan som gick. För närvarande är korrelationen mellan det amerikanska och det europeiska vetet mycket låg.
  • I Europa är det en blandad utveckling med förhållandevis goda prognoser avseende veteskörden i Tyskland, Storbritannien och Frankrike. Samtidigt är förutsättningarna bedrövliga i Spanien, där man gång på gång tvingas justera ned sina produktionsestimat.
  • I början av veckan kom International Grains Councils senaste spannmålsrapport, i vilken organisationen justerar ned sin prognos för den globala veteskörden. Denna nedrevidering av tidigare estimat är i princip uteslutande baserad på de europeiska köldproblemen från första kvartalet.
  • Vi förhåller oss neutrala till svagt negativa till vetet i Paris denna vecka, där vi dock är beredda att snabbt positionera oss mot en nedgång om planteringssiffrorna fortsätter att överraska oss positivt i USA och Europa.
  • Teknisk Analys: Tunga motstånd bromsar. Efter att i princip ha tangerat årshögsta faller vi tillbaka något i vad som får anses vara en mindre vinsthemtagning. Vidare behöver nog marknaden samla lite styrka för att kunna ta sig an ett så pass tungt motstånd som 219-området. Det mest troliga utfallet ser ut att bli intervall handel mellan medelvärdesbandet och topp området.

Analys - Köp SEB Certifikat Short VETE A S

[box]SEB Veckobrev Veckans råvarukommentar är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]

Disclaimer

The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).

Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.

About SEB

SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

Fundamentals trump geopolitical tensions

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Throughout this week, the Brent Crude price has experienced a decline of USD 3 per barrel, despite ongoing turmoil in the Middle East. Price fluctuations have ranged from highs of USD 91 per barrel at the beginning of the week to lows of USD 87 per barrel as of yesterday evening.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Following the release of yesterday’s US inventory report, Brent Crude once again demonstrated resilience against broader macroeconomic concerns, instead focusing on underlying market fundamentals.

Nevertheless, the recent drop in prices may come as somewhat surprising given the array of conflicting signals observed. Despite an increase in US inventories—a typically bearish indicator—we’ve also witnessed escalating tensions in the Middle East, coupled with the reinstatement of US sanctions on Venezuela. Furthermore, there are indications of impending sanctions on Iran in response to the recent attack on Israel.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has indicated that new sanctions targeting Iran, particularly aimed at restricting its oil exports, could be announced as early as this week. As previously highlighted, we maintain the view that Iran’s oil exports remain vulnerable even without further escalation of the conflict. It appears that Israel is exerting pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran, an action that is unfolding before our eyes.

Iran’s current oil production stands at close to 3.2 million barrels per day. Considering additional condensate production of about 0.8 million barrels per day and subtracting domestic demand of roughly 1.8 million barrels per day, the net export of Iranian crude and condensate is approximately 2.2 million barrels per day.

However, the uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of such sanctions casts doubt on the likelihood of a complete ending of Iranian exports. Approximately 80% of Iran’s exports are directed to independent refineries in China, suggesting that US sanctions may have limited efficacy unless China complies. The prospect of China resisting US pressure on its oil imports from Iran poses a significant challenge to US sanctions enforcement efforts.

Furthermore, any shortfall resulting from sanctions could potentially be offset by other OPEC nations with spare capacity. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for instance, can collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day, although this remains a contingency measure.

In addition to developments related to Iran, the Biden administration has re-imposed restrictions on Venezuelan oil, marking the end of a six-month reprieve. This move is expected to impact flows from the South American nation.

Meanwhile, US crude inventories (excluding SPR holdings) surged by 2.7 million barrels last week (page 11 attached), reaching their highest level since June of last year. This increase coincided with a decline in measures of fuel demand (page 14 attached), underscoring a slightly weaker US market.

In summary, while geopolitical tensions persist and new rounds of sanctions are imposed, our market outlook remains intact. We maintain our forecast of an average Brent Crude price of USD 85 per barrel for the year 2024. In the short term, however, prices are expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark as they navigate through geopolitical uncertainties and fundamental factors.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brace for Covert Conflict

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

In the past two trading days, Brent Crude prices have fluctuated between highs of USD 92.2 per barrel and lows of USD 88.7 per barrel. Despite escalation tensions in the Middle East, oil prices have remained relatively stable over the past 24 hours. The recent barrage of rockets and drones in the region hasn’t significantly affected market sentiment regarding potential disruptions to oil supply. The key concern now is how Israel will respond: will it choose a strong retaliation to assert deterrence, risking wider regional instability, or will it revert to targeted strikes on Iran’s proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq? While it’s too early to predict, one thing is clear: brace for increased volatility, uncertainty, and speculation.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Amidst these developments, the market continues to focus on current fundamentals rather than unfolding geopolitical risks. Despite Iran’s recent attack on Israel, oil prices have slid, reflecting a sideways or slightly bearish sentiment. This morning, oil prices stand at USD 90 per barrel, down 2.5% from Friday’s highs.

The attack

Iran’s launch of over 300 rockets and drones toward Israel marks the first direct assault from Iranian territory since 1991. However, the attack, announced well in advance, resulted in minimal damage as Israeli and allied forces intercepted nearly all projectiles. Hence, the damage inflicted was limited. The incident has prompted US President Joe Biden to urge Israel to exercise restraint, as part of broader efforts to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East.

Israel’s response remains uncertain as its war cabinet deliberates on potential courses of action. While the necessity of a response is acknowledged, the timing and magnitude remain undecided.

The attack was allegedly in retaliation for an Israeli airstrike on Iran’s consulate in Damascus, resulting in significant casualties, including a senior leader in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force. It’s notable that this marks the first direct targeting of Israel from Iranian territory, setting the stage for heightened tensions between the two nations.

Despite the scale of the attack, the vast majority of Iranian projectiles were intercepted before reaching Israeli territory. However, a small number did land, causing minor damage to a military base in the southern region.

President Biden swiftly condemned Iran’s actions and pledged to coordinate a diplomatic response with leaders from the G7 nations. The US military’s rapid repositioning of assets in the region underscores the seriousness of the situation.

Iran’s willingness to escalate tensions further depends on Israel’s response, as indicated by General Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces. Meanwhile, speculation about a retaliatory attack from Israel persists.

Looking ahead, key questions remain unanswered. Will Iran launch additional attacks? How will Israel respond, and what implications will it have for the region? Moreover, how will Iran’s allies react to the escalating tensions?

Given the potential for a full-scale war between Iran and Israel, concerns about its impact on global energy markets are growing. Both the United States and China have strong incentives to reduce tensions in the region, given the destabilizing effects of a regional conflict.

Our view in conclusion

The recent escalation between Iran and Israel underscores the delicate balance of power in the volatile Middle East. With tensions reaching unprecedented levels and the specter of further escalation looming, the potential for a full-blown conflict cannot be understated. The ramifications of such a scenario would be far-reaching and could have significant implications for regional stability and global security.

Turning to the oil market, there has been much speculation about the possibility of a full-scale blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the event of further escalation. However, at present, such a scenario remains highly speculative. Nonetheless, it is crucial to note that Iran’s oil production and exports remain at risk even without further escalation. Currently producing close to 3.2 million barrels per day, Iran has significantly increased its production from mid-2020 levels of 1.9 million barrels per day.

In response to the recent attack, Israel may exert pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran. The enforcement of such sanctions, particularly on Iranian oil exports, could result in a loss of anywhere between 0.5 million to 1 million barrels per day of oil supply. This would likely keep the oil market in deficit for the remainder of the year, contradicting the Biden administration’s wish to maintain oil and gasoline prices at sustainable levels ahead of the election. While other OPEC nations have spare capacity, utilizing it would tighten the global oil market even further. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for example, could collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day if necessary.

Furthermore, both Iran and the US have expressed a desire to prevent further escalation. However, much depends on Israel’s response to the recent barrage of rockets. While Israel has historically refrained from responding violently to attacks (1991), the situation remains fluid. If Israel chooses not to respond forcefully, the US may be compelled to promise stronger enforcement of sanctions on Iranian oil exports. Consequently, Iranian oil exports are at risk, regardless of whether a wider confrontation ensues in the Middle East.

Analyzing the potential impact, approximately 2.2 million barrels per day of net Iranian crude and condensate exports could be at risk, factoring in Iranian domestic demand and condensate production. The effectiveness of US sanctions enforcement, however, remains uncertain, especially considering China’s stance on Iranian oil imports.

Despite these uncertainties, the market outlook remains cautiously optimistic for now, with Brent Crude expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark in the near term. Navigating through geopolitical tensions and fundamental factors, the oil market continues to adapt to evolving conflicts in the Middle East and beyond.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Lots of talk about an increasingly tight oil market. And yes, the oil price will move higher as a result of this and most likely move towards USD 100/b. Tensions and flareups in the Middle East is little threat to oil supply and will be more like catalysts driving the oil price higher on the back of a fundamentally bullish market. I.e. flareups will be more like releasing factors. But OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed as it has no interest in killing the goose (global economy) that lays the golden egg (oil demand growth). We’ll probably get verbal intervention by OPEC+ with ”.. more supply in H2” quite quickly when oil price moves closer to USD 100/b and that will likely subdue the bullishness. OPEC+ in full control of the oil market probably means an oil price ranging from USD 70/b to USD 100/b with an average of around USD 85/b. Just like last year.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent crude continues to trade around USD 90/b awaiting catalysts like further inventory declines or Mid East flareups. Brent crude ydy traded in a range of USD 88.78 – 91.1/b before settling at USD 90.38/b. Trading activity ydy seems like it was much about getting comfortable with 90-level. Is it too high? Is there still more upside etc. But in the end it settled above the 90-line. This morning it has traded consistently above the line without making any kind of great leap higher.

Netanyahu made it clear that Rafah will be attacked. Israel ydy pulled some troops out of Khan Younis in Gaza and that calmed nerves in the region a tiny bit. But it seems to be all about tactical preparations rather than an indication of a defuse of the situation. Ydy evening Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel made it clear that a date for an assault on Rafah indeed has been set despite Biden’s efforts to prevent him doing so. Article in FT on this today. So tension in Israel/Gaza looks set to rise in not too long. The market is also still awaiting Iran’s response to the bombing of its consulate in Damascus one week ago. There is of course no oil production in Israel/Gaza and not much in Syria, Lebanon or Yemen either. The effects on the oil market from tensions and flareups in these countries are first and foremost that they work as catalysts for the oil price to move higher in an oil market which is fundamentally bullish. Deficit and falling oil inventories is the fundamental reason for why the oil price is moving higher and for why it is at USD 90/b today. There is also the long connecting string of:

[Iran-Iraq-Syria/Yemen/Lebanon/Gaza – Israel – US]

which creates a remote risk that oil supply in the Middle East potentially could be at risk in the end when turmoil is flaring in the middle of this connecting string. This always creates discomfort in the oil market. But we see little risk premium for a scenario where oil supply is really hurt in the end as neither Iran nor the US wants to end up in such a situation.

Tight market but OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed to prevent global economy getting hurt. There  is increasing talk about the oil market getting very tight in H2-24 and that the oil price could shoot higher unless OPEC+ is producing more. But of course OPEC+ will indeed produce more. The health of the global economy is essential for OPEC+. Healthy oil demand growth is like the goose that lays the golden egg for them. In no way do they want to kill it with too high oil prices. Brent crude averaged USD 82.2/b last year with a high of USD 98/b. So far this year it has averaged USD 82.6/b. SEB’s forecast is USD 85/b for the average year with a high of USD 100/b. We think that a repetition of last year with respect to oil prices is great for OPEC+ and fully acceptable for the global economy and thus will not hinder a solid oil demand growth which OPEC+ needs. Nothing would make OPEC+ more happy than to produce at a normal level and still being able to get USD 85/b. Brent crude will head yet higher because OPEC+ continues to hold back supply Q2-24 resulting in declining inventories and thus higher prices. But when the oil price is nearing USD 100/b we expect verbal intervention from the group with statements like ”… more supply in H2-24” and that will probably dampen bullish prices.

Not only does OPEC+ want to produce at a normal level. It also needs to produce at a normal level. Because at some point in time in the future there will be a situation sooner or later where they will have to cut again. And unless they are back to normal production at that time they won’t be in a position to cut again.

So OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg. They won’t allow the oil price to stay too high for too long. I.e. USD 100/b or higher. They will produce more in H2-24 if needed to prevent too high oil prices and they have the reserve capacity to do it.

Data today: US monthly oil market report (STEO) with forecast for US crude and liquids production at 18:00 CET

Fortsätt läsa

Populära