Analys
The IEA has just taken a walk into outer space but will come back to Earth at a later
Price action – Oil prices contaiged by broad based risk-off in financial markets
The sell-off in oil prices yesterday was basically risk-off in markets in general contagien the oil market where net long money had piled up six weeks in a row just shy of the Feb high long spec. Speculative money were taken off the table yesterday on broad based risk-off contagion and oil prices along the crude forward curve fell as a result. Little oil specific about it. Today oil prices are down 0.8% with Brent at $51.5/b with a little more sell-off following the IEA report but most of the sell-off came before the report.
Crude oil comment – The IEA has just taken a walk into outer space but will come back to Earth at a later stage
** The August IEA report: **
1) Demand revised down for 2015 (-0.2 mb/d) and 2016 (-0.42 mb/d) on new data
2) Demand revised down for 2017 and 2018 by 0.33 mb/d and 0.37 mb/d due to 2015 and 2016 revisions!!!
3) Demand growth for 2017 lifted from 1.4 mb/d y/y to to 1.5 mb/d y/y. So demand growth 2017 is seen stronger.
4) OECD inventories fell in Q2-17 by 9.2 mb (Mar to Jun) versus an average seasonal increase of 46.6 mb from 2010 to 2014. So strong counter seasonal draw in inventories in Q2-17
5) Provisional data for July shows further draws in inventories with largest US crude stock draw in 3 years
6) Due to lower demand projections (rippling down of 15 and 16 revisions) the IEA’s call-on-OPEC declined by 0.4 mb/d for both 17 &18 to 32.6 and 32.4 mb/d resp
**Why the IEA report is a confusing report**
Demand level in 15 and 16 is water under the bridge. We know we don’t know what it was and we know that the IEA don’t know either.
What we do know is that OECD inventories went sideways in H1-16 and then downwards in H2-16.
With its latest numbers (“IEA’s spread sheet exercise”) the IEA now calculates a 2016 surplus of +0.9 mb/d for 2017. But where is that surplus?!!! OECD inventories went DOWN in 2016!!
A 0.9 mb/d surplus in 2016 would mean that inventories actually should have increased somewhere by 329 mb. We don’t know where.
The proof of the pudding (inventories declined) is that 2016 was in balance to deficit. It was not a surplus of 0.9 mb/d. That surplus number is purely a spread sheet exercise number with no match to inventories.
Further we see that inventories are drawing down solidly counter seasonally in Q2-17 and further in July.
The positive take which matters from IEA August report is that:
1) Demand growth for 2017 is stronger than expected and revised higher. (More to come in our view. I.e. we expect 2017 demand growth to be revised yet higher further down the road)
2) Inventories are drawing down solidly (counter cyclically) in Q2-17 and continue to do so in July
Price action in the market is a Brent crude forward curve in backwardation at the front end of the forward curve reflecting that inventories are drawing down.
That the inventory draws are artificially managed by OPEC+ in 2017 is of course another matter and another story.
That 2018 poses a lot of challenges for the oil market with still strong non-OPEC production growth and thus need for OPEC+ management of the oil market balance is also another story.
What is striking is that there is a big mismatch between IEA’s oil market balance for 2016 and what we saw of inventory draws rather than a 329 mb inventory rise implied by a calculated 0.9 mb/d surplus.
Thus their “reset” of oil demand levels for 2017 and 2018 (on the back of 2015 and 2016 revisions) must be off the mark as well.
The IEA has just taken a walk into outer space but will come back to Earth at a later stage
Ch1: OECD inventories – Declined y/y in 2016 with especial decline in H2-16
Solid counter seasonal decline in Q2-17 versus 2010 to 2014 average seasonality
Ch2: US crude, gasoline and disstillates inventories – The strong draw down continues
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Oil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer
Market is starting to take US/Iran headlines with a pinch of salt. Brent crude rose $2.8/b yesterday to an official close of $112.1/b. But after that it traded as low as $108.05/b before ending late night at around $109.7/b. Through the day it traded in a range of $106.87 – 112.72/b amid a flurry of news or rumors from Iran and the US. ”US temporary sanctions during negotiations” (falls alarm). ”We will bomb Iran” (not anyhow),… etc. While the market is still fluctuating to this kind of news flow, it is starting to take such headlines with a pinch of salt.

We’ll see. Maybe, maybe not. The Brent M1 contract is trading at $110.2/b this morning which very close to the average ticks through yesterday of $110.4/b.
Trump with bearish, verbal intervention whenever Brent trades above $110/b it seems. What seems to be a pattern is that Trump states something like ”very good negotiations going on with Iran”, ”New leaders in Iran are great,..”, ”Great progress in negotiations,…”, ”Deal in sight,..” etc whenever the Brent M1 contract trades above $110/b. An effort to cool the market. These hot air verbal interventions from Trump used to have a heavy bearish impact on prices, but they now seems to have less and less effect unless they are backed by reality.
As far as we can see there has been no real progress in the negotiations between the US and Iran with both sides still standing by their previous demands.
Iran is getting stronger while the cease fire lasts making a return to war for Trump yet harder. Iran is naturally in constant preparation for a return to war given Trump’s steady threats of bombing Iran again. Iran is naturally doing what ever is possible to prepare for a return to war. And every day the cease fire lasts it is better prepared. This naturally makes it more and more difficult and dangerous for the US to return to warring activity versus Iran as the consequences for energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf will be more and more severe the longer the cease fire lasts. Israel seems to see it this way as well. That the war is not won and that current frozen state of a cease fire gives Iran opportunity to rebuild military and politically.
Global inventories are drawing down day by day. How much? In the meantime the Strait of Hormuz stays closed. There is varying measures and estimates of how much global inventories are drawing down. Our rough estimate, back of the envelope, is that global inventories are drawing down by at least some 10 mb/d or about 300 mb/d in a balance between loss of supply versus demand destruction. Other estimates we see are a monthly draw of 250-270 mb/d. The IEA only ’measured’ a draw in global observable stocks of 117 mb in April with oil on water rising 53 mb while on shore stocks fell 170 mb. But global stocks are hard to measure with large invisible, unmeasured stocks. As such a back of the envelope approach may be better.
Oil products is what the world is consuming. Oil product prices likely to rise while product stocks fall. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are predominantly crude oil. Discharging oil from OECD SPR stocks, a sharp reduction in Chinese crude imports and a reduction in global refinery throughput of 6-7 mb/d has helped to keep crude oil markets satisfactorily supplied. But global inventories are drawing down none the less. And oil products is really what the world is consuming. So if global refinery throughput stays subdued, then demand will eventually have to match the supply of oil products. The likely path forward this summer is a steady draw down in jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. Higher prices for these. Then, if possible, higher refinery throughput and higher usage of crude in response to very profitable refinery margins. And lastly sharper draw in crude stocks and higher prices for these. But some 6 mb/d of oil products used to be exported through the Strait of Hormuz. And it may not be so easy to ramp up refinery activity across the world to compensate. Especially as Ukraine continues to damage Russian refineries as well as Russian crude production and export facilities.
Watch oil product stocks and prices as well as Brent calendar 2027. What to watch for this summer is thus oil product inventories falling and oil product premiums to crude rising. Another measure to watch is the Brent crude 2027 contract as it rises steadily day by day as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed and global oil inventories decline. The latter is close to the highest level since the start of the war and keeps rising.
The Brent M1 contract and the Brent 2027 prices and current price of jet fuel in Europe (ARA). All in USD/b

Our back of the envelope calculation of the global shortage created by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Note that 3.5 mb/d of discharge from SPR is also a draw. Note also that ’Forced demand loss’ of 2.5 mb/d is probably temporary and will fall back towards zero as logistics are sorted out leaving ’Price demand loss’ to do the job of balancing the market. Thus a shortfall of at least 9 mb/d created by the closure. More if SPR discharge is included and more if Forced demand loss recedes.

Analys
Brent crude up USD 9/bl on the week… ”deal around the corner” narrative fades
Brent is climbing higher. Front-month is at USD 106.3/bl this morning, close to a weekly high and a USD 9/bl jump from Mondays open. This is the move we flagged as a risk earlier in the week: the market shifting from ”a deal is around the corner” to ”this is going to take longer than we thought”.

Analyst Commodities, SEB
During April, rest-of-year Brent remained remarkably stable around USD 90/bl. A stability which rested on one single assumption: the SoH reopens around 1 May. That assumption is now slowly falling apart.
As we highlighted yesterday: every week of delay beyond 1 May adds (theoretically) ish USD 5/bl to the rest-of-year average, as global inventories draw 100 million barrels per week. i.e., a mid-May reopening implies rest-of-year Brent closer to USD 100/bl, and anything pushing into June or July takes us meaningfully higher.
What’s changed in the last 48 hours:
#1: The US military has formally warned that clearing suspected sea mines from SoH could take up to six months. That is a completely different timescale from what the financial market is pricing. Even a political deal tomorrow does not immediately reopen the strait.
#2: Trump has shifted his tone from urgency to ”strategic patience”. In yesterday’s press conference: ”Don’t rush me… I want a great deal.” The market is reading this as a president no longer feeling pressured by timelines, with the naval blockade running in the background.
#3: So far, the military activity is escalating, not de-escalating. Axios reports Iran is laying more mines in SoH. The US 3rd carrier strike group (USS George H.W. Bush) is arriving with two countermine vessels. Trump yesterday ordered the US Navy to destroy any Iranian boats caught laying mines. While CNN reports that the Pentagon is actively drawing up plans to strike Iranian SoH capabilities and individual Iranian military leaders if the ceasefire collapses. i.e., NOT a attitude consistent with an imminent deal!
Spot crude and product prices eased off the early-April highs on a combination of system rerouting and deal optimism. Both now weakening. Goldman estimates April Gulf output is reduced by 14.5 mbl/d, or 57% of pre-war supply, a number that keeps getting worse the longer this drags on.
Demand-side adaptation is ongoing: S. Korea has cut its Middle East crude dependence from 69% to 56% by pulling more from the Americas and Africa, and Japan is kicking off a second round of SPR releases from 1 May. But SPRs are finite.
Ref. to the negotiations, we should not bet on speed. The current Iranian leadership is dominated by genuine hardliners willing to absorb economic pain and run the clock to extract concessions. That is not a setup for a rapid resolution. US/Israeli media briefings keep framing the delay as ”internal Iranian divisions”, the reality is more complicated and points toward weeks and months, not days.
Our point is that the complexity is large, and higher prices have only just started (given a scenario where the negotiations drag out in time). The market spent April leaning on the USD 90/bl rest-of-year assumption; that case is diminishing by the hour. If ”early May reopening” is replaced by ”June, July or later” over the next week or two, both crude and products have meaningful room to reprice higher from here. There is a high risk being short energy and betting on any immediate political resolution(!).
Analys
Market Still Betting on Timely Resolution, But Each Day Raises Shortage Risk
Down on Friday. Up on Monday. The Brent June crude oil contract traded down 5.1% last week to a close of $90.38/b. It reached a high of $103.87/b last Monday and a low of $86.09/b on Friday as Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz was fully open for transit. That quickly changed over the weekend as the US upheld its blockade of Iranian oil exports while Iran naturally responded by closing the SoH again. The US blew a hole in the engine room of the Iranian ship TOUSKA and took custody of the ship on Sunday. Brent crude is up 5.6% this morning to $95.4/b.

The cease-fire is expiring tomorrow. The US has said it will send a delegation for a second round of negotiations in Islamabad in Pakistan. But Iran has for now rejected a second round of talks as it views US demands as unrealistic and excessive while the US is also blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
While Brent is up 5% this morning, the financial market is still very optimistic that progress will be made. That talks will continue and that the SoH will fully open by the start of May which is consistent with a rest-of-year average Brent crude oil price of around $90/b with the market now trading that balance at around $88/b.
Financial optimism vs. physical deterioration. We have a divergence where the financial market is trading negotiations, improvements and resolution while at the same time the physical market is deteriorating day by day. Physical oil flows remain constrained by disrupted flows, longer voyage times and elevated freight and insurance costs.
Financial markets are betting that a US/Iranian resolution will save us in time from violent shortages down the road. But every day that the SoH remains closed is bringing us closer to a potentially very painful point of shortages and much higher prices.
The US blockade is also a weapon of leverage against its European and Asian allies. When Iran closed the SoH it held the world economy as a hostage against the US. The US blockade of the SoH is of course blocking Iranian oil exports. But it is also an action of disruption directed towards Europe and Asia. The US has called for the rest of the world to engaged in the war with Iran: ”If you want oil from the Persian Gulf, then go and get it”. A risk is that the US plays brinkmanship with the global oil market directed towards its European and Asian allies and maybe even towards China to force them to engage and take part. Maybe unthinkable. But unthinkable has become the norm with Trump in the White House.
-
Analys4 veckor sedanBrent crude up USD 9/bl on the week… ”deal around the corner” narrative fades
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanSolkraften pressar elpriserna dagtid
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanMichel Gubel ger sin syn på oljemarknaden
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanSvag vårflod dubblar elpriserna
-
Analys2 dagar sedanOil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer



