Följ oss

Analys

Why Brent 1mth at $65/b is reachable before Christmas

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - CommodityCrude oil price action – Brent crude 1mth Inching 1% higher WoW amid dollar headwinds. Brent to WTI crude spreads continues to widen

Brent crude inched 1% higher over the past week with a close of $57.75/b while the longer dated Dec-2020 gained 0.4% to $54.75/b.
The energy complex in total gained 0.6% while the other commodity sub-indexes all experienced losses from a marginal 0.03% loss for metals to a more substantial 1.7% and 1.8% for Agri and precious respectively.
Overall commodities lost 0.4% over the week and thus slightly less than dollar headwind from a 0.7% stronger USD index.
Compared to the 0.4% gain in the Brent Dec-2020 the WTI Dec-2020 instead fell back 0.3% to $50.08/b.
The spread between longer dated Brent and WTI prices thus continued to expand last week rising to $4.67/b for the Dec-2020 horizon.
The further expansion in Brent – WTI crude spreads was even more pronounced on the Dec-2018 horizon where it expanded 0.7% to $4.35/b., the highest since November 2015.

Brent crude oil comment – Why Brent 1mth at $65/b is reachable before Christmas

Declining US shale oil rig count is likely going to allow the mid-term WTI crude curve to move from current $51/b up towards the high of the year of around $56-57/b
Increasing US crude production is placing increasing strains on US crude oil export bottlenecks leading to further widening in the Brent to WTI crude spreads.
As a result mid-term forward Brent crude prices have the potential to move to $61-62/b when mid-term WTI moves to $56-57/b.
Further global inventory draws are likely to add yet steeper backwardation to the Brent crude curve which would allow the Brent 1mth contract to rise towards $65/b ($3-4/b above the Brent mid-term crude forward prices).

However, the 2018 crude oil market balance could be challenging as US shale oil players are likely going to drill less and complete more.
At the moment there is a tug of war between short term bullish drivers, real and visible, versus bearish concerns for 2018.
Bullish short term drivers are likely to win in the short term while medium term bearish drivers are likely going to come back and bite the market in the … in 2018.

There has been lots of comments that it would be unwise for Brent crude 1mth to move above $60/b because that would stimulate US shale oil production too much.
The thing is that it is not the 1mth Brent crude contract which sends stimulating price signals to US shale oil producers all that much. Rather it is the medium term forward WTI curve contracts which do so.
Typically it is the 1-3 year forward WTI contract price level which is what US shale oil players can sell and hedge new and existing production at. These forward prices are setting the level of profitability for new shale oil wells and production.

There has been lots of comments that it would be unwise for Brent crude 1mth to move above $60/b because that would stimulate US shale oil production too much.
The thing is that it is not the 1mth Brent crude contract which sends stimulating price signals to US shale oil producers all that much. Rather it is the medium term forward WTI curve contracts which do so.
Typically it is the 1-3 year forward WTI contract price level which is what US shale oil players can sell and hedge new and existing production at. These forward prices are setting the level of profitability for new shale oil wells and production.

The Brent 1mth contract reached its highest price level since March 2015 in late September ($59.49/b) and is trading just $1.6/b shy of that level today at $57.88/b.
Conversely the medium term WTI forward prices have set no such new ytd highs. If we look at the rolling WTI 18 mths contract (1.5 years forward) it reached a high of the year in early January of $57.39/b.
That was real shale oil stimulus resulting in lots of additional shale oil rigs and drilling. On Friday however it closed at no more than $51.02/b with the highest price this side of the summer being $51.7/b

In late September we commented that “Brent was set free to rally on increasing backwardation and widening spread to WTI”. The argument was that we can get a higher Brent 1mth price without stimulating US shale oil production because of an increasing Brent backwardation and an increasing Brent to WTI crude spread both in the front and on the curve.

At the moment we see that US shale oil players are kicking out shale oil drilling rigs. Just last week they kicked out 7 shale oil rigs. Since early August they have kicked out 30 oil rigs and 24 implied shale oil rigs.
Assuming a 6 week lag between price action and rig count reaction this shedding of US oil rigs is taking place at a forward WTI18 mth crude price of $50-51/b (6 weeks ago).

The US shale oil players are thus sentiment wise telling the market that WTI at a medium term forward price level of $50/b is not enough for them to keep the current rig count running.
They are kicking out rigs at $50/b. Thus while empirical market experience from May 2016 to July 2017 was that the US shale oil rig count inflection point was around $47/b (18mth forward) it has now clearly shifted higher than $50-51/b.

We believe that the market dynamic with respect to US shale oil is much about trial and error. Having figured out that it is now no longer at $47/b and that it is now also higher than $50-51/b it now remains to figure out where it has moved too. Thus the next test should now be to figure out where the US shale oil rig count change versus WTI 18mth forward price level relationship inflection point has moved to. I.e. the market should allow the forward WTI18mth contract to move upwards. Acceptable moves upwards in perspective of what we have seen earlier this year would be that the WTI 18 mth contract moves to $55-56/b.

One reason why such a move higher for the WTI 18 mth price horizon is reasonable to expect is because even though the WTI crude curve is in contango at the very front end of the curve there is still an overall backwardation in the forward WTI curve structure. The consequence of this is that shale oil producers now have to sell at a discount to front end prices if they want to sell forward hedging their future production. This typically leads to reluctance and reduced forward selling by producers. Consumers however experience the opposite. Consumers can now buy forward at a discount to front end prices which typically leads to more forward buying. Thus less forward selling and more forward buying should typically help to lift the mid-term forward crude prices higher both for Brent and WTI.

Thus if we assume that the mid-term WTI forward crude prices has potential to move $5/b higher it would allow the Brent mid-term crude price to shift $5/b higher as well which would allow the Brent 1mth contract to shift $5/b higher as well. If we in addition assume that the Brent to WTI crude price spread on the curve expands a further $1/b then the Brent crude curve can shift yet another dollar higher. Add another dollar in further steepening Brent backwardation and the front end Brent has another dollar on the upside. Thus a total $2/b extra on widening Brent – WTI spread and further Brent backwardation steepening.

Thus in total the Brent 1mth contract has an upside potential of another $7/b. The move would place the 18 mth WTI price at $56/b versus ytd high in early January of $57.39/b and current $51/b. It would place the Brent 18 mth contract at $61/b and a new ytd high and highest since April 2015 and it would place the Brent 1mth contract just shy of $65/b. And still US shale producers would not be stimulated with a higher forward price than WTI 18mth at $56/b. Maybe that is where the US shale oil rig count to WTI18mth inflection point has shifted to? At the moment it is at least higher than $51/b given data since early August.

The sentimental drivers for such a move higher is going to be further draw downs in inventories (yes, market is running a deficit due to OPEC+ production cuts), further reductions in US shale oil rig count (yes, we expect US shale players to kick out 5-10 rigs every week to Christmas to balance drilling versus completions), further accumulation of net long Brent spec into the backwardated Brent crude curve with positive roll yield, emergence of geopolitical risk premium in crude prices as stocks move lower, stronger and stronger signals from Saudi Arabia and Russia that they are willing to extend cuts to end of 2018 topped up with forecasts pointing to a cold US winter ahead (stronger La Nina event) with US Atlantic coast mid-distillate stocks now below 5yr average.

However, there is a reason for why Saudi Arabia and Russia both are signalling elevated willingness to extend current production cuts all to the end of 2018. They are concerned for the oil market balance in 2018. And with good reason. Since November 2016 when OPEC+ decided to cut production there has been a veritable shale oil drilling party with an accumulation of 1735 uncompleted wells and the accumulation continued also in September adding another 179 uncompleted wells lifting the total to 7270 uncompleted wells. In comparison the shale players completed 10161 wells over the 12mths to September and on average 847 wells per mth.

Thus if 2017 was a US shale oil drilling party then 2018 may be a shale oil completion party. US shale oil completions have been rising every month since January. In December 2016 completions stood at a low of 645 wells rising to 1029 in September and still rising. If completions average 1100 wells per month in 2018 then it would be 30% higher than the average of 847 in the 12 mths to September. In our view the US shale oil players today have too many active drilling rigs. They should spend their money on completions rather than drilling. That is what creates oil and cash flow. Thus the natural thing to expect is a further decline in the drilling rig count. Maybe another 100 to 200 rigs down and at the same time to expect a further increase in completions and eventually a draw down in the inventory of drilled but yet uncompleted wells.

At the moment the market is in a tug of war between short term bullish drivers which are very true, very visible and very strong versus real concerns for the oil market balance for 2018. We expect the short term bullish drivers will win in the short term while the medium term issues will hit back at the market in the medium term.

Ch1: US shale oil players are kicking out drilling rigs with WTI 18 mth contract at $51/b

US shale oil players are kicking out drilling rigs with WTI 18 mth contract at $51/b

Oil

Ch2: US shale oil rig count change to WTI mid-term forward price breaking up. Inflection point shifting higher. Rigs being kicked out at WTI $50-51/b

US shale oil rig count change to WTI mid-term forward price breaking up. Inflection point shifting higher. Rigs being kicked out at WTI $50-51/b

Ch3: Brent crude 1 to 18 mth time spread – Increasing backwardation as inventories falls
Stronger backwardation allows the 1mth contract to rise higher without stimulating US shale production on the forward WTI curve

Brent crude 1 to 18 mth time spread – Increasing backwardation as inventories falls

Ch4: Rolling Brent 18mth price spread to the rolling WTI 18mth crude price
The spread is expanding as the US crude production is increasing
Higher spread will allow the Brent18 mth contract to move relatively higher versus the WTI curve without stimulating US shale oil production
More to come as US crude production continues to rise

Rolling Brent 18mth price spread to the rolling WTI 18mth crude price

Ch5: WTI 18mth forward crude oil price. Still lots of room on the upside before getting back to ytd high

WTI 18mth forward crude oil price. Still lots of room on the upside before getting back to ytd high

Ch6: Crude oil forward curves. Brent in backwardation, more to come. Front end WTI in front end contango to flip into front end backwardation

Crude oil forward curves. Brent in backwardation, more to come. Front end WTI in front end contango to flip into front end backwardation

Ch7: Brent 1mth to WTI 1mth contract price spread makes a jump to $6/b

Brent 1mth to WTI 1mth contract price spread makes a jump to $6/b

Ch7: Resulting in a big jump in US crude oil exports
This will drain US crude inventories and flip front end WTI contango into backwardation

Resulting in a big jump in US crude oil exports

Kind regards

Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

Fundamentals trump geopolitical tensions

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Throughout this week, the Brent Crude price has experienced a decline of USD 3 per barrel, despite ongoing turmoil in the Middle East. Price fluctuations have ranged from highs of USD 91 per barrel at the beginning of the week to lows of USD 87 per barrel as of yesterday evening.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Following the release of yesterday’s US inventory report, Brent Crude once again demonstrated resilience against broader macroeconomic concerns, instead focusing on underlying market fundamentals.

Nevertheless, the recent drop in prices may come as somewhat surprising given the array of conflicting signals observed. Despite an increase in US inventories—a typically bearish indicator—we’ve also witnessed escalating tensions in the Middle East, coupled with the reinstatement of US sanctions on Venezuela. Furthermore, there are indications of impending sanctions on Iran in response to the recent attack on Israel.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has indicated that new sanctions targeting Iran, particularly aimed at restricting its oil exports, could be announced as early as this week. As previously highlighted, we maintain the view that Iran’s oil exports remain vulnerable even without further escalation of the conflict. It appears that Israel is exerting pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran, an action that is unfolding before our eyes.

Iran’s current oil production stands at close to 3.2 million barrels per day. Considering additional condensate production of about 0.8 million barrels per day and subtracting domestic demand of roughly 1.8 million barrels per day, the net export of Iranian crude and condensate is approximately 2.2 million barrels per day.

However, the uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of such sanctions casts doubt on the likelihood of a complete ending of Iranian exports. Approximately 80% of Iran’s exports are directed to independent refineries in China, suggesting that US sanctions may have limited efficacy unless China complies. The prospect of China resisting US pressure on its oil imports from Iran poses a significant challenge to US sanctions enforcement efforts.

Furthermore, any shortfall resulting from sanctions could potentially be offset by other OPEC nations with spare capacity. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for instance, can collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day, although this remains a contingency measure.

In addition to developments related to Iran, the Biden administration has re-imposed restrictions on Venezuelan oil, marking the end of a six-month reprieve. This move is expected to impact flows from the South American nation.

Meanwhile, US crude inventories (excluding SPR holdings) surged by 2.7 million barrels last week (page 11 attached), reaching their highest level since June of last year. This increase coincided with a decline in measures of fuel demand (page 14 attached), underscoring a slightly weaker US market.

In summary, while geopolitical tensions persist and new rounds of sanctions are imposed, our market outlook remains intact. We maintain our forecast of an average Brent Crude price of USD 85 per barrel for the year 2024. In the short term, however, prices are expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark as they navigate through geopolitical uncertainties and fundamental factors.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brace for Covert Conflict

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

In the past two trading days, Brent Crude prices have fluctuated between highs of USD 92.2 per barrel and lows of USD 88.7 per barrel. Despite escalation tensions in the Middle East, oil prices have remained relatively stable over the past 24 hours. The recent barrage of rockets and drones in the region hasn’t significantly affected market sentiment regarding potential disruptions to oil supply. The key concern now is how Israel will respond: will it choose a strong retaliation to assert deterrence, risking wider regional instability, or will it revert to targeted strikes on Iran’s proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq? While it’s too early to predict, one thing is clear: brace for increased volatility, uncertainty, and speculation.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Amidst these developments, the market continues to focus on current fundamentals rather than unfolding geopolitical risks. Despite Iran’s recent attack on Israel, oil prices have slid, reflecting a sideways or slightly bearish sentiment. This morning, oil prices stand at USD 90 per barrel, down 2.5% from Friday’s highs.

The attack

Iran’s launch of over 300 rockets and drones toward Israel marks the first direct assault from Iranian territory since 1991. However, the attack, announced well in advance, resulted in minimal damage as Israeli and allied forces intercepted nearly all projectiles. Hence, the damage inflicted was limited. The incident has prompted US President Joe Biden to urge Israel to exercise restraint, as part of broader efforts to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East.

Israel’s response remains uncertain as its war cabinet deliberates on potential courses of action. While the necessity of a response is acknowledged, the timing and magnitude remain undecided.

The attack was allegedly in retaliation for an Israeli airstrike on Iran’s consulate in Damascus, resulting in significant casualties, including a senior leader in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force. It’s notable that this marks the first direct targeting of Israel from Iranian territory, setting the stage for heightened tensions between the two nations.

Despite the scale of the attack, the vast majority of Iranian projectiles were intercepted before reaching Israeli territory. However, a small number did land, causing minor damage to a military base in the southern region.

President Biden swiftly condemned Iran’s actions and pledged to coordinate a diplomatic response with leaders from the G7 nations. The US military’s rapid repositioning of assets in the region underscores the seriousness of the situation.

Iran’s willingness to escalate tensions further depends on Israel’s response, as indicated by General Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces. Meanwhile, speculation about a retaliatory attack from Israel persists.

Looking ahead, key questions remain unanswered. Will Iran launch additional attacks? How will Israel respond, and what implications will it have for the region? Moreover, how will Iran’s allies react to the escalating tensions?

Given the potential for a full-scale war between Iran and Israel, concerns about its impact on global energy markets are growing. Both the United States and China have strong incentives to reduce tensions in the region, given the destabilizing effects of a regional conflict.

Our view in conclusion

The recent escalation between Iran and Israel underscores the delicate balance of power in the volatile Middle East. With tensions reaching unprecedented levels and the specter of further escalation looming, the potential for a full-blown conflict cannot be understated. The ramifications of such a scenario would be far-reaching and could have significant implications for regional stability and global security.

Turning to the oil market, there has been much speculation about the possibility of a full-scale blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the event of further escalation. However, at present, such a scenario remains highly speculative. Nonetheless, it is crucial to note that Iran’s oil production and exports remain at risk even without further escalation. Currently producing close to 3.2 million barrels per day, Iran has significantly increased its production from mid-2020 levels of 1.9 million barrels per day.

In response to the recent attack, Israel may exert pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran. The enforcement of such sanctions, particularly on Iranian oil exports, could result in a loss of anywhere between 0.5 million to 1 million barrels per day of oil supply. This would likely keep the oil market in deficit for the remainder of the year, contradicting the Biden administration’s wish to maintain oil and gasoline prices at sustainable levels ahead of the election. While other OPEC nations have spare capacity, utilizing it would tighten the global oil market even further. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for example, could collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day if necessary.

Furthermore, both Iran and the US have expressed a desire to prevent further escalation. However, much depends on Israel’s response to the recent barrage of rockets. While Israel has historically refrained from responding violently to attacks (1991), the situation remains fluid. If Israel chooses not to respond forcefully, the US may be compelled to promise stronger enforcement of sanctions on Iranian oil exports. Consequently, Iranian oil exports are at risk, regardless of whether a wider confrontation ensues in the Middle East.

Analyzing the potential impact, approximately 2.2 million barrels per day of net Iranian crude and condensate exports could be at risk, factoring in Iranian domestic demand and condensate production. The effectiveness of US sanctions enforcement, however, remains uncertain, especially considering China’s stance on Iranian oil imports.

Despite these uncertainties, the market outlook remains cautiously optimistic for now, with Brent Crude expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark in the near term. Navigating through geopolitical tensions and fundamental factors, the oil market continues to adapt to evolving conflicts in the Middle East and beyond.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Lots of talk about an increasingly tight oil market. And yes, the oil price will move higher as a result of this and most likely move towards USD 100/b. Tensions and flareups in the Middle East is little threat to oil supply and will be more like catalysts driving the oil price higher on the back of a fundamentally bullish market. I.e. flareups will be more like releasing factors. But OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed as it has no interest in killing the goose (global economy) that lays the golden egg (oil demand growth). We’ll probably get verbal intervention by OPEC+ with ”.. more supply in H2” quite quickly when oil price moves closer to USD 100/b and that will likely subdue the bullishness. OPEC+ in full control of the oil market probably means an oil price ranging from USD 70/b to USD 100/b with an average of around USD 85/b. Just like last year.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent crude continues to trade around USD 90/b awaiting catalysts like further inventory declines or Mid East flareups. Brent crude ydy traded in a range of USD 88.78 – 91.1/b before settling at USD 90.38/b. Trading activity ydy seems like it was much about getting comfortable with 90-level. Is it too high? Is there still more upside etc. But in the end it settled above the 90-line. This morning it has traded consistently above the line without making any kind of great leap higher.

Netanyahu made it clear that Rafah will be attacked. Israel ydy pulled some troops out of Khan Younis in Gaza and that calmed nerves in the region a tiny bit. But it seems to be all about tactical preparations rather than an indication of a defuse of the situation. Ydy evening Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel made it clear that a date for an assault on Rafah indeed has been set despite Biden’s efforts to prevent him doing so. Article in FT on this today. So tension in Israel/Gaza looks set to rise in not too long. The market is also still awaiting Iran’s response to the bombing of its consulate in Damascus one week ago. There is of course no oil production in Israel/Gaza and not much in Syria, Lebanon or Yemen either. The effects on the oil market from tensions and flareups in these countries are first and foremost that they work as catalysts for the oil price to move higher in an oil market which is fundamentally bullish. Deficit and falling oil inventories is the fundamental reason for why the oil price is moving higher and for why it is at USD 90/b today. There is also the long connecting string of:

[Iran-Iraq-Syria/Yemen/Lebanon/Gaza – Israel – US]

which creates a remote risk that oil supply in the Middle East potentially could be at risk in the end when turmoil is flaring in the middle of this connecting string. This always creates discomfort in the oil market. But we see little risk premium for a scenario where oil supply is really hurt in the end as neither Iran nor the US wants to end up in such a situation.

Tight market but OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed to prevent global economy getting hurt. There  is increasing talk about the oil market getting very tight in H2-24 and that the oil price could shoot higher unless OPEC+ is producing more. But of course OPEC+ will indeed produce more. The health of the global economy is essential for OPEC+. Healthy oil demand growth is like the goose that lays the golden egg for them. In no way do they want to kill it with too high oil prices. Brent crude averaged USD 82.2/b last year with a high of USD 98/b. So far this year it has averaged USD 82.6/b. SEB’s forecast is USD 85/b for the average year with a high of USD 100/b. We think that a repetition of last year with respect to oil prices is great for OPEC+ and fully acceptable for the global economy and thus will not hinder a solid oil demand growth which OPEC+ needs. Nothing would make OPEC+ more happy than to produce at a normal level and still being able to get USD 85/b. Brent crude will head yet higher because OPEC+ continues to hold back supply Q2-24 resulting in declining inventories and thus higher prices. But when the oil price is nearing USD 100/b we expect verbal intervention from the group with statements like ”… more supply in H2-24” and that will probably dampen bullish prices.

Not only does OPEC+ want to produce at a normal level. It also needs to produce at a normal level. Because at some point in time in the future there will be a situation sooner or later where they will have to cut again. And unless they are back to normal production at that time they won’t be in a position to cut again.

So OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg. They won’t allow the oil price to stay too high for too long. I.e. USD 100/b or higher. They will produce more in H2-24 if needed to prevent too high oil prices and they have the reserve capacity to do it.

Data today: US monthly oil market report (STEO) with forecast for US crude and liquids production at 18:00 CET

Fortsätt läsa

Populära