Analys
The EUA price could drop to EUR 40/ton and then be picked up by Airliners, Shipping and Utilities
The EUA price is dropping hard along with a sharp decline in the front-year TTF nat gas contract. The typical last-round sell-off in EUA prices have typically been a final sell-off of 10-20-30%. From EUR 60/ton level it implies a price decline down to EUR 54; 48; 42/ton. The front-year nat gas price and the front-year Coal-to-Gas (C-t-G) differential is what has held the EUA price above EUR 60/ton. But if the TTF 2025 price falls down to EUR 27/ton the front-year C-t-G differential will fall all the way towards EUR 40/ton. That TTF 2025 falls to EUR 27/ton or lower seems likely to happen and the risk is high that the EUA price will be sucked down along with it. But nat gas demand is starting to come back with a lag in nat gas price declines in the EU but probably also in Asia. Thus first an over-sell in nat gas prices, then demand revival and then a rebound in both nat gas prices and EUA prices. Airliners, shipping companies and Utilities will probably buy as much EUAs they can get if the EUA price fall down towards EUR 40/ton.
Front-year 2025 TTF nat gas price falls hard and so does the EUA price. The front-month EUA price dropped 2.7% yesterday to EUR 58.97/ton and thus broke out of the sideways trend around EUR 61/ton since 18 January. Today it has sold off another 3.2% to EUR 57.1/ton.
Again it is the nat gas price which is leading the way and more specifically it is about the front-year nat gas which lost 1.9% on Wednesday and another 2.5% again ydy to a close of EUR 30.65/MWh and today it has solf off 2.8% to EUR 29.8/ton.
The EUA price has very clearly been balancing on the front-year Coal-to-Gas (C-t-G) differentials. The C-t-G differentials have been significantly lower than EUR 60/ton both at the front-end of the curve (1-2-3 month) and for calendars 2026 and 2027. But the front-year nat gas price has held up at around EUR 31/MWh quite well since around mid January.
How far down will the EUA price go? The final sell-off could be down towards EUR 40/ton. With these dynamics the big question then becomes: How far down will the front-year nat gas contract sell? It will of course sell off too far as commodities always do. The reason commodities do this is the natural reactive chain of events which normally comes with a lag: First the price goes down before dropping hard in the final round of the sell-off. Then demand comes back with a lag to the price action. This again drives the price back up and off from the lows to a level consistent with the revival in demand. If demand instead had reacted immediately to lower prices then the hard drop at the end of the sell-off might not have happened.
Looking at previous hard, final sell-off-drops in the EUA price we can see that final drops typically have been 10-20-30% as the last final drop. If we take the EUR 60/ton as the starting point of this final drop, then we are talking an EUA price bottom of somewhere in the range of EUR 54; 48; 42/ton.
Global nat gas demand destruction in the face of very high nat gas prices solved the energy crisis. Let’s link this back to price action in nat gas. The reason why Europe has managed the recent energy crisis (Russia/Ukraine, nat gas,…) so surprisingly well is 1) Large reduction in nat gas demand in EU due to exceptionally high prices and 2) Significant demand destruction in Asia freeing up nat gas to flow to the EU. I.e. it was global demand destruction of nat gas in response to extremely high prices globally which solved the energy crisis. It was solved by the global market.
Demand for nat gas is starting to come back as the price falls. The nominal historical average nat gas TTF price was EUR 20/MWh from 2010 to 2019. But the real average was EUR 26/MWh. So seen from the eyes of consumers in both Europe and Asia, a price of EUR 26/MWh is an historically absolutely normal price. Demand for nat gas should thus naturally accelerate back towards normal levels at current nat gas prices. Not just in Europe, but also globally in all regions exposed to nat gas prices set by global LNG prices. This is already happening in the EU. Temp. adj. demand destruction vs. normal has typically been running at around 16% from mid-2022 to December 2023. Average ytd is 14% while the last 15 days is 9%. Demand destruction is fading as the price of nat gas is falling. But do remember that this is also happening in Asia but it is harder to track.
Normal nat gas demand AND normal gas prices is not consistent as Russian nat gas exports still down 1100 TWh/yr. There is however an inconsistency here in expecting normal prices and normal demand for natural gas now onward. The inconsistency is that the EU and thus the world is still robbed of the normal flow of nat gas on pipelines to Europe. This amounts to a loss of 3 TWh/day and thus close to 1100 TWh/year. When this gas is no longer flowing to the EU it isn’t flowing anywhere. It is lost to both the EU and the world. Until that is, Russia has built loads of new pipes to Asia and new LNG terminals. And that takes years.
A return to normal prices and normal demand while the world still is missing 1100 TWh/year of Russian nat gas isn’t really a consistent outcome in our view.
Demand for nat gas will continue to revive as the price of nat gas keeps falling. But both the EU and the world still need of a nat gas price at above normal levels to induce a certain amount of demand destruction until the point in time when new LNG export facilities globally has managed to replace the 1100 TWh/year we have lost from Russia.
Front-end TTF nat gas down to EUR 27/MWh could drive the EUA price to EUR 40/ton. The dynamic sell-off nat gas, prices will likely move lower than to the level which over time is consistent with continued need for some demand destruction globally. This because demand revival will come with a lag to the decline in prices. It is thus fully plausible that the TTF 2025 contract moves all the way down to EUR 27/MWh (or maybe even lower). If so it would imply a 2025 C-t-G differential of only EUR 40/ton for the EUA price to balance on and reference to. That could be the final hard drop in the EUA price. That’s a 30% drop from EUR 60/ton. But it won’t last because that nat gas price is likely too low vs. what is needed globally to maintain some level of demand destruction for a while longer.
An EUA price of EUR 40/ton would also be too cheap to resist for a range of market participants and they’d likely jump in and purchase with both hands. Airliners and shipping companies which will have difficulties of shifting away from fossil fuels and will need EUAs for years to come. Also utilities could step in and purchase large amounts of EUAs even if forward margins are negative. Some EU based utilities with large fossil-based assets bought truckloads of EUAs from 2011 to 2017 when the EUA price ranged from EUR 3/ton to EUR 9/ton. For them the EUA certificate is not only a marginal cost. It is also a licence to operate. The EUA price will of course not return to that level again. But if we move to EUR 40-50/ton, then it will probably trigger strategic buying by shipping companies, airliners as well as utilities.
Front-year TTF nat gas TTF price is dropping and leading the EUA price lower after a period of sideways action since mid-Jan
But the EU and the world is still missing some 3 TWh/d or 1100 TWh/yr of piped nat gas from Russia. When Russian nat gas is no longer flowing on pipes to Europe, it is flowing nowhere.
Nat gas demand destruction in the EU has been running at 15% to 17% since mid-2022 in the face of high nat gas prices. But demand destruction is now fading down to 8%. Demand has started to come back as nat gas prices fall. Demand is probably also coming back in Asia, but not so easily to see.
EU nat gas demand destruction has started to fade.
Forward Coal to Gas (C-t-G) differentials vs EUA market prices. The EUA price has balanced on the front-year differential. But that has now fallen like a rock along with the fall in front-year TTF nat gas price. Lead the EUA into a free-fall
The front-year Coal-to-Gas differential is a distribution of crosses between many different levels of efficiencies for coal and nat gas power plants. Averages of these are EUR 52.4/ton with Coal at USD 94.3/ton and Nat gas at EUR 29.8/MWh (both front-year 2025 prices). So EUA price is still hanging high.
Analys
Further US sanctions on Iran spark largest oil price surge in three weeks
Since yesterday morning, Brent crude prices have climbed by ish USD 2 per barrel, recovering to the current level of USD 73.9 per barrel. This represents a significant price movement over a short period and marks the largest such increase since mid-November.
Market whispers suggest that OPEC+ is likely to announce a deal to further delay the planned supply increase during their meeting scheduled for tomorrow (December 5th). Concerns about weaker global demand in the coming year leave little room for additional OPEC+ supply, compelling the cartel to exercise patience in its efforts to regain market share.
Adding to the upward pressure on crude prices, the U.S. has escalated its sanctions on Iran, targeting the country’s vital oil sector – a critical source of revenue.
Yesterday (December 3rd), the U.S. imposed sanctions on 35 entities and vessels associated with Iran’s ”shadow fleet,” which secretly transports Iranian oil. These operations rely on fraudulent practices such as falsified documentation, manipulated tracking systems, and frequent changes of ship names and flags. This move builds upon earlier sanctions, including those introduced in October this year, which restricted transactions involving Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products.
According to the U.S. Department of State, the latest measures aim to further disrupt Iran’s ability to finance activities deemed destabilizing in the Middle East, including its nuclear program and support for regional proxies.
From a market perspective, Iran’s crude oil and condensate exports reached roughly 1.7 million barrels per day in May 2024, the highest level in five years. China, as Iran’s largest importer, accounted for ish 490k barrels per day of these exports in 2023. The newly imposed sanctions could lead to a substantial reduction in Iran’s oil exports, potentially cutting up to 1 million barrels per day, depending on the enforcement’s strictness and global compliance.
Iranian crude exports to China have increased this year, but the sanctions may compel Chinese firms to reduce or halt purchases to avoid U.S. penalties. This would likely drive a search for alternative crude sources to sustain China’s refining operations, thereby adding further support to the current upward pressure on crude prices. This, together with the likelihood of OPEC+ continuing to delay their planned production increase, reinforces our view of limited downside risks to prices in the near term – caution remains reasonable, and we continue to favor a cautiously long position.
Analys
Crude prices steady amid OPEC+ uncertainty and geopolitical calm
Since last Friday’s opening at USD 73.1 per barrel, Brent crude prices have steadily declined over the weekend, with further losses on Monday afternoon following a brief recovery that saw prices approach USD 73 per barrel. As of this morning (Tuesday), Brent crude is inching upward again, currently trading at USD 72.2 per barrel. Over the past week, implied volatility has dropped to its lowest levels in roughly two months, as the upward momentum observed since mid-November has temporarily stalled.
On a bearish note, reduced geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East has contributed to easing the risk premium in oil prices. Israel has signaled its intention to uphold the current ceasefire despite launching airstrikes in Lebanon in response to Hezbollah’s first attack under the truce. While this de-escalation has softened prices, the attacks during the ceasefire highlight that tensions in the region are far from resolved. This persistent instability will likely remain a source of uncertainty for oil markets in the weeks ahead.
On the bullish side, the OPEC+ supply meeting, rescheduled to Thursday, December 5th, looms. Additionally, expectations are building for increased Chinese stimulus measures, potentially to be unveiled at the Chinese Central Economic Work Conference next Wednesday. This closed-door meeting is expected to outline key economic targets and stimulus plans for 2025, which could provide fresh support for Chinese oil demand.
From a supply perspective, OPEC+ has added to market uncertainty by postponing its meeting, initially planned for Sunday, December 1st. The group will decide whether to reintroduce production cuts or proceed with a scheduled supply increase of 180,000 barrels per day. Current market sentiment suggests that OPEC+ is unlikely to rush into restoring production, reflecting cautiousness amid subdued global demand and concerns about a potential supply glut in 2024.
Market participants and traders widely anticipate that the cartel will maintain its wait-and-see approach to avoid worsening the fragile market balance. Such cautiousness could lend support to prices as the new year approaches. We believe OPEC+ is acutely aware of the risks associated with oversupplying the market and will likely act to stabilize prices rather than jeopardize them.
Looking ahead, fundamentals such as U.S. inventory levels, geopolitical developments, and OPEC+ decisions will remain key drivers of the crude oil market. These factors will shape the outlook as we move into the final weeks of 2024 and entering 2025.
Analys
Crude oil comment: OPEC+ meeting postponement adds new uncertainties
Since last Friday’s close at USD 75.4 per barrel, Brent crude prices have experienced a steady decline over the week, bringing an end to the upward momentum observed since mid-November. Trading has been marked by volatility, highlighted by a sharp sell-off on Monday afternoon (CEST), which was driven by reduced geopolitical uncertainty. As of now, Brent crude has dropped USD 2.9 per barrel this week and is trading at USD 72.5 per barrel.
Geopolitical developments have played a pivotal role in shaping market sentiment this week. Israel and Lebanon have reached the terms of an agreement to end the Israel-Hezbollah conflict. The current cease-fire has alleviated some of the geopolitical tensions in the region, reducing some of the risk premium that had supported crude prices in recent weeks.
On the supply side, OPEC+ has introduced new uncertainties by delaying its upcoming meeting, which was originally scheduled for Sunday, December 1st. The group is set to deliberate on whether to revive production cuts by implementing a scheduled supply increase of 180,000 barrels per day (to begin with). However, signals from OPEC+ delegates earlier this week indicate ongoing discussions about postponing this move, potentially for several months. This delay aligns with a cautious market outlook, as global demand remains subdued, leaving little room for additional OPEC+ barrels in the market. The cartel appears acutely aware of the delicate balance, avoiding actions that could oversupply the market.
Meanwhile, speculation surrounding a potential surge in US oil production – up 3 million barrels per day – has gained attention. Such a ramp-up could drive crude prices below USD 50 per barrel but is considered unrealistic. US producers understand the strategic risks involved, particularly with OPEC+ holding an estimated 5–6 million barrels of spare capacity. A significant production increase by the US would likely provoke a strong response from OPEC+, potentially flooding the market to protect market share. Such a scenario would lead to sharp price declines, ultimately punishing US production rather than fostering growth. This dynamic makes the proposed ramp-up highly unlikely.
Inventory data from the US DOE further highlights the tight supply conditions in the market. Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) declined by 1.8 million barrels week-on-week, bringing total stocks to 428.4 million barrels. While smaller than the 5.9-million-barrel draw estimated by the API, inventories remain approximately 5% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Refined product inventories presented a mixed picture. Gasoline inventories increased by 3.3 million barrels (compared to API’s estimate of 1.8 million barrels), yet they remain 3% below the five-year average. Similarly, distillate inventories (diesel) rose by 0.4 million barrels but are still 5% below the five-year norm, contrasting with API’s estimate of a 2.5-million-barrel build. The modest crude draw continues to signal tight market conditions, particularly when combined with overall low inventory levels across petroleum products.
Refinery operations also provided important insights. US refinery inputs averaged 16.3 million barrels per day, with facilities operating at 90.5% capacity. Crude imports declined sharply, averaging 6.1 million barrels per day, down 1.6 million barrels compared to the previous week. Over the past four weeks, total product supply – a key indicator of demand – averaged 20.4 million barrels per day, representing a 1% year-on-year increase. Gasoline demand remained steady, while distillate fuel demand declined by 3.4%, and jet fuel demand rose by 3.3%.
Despite this week’s bearish price action, the decline in US crude inventories, albeit smaller than expected, signals that market fundamentals remain somewhat tight and capping the downside to prices. Additionally, the drop in total commercial petroleum inventories – down by 1.8 million barrels last week – further underscores this. US inventories, alongside ongoing geopolitical developments and OPEC+ decisions, will continue to dominate the crude oil narrative in the coming weeks.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: A price rise driven by fundamentals
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Iran’s silence hints at a new geopolitical reality
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Michel Rufli förklarar vad som händer på guldmarknaden
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tredje staden i Finland som satsar på kärnenergiproducerad fjärrvärme med världens enklaste reaktor
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent resumes after yesterday’s price tumble
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Guldpriset kommer stå i 3000 USD i slutet av 2025
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Mixed U.S. data skews bearish – prices respond accordingly
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Fundamentals back in focus, with OPEC+ strategy crucial for price direction