After a positive start to the week, crude oil prices rose on Monday and Tuesday, with Brent peaking at USD 66.8 per barrel on Tuesday evening. Since then, prices have drifted lower, declining by roughly 5% to around USD 63.5 per barrel – below where the week began during Monday’s opening.

Iran is currently in the spotlight, having signaled its willingness to sign a nuclear deal with the U.S. in exchange for lifting economic sanctions. Ali Shamkhani, a senior political, military, and nuclear adviser, spoke publicly about the ongoing negotiations. He indicated that Iran would commit to never developing nuclear weapons and could dismantle its stockpile of highly enriched uranium – provided there is immediate sanctions relief. While nothing is finalized, the rhetoric is notable and could theoretically lead to additional Iranian barrels entering the global market.

It’s worth recalling that in mid-March, Iran’s Oil Minister declared that the country’s oil exports were “unstoppable”, and that Iran would not relinquish its share of the global oil market – even in the face of new U.S. sanctions introduced earlier this year. In practice, however, this claim has proven exaggerated.

In February 2025, Iran’s crude production rose to 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd), staying above 3 million bpd since September 2023. Of this, approximately 1.74 million bpd were exported – primarily to Chinese private refiners (”teapots”). Early in the year, shipments to these teapots continued largely uninterrupted, as they have limited exposure to the U.S. financial system and remained willing buyers despite sanctions.

However, Washington’s “maximum pressure” campaign has gradually constrained Iran’s ability to ship crude to China. By March 2025, Chinese imports of Iranian oil peaked at approximately 1.8 million bpd. In April, imports dropped sharply to around 1.3 million bpd, reflecting stricter U.S. sanctions targeting Chinese refineries and port operators involved in handling Iranian crude. Preliminary data for May suggest a further decline, with Iranian oil arrivals potentially falling to 1.0–1.2 million bpd, as Chinese refiners adopt a more cautious stance.

As a result, any immediate sanctions relief stemming from a nuclear agreement could unlock an additional 0.8 million bpd of Iranian crude for the global market – an undeniably bearish development for prices.

On the other hand, failure to reach a deal would likely mean continued or even intensified U.S. pressure under the Trump administration. In a worst-case scenario – where Iran loses its remaining 1.0–1.2 million bpd of exports – and if Saudi Arabia or other major producers do not promptly step in to offset the shortfall, global oil prices could experience an immediate upside of USD 4–6 per barrel.

Meanwhile, both OPEC and the IEA expect the oil market to remain well-supplied in 2025, with supply growth exceeding demand. OPEC holds its demand growth forecast at 1.3 million bpd, driven mainly by emerging markets in Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. In contrast, the IEA sees more modest growth of 740,000 bpd, citing macroeconomic challenges and accelerating electric vehicle adoption – particularly in China, where petrochemical demand is now the primary growth engine.

On the supply side, OPEC has revised down its non-OPEC+ growth estimate to 800,000 bpd, citing weaker prices and reduced upstream investment. The IEA, however, expects global supply to expand by 1.6 million bpd, led by the U.S., Canada, Brazil, Guyana, and Argentina. Should OPEC+ proceed with unwinding voluntary cuts, the IEA warns that the market could face a surplus of up to 1.4 million bpd in 2025 – potentially exerting renewed downward pressure on prices.

_______________

EIA data released yesterday showed U.S. Crude inventories unexpectedly rose 3.45 million barrels with a drop in exports and despite a larger than expected increase in refinery runs.

U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 3.45 million barrels last week, reaching 441.8 million barrels – approximately 6% below the five-year seasonal average. Total gasoline inventories declined by 1 million barrels and now sit around 3% below the five-year average. Distillate (diesel) fuel inventories fell by 3.2 million barrels and remain roughly 16% below the seasonal norm. Meanwhile, propane/propylene inventories climbed by 2.2 million barrels but are still 9% below their five-year average. Overall, total commercial petroleum inventories rose by 4.9 million barrels over the week – overall a neutral report with limited immediate price impacts.

After a sharp selloff in late April and early May, Brent crude prices bottomed out at USD 58.5 per barrel on Monday, May 5th – the lowest level since April 9th. This was a natural reaction to higher-than-expected OPEC+ supply for both May and June.

Over the past week, however, oil prices have rebounded strongly, climbing by USD 7.9 per barrel on a week-over-week basis. Brent peaked at USD 66.4 per barrel yesterday afternoon before sliding slightly to USD 65 per barrel this morning.

Markets across the board saw significant moves yesterday after the U.S. and China agreed to temporarily lower tariffs and ease export restrictions for 90 days. Scott Bessent announced, the U.S. will lower its tariffs on Chinese goods to 30%, while China will reduce its tariffs on U.S. goods to 10%. While this is a temporary measure, the intent to reach a longer-term agreement is clearly gaining momentum. That said, the U.S. administration has layered tariffs extensively, making the exact average rate hard to pin down – estimates suggest it now sits around 20%.

In short, the macroeconomic outlook improved swiftly: equities rallied, long-term interest rates climbed, gold prices declined, and the USD strengthened. By yesterday’s close, the S&P 500 rose 3.3% and the Nasdaq jumped 4.4%, essentially recovering the losses sustained since April 2nd.

That said, some form of positive news was expected from the weekend meeting, and now oil markets appear to be pausing after three days of strong gains. Attention is shifting from U.S.-China trade de-escalation back toward market fundamentals and geopolitical developments in the Middle East.

On the supply side, the market is pricing in relaxed restrictions on Iranian crude exports after President Trump signaled progress in nuclear negotiations over the weekend. Further talks are expected within the next week.

Meanwhile, President Trump is visiting Saudi Arabia today – the key OPEC+ player – which has ramped up production to discipline non-compliant members by pressuring oil prices. This aligns well with U.S. interests, especially with the administration pushing for lower crude and refined product prices for its US domestic voters.

With Brent hovering around USD 65, it’s unlikely that oil prices will dominate the agenda during the Saudi visit. Instead, discussions are expected to focus on broader geopolitical issues in the Middle East.

Looking ahead, OPEC+ is expected to continue with its monthly meetings and market assessments. The group appears focused on navigating internal disputes and responding to shifts in global demand. Importantly, the recent increase in output doesn’t suggest an oversupplied market here and now – seasonal demand in the region also rises during the summer months, absorbing some of the additional barrels.

Strong rebound yesterday with further gains today. Brent crude rallied 3.2% with a close of USD 62.15/b yesterday and a high of the day of USD 62.8/b.  This morning it is gaining another 0.9% to USD 62.7/b with signs that US and China may move towards trade talks.

Brent went lower on 9 April than on Monday. Looking back at the latest trough on Monday it traded to an intraday low of USD 58.5/b. In comparison it traded to an intraday low of USD 58.4/b on 9 April. While markets were in shock following 2 April (’Liberation Day’) one should think that the announcement from OPEC+ this weekend of a production increase of some 400 kb/d also in June would have chilled the oil market even more. But no.

’ Technically overbought’ may be the explanation. ’Technically overbought’ has been the main explanation for the rebound since Monday. Maybe so. But the fact that it went lower on 9 April than on Monday this week must imply that markets aren’t totally clear over what OPEC+ is currently doing and is planning to do. Is it the start of a flood or a brief period where disorderly members need to be whipped into line?

The official message is that this is punishment versus quota cheaters Iraq, UAE and Kazakhstan. Makes a lot of sense since it is hard to play as a team if the team strategy is not followed by all players. If the May and June hikes is punishment to force the cheaters into line, then there is very real possibility that they actually will fall in line. And voila. The May and June 4x jumps is what we got and then we are back to increases of 137 kb/d per month. Or we could even see a period with no increase at all or even reversals and cuts. 

OPEC+ has after all not officially abandoned cooperation. It has not abandoned quotas. It is still an overall orderly agenda and message to the market. This isn’t like 2014/15 with ’no quotas’. Or like full throttle in spring 2020. The latter was resolved very quickly along with producer pain from very low prices. It is quite clear that Saudi Arabia was very angry with the quota cheaters when the production for May was discussed at the end of March. And that led to the 4x hike in May. And the same again this weekend as quota offenders couldn’t prove good behavior in April. But if the offenders now prove good behavior in May, then the message for July production could prove a very different message than the 4x for May and June.

Trade talk hopes, declining US crude stocks, backwardated Brent curve and shale oil pain lifts price. If so, then we are left with the risk for a US tariff war induced global recession. And with some glimmers of hope now that US and China will start to talk trade, we see Brent crude lifting higher today. Add in that US crude stocks indicatively fell 4.5 mb last week (actual data later today), that the Brent crude forward curve is still in front-end backwardation (no surplus quite yet) and that US shale oil production is starting to show signs of pain with cuts to capex spending and lowering of production estimates.