Analys
The self-destructive force of unregulated solar power
Modifications
Solar and wind power production has increased rapidly over the latest years as LCOE costs have fallen sharply while government support schemes have given it an extra boost as well. Solar and wind power production is totally unregulated supply. They produce whenever they produce. Fossil power supply on the other hand is fully dispatchable to the degree that we tend to take it for granted. As such we have naturally tended to underestimate the consequences of not having dispatchability in solar and wind power.
When you start out with a large, fossil-based power system it is fairly easy to add unregulated power supply from solar and wind because it can piggyback on the dispatchability and flexibility of the fossil power system. But as the share of unregulated renewable energy rises to a larger and larger share of production, the flexibility in the fossil part of the system naturally gets smaller and smaller. This problem is accentuated further by the fact that solar power production has a very high concentration of production where 80% of production in a year is produced in only 20% of the hours in the year. Thus fossil flexibility and dispatchability is eroded much faster during these 20% hours.
Power prices typically collapse to zero or negative when demand is fully met or saturated by unregulated power supply. That again implies that solar power profitability collapse as well. And the result of that of course is that the exponential growth in solar power production which we now take for granted and which we expect will lead us all the way to zero emissions could come to a full stop as well.
This is already a rapidly increasing problem in California where more and more renewable energy is denied access to the grid because there simply isn’t enough demand for it just then or because the grid cannot handle it. But it is also becoming an increasing problem in Germany where the strong growth and high concentration of solar power increasingly is destroying the power prices just when they produce the most.
The need for biiiig, cheeeeap grid batteries are now becoming increasingly critical for the the exponential growth in solar and wind power to continue.
We fear that the self-destructive force on power prices, of exponential growth in unregulated solar power, is some kind of Solar-hara-kiri process with respect to its own profitability. And that it has the potential to develop along a curve of ”first gradually, then suddenly”. And when/if that happens the exponential growth in unregulated solar power production should naturally come to a screeching halt.
The resolution of the problem is of course the eventual arrival of biiiig, cheeeap grid batteries which then again will sett solar power production free to resume its exponential growth.
Feeding solar and wind power supply into a fossil system is easy to start with. Then very difficult. It is easy to build unregulated solar and wind power supply into a flexible fossil system. It is easy to infuse unregulated power supply (Solar and Wind) into a power system where there is lots and lots of fossil based power. Fossil supply can then back-off and make room for solar and wind power whenever the sun is shining or the wind is blowing and then ramp up again when it suddenly disappear. But when unregulated, renewable energy supply keeps growing it becomes harder and harder to infuse yet more of it into the system as the fossil flexibility is increasingly eroded. That’s when yet more supply of solar and wind is no longer pushing aside fossil supply but instead is starting to destroy their own prices.
Solar power produces 80% of its production during 20% of the hours in the year. Solar power has however a much more tightly focused production profile than wind. In Germany in 2023 some 80% of all solar power production was concentrated on only 20% of the hours of the year. For wind power the 80% share of production was spread out over 50% of the hours in the year. The reason is of course that the wind can blow both summer and winter and night and day. Solar power is instead focused during the day and during summer. It has a much higher concentration of production.
Power prices tend to collapse when demand is fully covered by unregulated power supply. When solar power production grows rapidly in a given power system then its high production concentration will eventually lead to full saturation during certain hours of the year. Demand during these hours will then be fully supplied and covered by unregulated power like solar, wind, run-of-river hydro and other unregulated supply. That is great as it means that the fossil share in these hours then are close to zero.
The problem is that power markets, more than any other commodity market in the world, are extremely sensitive to imbalances in supply and demand. A little bit too little supply and the power price can spike up to close to infinity. A little bit too much supply and the price crashes to zero or negative.
When unregulated power supply reaches full demand saturation during certain hours then power prices tend to collapse because it is so easy to get a little bit too much supply.
It is not a problem when power prices collapse for just a few hours per year. But the number of hours affected is growing rapidly many places. The US EIA highlighted in October 2023 (”Solar and wind power curtailments are rising in California”) that this is becoming a bigger and bigger problem in California. Since 2019 the power system operator there has been forced to curtail supply of unregulated power more and more. There simply isn’t enough demand in certain hours to meet the spikes in unregulated supply or the grid isn’t up to the task of distributing the unregulated supply in the system.
So when producers of unregulated supply produces the most they increasingly are denied access to sell it into the grid or if they are allowed to sell it into the grid the price is close to zero or even negative.
US EIA: Solar and wind power curtailments are rising in California
Germany is increasingly affected as booming solar production is depressing prices more and more. This is now also a rapidly increasing problem in Germany where rapid growth in supply of solar and wind power together increasingly are forcing power prices lower just when they produce the most.
Average German power prices for hour 1 to 24 for certain periods and years. Highly concentrated supply of solar power during summer and during the day is increasingly forcing power prices towards zero during these periods
It is like ”Solar hara-kiri” when increasing supply of solar power is killing its own prices and profits. It was not a big problem economically when only a few hours are affected. But as more and more hours are affected it is becoming an increasing problem. It is like ”Solar hara-kiri” where rapidly rising supply of solar power is increasingly killing its own prices. With that it is killing its profits. And if profits are killed than new-build and growth in supply will typically slow down rapidly as well.
This is probably not a big problem globally yet as the global power system is still predominantly fueled by fossil fuels which can back off when renewable energy spikes up. But in certain pockets of the world where penetration of unregulated power supply has reached high levels it is becoming an increasing problem. Like in California and in Germany.
The volume weighted solar power price in September 2023 in Germany had a 38% discount to power prices during non-solar power hours. And the discount looks like it is rapidly getting bigger and bigger.
The monthly average volume weighted solar power price versus the average volume weighted non-solar power price weighted by the inverse profile. In Germany in September 2023 solar power producers only achieved 62% of the average price during hours of the day when the sun wasn’t shining.
First gradually, then suddenly. There is a clear risk here that this progresses along a process of ”first gradually, then suddenly”. This is already what we have seen over the past couple of years: The discount for what solar power earns when it produces power versus what the power price is when it is not producing is increasing rapidly as more and more unregulated power supply hits right into the ”demand ceiling”. The inflicted pain from this process so far has to a large degree been masked by incredibly high natural gas prices. So even if the profitability for solar power has been eroding, the average power price in the system has been much higher than usual due to high natural gas and CO2 prices.
Graphing all the individual hourly data for solar power and power demand in Germany in 2022 we see that solar power alone is not yet reaching full saturation versus demand.
Germany 2022: Hourly German power demand and solar power supply in 2022. A total of 8760 hours for each in consecutive order. Her showing only Demand and Solar power production
The unregulated power supply is increasingly hitting the ”demand ceiling”. If we now add all the other sources of unregulated power supply, predominantly offshore and onshore wind and run of river, then we get the following picture where we see that unregulated German power supply increasingly is hitting right up and into the ”demand ceiling”. In those instances there will be no, flexible fossil power supply left to back off and that is typically when power prices collapse or go negative.
Germany 2022: Hourly German power demand (blue dots) and unregulated supply (solar, wind, run of river,…) in orange dots. A total of 8760 hours for each in consecutive order.
High unregulated power supply saturation vs demand implied lower power prices in 2022. Sorting 8760 individual power prices in Germany from Y2022 from lowest to highest shows that power German power prices were strongly related to the penetration of unregulated power supply. In the following graph, we have sorted the data from the lowest price to the highest price in the year 2022. Prices were ireasingly depressed when unregulated power penetrated up and into the ”demand ceiling”. Natural gas prices were extreme in 2022 and overall power prices were exceptionally high for that reason as well. But the tendency of price destruction in relation to high levels of unregulated power vs demand is clear.
Germany 2022: Hourly German power demand (blue dots) and unregulated supply (solar, wind, run of river,…) in orange dots. A total of 8760 hours. Sorted according to how hourly power prices were from lowest to highest.
The unregulated power supply penetrating vs demand was even deeper in 2023. If we make the same graph for the year 2023 from 1 Jan to 20 Oct, we can see how the unregulated power is penetrating deeper and deeper into the power ”demand ceiling”. As a result the solar power discount vs. non-solar power hours from March to September in 2023 reached an even higher discount in 2023 than in 2022.
2023 year to 20 October: Hourly German power demand (blue dots) and unregulated supply (solar, wind, run of river,…) in orange dots. A total of 8760 hours. Sorted according to how hourly power prices were from lowest to highest. German power demand was down 8.3% YoY in H1-2023 due to the European energy crisis and still very high power prices
Solar power hours and non-solar power hours is not given as a clear cut-off, but a gradual one. In the following graph given as average profiles of the year from hour 1 to hour 24. First calculated explicitly for solar power production and then the inverse is calculated from that one. These solar power profiles can then be calculated for each individual day in the year giving individual inverse-curves on a daily basis.
The daily ”solar power production profiles” and the ”non-solar power production profiles” typically looks like this graph but calculated individually per day as solar power production varies from day to day and through the seasons. The solar power production profile is explicitly given by the actual solar power production that day while the non-solar power profile is derived directly from this and the inverse of it on a daily basis.
The exponential growth in solar and wind power is likely to slow down in the years to come as grid constraints and lack of power cables is holding up growth in renewable energy with waiting times for access of 5-10 years:
”Offshore wind auction’s lack of bids must be ‘wake-up call’ for UK, says RWE chief”
FT: ”Gridlock: how a lack of power lines will delay the age of renewables”
FT: ”Will there be enough cables for the clean energy transition?”
Analys
Crude oil comment: Tight here and now
Brent crude prices have risen by USD 2.75 per barrel (3.7%) since the start of the week, now trading at USD 74.5 per barrel. This price jump follows significant macroeconomic developments, most notably the Federal Reserve’s decision to implement a “larger” rate cut of 0.50 percentage points, bringing the target range to 4.75-5.00%. The move, driven by progress in managing inflation, reflects the Fed’s shift in focus towards supporting the labor market and the broader economy. Initially, the announcement led to market optimism, boosting stock prices and weakening the US dollar. However, equity markets quickly reversed as concerns grew that the aggressive cut might signal deeper economic issues.
In the oil market, the softer monetary policy outlook has fostered expectations of stronger future demand, supporting a more likely bullish outlook for crude prices further out. Despite this, speculative positions remain heavily short, particularly amid ongoing worries about China’s economic recovery, as highlighted in recent comments. Still, there are near-term signals of increased Chinese crude purchases, helping to mitigate some of the market’s demand-related concerns.
On the supply side, US commercial crude oil inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels last week, defying the API’s forecast of a 2-million-barrel increase (see page 12 attached). Gasoline and distillate inventories saw minimal changes, underscoring the persistent market tightness. OPEC+, led by Saudi Arabia, continues to play a pivotal role in stabilizing prices through prolonged production cuts, maintaining discipline (so far) in the wake of uncertainty around global demand. Despite tightness in the short term, broader demand fears, especially regarding China, are limiting more significant price increases.
Beyond inventory draws and the Fed’s double rate cut, escalating tensions in the Middle East have also contributed to the recent uptick in the oil price. Israel’s defense minister declared a “new phase” in its regional conflict, sparking concerns of a broader confrontation that could potentially involve Iran, a key OPEC producer.
Despite the recent price gains, Brent crude is still on track for its largest quarterly loss of the year, driven by China’s slowdown and ample global supply. Data from the DOE highlighted weaker demand for diesel (down 0.9% year-on-year) and jet fuel (down 1.4% year-on-year), while gasoline demand saw a slight 1.1% uptick but remained below 9 million barrels per day. However, shrinking US inventories are expected to support further price increases. Crude inventories at the Cushing, Oklahoma, in particular, are well below (!!) the five-year seasonal average, nearing critical low levels.
Analys
Crude oil: It’s all about macro
Brent crude prices have surged by USD 4.5 per barrel, or 6.2%, from last week’s low, now trading at USD 73.2 per barrel. The U.S. two-year yield has dropped to its lowest level since September 2022, while the dollar has weakened significantly due to rising expectations of lower interest rates. Yesterday, the S&P rose by 0.3%, while the Nasdaq fell by 0.5%. A weaker dollar boosted Asian currencies this morning, and heightened expectations of a rate hike in Japan contributed to a 1.8% drop in the Nikkei, driven by a stronger yen.
The recent rally in crude prices is underpinned by several factors, with macroeconomic signals weighing heavily on demand outlooks. A key driver is speculation that the Federal Reserve may implement a double interest rate cut tomorrow. While the Fed’s guidance has been vague, most analysts anticipate a 25 basis points cut, but markets are leaning toward the possibility of a 50 basis points cut. Significant volatility in FX markets is expected. Regardless of the size of the cut, looser monetary policy could stimulate energy demand, leading to a more bullish outlook for oil further along the curve.
In addition, China is showing stronger indications of increasing crude oil and product purchases at current price levels. Net crude and product imports in China rose by 20% month-on-month in August, though they remain 2.2% lower year-on-year in barrels per day. While still below last year’s levels, this uptick has eased concerns of a sharp decline in Chinese demand. Supporting this trend, higher dirty freight rates from the Middle East to China suggest the country is buying more crude as prices have pulled back.
Despite this, bearish sentiment remains in the market, particularly due to record-high speculative short positions driven by concerns about long-term demand, especially from China. This dynamic has resulted in oil prices behaving more like equities, with market participants pricing in future demand fears. However, the market remains tight in the short term, as evidenced by low U.S. crude inventories and continued OPEC+ production cuts. OPEC+, led by Saudi Arabia, has maintained its cuts in response to lower prices, supporting oil prices below USD 75 per barrel.
U.S. crude inventories have consistently drawn down, and OPEC+ continues to withhold significant supply from the market. Under normal circumstances, this would support higher prices, but ongoing concerns about future demand are keeping prices suppressed for now.
Analys
OPEC’s strategy caps downside, and the market gets it
Brent crude prices have risen by USD 2.8 per barrel as of yesterday and this morning, currently trading at USD 71.8 per barrel. This is despite U.S. inventory data showing a notable build in both commercial crude and product inventories, typically a bearish signal for the market (details below).
The recent price recovery is unlikely driven by these inventory figures. Instead, it appears to be a response to OPEC+ signaling its intention to intervene if Brent crude prices fall below USD 75 per barrel (take time for the market to fully react). This was made clear last week when the group adjusted its production plans, delaying increases. Such action offers substantial downside protection, limiting further declines.
Over the past few weeks, Brent crude experienced a sharp sell-off, hitting a low of USD 67.7 per barrel on Tuesday. This decline was largely driven by demand concerns stemming from weak economic data in both China and the U.S.
While macroeconomic data for both nations remains sluggish, U.S. consumer spending has held up. For instance, the U.S. ISM non-manufacturing PMI for August showed the services sector expanding for a second consecutive month, recording 51.5 versus the expected 51.3. Although the U.S. economy is clearly decelerating – contributing to bearish market sentiment – the most recent jobs report saw the unemployment rate fall back to 4.2%. As a result, the anticipated Federal Reserve rate cut next week is expected to be 25 basis points, rather than the widely discussed 50 basis points.
Fundamental concerns persist. A ”soft landing” for the U.S. economy seems increasingly plausible, and China’s oil imports appear to be rising as current price levels attract more buying interest. This is reflected in higher VLCC freight rates from the Middle East to China.
As such, there are supporting factors that may limit further price declines, with the potential for prices to recover from here. For more details, read yesterday’s crude oil comment.
U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excluding the Strategic Petroleum Reserve) increased by 0.8 million barrels last week, bringing the total to 419.1 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year. This build occurred despite U.S. refineries processing 16.8 million barrels per day (bpd), a decrease of 141,000 bpd from the prior week. Refineries were operating at 92.8% capacity.
In addition, U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.9 million bpd, an increase of 1.1 million bpd compared to the previous week. However, over the last four weeks, imports averaged 6.5 million bpd, down 7.3% from the same period last year.
For refined products, motor gasoline inventories increased by 2.3 million barrels, although they remain 1% below the five-year average. Distillate (diesel) fuel inventories also rose by 2.3 million barrels but are still 8% below the five-year average.
Overall, total commercial petroleum inventories increased by 9.0 million barrels last week.
On the demand side, total products supplied over the last four weeks averaged 20.5 million bpd, representing a 2.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Motor gasoline product supplied averaged 9.0 million bpd, up 0.9% year-over-year, while distillate fuel product supplied averaged 3.7 million bpd, down 0.2%. Jet fuel demand fell by 2.3% compared to the same period last year.
Despite the increase in U.S. inventories, overall levels remain relatively low, which could become a key factor in shifting market sentiment and driving prices higher.
-
Nyheter1 vecka sedan
En 25 år lång megatrend för järnmalm är över – konsekvenserna kommer bli många och kraftiga
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Lucara Diamond har hittat en diamant på 2492 karat
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Torbjörn Iwarson kommenterar vad som händer på råvarumarknaden
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Fear of coming weakness trumps current tightness
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Bixias höstprognos: Fortsatt låga elpriser
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Christian Kopfer kommenterar vad som händer med oljepriset
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tata Steel vill bygga 200 kärnkraftsreaktorer på 220 MW vardera för att producera grönt stål
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Italien satsar på ny kärnkraft