Följ oss

Analys

SEB – Råvarukommentarer, 27 maj 2013

Publicerat

den

SEB Veckobrev med prognoser på råvaror

Rekommendationer

SEB Råvaror - Rekommendationer den 27 maj 2013

*) Avkastningen avser 1:1 råvarucertifikat där de ingår i rekommendationen. I den aktuella tabellen ovan har jag tagit prisförändringen den senaste veckan sedan det förra veckobrevet publicerades.

Inledning

Inköpschefsindex kom in på sin svagaste nivå på 7 månader och i stort sett alla råvarumarknader präglas av långsiktigt fallande trender. En produktion som kommer ikapp efterfrågan med lagerökningar som följd syns tydligast på spannmålsmarknaden, men samma sak kan anas även på andra marknader, t ex för basmetaller, där lagren varit stigande länge. Vissa marknader har dock fallit under lång tid, och börjar närma sig vad jag tror är bottennivåer. Dit hör t ex kaffe, socker och guld och amerikansk naturgas.

Råolja – Brent

Oljan var har under april och maj rekylerat uppåt och i slutet av förra veckan brutit detta mönster och handlat lägre. Det är en teknisk säljsignal och vi rekommenderar köp av BEAR OLJA X4 S.

Brentolja, läge att köpa bear-certifikat

Lagren och lagerförändringarna i USA den senaste rapportveckan (som slutade den 10 maj) ser vi nedan, enligt Department of Energy och American Petroleum Institute.

Oljelager i USA

Nedan ser vi amerikanska råoljelager enligt DOE i tusen fat. Den svarta kurvan är 2012 års lagernivåer vecka för vecka och den lilla röda linjen är 2013 års nivå.

Amerikanska råoljelager enligt DOE i tusen fat

Importen fortsätter att hålla sig under förra årets nivå. En liten ökning av importen noterades i den senaste rapporten.

Hur mycket olja USA importerar

Slutsatsen är alltså att vi tror att oljepriset faller från den här punkten.

Elektricitet

Elen har konsoliderat sig över 35 euro per MWh. Eftersom inget brott åt något håll har skett ligger vi kvar, men följer på i den riktning som utbrottet sker.

Investerare bör avvakta utbrott i elpriset

Hydrologisk balans har fortsatt att stiga från -11.93 till -8.51 i tioveckorsprognosen.

Hydrologisk balans

Eftersom priset trots allt kommit ner ganska långt, väljer vi att fortsätta med neutral position.

Naturgas

Naturgasen vände upp och är i stadig trend nu. Därför rekommenderas en köpt position, t ex genom BULL NATGAS X4 S.

Läge att ta position i naturgaspriset via NATGAS X4 S

Guld & Silver

Guldpriset var nere och ”nästan” rörde vid botten från prisfallet i april. Det är ett styrketecken för marknaden att det inte registrerades en ny botten. Trenden är dock fortfarande nedåtriktad och det ”borde” bli en förnyad nedgång mot 1300 i veckan som kommer.

Teknisk analys på guldpriset den 24 maj 2013

ETF-investerare har fortsatt att likvidera sina innehav i guld, som vi ser i diagrammet nedan.

Investerare fortsätter att sälja guld ETF

Vad som kan ha utlöst försäljningarna var ”hacket” i kurvan på penningmängden i USA. Samtidigt började FED tala om ett slut på QE. Men som vi ser i grafen nedan, har M1 fortsatt att öka i USA. Man fick kalla fötter hos FED och fortsatte trycka pengar. Det gör att det byggs upp ett latent stöd för guldpriset, bara kursfallet tar slut.

Diagram över penningmängd (M1) och guldpriset

Nedan ser vi kursdiagrammet för silver i dollar per troy ounce. Stödet på 22 dollar håller än så länge. Bryts den nivån finns inget förrän vid 20 dollar, 10% längre ner. Silverpriset var nere och rörde nästan vid 20 och frågan är om det räcker så, eller om priset kommer att gå ner och testa stödet ordentligt.

Analys på silverpris för investerare

Jag tror att silverpriset kan gå lite lägre från dagens nivå, Trenden är nedåtriktad.

Vi ligger korta guld och silver. Jag tror att det kommer en till vända ner och ligger självklart kvar med köpt position i BEAR GULD X4 S och BEAR SILVER X4 S.

Platina & Palladium

Platina började veckan med att rekylera upp från 1450, men trenden (nedåt) tog över och vid slutet av veckan var priset återigen nere vid 1450. Den här nivån var toppen på konsolideringen efter det kraftiga prisfallet i mitten av april och därför ett visst tekniskt stöd. Marknaden står nu och väger. Antingen får vi se en trendvändning uppåt, eller så fortsätter priset i den fallande pristrenden.

Platinaanalys (XPT) den 24 maj 2013

Palladium vände ner vid 750 dollar. Som jag skrev förra veckan, skulle 750 vara en lockande nivå för säljare att lägga sina ordrar. Priset har nu rekylerat ner och det mesta tyder på att prisfallet fortsätter, åtminstone ner mot 710 dollar.

Palldadiumpriset ser ut att fortsätta falla

Vi ligger kvar såld både platina och palladium, dvs med BEAR PLATNA X4 S och BEAR PALLAD X4 S.

Basmetaller

Fokus i veckan låg på onsdagens kongressutfrågning av Bernanke´s. Priserna inledde veckan positivt med köp från finansiella aktörer på förväntan om indikationer på en långvarig penningpolitisk stimulans från FED. Turbulensen ökad inför, och under talet. När han fick frågan om tidsaspekten, med svaret att det kan vara aktuellt med ett tillbakadragande de 2-3 nästkommande mötena, började börser och råvaror att falla tillbaka. Kinas PMI kom in svagare (49,6 mot 50,4 månaden före) natten till torsdagen, vilket satte förnyad press. Veckan avslutas i stort sett där den började, med endast marginellt högre priser.

Koppar

Som vi skrivit tidigare har vi haft kopparn under bevakning för att gå från neutral till köp. Tekniskt sett bedömde vi förutsättningarna som goda för en kortsiktig uppgång. Veckan inleddes som väntat starkt med en uppgång till nivåer strax över $7500, upp 3 % på veckan. Kinas PMI dämpade riskaptiten och priset föll ungefär lika mycket dagen efter. Trots tveksamhet under veckan, ser vi tecken på att det negativa stämningsläget kring koppar håller på att svänga om.

Tekniskt sett fokuserar vi på ”dubbelbotten” från april och maj, som ger en potentiell uppgång till $7620, där motståndet sätter in. Nästa nivå är $7800. Den omedelbara pressen på koppar verkar vara över och den nedåtgående trenden är bruten. Den generella trenden får betraktas som mer sidledes för koppar.

Analys på kopparpriset den 24 maj 2013

Vi förväntar oss fortsatt hög volatilitet. Vår kortsiktiga bedömning talar för uppsidan och vi rekommenderar därför köp av BULL KOPPAR X2 S eller X4 S.

Aluminium

Priset har nu ”testat” stödnivåerna vid $1810-20 vid tre tillfällen, och lyckats studsa upp. Det är ett styrketecken. Vi ser fysiska aktörer som går in och täcker in framtida konsumtion via terminsköp vid varje dipp. Tekniskt orienterade fonder säljer vid varje uppställ. Trenden blir därefter, det rör sig sidledes. Vi ser tecken på att marknaden håller på att bottna ur. Högkostnadsproducenterna, framför allt i Kina, förväntas minska utbudet (ännu mer) om priset långvarigt stannar på nuvarande nivåer.

Långsiktigt är nivån väldigt intressant för kontraktet Aluminium S (utan hävstång).

Aluminium långsiktigt intressant

Zink

Situationen för zink påminner om den för aluminium, både fundamentalt och tekniskt. Vi bedömer zinken som ”billig” ur ett kostnadsperspektiv och nuvarande nivåer är mycket intressanta på lite längre sikt (6-12 månader). I det perspektivet är Zink S (utan hävstång) att föredra.

Teknisk zink-analys den 24 maj 2013

Nickel

Nickel följde övriga basmetaller under veckan, upp ca 3 % i mitten av veckan, och sen ner igen. Förutom det makroekonomiska nyhetsflödet är det inte mycket som har förändrats sen förra veckan.

Ur ett tekniskt perspektiv gäller att nivån från i början av månaden $14600 håller, för att undvika en test av lägre nivåer. Det finansiella kollektivet är redan väldigt ”korta” och frågan är hur mycket mer kraft det finns för att pressa priset ytterligare. Det byggs upp ett stort behov av att köpa tillbaka kortpositioner, vilket i sig kan skapa kraftiga rekyler på uppsidan. Vi bedömer nickel som ”billig” ur ett kostnadsperspektiv och nuvarande nivåer är mycket intressanta på lite längre sikt (6-12 månader). I det perspektivet är Nickel S (utan hävstång) att föredra.

Metallen nickel analyserad

[box]SEB Veckobrev Veckans råvarukommentar är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]

Disclaimer

The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).

Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.

About SEB

SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

Fundamentals trump geopolitical tensions

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Throughout this week, the Brent Crude price has experienced a decline of USD 3 per barrel, despite ongoing turmoil in the Middle East. Price fluctuations have ranged from highs of USD 91 per barrel at the beginning of the week to lows of USD 87 per barrel as of yesterday evening.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Following the release of yesterday’s US inventory report, Brent Crude once again demonstrated resilience against broader macroeconomic concerns, instead focusing on underlying market fundamentals.

Nevertheless, the recent drop in prices may come as somewhat surprising given the array of conflicting signals observed. Despite an increase in US inventories—a typically bearish indicator—we’ve also witnessed escalating tensions in the Middle East, coupled with the reinstatement of US sanctions on Venezuela. Furthermore, there are indications of impending sanctions on Iran in response to the recent attack on Israel.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has indicated that new sanctions targeting Iran, particularly aimed at restricting its oil exports, could be announced as early as this week. As previously highlighted, we maintain the view that Iran’s oil exports remain vulnerable even without further escalation of the conflict. It appears that Israel is exerting pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran, an action that is unfolding before our eyes.

Iran’s current oil production stands at close to 3.2 million barrels per day. Considering additional condensate production of about 0.8 million barrels per day and subtracting domestic demand of roughly 1.8 million barrels per day, the net export of Iranian crude and condensate is approximately 2.2 million barrels per day.

However, the uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of such sanctions casts doubt on the likelihood of a complete ending of Iranian exports. Approximately 80% of Iran’s exports are directed to independent refineries in China, suggesting that US sanctions may have limited efficacy unless China complies. The prospect of China resisting US pressure on its oil imports from Iran poses a significant challenge to US sanctions enforcement efforts.

Furthermore, any shortfall resulting from sanctions could potentially be offset by other OPEC nations with spare capacity. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for instance, can collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day, although this remains a contingency measure.

In addition to developments related to Iran, the Biden administration has re-imposed restrictions on Venezuelan oil, marking the end of a six-month reprieve. This move is expected to impact flows from the South American nation.

Meanwhile, US crude inventories (excluding SPR holdings) surged by 2.7 million barrels last week (page 11 attached), reaching their highest level since June of last year. This increase coincided with a decline in measures of fuel demand (page 14 attached), underscoring a slightly weaker US market.

In summary, while geopolitical tensions persist and new rounds of sanctions are imposed, our market outlook remains intact. We maintain our forecast of an average Brent Crude price of USD 85 per barrel for the year 2024. In the short term, however, prices are expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark as they navigate through geopolitical uncertainties and fundamental factors.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brace for Covert Conflict

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

In the past two trading days, Brent Crude prices have fluctuated between highs of USD 92.2 per barrel and lows of USD 88.7 per barrel. Despite escalation tensions in the Middle East, oil prices have remained relatively stable over the past 24 hours. The recent barrage of rockets and drones in the region hasn’t significantly affected market sentiment regarding potential disruptions to oil supply. The key concern now is how Israel will respond: will it choose a strong retaliation to assert deterrence, risking wider regional instability, or will it revert to targeted strikes on Iran’s proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq? While it’s too early to predict, one thing is clear: brace for increased volatility, uncertainty, and speculation.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Amidst these developments, the market continues to focus on current fundamentals rather than unfolding geopolitical risks. Despite Iran’s recent attack on Israel, oil prices have slid, reflecting a sideways or slightly bearish sentiment. This morning, oil prices stand at USD 90 per barrel, down 2.5% from Friday’s highs.

The attack

Iran’s launch of over 300 rockets and drones toward Israel marks the first direct assault from Iranian territory since 1991. However, the attack, announced well in advance, resulted in minimal damage as Israeli and allied forces intercepted nearly all projectiles. Hence, the damage inflicted was limited. The incident has prompted US President Joe Biden to urge Israel to exercise restraint, as part of broader efforts to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East.

Israel’s response remains uncertain as its war cabinet deliberates on potential courses of action. While the necessity of a response is acknowledged, the timing and magnitude remain undecided.

The attack was allegedly in retaliation for an Israeli airstrike on Iran’s consulate in Damascus, resulting in significant casualties, including a senior leader in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force. It’s notable that this marks the first direct targeting of Israel from Iranian territory, setting the stage for heightened tensions between the two nations.

Despite the scale of the attack, the vast majority of Iranian projectiles were intercepted before reaching Israeli territory. However, a small number did land, causing minor damage to a military base in the southern region.

President Biden swiftly condemned Iran’s actions and pledged to coordinate a diplomatic response with leaders from the G7 nations. The US military’s rapid repositioning of assets in the region underscores the seriousness of the situation.

Iran’s willingness to escalate tensions further depends on Israel’s response, as indicated by General Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces. Meanwhile, speculation about a retaliatory attack from Israel persists.

Looking ahead, key questions remain unanswered. Will Iran launch additional attacks? How will Israel respond, and what implications will it have for the region? Moreover, how will Iran’s allies react to the escalating tensions?

Given the potential for a full-scale war between Iran and Israel, concerns about its impact on global energy markets are growing. Both the United States and China have strong incentives to reduce tensions in the region, given the destabilizing effects of a regional conflict.

Our view in conclusion

The recent escalation between Iran and Israel underscores the delicate balance of power in the volatile Middle East. With tensions reaching unprecedented levels and the specter of further escalation looming, the potential for a full-blown conflict cannot be understated. The ramifications of such a scenario would be far-reaching and could have significant implications for regional stability and global security.

Turning to the oil market, there has been much speculation about the possibility of a full-scale blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the event of further escalation. However, at present, such a scenario remains highly speculative. Nonetheless, it is crucial to note that Iran’s oil production and exports remain at risk even without further escalation. Currently producing close to 3.2 million barrels per day, Iran has significantly increased its production from mid-2020 levels of 1.9 million barrels per day.

In response to the recent attack, Israel may exert pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran. The enforcement of such sanctions, particularly on Iranian oil exports, could result in a loss of anywhere between 0.5 million to 1 million barrels per day of oil supply. This would likely keep the oil market in deficit for the remainder of the year, contradicting the Biden administration’s wish to maintain oil and gasoline prices at sustainable levels ahead of the election. While other OPEC nations have spare capacity, utilizing it would tighten the global oil market even further. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for example, could collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day if necessary.

Furthermore, both Iran and the US have expressed a desire to prevent further escalation. However, much depends on Israel’s response to the recent barrage of rockets. While Israel has historically refrained from responding violently to attacks (1991), the situation remains fluid. If Israel chooses not to respond forcefully, the US may be compelled to promise stronger enforcement of sanctions on Iranian oil exports. Consequently, Iranian oil exports are at risk, regardless of whether a wider confrontation ensues in the Middle East.

Analyzing the potential impact, approximately 2.2 million barrels per day of net Iranian crude and condensate exports could be at risk, factoring in Iranian domestic demand and condensate production. The effectiveness of US sanctions enforcement, however, remains uncertain, especially considering China’s stance on Iranian oil imports.

Despite these uncertainties, the market outlook remains cautiously optimistic for now, with Brent Crude expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark in the near term. Navigating through geopolitical tensions and fundamental factors, the oil market continues to adapt to evolving conflicts in the Middle East and beyond.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Lots of talk about an increasingly tight oil market. And yes, the oil price will move higher as a result of this and most likely move towards USD 100/b. Tensions and flareups in the Middle East is little threat to oil supply and will be more like catalysts driving the oil price higher on the back of a fundamentally bullish market. I.e. flareups will be more like releasing factors. But OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed as it has no interest in killing the goose (global economy) that lays the golden egg (oil demand growth). We’ll probably get verbal intervention by OPEC+ with ”.. more supply in H2” quite quickly when oil price moves closer to USD 100/b and that will likely subdue the bullishness. OPEC+ in full control of the oil market probably means an oil price ranging from USD 70/b to USD 100/b with an average of around USD 85/b. Just like last year.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent crude continues to trade around USD 90/b awaiting catalysts like further inventory declines or Mid East flareups. Brent crude ydy traded in a range of USD 88.78 – 91.1/b before settling at USD 90.38/b. Trading activity ydy seems like it was much about getting comfortable with 90-level. Is it too high? Is there still more upside etc. But in the end it settled above the 90-line. This morning it has traded consistently above the line without making any kind of great leap higher.

Netanyahu made it clear that Rafah will be attacked. Israel ydy pulled some troops out of Khan Younis in Gaza and that calmed nerves in the region a tiny bit. But it seems to be all about tactical preparations rather than an indication of a defuse of the situation. Ydy evening Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel made it clear that a date for an assault on Rafah indeed has been set despite Biden’s efforts to prevent him doing so. Article in FT on this today. So tension in Israel/Gaza looks set to rise in not too long. The market is also still awaiting Iran’s response to the bombing of its consulate in Damascus one week ago. There is of course no oil production in Israel/Gaza and not much in Syria, Lebanon or Yemen either. The effects on the oil market from tensions and flareups in these countries are first and foremost that they work as catalysts for the oil price to move higher in an oil market which is fundamentally bullish. Deficit and falling oil inventories is the fundamental reason for why the oil price is moving higher and for why it is at USD 90/b today. There is also the long connecting string of:

[Iran-Iraq-Syria/Yemen/Lebanon/Gaza – Israel – US]

which creates a remote risk that oil supply in the Middle East potentially could be at risk in the end when turmoil is flaring in the middle of this connecting string. This always creates discomfort in the oil market. But we see little risk premium for a scenario where oil supply is really hurt in the end as neither Iran nor the US wants to end up in such a situation.

Tight market but OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed to prevent global economy getting hurt. There  is increasing talk about the oil market getting very tight in H2-24 and that the oil price could shoot higher unless OPEC+ is producing more. But of course OPEC+ will indeed produce more. The health of the global economy is essential for OPEC+. Healthy oil demand growth is like the goose that lays the golden egg for them. In no way do they want to kill it with too high oil prices. Brent crude averaged USD 82.2/b last year with a high of USD 98/b. So far this year it has averaged USD 82.6/b. SEB’s forecast is USD 85/b for the average year with a high of USD 100/b. We think that a repetition of last year with respect to oil prices is great for OPEC+ and fully acceptable for the global economy and thus will not hinder a solid oil demand growth which OPEC+ needs. Nothing would make OPEC+ more happy than to produce at a normal level and still being able to get USD 85/b. Brent crude will head yet higher because OPEC+ continues to hold back supply Q2-24 resulting in declining inventories and thus higher prices. But when the oil price is nearing USD 100/b we expect verbal intervention from the group with statements like ”… more supply in H2-24” and that will probably dampen bullish prices.

Not only does OPEC+ want to produce at a normal level. It also needs to produce at a normal level. Because at some point in time in the future there will be a situation sooner or later where they will have to cut again. And unless they are back to normal production at that time they won’t be in a position to cut again.

So OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg. They won’t allow the oil price to stay too high for too long. I.e. USD 100/b or higher. They will produce more in H2-24 if needed to prevent too high oil prices and they have the reserve capacity to do it.

Data today: US monthly oil market report (STEO) with forecast for US crude and liquids production at 18:00 CET

Fortsätt läsa

Populära