Analys
The IEA has just taken a walk into outer space but will come back to Earth at a later

Price action – Oil prices contaiged by broad based risk-off in financial markets
The sell-off in oil prices yesterday was basically risk-off in markets in general contagien the oil market where net long money had piled up six weeks in a row just shy of the Feb high long spec. Speculative money were taken off the table yesterday on broad based risk-off contagion and oil prices along the crude forward curve fell as a result. Little oil specific about it. Today oil prices are down 0.8% with Brent at $51.5/b with a little more sell-off following the IEA report but most of the sell-off came before the report.
Crude oil comment – The IEA has just taken a walk into outer space but will come back to Earth at a later stage
** The August IEA report: **
1) Demand revised down for 2015 (-0.2 mb/d) and 2016 (-0.42 mb/d) on new data
2) Demand revised down for 2017 and 2018 by 0.33 mb/d and 0.37 mb/d due to 2015 and 2016 revisions!!!
3) Demand growth for 2017 lifted from 1.4 mb/d y/y to to 1.5 mb/d y/y. So demand growth 2017 is seen stronger.
4) OECD inventories fell in Q2-17 by 9.2 mb (Mar to Jun) versus an average seasonal increase of 46.6 mb from 2010 to 2014. So strong counter seasonal draw in inventories in Q2-17
5) Provisional data for July shows further draws in inventories with largest US crude stock draw in 3 years
6) Due to lower demand projections (rippling down of 15 and 16 revisions) the IEA’s call-on-OPEC declined by 0.4 mb/d for both 17 &18 to 32.6 and 32.4 mb/d resp
**Why the IEA report is a confusing report**
Demand level in 15 and 16 is water under the bridge. We know we don’t know what it was and we know that the IEA don’t know either.
What we do know is that OECD inventories went sideways in H1-16 and then downwards in H2-16.
With its latest numbers (“IEA’s spread sheet exercise”) the IEA now calculates a 2016 surplus of +0.9 mb/d for 2017. But where is that surplus?!!! OECD inventories went DOWN in 2016!!
A 0.9 mb/d surplus in 2016 would mean that inventories actually should have increased somewhere by 329 mb. We don’t know where.
The proof of the pudding (inventories declined) is that 2016 was in balance to deficit. It was not a surplus of 0.9 mb/d. That surplus number is purely a spread sheet exercise number with no match to inventories.
Further we see that inventories are drawing down solidly counter seasonally in Q2-17 and further in July.
The positive take which matters from IEA August report is that:
1) Demand growth for 2017 is stronger than expected and revised higher. (More to come in our view. I.e. we expect 2017 demand growth to be revised yet higher further down the road)
2) Inventories are drawing down solidly (counter cyclically) in Q2-17 and continue to do so in July
Price action in the market is a Brent crude forward curve in backwardation at the front end of the forward curve reflecting that inventories are drawing down.
That the inventory draws are artificially managed by OPEC+ in 2017 is of course another matter and another story.
That 2018 poses a lot of challenges for the oil market with still strong non-OPEC production growth and thus need for OPEC+ management of the oil market balance is also another story.
What is striking is that there is a big mismatch between IEA’s oil market balance for 2016 and what we saw of inventory draws rather than a 329 mb inventory rise implied by a calculated 0.9 mb/d surplus.
Thus their “reset” of oil demand levels for 2017 and 2018 (on the back of 2015 and 2016 revisions) must be off the mark as well.
The IEA has just taken a walk into outer space but will come back to Earth at a later stage
Ch1: OECD inventories – Declined y/y in 2016 with especial decline in H2-16
Solid counter seasonal decline in Q2-17 versus 2010 to 2014 average seasonality
Ch2: US crude, gasoline and disstillates inventories – The strong draw down continues
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).
Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.
The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.
Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.


Analys
Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.
As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.
Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.
However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.
That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.
The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.
Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.
In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.
Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.
Analys
A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.
It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.
No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.
What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend.
The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
USA slår nytt produktionsrekord av naturgas
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Stor uppsida i Lappland Guldprospekterings aktie enligt analys
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Brookfield ska bygga ett AI-datacenter på hela 750 MW i Strängnäs
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Sommaren inleds med sol och varierande elpriser
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
OPEC+ ökar oljeproduktionen trots fallande priser
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Silverpriset släpar efter guldets utveckling, har mer uppsida
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent needs to fall to USD 58/b to make cheating unprofitable for Kazakhstan
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tradingfirman XTX Markets bygger datacenter i finska Kajana för 1 miljard euro