Analys

The long game is the wrong game (from short term intervention to longer term structural battle)

Publicerat

8 år sedan

den

26 maj, 2017

OPEC yesterday decided to roll existing cuts over for another 9 months lasting all the way to March 2018. Maintaining production cuts also in Q1-18 was however communicated as a measure mainly to avoid driving inventories higher again in the demand wise seasonally weak first quarter of the year. To the surprise of many the market did not take the deal well and Brent crude oil fell $4.6% to a close of the day of $51.46/b with a low of the day of $51.03/b.

In hindsight we can now clearly say that there must have been a substantial amount of anticipation in the market for not only an extension of cuts but also for deeper cuts. Saudi Arabia’s communication to the market ahead of the meeting has clearly been misinterpreted when he stated that OPEC “will do whatever it takes” to draw inventories down to the 5 year average. The market view must have been that what OPEC & Co. did in H1-17 was far from enough. Thus “whatever it takes” should be MORE. Thus the moment Khalid Al-Falih said to reporters in Vienna yesterday at 10:20 CEST that “deeper cuts are not needed”, that was when the oil price started to fall. Long speculative positions which had run hard into the meeting and then instead ran for cover when the oil price started to tumble.

When OPEC launched the cuts last year they were dubbed as a “short term intervention”. Now it increasingly starts to look like a long haul structural battle. We do think that OPEC’s decision to cut will drive inventories down towards normal by the end of the year. Thus yesterday’s decision by OPEC & Co. is in our view making $60/b a sensible target for the front month Brent crude at the end of 2017. Thus as such we think that yesterday’s sell-off should be used as a buying opportunity. At the same time however it is likely leading to another 9 months during which a positive crude oil price signal leads US shale oil production to accelerate yet more.

US shale oil production has accelerated massively since November when OPEC & Co. decided to cut production. US crude oil production is now up more than 600 kb/d since the start of December 2016 which is more than the total 558 kb/d in pledged cuts from the 11 countries which have joined OPEC in cutting production at the moment. Their cuts are now basically wiped out. The US shale oil stimulus from the price gains following OPEC’s decision to cut in November has added some 250 shale oil rigs to the market. If we assume that there will not be a single additional US shale oil rig added to the market from July 2017 and all through to the end of 2018 we still expect that US crude oil production will grow by 0.5 mb/d y/y in 2017, 1.5 mb/d y/y in 2018 and by 1 mb/d y/y in 2019. However, as a consequence of the extension of the cuts all until March 2018 we are likely going to see a more supportive oil price and thus yet more US shale oil rigs being added to the market over the coming 9 months of cuts. In our view this is likely going to flip the global supply/demand balance for 2018 and 2019 into surplus.

Thus OPEC is increasingly painting itself into a corner. OPEC’s choice next year will be
1) Roll some cuts forward in both 2018 and 2019 (longer term structural battle) or
2) Put 1.8 mb/d of production cuts (OPEC & Co.) back into the market. Produce at will and let the price regulate the market yet again. I.e. the oil price needs to drop in order to push non-OPEC production lower in order to make room for OPEC & Co’s production revival.

It is often said that generals always fight the previous war meaning that they use tactics and strategy from the last war because that is what they know even if these are outdated. In a way this is what OPEC & Co are doing. In a shale oil world they should have med the cuts quick and dirty. It should definitely have been a short term intervention and not a long term structural battle. In the old days when non-OPEC production solely consisted of conventional oil production with a lead time from investments to production of some 5 years then gradual, enduring cuts did work. Now however keeping cuts going just leaves US shale oil producers all the time in the world to respond and revive. Rather than OPEC & Co cutting 1.8 mb/d for a full 5 quarters (2017 + Q1-18) they should rather have cut production by 3 mb/d for one quarter. That would have left little time for US shale oil players to ramp up investments and thus have limited the cumulative production impact on 2018 and 2019.

At yesterday’s meeting they should have decided massive cuts in Q3-17 and then no more. That would have been the right medicine for the market. Draw down the inventories in a flash. No lengthy time for US shale oil producers to revive and voila, inventories down to normal. A flat or backwardated crude oil forward curve where the mid-term WTI forward curve could be kept in check from there onwards.

It is still not too late for Saudi Arabia to follow this kind of strategy. They have basically promised what they are going to produce over the next 9 months. They could possibly do all of it in Q3-17. Rather than placing production at 10.06 mb/d for 9 months (a cut of 486 kb/d) they could instead produce 9.07 mb/d for the three months in Q3-17 which would mean a cut of 1.458 kb/d versus its October 2017 level. That would have drawn the inventories down by an additional 90 mb in Q3-17. At the same time Saudi Arabia should sell a comparable amount of volumes on a forward basis 2018 and 2019. This would help to prevent the medium term forward curve from rising. Thus again limiting the price signals and hedging opportunities for US shale oil producers.

Khalid Al-Falih has said that US shale oil producers are not the enemy. He welcomes their production revival. However, it still needs to be managed in the right way. At least as long as OPEC & Co is trying to manage the market. And the right way in our view is quick and dirty cuts. Do it all in one go rather than extended and do manage the price level of the mid-term forward crude oil prices.

JPM this morning cut its 2018 Brent crude oil price outlook to $45/b. That is great news for OPEC & Co because it will help to hold price expectations low for 2018 and 2019 and thus help to keep the mid-term forward crude prices in check and thus help to limit the positive price signals to US shale oil producers and thus limit further strong additions and activations of rigs.

As of now however the picture is for a lengthy nine months of additional production cuts and thus more US shale oil rigs being activated driving both 2018 and 2019 into surplus. As such there is increasing concern in the market for the exit from cuts. It is easy to take 1.8 mb/d off the market (1.2 mb/d for OPEC and 0.6 for Co.). With further revival of US shale oil it will be increasingly difficult to put the volumes back into the market again. An exit strategy was not discussed at the OPEC meeting. “We will cross that bridge when we get there” was Khalid Al-Falih’s comment. The market is worried however that come April 2018 then OPEC & Co moves back to “produce at will”. If that was the case following 5 quarters of US shale oil stimulating production cuts from OPEC & Co that would mean that the front month Brent crude oil price probably would have to move down to $35/b in order to slow down US shale oil production again.

With increasingly a surplus becoming the likely outlook for 2018 and 2019 (due to nine more months of cuts) the price outlook for these years increasingly becomes tied to OPEC & Co’s strategy of rolling cuts yet further down the road or not.

For now we are positive to oil prices for the rest of the year in 2017 where we expect OECD inventories at normal level at the end of 2017 with the Brent crude curve moving into backwardation with the front end contract standing at $60/b. We then expect the market price structure to be as follows. The WTI 18 month contract standing at $52.5/b. The Brent crude 18 month contract standing at a $2.5/b premium at $55/b and lastly the front month Brent crude oil contract having a $5/b premium backwardation the 18 months contract thus placing Brent crude front month contract at $60/b at year end 2017.

We are however increasingly concerned about the oil market balance and thus oil prices in 2018 and 2019. The fact that Algeria’s Energy Minister, Noureddine Bouterfa, was replaced in a minister re-shuffle yesterday is concerning. He was at the heart of last year’s negotiations. He was the oil diplomat which criss-crossed between OPEC and non-OPEC members to make the production cut deal last year happen. Thus losing him as oil minister is probably not a good thing with respect to further cuts beyond March 2018.

Annons

Global supply/demand oil market balance:

This is what OPEC hopes for:

This is however probably what they might get:

Kind regards

Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking

Relaterade ämnen:seb analys

Nästa

OPEC and non-OPEC tighten their belts

Missa inte

OPEC meeting May 25th – Give me a premium!

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

More weakness and lower price levels ahead, but the world won’t drown in oil in 2026

Publicerat

4 dagar sedan

den

7 oktober, 2025

Redaktionen

Some rebound but not much. Brent crude rebounded 1.5% yesterday to $65.47/b. This morning it is inching 0.2% up to $65.6/b. The lowest close last week was on Thursday at $64.11/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The curve structure is almost as week as it was before the weekend. The rebound we now have gotten post the message from OPEC+ over the weekend is to a large degree a rebound along the curve rather than much strengthening at the front-end of the curve. That part of the curve structure is almost as weak as it was last Thursday.

We are still on a weakening path. The message from OPEC+ over the weekend was we are still on a weakening path with rising supply from the group. It is just not as rapidly weakening as was feared ahead of the weekend when a quota hike of 500 kb/d/mth for November was discussed.

The Brent curve is on its way to full contango with Brent dipping into the $50ies/b. Thus the ongoing weakening we have had in the crude curve since the start of the year, and especially since early June, will continue until the Brent crude oil forward curve is in full contango along with visibly rising US and OECD oil inventories. The front-month Brent contract will then flip down towards the $60/b-line and below into the $50ies/b.

At what point will OPEC+ turn to cuts? The big question then becomes: When will OPEC+ turn around to make some cuts? At what (price) point will they choose to stabilize the market? Because for sure they will. Higher oil inventories, some more shedding of drilling rigs in US shale and Brent into the 50ies somewhere is probably where the group will step in.

There is nothing we have seen from the group so far which indicates that they will close their eyes, let the world drown in oil and the oil price crash to $40/b or below.

The message from OPEC+ is also about balance and stability. The world won’t drown in oil in 2026. The message from the group as far as we manage to interpret it is twofold: 1) Taking back market share which requires a lower price for non-OPEC+ to back off a bit, and 2) Oil market stability and balance. It is not just about 1. Thus fretting about how we are all going to drown in oil in 2026 is totally off the mark by just focusing on point 1.

When to buy cal 2026? Before Christmas when Brent hits $55/b and before OPEC+ holds its last meeting of the year which is likely to be in early December.

Brent crude oil prices have rebounded a bit along the forward curve. Not much strengthening in the structure of the curve. The front-end backwardation is not much stronger today than on its weakest level so far this year which was on Thursday last week.

The front-end backwardation fell to its weakest level so far this year on Thursday last week. A slight pickup yesterday and today, but still very close to the weakest year to date. More oil from OPEC+ in the coming months and softer demand and rising inventories. We are heading for yet softer levels.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

A sharp weakening at the core of the oil market: The Dubai curve

Publicerat

1 vecka sedan

den

3 oktober, 2025

Redaktionen

Down to the lowest since early May. Brent crude has fallen sharply the latest four days. It closed at USD 64.11/b yesterday which is the lowest since early May. It is staging a 1.3% rebound this morning along with gains in both equities and industrial metals with an added touch of support from a softer USD on top.

What stands out the most to us this week is the collapse in the Dubai one to three months time-spread.

Dubai is medium sour crude. OPEC+ is in general medium sour crude production. Asian refineries are predominantly designed to process medium sour crude. So Dubai is the real measure of the balance between OPEC+ holding back or not versus Asian oil demand for consumption and stock building.

A sharp weakening of the front-end of the Dubai curve. The front-end of the Dubai crude curve has been holding out very solidly throughout this summer while the front-end of the Brent and WTI curves have been steadily softening. But the strength in the Dubai curve in our view was carrying the crude oil market in general. A source of strength in the crude oil market. The core of the strength.

The now finally sharp decline of the front-end of the Dubai crude curve is thus a strong shift. Weakness in the Dubai crude marker is weakness in the core of the oil market. The core which has helped to hold the oil market elevated.

Facts supports the weakening. Add in facts of Iraq lifting production from Kurdistan through Turkey. Saudi Arabia lifting production to 10 mb/d in September (normal production level) and lifting exports as well as domestic demand for oil for power for air con is fading along with summer heat. Add also in counter seasonal rise in US crude and product stocks last week. US oil stocks usually decline by 1.3 mb/week this time of year. Last week they instead rose 6.4 mb/week (+7.2 mb if including SPR). Total US commercial oil stocks are now only 2.1 mb below the 2015-19 seasonal average. US oil stocks normally decline from now to Christmas. If they instead continue to rise, then it will be strongly counter seasonal rise and will create a very strong bearish pressure on oil prices.

Will OPEC+ lift its voluntary quotas by zero, 137 kb/d, 500 kb/d or 1.5 mb/d? On Sunday of course OPEC+ will decide on how much to unwind of the remaining 1.5 mb/d of voluntary quotas for November. Will it be 137 kb/d yet again as for October? Will it be 500 kb/d as was talked about earlier this week? Or will it be a full unwind in one go of 1.5 mb/d? We think most likely now it will be at least 500 kb/d and possibly a full unwind. We discussed this in a not earlier this week: ”500 kb/d of voluntary quotas in October. But a full unwind of 1.5 mb/d”

The strength in the front-end of the Dubai curve held out through summer while Brent and WTI curve structures weakened steadily. That core strength helped to keep flat crude oil prices elevated close to the 70-line. Now also the Dubai curve has given in.

Brent crude oil forward curves

Total US commercial stocks now close to normal. Counter seasonal rise last week. Rest of year?

Total US crude and product stocks on a steady trend higher.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

OPEC+ will likely unwind 500 kb/d of voluntary quotas in October. But a full unwind of 1.5 mb/d in one go could be in the cards

Publicerat

1 vecka sedan

den

1 oktober, 2025

Redaktionen

Down to mid-60ies as Iraq lifts production while Saudi may be tired of voluntary cut frugality. The Brent December contract dropped 1.6% yesterday to USD 66.03/b. This morning it is down another 0.3% to USD 65.8/b. The drop in the price came on the back of the combined news that Iraq has resumed 190 kb/d of production in Kurdistan with exports through Turkey while OPEC+ delegates send signals that the group will unwind the remaining 1.65 mb/d (less the 137 kb/d in October) of voluntary cuts at a pace of 500 kb/d per month pace.

Signals of accelerated unwind and Iraqi increase may be connected. Russia, Kazakhstan and Iraq were main offenders versus the voluntary quotas they had agreed to follow. Russia had a production ’debt’ (cumulative overproduction versus quota) of close to 90 mb in March this year while Kazakhstan had a ’debt’ of about 60 mb and the same for Iraq. This apparently made Saudi Arabia angry this spring. Why should Saudi Arabia hold back if the other voluntary cutters were just freeriding? Thus the sudden rapid unwinding of voluntary cuts. That is at least one angle of explanations for the accelerated unwinding.

If the offenders with production debts then refrained from lifting production as the voluntary cuts were rapidly unwinded, then they could ’pay back’ their ’debts’ as they would under-produce versus the new and steadily higher quotas.

Forget about Kazakhstan. Its production was just too far above the quotas with no hope that the country would hold back production due to cross-ownership of oil assets by international oil companies. But Russia and Iraq should be able to do it.

Iraqi cumulative overproduction versus quotas could reach 85-90 mb in October. Iraq has however steadily continued to overproduce by 3-5 mb per month. In July its new and gradually higher quota came close to equal with a cumulative overproduction of only 0.6 mb that month. In August again however its production had an overshoot of 100 kb/d or 3.1 mb for the month. Its cumulative production debt had then risen to close to 80 mb. We don’t know for September yet. But looking at October we now know that its production will likely average close to 4.5 mb/d due to the revival of 190 kb/d of production in Kurdistan. Its quota however will only be 4.24 mb/d. Its overproduction in October will thus likely be around 250 kb/d above its quota with its production debt rising another 7-8 mb to a total of close to 90 mb.

Again, why should Saudi Arabia be frugal while Iraq is freeriding. Better to get rid of the voluntary quotas as quickly as possible and then start all over with clean sheets.

Unwinding the remaining 1.513 mb/d in one go in October? If OPEC+ unwinds the remaining 1.513 mb/d of voluntary cuts in one big go in October, then Iraq’s quota will be around 4.4 mb/d for October versus its likely production of close to 4.5 mb/d for the coming month..

OPEC+ should thus unwind the remaining 1.513 mb/d (1.65 – 0.137 mb/d) in one go for October in order for the quota of Iraq to be able to keep track with Iraq’s actual production increase.

October 5 will show how it plays out. But a quota unwind of at least 500 kb/d for Oct seems likely. An overall increase of at least 500 kb/d in the voluntary quota for October looks likely. But it could be the whole 1.513 mb/d in one go. If the increase in the quota is ’only’ 500 kb/d then Iraqi cumulative production will still rise by 5.7 mb to a total of 85 mb in October.

Iraqi production debt versus quotas will likely rise by 5.7 mb in October if OPEC+ only lifts the overall quota by 500 kb/d in October. Here assuming historical production debt did not rise in September. That Iraq lifts its production by 190 kb/d in October to 4.47 mb/d (August level + 190 kb/d) and that OPEC+ unwinds 500 kb/d of the remining quotas in October when they decide on this on 5 October.