Analys
You borrowed our market share – Now we want it back
From ”price over volume” to ”we want our market share back”. OPEC+ changed its wording big time last Sunday as it essentially shifted its strategy from ”price over volume” to instead ”price yes, but also volume”. OPEC+ has been regulating the supply oil oil since May 2020 when oil demand collapsed due to Covid-19. Since then the organisation has continuously been willing to adjust supply to whatever needed to balance the market. Oil market participants thus didn’t need to worry too much about changes in the outlook for global oil demand or non-OPEC+ supply growth as the oil cartel would adjust to balance the market whatever happened. That period has now come to an end. The oil price will now become much more sensitive to macro data related to economic growth and oil demand growth as well as changes in projections in non-OPEC+ production growth.
Little finesse when Saudi Arabia shifted from ”price” to ”volume” in 2014. Back in 2014 when Saudi Arabia decided that enough was enough in terms of losses in market share to booming US shale oil production it shifted tactics from ”price over volume” to ”market share” without much fines. Saudi Arabia then, without saying much, started to drop its Official Selling Prices sharply into the autumn of 2014. Finally in December 2014 it became official that OPEC would no longer shed market share to non-OPEC (essentially US shale) to defend the oil price.
This time however the shift in strategy is done with much more finesse and in a much more clever way. To start with OPEC+ is doing nothing what so ever in Q3-24. No change in production. As demand will seasonally rise a bit in Q3, this should ensure a fairly balanced market with no rise in inventories (maybe even a draw). At least according to estimated need for oil from OPEC+ (paper balances). The communicated plan is then to gradually add around 2 m b/d to the market from Q4-24 to Q3-25 with an increase of 750 k b/d already by January 2025. But the finesse is that the cartel is holding an open door to modify that plan by saying that ”if market circumstances do not allow it” they may not place the 2 m b/d of voluntary cuts back into the market from Q4-24 to Q3-25 anyhow. Anyhow they are making it clear that these volumes will eventually return to the market. And that is something which all non-OPEC+ producers will discuss at boardroom levels going forward.
IEA’s May report projects a decline in call-on-OPEC 2025 of 0.5 m b/d. Not acceptable for OPEC. The IEA, in its May report, is projecting that global demand will rise by 1.1 m b/d while non-OPEC supply will rise by 1.6 m b/d. The result is that OPEC will loose a market share of 0.5 m b/d in 2025 and thus have to cut the same to maintain market balance and prices. OPEC(+) is now saying that that is not a feasible path. They don’t want to cut yet more. Enough is enough.
No one believes that there is room for an additional 2 m b/d without crashing the price. No one believes that there is room in the global oil market for an additional 2 m b/d (the voluntary cuts) from OPEC+ from Q4-24 to Q3-25. At least not without crashing oil prices. The cartel probably doesn’t believe that either. And as a result it has left a backdoor open to modify their plans as they go by saying that they may modify these plans of added supply if market conditions do not allow the return of these volumes to the market.
The message is a warning shot to non-OPEC+ producers to scale back or face the consequences. The latest message from the cartel is a warning shot to non-OPEC+ producers. The market share that non-OPEC+ producers have grabbed since year 2020 is not for them to keep. The oil cartel want these volumes back. Preferably as fast as possible but with some levy with respect to time.
The cartel may hope to influence demand and non-OPEC+ supply for 2025. With its latest communication and actions the cartel may be hoping to modify the outcome for 2025 where the IEA is projecting that call-on-OPEC will decline by 0.5 m b/d. A little bit softer prices now, but no collapse, could help to ease inflation further, reduce interest rates faster, speed up global economic growth and thus potentially lift projected oil demand growth for 2025.
The messaging from the cartel will most likely also be widely discussed in non-OPEC+ oil producer boardrooms and not the least among shale oil producers. The natural conclusion they should arrive at is that they should ease back on production growth planes for 2025. Preferably by starting to shed some drilling and fracking activity already in H2-24.
So if as a result of all of this we get that global oil demand ends up growing 1.4 m b/d in 2025 rather than 1.1 m b/d in 2025 (IEA proj.) and non-OPEC+ production grows by 1.4 m b/d rather than by 1.6 m b/d (IEA proj.), then at least OPEC+ will be able to keep its market share in 2025 without further losses.
OPEC is now producing roughly 4 m b/d below normal production level. Not sustainable. Especially if it would need to cut yet further in 2025.
Call-on-OPEC projected to fall from 27.4 m b/d in 2024 to 26.9 m b/d in 2025
Effective OPEC+ spare capacity close to 6 m b/d sitting idele.
Analys
Crude oil comment: US inventories remain well below averages despite yesterday’s build
Brent crude prices have remained stable since the sharp price surge on Monday afternoon, when the price jumped from USD 71.5 per barrel to USD 73.5 per barrel – close to current levels (now trading at USD 73.45 per barrel). The initial price spike was triggered by short-term supply disruptions at Norway’s Johan Sverdrup field and Kazakhstan’s Tengiz field.
While the disruptions in Norway have been resolved and production at Tengiz is expected to return to full capacity by the weekend, elevated prices have persisted. The market’s focus has now shifted to heightened concerns about an escalation in the war in Ukraine. This geopolitical uncertainty continues to support safe-haven assets, including gold and government bonds. Consequently, safe-haven currencies such as the U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, and Swiss franc have also strengthened.
U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 0.5 million barrels last week, according to U.S DOE. This build contrasts with expectations, as consensus had predicted no change (0.0 million barrels), and the API forecast projected a much larger increase of 4.8 million barrels. With last week’s build, crude oil inventories now stand at 430.3 million barrels, yet down 18 million barrels(!) compared to the same week last year and ish 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Gasoline inventories rose by 2.1 million barrels (still 4% below their five-year average), defying consensus expectations of a slight draw of 0.1 million barrels. Distillate (diesel) inventories, on the other hand, fell by 0.1 million barrels, aligning closely with expectations of no change (0.0 million barrels) but also remain 4% below their five-year average. In total, combined stocks of crude, gasoline, and distillates increased by 2.5 million barrels last week.
U.S. demand data showed mixed trends. Over the past four weeks, total petroleum products supplied averaged 20.7 million barrels per day, representing a 1.2% increase compared to the same period last year. Motor gasoline demand remained relatively stable at 8.9 million barrels per day, a 0.5% rise year-over-year. In contrast, distillate fuel demand continued to weaken, averaging 3.8 million barrels per day, down 6.4% from a year ago. Jet fuel demand also softened, falling 1.3% compared to the same four-week period in 2023.
Analys
China is turning the corner and oil sentiment will likely turn with it
Brent crude is maintaining its gains from Monday and ticking yet higher. Brent crude made a jump of 3.2% on Monday to USD 73.5/b and has managed to maintain the gain since then. Virtually no price change yesterday and opening this morning at USD 73.3/b.
Emerging positive signs from the Chinese economy may lift oil market sentiment. Chinese economic weakness in general and shockingly weak oil demand there has been pestering the oil price since its peak of USD 92.2/b in mid-April. Net Chinese crude and product imports has been negative since May as measured by 3mth y/y changes. This measure reached minus 10% in July and was still minus 3% in September. And on a year to Sep, y/y it is down 2%. Chinese oil demand growth has been a cornerstone of global oil demand over the past decades accounting for a growth of around half a million barrels per day per year or around 40% of yearly global oil demand growth. Electrification and gassification (LNG HDTrucking) of transportation is part of the reason, but that should only have weakened China’s oil demand growth and not turned it abruptly negative. Historically it has been running at around +3-4% pa.
With a sense of ’no end in sight’ for China’ ills and with a trade war rapidly approaching with Trump in charge next year, the oil bears have been in charge of the oil market. Oil prices have moved lower and lower since April. Refinery margins have also fallen sharply along with weaker oil products demand. The front-month gasoil crack to Brent peaked this year at USD 34.4/b (premium to Brent) in February and fell all the way to USD 14.4/b in mid October. Several dollar below its normal seasonal level. Now however it has recovered to a more normal, healthy seasonal level of USD 18.2/b.
But Chinese stimulus measures are already working. The best immediate measure of that is the China surprise index which has rallied from -40 at the end of September to now +20. This is probably starting to filter in to the oil market sentiment.
The market has for quite some time now been staring down towards the USD 60/b. But this may now start to change with a bit more optimistic tones emerging from the Chinese economy.
China economic surprise index (white). Front-month ARA Gasoil crack to Brent in USD/b (blue)
The IEA could be too bearish by up to 0.8 mb/d. IEA’s calculations for Q3-24 are off by 0.8 mb/d. OECD inventories fell by 1.16 mb/d in Q3 according to the IEA’s latest OMR. But according to the IEA’s supply/demand balance the decline should only have been 0.38 mb/d. I.e. the supply/demand balance of IEA for Q3-24 was much less bullish than how the inventories actually developed by a full 0.8 mb/d. If we assume that the OECD inventory changes in Q3-24 is the ”proof of the pudding”, then IEA’s estimated supply/demand balance was off by a full 0.8 mb/d. That is a lot. It could have a significant consequence for 2025 where the IEA is estimating that call-on-OPEC will decline by 0.9 mb/d y/y according to its estimated supply/demand balance. But if the IEA is off by 0.8 mb/d in Q3-24, it could be equally off by 0.8 mb/d for 2025 as a whole as well. Leading to a change in the call-on-OPEC of only 0.1 mb/d y/y instead. Story by Bloomberg: {NSN SMXSUYT1UM0W <GO>}. And looking at US oil inventories they have consistently fallen significantly more than normal since June this year. See below.
Later today at 16:30 CET we’ll have the US oil inventory data. Bearish indic by API, but could be a bullish surprise yet again. Last night the US API indicated that US crude stocks rose by 4.8 mb, gasoline stocks fell by 2.5 mb and distillates fell by 0.7 mb. In total a gain of 1.6 mb. Total US crude and product stocks normally decline by 3.7 mb for week 46.
The trend since June has been that US oil inventories have been falling significantly versus normal seasonal trends. US oil inventories stood 16 mb above the seasonal 2015-19 average on 21 June. In week 45 they ended 34 mb below their 2015-19 seasonal average. Recent news is that US Gulf refineries are running close to max in order to satisfy Lat Am demand for oil products.
US oil inventories versus the 2015-19 seasonal averages.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Europe’s largest oil field halted – driving prices higher
Since market opening on Monday, November 18, Brent crude prices have climbed steadily. Starting the week at approximately USD 70.7 per barrel, prices rose to USD 71.5 per barrel by noon yesterday. However, in the afternoon, Brent crude surged by nearly USD 2 per barrel, reaching USD 73.5 per barrel, which is close to where we are currently trading.
This sharp price increase has been driven by supply disruptions at two major oil fields: Norway’s Johan Sverdrup and Kazakhstan’s Tengiz. The Brent benchmark is now continuing to trade above USD 73 per barrel as the market reacts to heightened concerns about short-term supply tightness.
Norway’s Johan Sverdrup field, Europe’s largest and one of the top 10 globally in terms of estimated recoverable reserves, temporarily halted production on Monday afternoon due to an onshore power outage. According to Equinor, the issue was quickly identified but resulted in a complete shutdown of the field. Restoration efforts are underway. With a production capacity of 755,000 barrels per day, Sverdrup accounts for approximately 36% of Norway’s total oil output, making it a critical player in the country’s production. The unexpected outage has significantly supported Brent prices as the market evaluates its impact on overall supply.
Adding to the bullish momentum, supply constraints at Kazakhstan’s Tengiz field have further intensified concerns. Tengiz, with a production capacity of around 700,000 barrels per day, has seen output cut by approximately 30% this month due to ongoing repairs, exceeding earlier estimates of a 20% reduction. Repairs are expected to conclude by November 23, but in the meantime, supply tightness persists, amplifying market vol.
On a broader scale, a pullback in the U.S. dollar yesterday (down 0.15%) provided additional tailwinds for crude prices, making oil more attractive to international buyers. However, over the past few weeks, Brent crude has alternated between gains and losses as market participants juggle multiple factors, including U.S. monetary policy, concerns over Chinese demand, and the evolving supply strategy of OPEC+.
The latter remains a critical factor, as unused production capacity within OPEC continues to exert downward pressure on prices. An acceleration in the global economy will be crucial to improving demand fundamentals.
Despite these short-term fluctuations, we see encouraging signs of a recovering global economy and remain moderately bullish. We are holding to our price forecast of USD 75 per barrel in 2025, followed by USD 87.5 in 2026.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: It takes guts to hold short positions
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: A price rise driven by fundamentals
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Recent ’geopolitical relief’ seems premature
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guldpriset stiger hela tiden till nya rekord
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Oljepriset kommer gå upp till 500 USD per fat år 2030
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
ABB och Blykalla samarbetar om teknikutveckling för små modulära reaktorer
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Brent resumes after yesterday’s price tumble
-
Analys1 vecka sedan
Crude oil comment: Iran’s silence hints at a new geopolitical reality