Följ oss

Analys

Iranian nuclear negotiations at center stage

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror
SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - Commodity

Brent crude is trading like it is April with snow one day and sunshine the next. We currently have spring refinery maintenance with reduced processing of crude by refineries and rising crude stocks. The strength of the crude curve is weakening, floating crude stocks are rising, speculative positions in crude are taking some exit and Brent crude prices have been ticking lower. Gasoline refinery margins are however extremely strong and oil product demand is set to revive yet more in the months to come. Over the market however hangs a dark shadow of Iran nuclear negotiations in Vienna which if successful would add more crude to the market.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent crude traded down 2.9% last week with a close of USD 62.95/bl and is trading down another 0.5% this morning to USD 62.6/bl. Since 19 March Brent crude has averaged USD 63.4/bl. While currently not far from this average but in general it is clear that prices have been ticking lower since late March and still are.

Center stage in the oil market these days is the ongoing negotiations in Vienna where world powers are trying to revive the Iranian Nuclear deal (JCPOA) which Biden helped to create when he was Vice President under Obama. There is a lot of noise around the ongoing negotiations with a lot of crossing interests. Israel and Saudi Arabia probably both want Iran to be in constant lock-down rather than to revive. And the Iranian Revolutionary Gard might also want to see a continued status quo rather than a normalization and a reopening of the country as this might threaten its current grip on power. But fundamentally all parties in the negotiations in Vienna wants to see the JCPOA deal revived and reinstated. Thus, fundamentally the outcome should be successful in the end. When is of course a large open question with most observers predict a lengthy and difficult process with revival of Iranian production in late 2021 or into 2022. President Rouhani of Iran is however set to end his presidency in June this year with expectations that Iran’ hard-liners will take over which would make it more difficult to succeed. Thus, the window of opportunity might be quite narrow. And President Biden seems to want to undo all of Donald Trump’s deeds as quickly as possible. So sooner rather than later could be the outcome of the Vienna negotiations. But sitting far from Vienna this is hard to tell. But what is clear is that the ongoing Iranian nuclear negotiations in Vienna is posing a bearish risk for oil.

On the physical part of the crude oil market it is obvious that there is currently not a continued strong draw-down in crude stocks as we have seen previously, and which has underpinned the previously increasing Brent crude oil backwardation.

Refineries are currently in spring maintenance; Chinese crude stocks are reportedly very high and April/May refinery maintenance there is unusually strong this year as well. OPEC ME Gulf loadings rose 1.6 m bl/d month on month in March and OPEC+ production is set to rise further in May, June and July. Floating crude oil stocks have as a result of all this been ticking higher from a low of 80 m bl in February to now 106 m bl versus a normal of 50-60 m bl.

Parts of the weakness right now is clearly the refinery turnaround season in combination with further production increases lined up by OPEC+ in the months ahead (600, 700, 841 k bl/d for May, June, July).

But all is not grim, and the current crude oil weakness is clearly exacerbated by the ongoing refinery maintenance season.

If we instead look at the oil products, we see that US crude based products are only 1.5 m bl/d below the 2019 level. And US oil demand is set to revive more. Gasoline is being shipped from east of Suez to West Africa at the highest rate since 2016 and diesel is being shipped from Europe to the US in an unusual reverse flow.

So amid all the noise of Iran JCPOA negotiations, crude oil weakness, refinery maintenance it is easy to forget the broad, underlying fundamental here that vaccines are increasingly rolled out and product demand is on its way back in the US and a little later in the EU.

Brent crude oil prices have fallen back. Ticking lower since the recent fall from USD 69.63/bl. From recent high-close to to recent low-closes we have still spanned less than USD 10/bl. Normal pull-backs during price recoveries are typically USD 10-12/bl. Thus the pull-back is still not all that big.

Brent price
Source: SEB, Bloomberg

Backwardation of the Brent crude oil curve has consistently softened since late February when the front month contract traded at a premium of USD 6.6/bl vs the 12 months contract. It now trades at only USD 3.1/bl. In comparison this backwardation averaged USD 2.9/bl through 2018 and 2019. Thus, current backwardation is very normal though it is clearly on a weakening trend right now.

Brent price in backwardation
Source: SEB, Bloomberg

Net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI has declined about 100 m bl from 926 m bl in early March to now 825 m bl. In comparison the average position in 2019 was 733 m bl. Speculative positions are thus still some 100 m bl above this level and could draw down to below 600 m bl if speculators take more exits.

Net long oil
Source: SEB, Bloomberg

The time-spread of the Brent crude oil curve given as month 1 minus month 6 versus the ranking of net long speculative positions in Brent crude. The backwardation/contango of the Brent crude oil curve is not solely a reflection of the physical market. It is also a reflection of ebbs and flows of speculative positions. As these moves in and out of the front-end of the front-end contracts of the crude curve they typically drag front-end prices higher or lower versus longer dated contracts. Further speculative exits would weaken the Brent crude backwardation yet more (flatten the curve) with the front-end contract then moving closer to longer dated prices.

Time spread in oil
Source: SEB, Bloomberg

The 5-year Brent contract now trades at USD 55/bl which is just USD 3.5/bl below the average of the 5-year contract from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019 of USD 58.5/bl. Thus, longer dated Brent crude oil contracts are now very close to “normal” so to speak. In a total flattening of the Brent crude oil curve if crude stocks build more and speculative positions takes yet more exit the Brent crude prices would naturally decline to USD 55/bl where the longer dated contracts are located right now. Though this is not our main scenario it paints a picture of where Brent crude would naturally head if further bearishness unfolds. And in terms of price-pullbacks we have still not spanned a full USD 10/bl since the recent high close of USD 69.63/bl on 11 March. Pull-backs of USD 10-12/bl are normal during price recoveries.

5 year brent price
Source: SEB, Bloomberg

If we however look at oil products we see that gasoline refining margins are now USD 11/bl in Europe versus a more normal USD 5-6/bl. I.e. they are very strong. And with more to come. This reflects strengthening gasoline demand together with strong naphtha (for plastics) demand where both products are at the lighter end of the barrel. Diesel and middle distillate cracks are still weak versus normal as demand for jet fuel is still subdued. Fuel oil 3.5 cracks are weakening and reports are that floating stocks of 3.5% is building off the coast of Iraq as it struggles to process this part of the barrel. Increasing exports of medium sour crude from OPEC+ is also weakening this part of the complex while production of light sweet crude from the US is overall still ticking lower.

Oil
Source: SEB, Bloomberg

US oil product demand is now only 1.5 m bl/d below its 2019 level if we only count crude oil based products. And more demand is set to come back by the day as the US economy opens up over the coming 2 months. If we include propane and polypropylene then US product demand is already very close to normal.

US oil product demand
Source: SEB, Bloomberg

Global, floating crude stocks have ticked higher from a low of 80 m barrels and now at 106 m barrels. Current refinery maintenance is part of this. The trend and the goal of OPEC+ was to move down to 50-60 million barrels (normal). But not yet.

Global, floating crude stocks
Source: SEB, Bloomberg

US oil rig count did not rise last week and there is now an emerging difference between the activation of drilling rigs from June 2016 versus the one that started in September 2020. Will shale oil producers actually be true to their words that this time will be different and that they won’t spend all income on drilling and instead be prudent? This emerging picture is lending support to longer dated contracts for 2022/23/24

US oil rig count

Source: SEB, Bloomberg
Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

Fundamentals trump geopolitical tensions

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Throughout this week, the Brent Crude price has experienced a decline of USD 3 per barrel, despite ongoing turmoil in the Middle East. Price fluctuations have ranged from highs of USD 91 per barrel at the beginning of the week to lows of USD 87 per barrel as of yesterday evening.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Following the release of yesterday’s US inventory report, Brent Crude once again demonstrated resilience against broader macroeconomic concerns, instead focusing on underlying market fundamentals.

Nevertheless, the recent drop in prices may come as somewhat surprising given the array of conflicting signals observed. Despite an increase in US inventories—a typically bearish indicator—we’ve also witnessed escalating tensions in the Middle East, coupled with the reinstatement of US sanctions on Venezuela. Furthermore, there are indications of impending sanctions on Iran in response to the recent attack on Israel.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has indicated that new sanctions targeting Iran, particularly aimed at restricting its oil exports, could be announced as early as this week. As previously highlighted, we maintain the view that Iran’s oil exports remain vulnerable even without further escalation of the conflict. It appears that Israel is exerting pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran, an action that is unfolding before our eyes.

Iran’s current oil production stands at close to 3.2 million barrels per day. Considering additional condensate production of about 0.8 million barrels per day and subtracting domestic demand of roughly 1.8 million barrels per day, the net export of Iranian crude and condensate is approximately 2.2 million barrels per day.

However, the uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of such sanctions casts doubt on the likelihood of a complete ending of Iranian exports. Approximately 80% of Iran’s exports are directed to independent refineries in China, suggesting that US sanctions may have limited efficacy unless China complies. The prospect of China resisting US pressure on its oil imports from Iran poses a significant challenge to US sanctions enforcement efforts.

Furthermore, any shortfall resulting from sanctions could potentially be offset by other OPEC nations with spare capacity. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for instance, can collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day, although this remains a contingency measure.

In addition to developments related to Iran, the Biden administration has re-imposed restrictions on Venezuelan oil, marking the end of a six-month reprieve. This move is expected to impact flows from the South American nation.

Meanwhile, US crude inventories (excluding SPR holdings) surged by 2.7 million barrels last week (page 11 attached), reaching their highest level since June of last year. This increase coincided with a decline in measures of fuel demand (page 14 attached), underscoring a slightly weaker US market.

In summary, while geopolitical tensions persist and new rounds of sanctions are imposed, our market outlook remains intact. We maintain our forecast of an average Brent Crude price of USD 85 per barrel for the year 2024. In the short term, however, prices are expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark as they navigate through geopolitical uncertainties and fundamental factors.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brace for Covert Conflict

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

In the past two trading days, Brent Crude prices have fluctuated between highs of USD 92.2 per barrel and lows of USD 88.7 per barrel. Despite escalation tensions in the Middle East, oil prices have remained relatively stable over the past 24 hours. The recent barrage of rockets and drones in the region hasn’t significantly affected market sentiment regarding potential disruptions to oil supply. The key concern now is how Israel will respond: will it choose a strong retaliation to assert deterrence, risking wider regional instability, or will it revert to targeted strikes on Iran’s proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq? While it’s too early to predict, one thing is clear: brace for increased volatility, uncertainty, and speculation.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Amidst these developments, the market continues to focus on current fundamentals rather than unfolding geopolitical risks. Despite Iran’s recent attack on Israel, oil prices have slid, reflecting a sideways or slightly bearish sentiment. This morning, oil prices stand at USD 90 per barrel, down 2.5% from Friday’s highs.

The attack

Iran’s launch of over 300 rockets and drones toward Israel marks the first direct assault from Iranian territory since 1991. However, the attack, announced well in advance, resulted in minimal damage as Israeli and allied forces intercepted nearly all projectiles. Hence, the damage inflicted was limited. The incident has prompted US President Joe Biden to urge Israel to exercise restraint, as part of broader efforts to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East.

Israel’s response remains uncertain as its war cabinet deliberates on potential courses of action. While the necessity of a response is acknowledged, the timing and magnitude remain undecided.

The attack was allegedly in retaliation for an Israeli airstrike on Iran’s consulate in Damascus, resulting in significant casualties, including a senior leader in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force. It’s notable that this marks the first direct targeting of Israel from Iranian territory, setting the stage for heightened tensions between the two nations.

Despite the scale of the attack, the vast majority of Iranian projectiles were intercepted before reaching Israeli territory. However, a small number did land, causing minor damage to a military base in the southern region.

President Biden swiftly condemned Iran’s actions and pledged to coordinate a diplomatic response with leaders from the G7 nations. The US military’s rapid repositioning of assets in the region underscores the seriousness of the situation.

Iran’s willingness to escalate tensions further depends on Israel’s response, as indicated by General Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces. Meanwhile, speculation about a retaliatory attack from Israel persists.

Looking ahead, key questions remain unanswered. Will Iran launch additional attacks? How will Israel respond, and what implications will it have for the region? Moreover, how will Iran’s allies react to the escalating tensions?

Given the potential for a full-scale war between Iran and Israel, concerns about its impact on global energy markets are growing. Both the United States and China have strong incentives to reduce tensions in the region, given the destabilizing effects of a regional conflict.

Our view in conclusion

The recent escalation between Iran and Israel underscores the delicate balance of power in the volatile Middle East. With tensions reaching unprecedented levels and the specter of further escalation looming, the potential for a full-blown conflict cannot be understated. The ramifications of such a scenario would be far-reaching and could have significant implications for regional stability and global security.

Turning to the oil market, there has been much speculation about the possibility of a full-scale blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the event of further escalation. However, at present, such a scenario remains highly speculative. Nonetheless, it is crucial to note that Iran’s oil production and exports remain at risk even without further escalation. Currently producing close to 3.2 million barrels per day, Iran has significantly increased its production from mid-2020 levels of 1.9 million barrels per day.

In response to the recent attack, Israel may exert pressure on its ally, the US, to impose stricter sanctions on Iran. The enforcement of such sanctions, particularly on Iranian oil exports, could result in a loss of anywhere between 0.5 million to 1 million barrels per day of oil supply. This would likely keep the oil market in deficit for the remainder of the year, contradicting the Biden administration’s wish to maintain oil and gasoline prices at sustainable levels ahead of the election. While other OPEC nations have spare capacity, utilizing it would tighten the global oil market even further. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for example, could collectively produce an additional almost 3 million barrels of oil per day if necessary.

Furthermore, both Iran and the US have expressed a desire to prevent further escalation. However, much depends on Israel’s response to the recent barrage of rockets. While Israel has historically refrained from responding violently to attacks (1991), the situation remains fluid. If Israel chooses not to respond forcefully, the US may be compelled to promise stronger enforcement of sanctions on Iranian oil exports. Consequently, Iranian oil exports are at risk, regardless of whether a wider confrontation ensues in the Middle East.

Analyzing the potential impact, approximately 2.2 million barrels per day of net Iranian crude and condensate exports could be at risk, factoring in Iranian domestic demand and condensate production. The effectiveness of US sanctions enforcement, however, remains uncertain, especially considering China’s stance on Iranian oil imports.

Despite these uncertainties, the market outlook remains cautiously optimistic for now, with Brent Crude expected to hover around the USD 90 per barrel mark in the near term. Navigating through geopolitical tensions and fundamental factors, the oil market continues to adapt to evolving conflicts in the Middle East and beyond.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Lots of talk about an increasingly tight oil market. And yes, the oil price will move higher as a result of this and most likely move towards USD 100/b. Tensions and flareups in the Middle East is little threat to oil supply and will be more like catalysts driving the oil price higher on the back of a fundamentally bullish market. I.e. flareups will be more like releasing factors. But OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed as it has no interest in killing the goose (global economy) that lays the golden egg (oil demand growth). We’ll probably get verbal intervention by OPEC+ with ”.. more supply in H2” quite quickly when oil price moves closer to USD 100/b and that will likely subdue the bullishness. OPEC+ in full control of the oil market probably means an oil price ranging from USD 70/b to USD 100/b with an average of around USD 85/b. Just like last year.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent crude continues to trade around USD 90/b awaiting catalysts like further inventory declines or Mid East flareups. Brent crude ydy traded in a range of USD 88.78 – 91.1/b before settling at USD 90.38/b. Trading activity ydy seems like it was much about getting comfortable with 90-level. Is it too high? Is there still more upside etc. But in the end it settled above the 90-line. This morning it has traded consistently above the line without making any kind of great leap higher.

Netanyahu made it clear that Rafah will be attacked. Israel ydy pulled some troops out of Khan Younis in Gaza and that calmed nerves in the region a tiny bit. But it seems to be all about tactical preparations rather than an indication of a defuse of the situation. Ydy evening Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel made it clear that a date for an assault on Rafah indeed has been set despite Biden’s efforts to prevent him doing so. Article in FT on this today. So tension in Israel/Gaza looks set to rise in not too long. The market is also still awaiting Iran’s response to the bombing of its consulate in Damascus one week ago. There is of course no oil production in Israel/Gaza and not much in Syria, Lebanon or Yemen either. The effects on the oil market from tensions and flareups in these countries are first and foremost that they work as catalysts for the oil price to move higher in an oil market which is fundamentally bullish. Deficit and falling oil inventories is the fundamental reason for why the oil price is moving higher and for why it is at USD 90/b today. There is also the long connecting string of:

[Iran-Iraq-Syria/Yemen/Lebanon/Gaza – Israel – US]

which creates a remote risk that oil supply in the Middle East potentially could be at risk in the end when turmoil is flaring in the middle of this connecting string. This always creates discomfort in the oil market. But we see little risk premium for a scenario where oil supply is really hurt in the end as neither Iran nor the US wants to end up in such a situation.

Tight market but OPEC+ will for sure produce more if needed to prevent global economy getting hurt. There  is increasing talk about the oil market getting very tight in H2-24 and that the oil price could shoot higher unless OPEC+ is producing more. But of course OPEC+ will indeed produce more. The health of the global economy is essential for OPEC+. Healthy oil demand growth is like the goose that lays the golden egg for them. In no way do they want to kill it with too high oil prices. Brent crude averaged USD 82.2/b last year with a high of USD 98/b. So far this year it has averaged USD 82.6/b. SEB’s forecast is USD 85/b for the average year with a high of USD 100/b. We think that a repetition of last year with respect to oil prices is great for OPEC+ and fully acceptable for the global economy and thus will not hinder a solid oil demand growth which OPEC+ needs. Nothing would make OPEC+ more happy than to produce at a normal level and still being able to get USD 85/b. Brent crude will head yet higher because OPEC+ continues to hold back supply Q2-24 resulting in declining inventories and thus higher prices. But when the oil price is nearing USD 100/b we expect verbal intervention from the group with statements like ”… more supply in H2-24” and that will probably dampen bullish prices.

Not only does OPEC+ want to produce at a normal level. It also needs to produce at a normal level. Because at some point in time in the future there will be a situation sooner or later where they will have to cut again. And unless they are back to normal production at that time they won’t be in a position to cut again.

So OPEC+ won’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg. They won’t allow the oil price to stay too high for too long. I.e. USD 100/b or higher. They will produce more in H2-24 if needed to prevent too high oil prices and they have the reserve capacity to do it.

Data today: US monthly oil market report (STEO) with forecast for US crude and liquids production at 18:00 CET

Fortsätt läsa

Populära