Analys

When affordable gas and expensive carbon puts coal in the corner

Publicerat

11 månader sedan

den

14 mars, 2024

Coal and nat gas prices are increasingly quite normal versus real average prices from 2010 to 2019 during which TTF nat gas averaged EUR 27/MWh and ARA coal prices averaged USD 108/ton in real-terms. In the current environment of ”normal” coal and nat gas prices we now see a darkening picture for coal fired power generation where coal is becoming less and less competitive over the coming 2-3 years with cost of coal fired generation is trading more and more out-of-the money versus both forward power prices and the cost of nat gas + CO2. Coal fired power generation will however still be needed many places where there is no local substitution and limited grid access to other locations with other types of power supply. These coal fired power-hubs will then become high-power-cost-hubs. And that may become a challenge for the local power consumers in these locations.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB — Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

When affordable gas and expensive carbon puts coal in the corner. The power sector accounts for some 50% of emissions in the EU ETS system in a mix of coal and nat gas burn for power. The sector is also highly dynamic, adaptive and actively trading. This sector has been and still is the primary battleground in the EU ETS where a fight between high CO2 intensity coal versus lower CO2 intensity nat gas is playing out.

Coal fired power is dominant over nat gas power when the carbon market is loose and the EUA price is low. The years 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 were typical example-years of this. Coal fired power was then in-the-money for around 7000 hours (one year = 8760 hours) in Germany. Nat gas fired power was however only in the money for about 2500 hours per year and was predominantly functioning as peak-load supply.

Then the carbon market was tightened by politicians with ”back-loading” and the MSR mechanism which drove the EUA price up to EUR 20/ton in 2019 and to EUR 60/ton in 2021. Nat gas fired power and coal fired power were then both in-the-money for almost 5000 hours per year from 2016 to 2023. The EUA price was in the middle-ground in the fight between the two. In 2023 however, nat gas was in-the-money for 4000 hours while coal was only in-the-money for 3000 hours. For coal that is a dramatic change from the 2012-2015 period when it was in the money for 7000 hours per year.

And it is getting worse and worse for coal fired generation when we look forward. That is of course the political/environmental plan as well. It is still painful of course for coal power.

On a forward basis the cost of Coal+EUA is increasingly way, way above the forward German power prices. Coal is basically out-of-the money for more and more hours every year going forward. It may be temporary, but it fits the overall political/environmental plan and also the increasing penetration of renewable energy which will push aside more and more fossil power as we move forward.

But coal power cannot easily and quickly be shut down all over the place in preference to cheaper nat gas based power. Coal fired power will be the primary source of power in many places with no local alternative and limited grid capacity to other sources of power elsewhere.

The consequence is that those places where coal fired power generation cannot be easily substituted and closed down will be ”high power price hubs”. If we imagine physical power prices as a topological map, geographically across Germany then the locations where coal fired power is needed will rise up like power price hill-tops amid a sea of lower power prices set by cheaper nat gas + CO2 or power prices depressed by high penetration of renewable energy.

Coal fired power generation used to be a cheap and safe power bet. Those forced to rely on coal fired power will however in the coming years face higher and higher, local power costs both in absolute terms and in relative terms to other non-coal-based power locations.

Coal fired power in Germany is increasingly very expensive both versus the cost of nat gas + CO2 and versus forward German power prices. Auch, it will hurt more and more for coal fired power producers and more and more for consumers needing to buy it.

And if we graph in the most efficient nat gas power plants, CCGTs, then nat gas + CO2 is today mostly at the money for the nearest three years while coal + CO2 is way above both forward power prices and forward nat gas + CO2 costs.

EUR/MWh — Source: SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Number of hours in the year (normal year = 8760 hrs) when the cost of coal + CO2 and nat gas + CO2 in the German spot power market (hour by hour) historically has been in the money. Coal power used to run 7000 hours per year in 2012-2016, Baseload. Coal in Germany was only in-th-money for 3000 hours in 2023. That is versus the average, hourly system prices in Germany. But local, physical prices will likely have been higher where coal is concentrated and where there is no local substitution for coal in the short to medium term. Coal power will run more hours in those areas and local, physical prices need to be higher there to support the higher cost of coal + CO2.

Relaterade ämnen:bjarne schieldrop carbon coal seb analys

Nästa

Brent gains on positive China data and new attacks on Russian oil processing

Missa inte

War-premium back on the agenda?

Fortsätt läsa

Annons

Analys

Saudi won’t break with OPEC+ to head calls for more oil from Trump

Publicerat

2 dagar sedan

den

28 januari, 2025

Redaktionen

Rebounding after yesterday’s drop but stays within recent bearish trend. Brent crude sold off 1.8% yesterday with a close of USD 77.08/b. It hit a low on the day of USD 76.3/b. This morning it is rebounding 0.8% to USD 77.7/b. That is still below the 200dma at USD 78.4/b and the downward trend which started 16 January still looks almost linear. A stronger rebound than what we see this morning is needed to break the downward trend.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Saudi won’t break with OPEC+ to head calls for more oil from Trump. OPEC+ will likely stick to its current production plan as it meets next week. The current plan is steady production in February and March and then a gradual, monthly increase of 120 kb/d/mth for 18 months starting in April. These planned increases will however highly likely be modified along the way just as we saw the group’s plans change last year. When they are modified the focus will be to maintain current prices as the primary goal with production growth coming second in line. There is very little chance that Saudi Arabia will unilaterally increase production and break the OPEC+ cooperation in response to recent calls from Trump. If it did, then the rest of OPEC+ would have no choice but to line up and produce more as well with the result that the oil price would totally collapse.

US shale oil producers have no plans to ramp up activity in response to calls from Trump. There are no signs that Trump’s calls for more oil from US producers are bearing any fruits. US shale oil producers are aiming to slow down rather than ramp up activity as they can see the large OPEC+ spare capacity of 5-6 mb/d sitting idle on the sideline. Even the privately held US shale oil players who account for 27% of US oil production are planning to slow down activity this year according to Jefferies Financial Group. US oil drilling rig count falling 6 last week to lowest since Oct 2021 is a reflection of that.

The US EIA projects a problematic oil market from mid-2025. Stronger demand would be the savior. Looking at the latest forecast from the US EIA in its January STEO report one can see why US shale oil producers are reluctant to ramp up production activity. If EIA forecast pans out, then either OPEC+ has to reduce production or US shale oil producers have to if they want to keep current oil prices. The savior would be global economic acceleration and higher oil demand growth.

Saudi Arabia to lift prices for March amid tight Mid-East crude market. But right now, the market is very tight for Mid-East crude due to Biden-sanctions. The 1-3mth Dubai time-spread is rising yet higher this morning. Saudi Arabia will highly likely lift its Official Selling Prices for March in response.

US EIA January STEO report. Global demand and supply growth given as 3mth average y-y diff in mb/d and the outright 3mth average demand diff to 3mth average supply in mb/d. Projects a surplus market where either US shale oil producers have to produce less, or OPEC+ has to produce less.

Global demand and supply growth given as 3mth average y-y diff in mb/d and the outright 3mth average demand diff to 3mth average supply in mb/d. — Source: SEB graph and calculations, US EIA data

Forward prices for ICE gasoil swaps in USD/ton. Deferred contracts at very affordable levels.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent rebound is likely as Biden-sanctions are creating painful tightness

Publicerat

3 dagar sedan

den

27 januari, 2025

Redaktionen

Bearish week last week and dipping lower this morning on China manufacturing and Trump-tariffs. Brent crude traded down 4 out of five days last week and lost 2.8% on a Friday-to-Friday basis with a close of USD 78.5/b. It hit the low of USD 77.8/b on Friday while it managed to make a small 0.3% gain at the end of the week with a close that was marginally below the 200dma. This morning it is trading down 0.4% at USD 78.2/b amid general market bearishness. China manufacturing PMI down to 49.1 for January versus 50.1 in December is pulling copper down 1.3%. Trump threatening Colombia with tariffs.

Rebound in crude prices likely as Dubai time-spreads rises further. The Dubai 1-3mth time-spread is rising to a new high this morning of USD 3.7/b. It is a sign that the Biden-sanctions towards Russia is making the medium sour crude market very tight. Brent crude is unlikely to fall much lower as long as these sanctions are in place. Will likely rebound.

Asian buyers turning to the Mid-East to replace Russian barrels. Amin Nasser, CEO of Saudi Aramco, said that the new sanctions are affecting 2 out of 3.4 mb/d of Russian seaborne crude oil exports. Strong bids for Iraqi medium and heavy crudes are sending spot prices to Asia to highest premiums versus formula pricing since August 2023. And Europe is seeing spot premiums to formula pricing at highest since 2021 (Argus).

Strong rise in US oil production is a losing hand. A lot of Trump-talk about a 3 mb/d increase in US oil production. Occidental Petroleum CEO Vicki Hollub commented in Davos that it is possible given the US resource base, but it is not the right thing to do since the global market is oversupplied (Argus). Everyone knows that OPEC+ has a spare capacity of 5-6 mb/d on hand. The comfort zone is probably to have a spare capacity of around 3 mb/d. FIRST the group needs to re-deploy some 3 mb/d of its current spare capacity and THEN the US and the rest of non-OPEC+ can start to think about acceleration in supply growth again. Vicki Hollub understands this and highly likely all the other oil CEOs in the US understands this as well. Donald Trump calling for more US oil will not be met before market circumstances allows it. Even sanctions on Iran forcing 1.5-2.0 mb/d of its crude exports out of the market will first be covered by existing surplus spare capacity within OPEC6+ and not the US.

US oil drilling rig count fell by 6 to 472 last week and lowest since October 2021. Current decline could be due to winter weather in the US but could also be like Hollub commented in Davos arguing that US oil production growth is not the right thing to do.

1-3mth time-spreads in USD/b. Dubai to yet higher level this morning. Even Brent and WTI are rebounding. Could be some extra spike since we are moving towards the end of the month. But it is still indicating a very tight market for medium sour crude as a result of the latest Biden-sanctions.

US oil drilling rig count down 6 last week to lowest level since October 2021

Non-OPEC, non-FSU production to grow 1.4 mb/d in 2025. Third weakest in 4 years. Though still a bit more than total expected global oil demand growth of 1.1 mb/d/y (IEA)

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent testing the 200dma at USD 78.6/b with API indicating rising US oil inventories

Publicerat

1 vecka sedan

den

23 januari, 2025

Redaktionen

Brent touching down to the 200dma. Brent crude traded down for a fifth day yesterday with a decline of 0.4% to USD 70/b. This morning it has traded as low as USD 78.6/b and touched down and tested the 200dma at USD 78.6/b before jumping back up and is currently trading up 0.2% on the day at USD 79.1/b.

The Dubai 1-3mth time-spread is holding up close to recent highs. The 1-3mth time spreads for WTI and Brent crude have eased significantly. The Dubai 1-3mth spread is however holding up close to latest high. Indian refiner Bharat is reported to struggle to get Russian crude for March delivery (Blbrg). The Biden-sanctions are clearly having physical market effects. So, the Dubai 1-3mth time-spread holding on to recent high makes a lot of sense. I.e. it was not just a spike on fears.

US oil inventories may have risen 6 mb last week (API). Actual data later today. The US DOE will release US oil data for last week later today. The US API last night indicated that US crude and product stocks may have risen close to 6 mb last week. This may be weighing on the oil price today.

Brent and WTI 1-3mths time-spreads have fallen back while Dubai is holding up